Showing posts with label Christadelphians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christadelphians. Show all posts

Monday, 22 June 2020

Dr John Thomas Christadelphian Connection to Medieval Gnosticism



Dr Thomas as a “Gnostic Historian”

Dr John Thomas: Christadelphian Connection to Medieval Gnosticism

Christadelphian origins come from Dr. John Thomas (1805–1871), who emigrated to North America from England in 1832. Thomas was born in Hoxton Square, Hackney, London, on 12 April 1805, and was the son of a Dissenting minister, also named John Thomas. His family is reputed to be descended from French Huguenot refugees (Blore, Charles B., Dr John Thomas: His Family and the Background of his Times). The distinctive family name "Bloy" comes from Blois in Normandy, and the Blois family settled in Norfolk in 1769.

In Greek, Christadelphian means “Brethren of Christ.” They trace their spiritual roots through such groups as the Waldenses, Albigenses, and Huguenots.


The Cathari

The Cathari (/ˈkæθərɪzəm/; from the Greek: καθαροί, katharoi, “the pure [ones]”) were a Christian dualist or Gnostic revival movement that thrived in some areas of Southern Europe, particularly what is now northern Italy and southern France, between the 12th and 14th centuries. The followers were known as Cathars. The adherents were sometimes called Albigenses, after the city Albi in southern France where the movement first took hold.

It is evident that the term Albigenses, or rather Albienses, employed by early historians, was taken from the town of Albi, where the Waldenses flourished (The Late Rev. Joseph Milner, The History Of The Church Of Christ, 1794–1809). Many medieval "heresies" were named after their founders, but some—the Albigenses, for example—were derived from particular localities or their manner of life (The Protesters, Alan Eyre).

In Eureka: An Exposition of the Apocalypse, Dr. Thomas calls the Paulicians and Albigenses “the remnants of the woman’s seed” and claims they are part of the groups which make up the Two Witnesses:

"Thus, I have briefly tracked 'the remnants of the woman's seed,' under the names of Novatians, Donatists, Aerians, Paulicians and Albigenses, through a long and sanguinary period of sack-cloth-witnessing of a thousand years, against the Apostasy as by law established in 'the two Wings of the Great Eagle.'"

He continues:

"Now, the Puritan Woman, styled by her enemies and persecutors 'the Donatists;' but by the children of her body, Cathari, or the Pure Ones; for the first 1260 years of her existence was Providentially settled in the wings of the Roman Eagle. Her remnants were not to be found in Persia, India, China, or America: but after the discovery and settlement of America, the persecutions and massacre of her seed by the Serpent-Powers of Europe caused her to seek refuge in the American wilderness, whereby the help of 'the earth,' which styles itself 'the unterrified democracy,' she is fed and nourished to the full."

Thomas situates the flight of the faithful witnesses as historical and material, reflecting both Gnostic and apocalyptic dualism. The truth was corrupted into the Catholic apostacy in the 2nd and 3rd centuries (2 Thess 2), enthroned by Constantine AD 312–324 (Rev 12, 13, 17). Then the true witnesses fled into the wilderness and were given succor in "the two wings of the great eagle" (eastern and western provinces of the Roman Empire) for 1260 years (Rev 12:6,14). They were variously known as the Paulicians, Novatians, Donatists, Albigenses of Southern France, Waldenses of the Alps, Vaudois, Huguenots, and Anabaptists.

The 3rd Editor of the Christadelphian magazine, C. C. Walker, agrees with this interpretation:

"Rev 12 Verse 14.—'Two wings of a great eagle.' The extremities of the Roman Empire. 'The wilderness.' Exile from place and power. Geographically, Northern Africa first, and many other countries afterwards in the course of the 1,260 years. The wilderness wanderings of the woman are illustrated in the experiences of the Donatists, Novatians, Paulicians, Waldenses, Albigenses, &c." (Notes On The Apocalypse, C. C. Walker)

Contemporary Christadelphian writers have tried to distance themselves from such groups. Harry Whittaker notes:

"Dr Thomas turned a blind eye to the massive perversions of Truth by Donatists and Waldenses and Albigenses and Huguenots in desperate attempts to identify them with the Lord’s faithful remnant." (Revelation – A Biblical Approach, Harry Whittaker)

The Cathari were said to be a sect of the Albigenses. Both showed Gnostic tendencies (The Protesters, Alan Eyre).

