Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

By the late second century, Valentinian Gnosticism had developed a highly intricate cosmology. Though it exhibited some variations within its interpretations, a basic framework can still provide clarity for understanding its views on creation and the divine order.

From the Valentinian perspective, the creation narrative is seen as an unfolding of the divine emanations, beginning with a prologue that precedes the Judeo-Christian understanding of Genesis. This pre-creation phase involves the emanation of divine powers, or aeons, from the ultimate source, Bythos (the Depth), which represents the hidden and ineffable Father. The Valentinian cosmology views the material world as the culmination of a process of divine emanation, wherein the Pleroma, or spiritual fullness, gradually unfolds into the creation described in Genesis, revealing the deeper, mystical truths of divine order.

The Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as presented by Irenaeus in *Against All Heresies*, offers a deeply symbolic view of the creation narrative, aligning it with their understanding of the emanation of the Aeons from the ultimate source, the Father. This interpretation reflects the idea that all things in creation are a reflection of the divine, ordered in a pattern that mirrors the structure of the divine realm of Aeons. In this schema, the creation story becomes a representation of a hidden, invisible spiritual process that unfolds into the visible world, a world that mirrors the hidden, divine reality.

At the beginning of Genesis, when Moses declares, "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1:1), the Valentinians see this as a reference to the first Tetrad of divine principles. This Tetrad consists of **Bythos** (God), **Charis** (beginning), **Nous** (heaven), and **Aletheia** (earth). These four elements form the foundational principles of the cosmos, the first emanations of the divine source. **Bythos**, the unknowable depth, is the source from which all emanation begins. **Charis**, representing grace or the beginning, initiates the unfolding of divine power. **Nous**, or divine mind, is the principle of intellectuality, while **Aletheia**, or truth, represents the principle of reality or manifestation. Together, these four represent the unspoken, invisible foundation of all creation, much like the earth in Genesis is initially formless and void, unseen and unmanifest.

The second Tetrad, as described in the Valentinian system, is made up of four further Aeons: **Logos** (abyss), **Zoe** (darkness), **Anthropos** (water), and **Ecclesia** (Spirit). These are the next emanations from the first Tetrad. The second Tetrad represents an even deeper layer of spiritual principle, and like the first, it is described as invisible and hidden. The abyss (**Logos**) is the deep, the origin of the divine speech, while **Zoe**, representing life, emerges as the spiritual substance that gives all things existence. **Anthropos**, or the divine human, corresponds to the primal water, representing the potential for life, while **Ecclesia** (Spirit) corresponds to the divine principle that moves through the creation, unseen but vital for existence. These four principles are not yet visible in the physical realm but are rather the invisible causes of all that is to come.

Next, we encounter the Decad, represented by ten emanations that begin to take visible shape and form in the creation narrative. These Aeons correspond to the ten elements of the creation story as described in Genesis 1:3-13—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees. Each of these represents a further step in the unfolding of creation, moving from the invisible to the more manifest. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these ten are: **Bythios** (light), **Mixis** (day), **Ageratos** (night), **Henosis** (firmament), **Autophyes** (evening), **Hedone** (morning), **Acinetos** (dry land), **Syncrasis** (sea), **Monogenes** (plants), and **Macaria** (trees). These Aeons reflect the natural elements and phenomena of the created world, signifying the move from the hidden, spiritual realms to a more visible and tangible creation. The Decad represents the increasing visibility of the divine process as it emanates through the layers of reality, bridging the gap between the invisible and the visible.

The Duodecad, consisting of twelve Aeons, represents the most visible and manifest stage of creation, corresponding to the twelve elements in the Genesis account that follow the creation of trees. These are the sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and man. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these elements are: **Paracletus** (sun), **Pistis** (moon), **Patrikas** (stars), **Elpis** (seasons), **Metricos** (years), **Agape** (whales), **Ainos** (fishes), **Synesis** (reptiles), **Ecclesiasticus** (birds), **Macariotes** (quadrupeds), **Theletus** (wild beasts), and **Sophia** (man). This stage of creation is the most complete manifestation of the divine, and man, as the highest creation, embodies the fullness of the divine image.

Finally, the Valentinian view teaches that the Ogdoad, the eight invisible Aeons, is hidden within the body of man. The Ogdoad is the unspeakable and invisible power, located within the inner recesses of the human being, symbolizing the hidden spiritual forces that shape and sustain creation. These Aeons are reflected in the human body’s faculties, as man is created in the image of the ultimate source, containing within him the same spiritual structure as the divine.

In conclusion, the Valentinian understanding of Genesis 1 reveals a profound and symbolic reading of the creation narrative. Through the Tetrad, Decad, Duodecad, and Ogdoad, the Valentinian system shows the unfolding of the divine emanations, which begin as invisible, formless principles and gradually take visible, manifest shape in the creation of the world, culminating in the creation of man as the image of the divine.

In reconstructing the Valentinian teaching on Genesis 1 based on Irenaeus' *Against Heresies*, we can observe the Valentinian perspective on the creation narrative as an unfolding of divine emanations through a system of Aeons. The Valentinian system divides the Aeons into various groups, each group symbolized through different aspects of the natural world, as articulated by Moses in Genesis. The description unfolds in a symbolic manner, illustrating the structure and hierarchy of these emanations, as well as the divine image in human creation.

### The First Tetrad

The first Tetrad, representing the foundation of all existence, is composed of four central principles that are the ultimate source from which all other Aeons emanate. These principles are represented by the following:

1. **God (Bythos)** – This principle stands as the ultimate, ineffable source. Bythos signifies the depth or abyss of the divine being, the root from which all emanations emerge.

2. **Beginning (Charis)** – Charis, or grace, represents the commencement of creation and the first movement of divine will that flows out from Bythos. It is the generative force that enables the unfolding of reality.

3. **Heaven (Nous)** – Nous, or the divine mind, is the first intellectual emanation from the divine source. It governs and arranges the cosmos, serving as the rational principle behind all that exists.

4. **Earth (Aletheia)** – Aletheia, or truth, is the foundation of material existence, symbolizing the grounded reality that is hidden and formless, much like the earth before it was shaped.

This Tetrad represents the hidden, invisible source of creation, much like the earth before it was formed, as Irenaeus mentions. These four principles are indivisible and transcend visible creation, embodying the most profound and abstract aspects of the divine.

### The Second Tetrad

The second Tetrad emanates from the first, representing a further development of divine forces in the creation process. These four are:

1. **Abyss (Logos)** – Logos, representing divine reason and speech, is the medium through which the divine will is expressed and communicated into the material world.

2. **Darkness (Zoe)** – Zoe, or life, is the principle of vitality and existence. It is the foundation of the inner life of the cosmos, bringing forth life from the darkness of the unmanifest.

3. **Water (Anthropos)** – Anthropos, representing humanity, signifies the potential for consciousness and reflection. As water is the source of life in the physical world, so too does Anthropos represent the potential for rational, conscious existence.

4. **Spirit (Ecclesia)** – Ecclesia, or the assembly, embodies the unifying force of the divine, bringing together the disparate elements of creation into a coherent whole, much like the Spirit that moves upon the waters in Genesis.

This second Tetrad is still largely hidden, as the divine powers remain veiled in abstraction, but they begin to take more defined form within the structure of creation.

### The Decad

The Decad consists of ten Aeons that represent a more visible manifestation of divine order. These ten are reflected in various natural elements as Moses describes them:

1. **Light (Bythios)** – Bythios, the Aeon of light, signifies illumination and revelation, bringing clarity and structure to creation.

2. **Day (Mixis)** – Mixis represents the concept of harmony and balance, signifying the separation of light and dark and the establishment of cycles.

3. **Night (Ageratos)** – Ageratos, the eternal night, represents the mystery and the unmanifested potential of creation, balancing the visible day.

4. **Firmament (Henosis)** – Henosis, unity, represents the separation of the heavens from the earth, a divine order bringing together disparate elements.

5. **Evening (Autophyes)** – Autophyes, the self-born, embodies the cyclical nature of existence, where one cycle ends, making way for the next.

6. **Morning (Hedone)** – Hedone, pleasure, signifies the beginning of a new cycle and the renewal of life.

7. **Dry Land (Acinetos)** – Acinetos represents stability and foundation, signifying the creation of solid matter from the chaos.

8. **Sea (Syncrasis)** – Syncrasis represents the fluid, mutable aspects of creation, the realm of change and potentiality.

9. **Plants (Monogenes)** – Monogenes, the only begotten, signifies life that grows from the earth, the beginning of creation’s fertility and productivity.

10. **Trees (Macaria)** – Macaria represents the completion of the physical world, the final manifestation of nature’s abundance.

The Decad signifies the visible, structured world, with these Aeons representing elements of creation that are seen and experienced by beings within the material universe.