Some Christadelphians have embraced the Socinians as their theological forebears, evident in Alan Eyre's historiographical works The Protesters and Brethren in Christ. However, Dr. Thomas knew of Socinianism and Unitarianism, yet harbored antipathy toward them, as well as toward Trinitarianism and Arianism:

"But the New Man of the Spirit is free, looking searchingly into the perfect law of liberty, and having no respect to 'the philosophy and empty delusion,' and antitheses of gnosis, or 'oppositions of science,' falsely so called, in which the flesh delights. He troubles not himself about Trinitarianism, or Antitrinitarianism, Unitarianism, Arianism, or Socinianism. He has no more deference for these than for any other of 'the works of the Devil,' or for the Old Man himself." (Eureka: An Exposition of the Apocalypse)

Christadelphians are neither Arians, Socinians, nor Trinitarians; rather, they are believers in the "great mystery of godliness, Deity manifested in Flesh," as preached in the apostles' teaching (Revelation of the Mystery).


The Huguenots

The label Huguenot was first applied in France to conspirators (mostly aristocratic members of the Reformed Church) involved in the Amboise plot of 1560. The term is derived from Hu-Gnosticorum, explicitly retaining the association with Gnosticism (Encyclopaedia Meropolitana, Vol XX, p. 381; Pasquier, Recherches de la France, vol. VIII, p. 53). Officially, the Huguenots were French Calvinist Protestants, members of the Reformed Church established by John Calvin in France around 1555.


Yahweh, Elohim, and Phanerosis

Dr. Thomas reduces Yahweh to the role of an angel or Demiurge in the biblical narrative. Yahweh is said to have appeared to Abraham as he sat at the door of his tent (Gen. 18:1). Abraham initially saw “three men” or Elohim, of whom one was the chief. Across Genesis 18–19, the Everlasting Deity acts through these Elohim, chiefly through one called Yahweh Elohim (Elpis Israel).

"God appears to Jacob in Genesis 35:9 and says in the second verse, 'I am God Almighty.' In the thirteenth verse we see God went up from the place where He talked with Jacob. At the time, he was at Bethel where the Elohim were previously revealed to him. On that occasion he dreamed he saw a ladder reaching from Earth to heaven with 'the Lord standing above it, and the Elohim of God ascending and descending.' These messengers or angels were the Elohim or 'ministering Spirits sent forth to assist those who will inherit salvation.'" (Elpis Israel)

Jacob encounters the “Invisible God” when wrestling with one of the Elohim (Gen. 32:24–30):

"So Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: 'For I have seen God (the Elohim) face to face, and my soul is preserved.'"

Hosea clarifies:

"He took his brother by the heel in the womb; and by his strength he had power with God: yea, he had power over the angel, and prevailed: he wept, and made supplication unto him: he found him in Bethel, and there he spake with us." (Ho 12:3–4)

The Elohim speak as personifications of the Invisible and Incorruptible Substance, the real author of all that they say and do. Moses alone came near Yahweh; the elders of Israel saw the Elohim (Exod. 24:10–11). Even Moses did not see the eternal spirit, only its manifestation:

"The glory of Yahweh like devouring fire," but neither they, Moses, nor their nobles, saw the face of the Eternal Substance himself.

This is phanerosis: the glory of Yahweh manifested through the medium of a corporeal angel or spirit-manifestation, enabling human perception of divine activity.


Thomas and Gnostic Continuity

Dr. Thomas’s views are not unique when considered alongside Gnostic interpretation. Elaine Pagels, in The Origin of Satan, highlights how early Christian groups personified evil forces as symbols of political and religious oppression. Celene Lillie, in The Rape of Eve, shows Yaldabaoth as a symbol of the Roman emperor. Similarly, ‘The Demiurge and his Archons’—A Gnostic View of the Bishop and Presbyters (HTR 69, 1976, Elaine Pagels) frames church leaders as material embodiments of corrupt power.

Insight: Dr. Thomas mirrors these symbolic interpretations, personifying the Papacy, European powers, and corrupt churches as the Dragon, Beast, or Devil in historical terms.