### The Duodecad and Ogdoad

Finally, the Duodecad represents the twelve most manifest Aeons, including the sun, moon, stars, and animals, culminating in the creation of man. These Aeons embody the fullest expression of the divine in the world. Man, created in the image of the divine, reflects the ultimate source and contains within himself the same abilities and faculties as the Aeons. The Ogdoad, invisible and unspeakable, is hidden within the human body, representing the ineffable and ungraspable elements of divine reality.

In this Valentinian schema, the world is not merely a creation ex nihilo but an unfolding process of emanation, where the divine nature is progressively revealed through Aeons. Each level of creation mirrors and reflects the structure of the divine, with humanity as the image of the ultimate source, containing within himself the potential for the divine within the created order.

1 In the Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as outlined by Irenaeus in *Against Heresies*, the creation narrative is understood as a symbolic representation of the divine emanations, or *aeons*, that form the structure of the spiritual fullness, or *Pleroma*. Valentinian Gnosticism uses the account of creation to outline the cosmic principles through the use of symbolic numbers and hidden divine entities. This framework can be understood through the four primary groups that reflect various emanations from the ultimate source: the Tetrad, the second Tetrad, the Decad, the Duodecad, and the Ogdoad.

The *first Tetrad* represents the primal source of all existence, which is invisible and formless, much like the earth before creation was made visible. The grouping of four—God (*Bythos*), beginning (*Charis*), heaven (*Nous*), and earth (*Aletheia*)—symbolizes the fundamental powers at the origin of all creation. These powers are thought to represent the essential building blocks of the universe and the divine order. They are the first emanations from the ultimate source, the *Pleroma*, and signify both the generative force and the inherent hidden nature of the cosmos before it takes visible form. The earth, described in Genesis 1:2 as formless and void, aligns with this understanding, symbolizing the mystery and hiddenness of the initial creation, much like the divine powers before they manifest.

Next, the *second Tetrad* emerges as a further emanation, representing four more divine principles: abyss (*Logos*), darkness (*Zoe*), water (*Anthropos*), and spirit (*Ecclesia*). These principles are also hidden and invisible, signifying the beginning of the process of creation but still in a potential or unmanifest state. The second Tetrad brings forth the conditions necessary for formation, with water representing the latent potential within creation and the Spirit moving over it, ready to bring order out of chaos.

As the narrative progresses, Moses introduces the *Decad*, a group of ten divine powers that emanate from the second Tetrad. These principles—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees—mark the first tangible manifestations of creation. These ten elements represent the unfolding of divine thought, gradually moving from the abstract (such as light and day) to more structured forms (such as land and plants). In the Valentinian worldview, these manifestations are the first clear reflections of divine qualities in the material world. The Decad symbolizes the dynamic and ordered progression of creation, with each act in Genesis reflecting a more defined, structured layer of the Pleroma's emanation.

The *Duodecad*, or the twelve emanations, represents the final phase of creation. The twelve principles—sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and humanity—mirror the completion of divine manifestation in the physical universe. These principles are not only more visible and tangible but also embody the diversity of the material world. Humanity, as the final creation, represents the culmination of the divine image and bears the reflection of the Pleroma in the material world. The twelve components also align with the twelvefold nature of creation, symbolizing completeness and the full expression of divine attributes within creation.

Humanity itself is considered to be an image of the divine order of the *Triacontad*, the thirty *aeons* of the Pleroma. Through the human body, the various divine emanations are mirrored. The four faculties of sight, hearing, smell, and taste reflect the Tetrad. The ten fingers mirror the Decad, and the twelve primary body parts correspond to the Duodecad. Additionally, the *Ogdoad*, a mysterious and invisible grouping of eight divine principles, is understood to be hidden within the human body, especially within the internal organs, symbolizing a profound, secret aspect of divine reality.

In this Valentinian framework, the Genesis creation account is more than a literal narrative; it serves as an esoteric key to understanding the divine order and the emanation of the *aeons*. The creation story, through its symbolic use of numbers and principles, reveals the unfolding of the divine order from the highest, most hidden source to the most manifest and material aspects of existence. Through this lens, humanity itself becomes a microcosm of the divine structure, reflecting the Pleroma’s organization and the hidden mysteries of creation.

God's Face and the Creation of Humans 2 Enoch 44

### Document 1: The Image of God and Human Creation in 2 Enoch

The concept of humans being created in the image of God is central in both the canonical scriptures and in *2 Enoch*. In *Genesis* 1:27, God creates man in His image, a concept that is echoed in *2 Enoch* but with further elaboration on the nature of this image and its implications. According to *2 Enoch*, God's face serves as the model for the human face, thus affirming the dignity and sanctity of every individual. This profound idea is emphasized by *2 Enoch* 44:2, which warns that whoever insults a human face, whether great or small, insults the face of the Lord Himself.

In *2 Enoch* 30:10-14, the creation of humanity is described with remarkable detail. God commands His Wisdom to create man from seven different consistencies: flesh from the earth, blood from dew, eyes from the sun, bones from stone, intelligence from angelic swiftness, veins and hair from the earth’s grass, and the soul from God’s breath. These descriptions are not merely physical components but represent a blend of visible and invisible aspects of human nature, revealing a profound interplay between the material and spiritual worlds. God not only gives man physical form but also seven natures: hearing, sight, smell, touch, taste, endurance, and sweetness. These elements reflect man’s capacity to interact with the world and to perceive the divine wisdom embedded in creation.

The passage further underscores the uniqueness of humanity, referring to man as a “second angel” who is appointed as the ruler of the earth, bearing God’s wisdom (2 Enoch 30:12). This elevated status reflects humanity’s special role in creation, as being simultaneously small in greatness and great in smallness. The duality of man's nature—both physical and spiritual, visible and invisible—is emphasized in this description. God’s challenge to humanity, represented in Adam, is whether man will choose the path of light or darkness, good or evil (2 Enoch 30:14). The choice highlights man's free will, given as a test of his love for the Creator.

Interestingly, *2 Enoch* employs a Gnostic-like motif where Wisdom (Gk. Sophia) is given a role in the creation of man (2 Enoch 30:8). Some scholars suggest this could be a Jewish precursor to later Gnostic developments, where Sophia is a key figure in Gnostic cosmology. While Gnostic traditions emphasize the fall and redemption of Wisdom, *2 Enoch* integrates Wisdom into a positive account of creation, where the role of Sophia aligns with God’s plan for humanity's exaltation, not its downfall.

The creation narrative in *2 Enoch* closely mirrors Genesis 1:27, where humans are made "in the image of God." However, *2 Enoch* enriches this idea by linking the human face to God's divine face. The repeated admonition not to treat any human with contempt in *2 Enoch* 44 reflects the high regard for the image of God in man. Just as Adam was created in God’s likeness, so all humans bear this divine reflection. This idea resonates with *Genesis* 5:3, which notes that Adam’s son Seth was born in Adam’s image, after his likeness. This continuity between God's image and humanity's image demonstrates the enduring significance of the divine-human connection, even after the Fall.

In essence, *2 Enoch* teaches that disrespect for another human is disrespect for God Himself, for to insult a person's face is to insult the face of the Creator. This idea finds resonance in James 3:9, where the apostle warns against using the tongue to curse men, who are made in God's likeness, while simultaneously blessing God. This moral imperative is profound in *2 Enoch* and adds a rich layer of ethical teaching to the doctrine of creation, making it clear that reverence for the Creator should manifest in the way humans treat each other, as all bear the face of God.

---

### Document 2: The Theological Implications of the Image of God in 2 Enoch and Gnostic Thought

In *2 Enoch*, the theology surrounding the creation of humanity bears striking similarities to the notion of divine reflection, seen not only in biblical texts but also in Gnostic thought, particularly the Valentinian tradition. The creation of Adam in *2 Enoch* follows a detailed process where man is formed from seven components, and the human face is directly linked to the face of God. This intricate account, especially in *2 Enoch* 30:10-14, can be seen as an extension of *Genesis* 1:27, where humans are created "in the image of God." Here, *2 Enoch* amplifies this idea by providing the components of human creation as a fusion of visible and invisible aspects, grounding human existence in both the material and spiritual realms.

In Valentinian Gnostic traditions, as preserved in the *Excerpta ex Theodoto*, there is a rejection of the idea that spiritual entities in the Pleroma, including God, are formless or incorporeal. Rather, spiritual beings, including the Only-Begotten and the First-Created, have bodies that correspond to their status and preeminence, though these bodies differ from the corporeal forms familiar to humans. This corporeality is not bound by material limitations, but it nevertheless reflects form and distinction, a theme that resonates with *2 Enoch's* emphasis on God having a face and creating man in the image of that face.

In *2 Enoch* 44:1-2, the narrative takes the theological idea of the image of God one step further by connecting the dignity of the human face with the divine face. This notion—that to insult a human face is to insult God's face—parallels the Gnostic concept that divine beings, even though they may be spiritual, possess form and visibility. For the Valentinians, the divine and the human share an intimate connection, just as in *2 Enoch*, where humanity’s creation reflects the divine.