His interpretation of the Devil and Satan as historical and political forces rather than spiritual beings aligns with classical and medieval Gnosticism. The kingdom of Satan and the kingdom of God correspond to historical dualism: the faithful remnant versus worldly corruption. Thomas historicizes the Gnostic critique of authority:

  • Dragon = European imperial powers

  • Beast = Papacy

  • Serpent-powers = systemic persecution of the faithful


Conclusion

Dr. John Thomas, though a 19th-century Englishman and founder of the Christadelphian movement, can be seen as a “Gnostic historian.” His historiography adopts classical Gnostic dualism, applying it materially and historically to the institutions and empires of Europe. By personifying evil in historical powers and aligning the faithful with material manifestations of divine spirit, he continues a Gnostic lineage that includes the Cathari, Albigenses, Paulicians, and Waldenses.

His innovations—particularly corporeal emanation and historical-philosophical materialism—distinguish him from earlier Gnostics, yet his method of interpreting evil, exile, and the faithful remnant through apocalyptic symbolism is directly in continuity with medieval and early Christian Gnostic thought. As Elaine Pagels, Celene Lillie, and other scholars show, the symbolic historicization of Satan and the Demiurge was a consistent Gnostic strategy; Thomas simply adapts it to the historical-material and Christadelphian framework.

In sum, Thomas is not a unique visionary in his conceptual dualism, but his corporeal-material approach to phanerosis, divine emanation, and apocalyptic witness situates him as a distinctive figure bridging Gnostic interpretation and 19th-century Christadelphian theology.


Word count: 2,019



The Christadelphians and Knowledge

The Christadelphians and Knowledge

Most Christadelphians would strongly disagree that their faith is Gnostic. Yet this depends entirely on how one defines Gnosticism. There are at least two forms of gnosis: Mythological Gnosis and Non-Mythological Gnosis. Mythological Gnosis involves elaborate cosmologies, emanations, aeons, and mythic narratives about divine realms. Non-Mythological Gnosis, however, centers upon knowledge—specifically saving knowledge—without necessarily adopting mythological frameworks.

I would class the Christadelphians as a gnostic group which does not believe in Mythological Gnosis.

I have studied Christadelphian teachings since 2006 and was baptized in 2009. There is a great emphasis on knowledge in Christadelphian meetings. Bible study, doctrinal precision, and careful interpretation are central. The culture of the ecclesia revolves around correct understanding. The assumption is clear: right belief matters eternally.

Around 2011 I began to study the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the Nag Hammadi Library. After studying certain Gnostic groups, particularly the Valentinians, I came to the conclusion that Christadelphians share some structural understandings with them—though not their mythology.

What is Gnosticism? Gnostics considered the principal element of salvation to be direct knowledge of the remote supreme divine being; esoteric knowledge (gnosis) of whom enabled the redemption of the human spirit. Knowledge was not merely intellectual—it was transformative and salvific.

Christadelphians likewise believe that there is a process based around knowledge and work that leads to salvation. One must possess knowledge of what the Bible teaches if one would be saved. As stated in the Christadelphian Messenger:

“One must also possess knowledge of what the Bible teaches if one would be saved” (Christadelphian Messenger, No. 4, “The One Hope of Everlasting Salvation”; No. 47, “Christendom Creeds not Christianity,” p. 1; No. 11, “A Refuge from the Judgment Storm,” p. 4).

Christadelphians believe the Correct Knowledge (ἐπίγνωσις, εως, ἡ, epignósis) of the Gospel is essential for salvation. This concept of ἐπίγνωσις—full, precise knowledge—mirrors the Gnostic insistence that ignorance is the fundamental human problem. Christadelphians call their version of this teaching “Resurrectional Responsibility.” It is summarized in Bible Basics by Duncan Heaster:

  1. Knowledge of God's Word brings responsibility to Him.

  2. Only the responsible will be resurrected and judged.

  3. Those who do not know the true God will therefore remain dead like the animals.

This teaching establishes a sharp distinction between the knowing and the unknowing. Knowledge creates accountability; ignorance results in remaining in the grave. The structure is strikingly similar to certain Gnostic frameworks in which awakening through knowledge separates the enlightened from the ignorant masses.