In both *2 Enoch* and Gnosticism, the corporeality of divine beings challenges the often abstract and incorporeal depictions of God found in other traditions. While *2 Enoch* presents this in terms of human creation and the sanctity of the human form, Valentinian Gnosticism extends the idea to all spiritual beings, asserting that even the First-Created and the Only-Begotten have specific forms that reflect their divine nature.

The ethical dimension in *2 Enoch*, however, adds a unique layer to this theology. In *2 Enoch* 44:2, human dignity is directly tied to the divine image, leading to a moral exhortation against treating others with contempt. This teaching finds a parallel in *James* 3:9, where the apostle reminds believers that humans, made in the likeness of God, should not be cursed with the same tongue used to bless God. The intrinsic connection between the divine image and human identity emphasizes the theological importance of treating others with respect, reflecting God's presence in all.

In conclusion, *2 Enoch* and Valentinian Gnosticism both reflect a deep connection between the divine and the human, grounded in the idea that spiritual beings, including God, have form and substance. While Gnosticism focuses more on the metaphysical aspects of spiritual corporeality, *2 Enoch* presents this concept in a more practical, ethical framework, urging reverence for the divine image reflected in humanity. These traditions, though distinct, both affirm the profound significance of the human form as a reflection of the divine, with important implications for how humans perceive themselves and others.

God's Face and the Creation of Humans in 2 Enoch

According to Genesis, humans are created in the image of God. 2 Enoch takes this idea and likens God's face to the human face, which is God's image, and which should not be treated with contempt.

Chapter 30:10 On the sixth day I commanded my wisdom to create man from seven consistencies: one, his flesh from the earth; two, his blood from the dew; three, his eyes from the sun; four, his bones from stone; five, his intelligence from the swiftness of the angels and from cloud; six, his veins and his hair from the grass of the earth; seven, his soul from my breath and from the wind.

11And I gave him seven natures: to the flesh hearing, the eyes for sight, to the soul smell, the veins for touch, the blood for taste, the bones for endurance, to the intelligence sweetness [enjoyment].

12I conceived a cunning saying to say, I created man from invisible and from visible nature, of both are his death and life and image, he knows speech like some created thing, small in greatness and again great in smallness, and I placed him on earth, a second angel, honourable, great and glorious, and I appointed him as ruler to rule on earth and to have my wisdom, and there was none like him of earth of all my existing creatures.

13And I appointed him a name, from the four component parts, from east, from west, from south, from north, and I appointed for him four special stars, and I called his name Adam, and showed him the two ways, the light and the darkness, and I told him:

14This is good, and that bad, that I should learn whether he has love towards me, or hatred, that it be clear which in his race love me.

15For I have seen his nature, but he has not seen his own nature, therefore through not seeing he will sin worse, and I said After sin what is there but death?

In this respect another, even more striking parallel between the account of creation in 2 Enoch 30 and the Gnostic materials should be mentioned. In the longer recension44 of 2 Enoch 30.8 the deity commanded his Wisdom45 to create man out the seven components.46 Scholars have previously noted the parallels between this role of Wisdom (Gk. Sophia) in the creation of the first human in the Slavonic apocalypse and the Gnostic texts.47 Some scholars even suggested that the Sophia tradition in 2 Enoch 30 might be an early Jewish prototype of the later Gnostic developments.48

Enoch instructs his sons, that they might not insult the face of any person, small or great

2 Enoch 44:1 The Lord with his hands having created man, in the likeness of his own face, the Lord made him small and great.
2 Enoch 44:2 Whoever insults a person's face insults the face of the Lord;... Whoever treats with contempt the face of any person treats the face of the Lord with contempt.

In this passage, 2 Enoch likens the human face to the divine face, vers 1; reminds us of Gen 1:27 it has similar wording

44:1 The Lord with his hands having created man, in the likeness of his own face, the Lord made him small and great.

Gen 1:27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

"in the image of God" That is, in the image of the Elohim whom the Father used in the work of creation. Man is In the Image And Likeness Of The Elohim, or angels . The word image means a shadow, or a likeness. The word is reproduced in Daniel 2 in relation to the image, and thus relates to form or appearance.

Genesis 5:3 states that "Adam begat a son in his likeness after his image" which illustrates its use here.

Man was made "in the image" of the Elohim, and inasmuch as they are "sons of God," the image is divine (though the nature of man is not).

Of the Lord Jesus Christ also, we read that he is "the exact representation of his (God's) very being" (Heb. 1:3). Yahweh has corporeal existence in heaven.

"While image, then, hath reference to form or shape, 'likeness' hath regard to mental constitution, or capacity... Adam's mental capacity enabled him to comprehend and receive spiritual ideas

But whereas Adam was made in "the image and likeness of the Elohim," the descendants of Adam inherit the consequences of the Fall. Seth was "in the likeness after the image" of Adam (Gen. 5:3), and not that of God.

Therefore, since the Fall it has been impossible for man to reflect the divine excellence in its fullness, and this has required the formation of a New Man who should exactly reveal the divine image and likeness. This Christ accomplished by conquering the flesh (Rom. 1:3; Heb. 1:3; Col. 1:15).

Man is a facsimile of god that is of god's visible face
any disrespect for any human being is to disrespect  God himself

2 Enoch 44:2 Whoever insults a person's face insults the face of the Lord; ....Whoever treats with contempt the face of any person treats the face of the Lord with contempt.

James 3:8 But the tongue, not one of mankind can get it tamed. An unruly injurious thing, it is full of death-dealing poison. 9 With it we bless God, even [the] Father, and yet with it we curse men who have come into existence “in the likeness of God


And now, my children, it is not from my own lips that I am reporting to you today, but from the lips of the Lord who has sent me to you. As for you, you hear my words, out of my lips, a human being created equal to yourselves; but I, I have heard the words from the fiery lips of the Lord. For the lips of the Lord are a furnace of fire, and his words are the fiery flames which come out. You, my children, you see my face, a human being created just like yourselves; I, I am one who has seen the face of the Lord, like iron made burning hot by fire, emitting sparks. For you gaze into (my) eyes, a human being created just like yourselves; but I have gazed into the eyes of the Lord, like the rays of the shining sun and terrifying the eyes of a human being.

Finally Theodotus is an important figure in Valentianian Gnosticism rejects the idea that the Pleroma is non-corporeal 

10 But not even the world of spirit and of intellect, nor the arch angels and the First-Created, no, nor even he himself is shapeless and formless and without figure, and incorporeal; but he also has his own shape and body corresponding to his preeminence over all spiritual beings, as also those who were first created have bodies corresponding to their preeminence over the beings subordinate to them. For, in general, that which has come into being is not unsubstantial, but they have form and body, though unlike the bodies in this world. Those which are here are male and female and differ from each other, but there he who is the Only-Begotten and inherently intellectual has been provided with his own form and with his own nature which is exceedingly pure and sovereign and directly enjoys the power of the Father; and the First-Created even though numerically distinct and susceptible of separate distinction and definition, nevertheless, are shown by the similarity of their state to have unity, equality and similarity. For among the Seven there is neither inferiority nor superiority and no advance is left for them, since they have received perfection from the beginning, at the time of the first creation from God through the Son. And he is said to be “inapproachable Light” as” Only-Begotten,” and “First-Born,” “the things which eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, and which have not entered into the heart of man,” – and such a one shall not be found either among the First-Created or among men, – but they “always behold the face of the Father” and the face of the Father is the Son, through whom the Father is known. Yet that which sees and is seen cannot be formless or incorporeal. But they see not with an eye of sense, but with the eye of mind, such as the Father provided.

Emanation creation out of the substance of God (creation ex deo)

Emanation creation out of the substance of God

Emanation or creatio ex deo

1 Cor. 8:5 For even though there are those who are called “gods,” whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,”

6 yet to us there is but one God, the Father, out of whom are all things and we in Him, and one Lord Jesus Christ on account of whom are all things, and we by Him.

I want to challenge a commonly assumed theory called creatio ex nihilo. This is the idea that when God created the universe, he created it out of nothing. It put forward as fact that God didn’t form and shape creation out of his own being but made the creation itself appear out of nowhere.

If God created the universe, and 'before' that the only existence was that of God, and From nothing comes nothing, and something always comes from something, then God must have created the universe out of his own being. (creation ex deo)

The common phrase creatio ex nihilo (lit. "creation out of nothing"), the idea of a big bang is incorrect you can not make something out of nothing this is were the doctrine of emanation comes in or creatio ex deo (creation out of the being of God or Creation out of the substance of God himself.) 1st Cor. 8:6.

Note that the substance of God is his divine nature which is corporeal  

The word "Emanation" comes from the Latin e-manare, "to flow forth".

According to Emanationism, Creation occurs by a process of emanation - "out-flowing".