The Christadelphian Statement of Faith, formally known as the Birmingham Amended Statement of Faith (BASF), reinforces this epistemological foundation. The entire Christadelphian Statement of Faith includes “the truth to be received,” “the commandments of Christ,” and “the doctrines to be rejected.”

In Clause 24 of the “truth to be received,” we read:

“That at the appearing of Christ prior to the establishment of the Kingdom, the responsible (namely, those who know the revealed will of God, and have been called upon to submit to it), dead and living -- obedient and disobedient -- will be summoned before his judgment seat ‘to be judged according to their works,’ and ‘receive in body according to what they have done, whether it be good or bad.’
2 Cor. 5:10; 2 Tim. 4:1; Rom. 2:5-6, 16; 14:10-12; 1 Cor. 4:5; Rev. 11:18.”

The phrase “those who know the revealed will of God” is crucial. Responsibility is grounded in knowledge. The part underlined in the historical development of the clause was inserted to rule out the belief that baptism made a person responsible rather than knowledge. Thus, knowledge—not ritual—is determinative.

In Clause 22 under “Doctrines to be Rejected,” we read:

“22. We reject the doctrine - that those without knowledge - through personal choice, immaturity, or lack of mental capacity - will be saved.
23. We reject the doctrine - that man can be saved by morality or sincerity, without the Gospel.
24. We reject the doctrine - that the Gospel alone will save, without obedience to Christ's commandments.”

These rejections further define the epistemological boundary. Salvation is not through sincerity. It is not through morality alone. It is not through ignorance. It requires knowledge of the Gospel and obedience flowing from that knowledge. In this sense, ignorance excludes; knowledge includes.

Christadelphians also possess a distinct dualism. There are two basic doctrines of the Bible, as expressed in their literature:

“There are two basic doctrines of the Bible: (a) The nature of flesh; and (b) the spirit manifestation of God. The former teaches us what we are, and what we must guard against; the latter outlines what we can become, and what we must aim for.”

This dual structure resembles certain Gnostic contrasts, though without mythological cosmology. Flesh represents what humanity presently is; spirit manifestation represents what humanity may become.

Another striking quotation reads:

“Men were not ushered into being for the purpose of being saved or lost! God manifestation not human salvation was the great purpose of the Eternal Spirit. The salvation of a multitude is incidental to the manifestation, but was not the end proposed. The Eternal Spirit intended to enthrone Himself on the earth, and in so doing, to develop a Divine family from among men, every one of whom shall be Spirit, because born of the Spirit, and that this family shall be large enough to fill the earth, when perfected, to the entire exclusion of flesh and blood (1 Cor. 15:28).”

Here the purpose of existence is not merely individual redemption but participation in divine manifestation. Salvation is subordinated to a larger revelatory process. This parallels Valentinian emphasis on participation in divine fullness—though again, without mythological aeons.

Christadelphians also distinguish between classes of believers. As written:

“into two classes the one the fellowservants, and the other the brethren, of the deceased souls. The brethren are fellowservants, but all the fellowservants were not brethren -- even as Christadelphians are christians, but all christians so-called are not Christadelphians.”

This differentiation resembles the Valentinian distinction between categories of people—though Christadelphians define theirs ecclesially rather than cosmologically. There is an inner body defined by shared doctrine and knowledge.

For these reasons, I describe myself as:

“I am a Gnostic Christadelphian.”

You may say that this is, is a contradiction if ever I've heard one. That's like saying “I'm a Muslim Catholic” or “I'm a Buddhist Mormon”.

But it is a self-definition and self-designation. It recognizes that Gnosis need not require mythological cosmology. It can simply denote the conviction that knowledge—ἐπίγνωσις—is essential for salvation. Christadelphians do not teach emanations or mythic divine hierarchies. They do not embrace Mythological Gnosis. Yet they place extraordinary emphasis on knowledge as salvific, boundary-defining, and responsibility-creating.

Therefore, the label “Gnostic Christadelphian” defies conventional categorization, yet accurately reflects a structural similarity: salvation is inseparable from knowledge.

It is very good to defy the laws of labels and be who you are.