The source or fountain of power in the universe is One. It is a unit. Therefore, everything that exists is “out of Him.” Hence, the Creator did not “make all things out of nothing.” This is the theology taught by the orthodox scholars of the old self of the flesh, and it leads many of its children to affirm that “matter is God.” They understand “matter” to be that “which is knowable by the five senses.” Hence, the sun, the moon, the stars, and all the things they can see, taste, touch, smell, and hear on Earth are God to them. They confuse that which is “of Him” with the “Him” out of whom all things proceed.

On the other hand, some children of the old self claim “God is immaterial.” By this they

mean God is not matter, or substance, or body, but an inconceivable something they call

“spirit,” an incorporeal, unsubstantial, immaterial spirit that is as near to nothing as words can express.

Nothing making all things out of nothing is the old self's teaching concerning God.

the Scripture declares that Spirit is the Deity. "Spirit," then, is the Deity commonly called God. But more than this, this Spirit is the Father; that is, the One, out of whom (ex autou) are all things.

This appears from what is said of “Spirit” and of “Father.” Jesus stated in John 5:31: “The Father raises the dead and quickens them.”That is, He makes the ones liberated from the grave incorruptibly alive. 

And in John 6:63, he says: “It is the Spirit that quickens” or makes alive. Therefore, the Father and the Spirit are the same. 

Nevertheless, the word “spirit” is often used in other senses. It is the FATHER-SPIRIT Paul refers to in 1 Timothy 6:16 that no one has seen in His unveiled splendor. 

Veiled in flesh (“the Veil of the Covering” - Ex. 35:12) those who discerned the one who spoke to Philip “saw the Father.” (Jn. 14:9 and 12:45) 

But veiled or unveiled, the Father-spirit is material. Regarding the Unveiled Father-Spirit, Hebrews 1:2-3 tells us that the Son is the Character of his Hypostasis, rendered in the common version as “the express image of His person.” The Son is the character or exact representation, and the Father is the hypostasis.

The Father is absolute power from his incorruptible substance radiates holy spirit or active force is before all existing things. This self-existing incorruptible substance is essentially spirit—spirit substance—a concentration and condensation into ONE BODY of all the attributes, intellectual, moral and physical, of omnipotence—all things are out of Deity (1 Cor. 8:6).

 All things being out of Deity, they were not made out of nothing. The sun, moon and stars, together with all things pertaining to each, were made out of something, and that something was the radiant flowing out of His substance, spirit or active force, which pervades all things. By his spirit or active force, all created things are connected with the creator of the universe, which is light that no man can approach unto, so that not even a sparrow falls to the ground without the Father, who is not far from every one of us.

The formation of the first man of the earth was the expression by spirit of the peculiar divine idea or mental image. The spirit-developed form, styled man, was the result of power divinely exercised upon the dust of the ground.

Thus, Creation is not Creation out of nothing, but creation out of the being of the higher hypostasis.

Unveiling Symbolism: Exploring Political Interpretations and Figurative Language in The Exegesis on the Soul

**The Exegesis on the Soul: Unveiling a Valentinian Gnostic Text**

The Nag Hammadi Library presents us with a treasure trove of ancient texts, each offering unique insights into early Christian thought and spirituality. Among these, The Exegesis on the Soul stands out as a profound yet enigmatic work whose authorship and precise historical context remain shrouded in mystery. Dating back to a period likely spanning the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, this text offers a captivating narrative that delves into the nature of the soul, its fall from grace, and its ultimate redemption.




Contrary to typical Gnostic cosmological themes prevalent in other texts of the Nag Hammadi Library, The Exegesis on the Soul chooses a different path. It remains notably silent on concepts such as the pleroma, aeons, Yaldabaoth, and the Demiurge. Instead, it unfolds as an allegorical exposition, inviting readers to explore its depths through comparisons within its own scripture-like narrative. Rather than delving into myths surrounding the fall of Sophia, the text encourages an allegorical interpretation rooted in scripture itself.

The narrative within The Exegesis on the Soul is not presented in a linear or straightforward manner. Instead, it weaves a tapestry of allegorical storytelling, interspersed with commentary, quotations from Old and New Testament scriptures, and even references to Homer's Odyssey. This eclectic mix underscores the author's syncretistic background and suggests a Valentinian Gnostic context, likely originating in Alexandria at the dawn of the third century.

Central to the text is the allegorical portrayal of the soul as a fallen woman, symbolizing humanity's descent from a state of perfection into spiritual degradation. Drawing parallels with biblical motifs, particularly from Lamentations 2:1, the text paints a vivid picture of the soul's journey through metaphorical prostitution and eventual redemption. The overarching theme revolves around the soul's reunion with the divine, symbolized by an androgynous union between the soul and the Spirit within the nuptial chamber.

Through copious quotations from both Old Testament prophets, New Testament gospels, and the epistles of Paul, the author establishes a rich tapestry of scripture. Interestingly, the inclusion of Homer's Odyssey alongside biblical texts suggests a broader understanding of scripture encompassing Greek legend and mythology. This inclusive approach underscores the author's view of diverse sources as potential sources of spiritual wisdom.

Understanding The Exegesis on the Soul as a Valentinian Gnostic text sheds light on its theological framework and thematic underpinnings. While the text touches upon sacramental themes, it does so with a subtlety distinct from other Valentinian writings in the Nag Hammadi Library. This nuanced exploration of sacramental themes further enriches our understanding of the text's theological milieu.

In conclusion, The Exegesis on the Soul emerges as a captivating Valentinian Gnostic text that challenges readers to delve into its allegorical depths. Through its intricate narrative, rich symbolism, and eclectic scriptural references, it offers a unique perspective on the nature of the soul, its fall from grace, and its journey towards redemption. As we unravel its mysteries, we embark on a spiritual journey that transcends conventional boundaries, inviting us to explore the depths of the human soul and its quest for divine reunion.

**Exploring the Nature of the Soul: Perspectives from Gnosticism and Biblical Teachings**

The concept of the soul has been a subject of profound philosophical and theological inquiry throughout history, with diverse perspectives emerging from different religious and philosophical traditions. In the context of Gnosticism, particularly among the Valentinian school, and within the framework of biblical teachings, the nature of the soul takes on varied interpretations that shape fundamental beliefs about human existence and spirituality.

April D. DeConick, in her seminal work *The Gnostic New Age*, elucidates the prevailing view among most Gnostics regarding the mortality of the soul. Contrary to Plato's notion of the immortal soul, Gnostics, particularly those within the Jewish-Christian tradition like the Valentinians, believed that the soul shares the same mortality as the physical body. According to DeConick, the soul is not endowed with eternal existence but is subject to the same fate of impermanence and eventual demise as the physical form it inhabits.

April D. DeConick in her book The Gnostic New Age "most Gnostics thought that the psyche, or soul, was mortal." page 21

According to most Gnostics, the soul is not immortal, as Plato thought. Rather, it is mortal, just like the physical body, and will not endure. (The Gnostic New Age P. 212 April D. DeConick)

This perspective finds resonance in the teachings of Heracleon, a prominent figure within the Valentinian Gnostic tradition who flourished around AD 175. Described by Clement of Alexandria as the most esteemed of the school of Valentinus, Heracleon's insights shed light on the Valentinian rejection of the doctrine of the immortal soul. Fragment 40 from Heracleon's commentary on the Gospel of John provides a nuanced interpretation of biblical passages, particularly John 4:46-53, emphasizing the mortal nature of the soul. By dissecting the symbolism within the biblical narrative, Heracleon argues against the notion of the immortal soul, asserting instead that the soul possesses only a disposition towards salvation and is susceptible to destruction in death.

Fragment 40, on John 4:46-53 (In John 4:46, “So he came again to Cana in Galilee, where he had made the water wine. And at Capernaum, there was an official whose child was ill.) The official was the Craftsman, for he himself ruled like a king over those under him. Because his domain is small and transitory, he was called an “official,” like a petty princeling who is set over a small kingdom by the universal king. The “child” “in Capernaun” is one who is in the lower part of the Middle (i.e. of animate substance), which lies near the sea, that is, which is linked with matter. The child’s proper person was sick, that is, in a condition not in accordance with the child’s proper nature, in ignorance and sins. (In John 4:47, “When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went and begged him to come down and heal his child , for it was at the point of death.”) The words “from Judea to Galilee” mean ‘from the Judea above.’. . . By the words “it was at the point of death,” the teaching of those who claim that the soul is immortal is refuted. In agreement with this is the statement that “the body and soul are destoyed in Hell.” (Matthew 10:28) The soul is not immortal, but is possessed only of a disposition towards salvation, for it is the perishable which puts on imperishability and the mortal which puts on immortality when “its death is swallowed up in victory.” (1 Corinthians 15:54) (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John.)

This perspective aligns with biblical teachings found in both the Old and New Testaments, which consistently portray the soul as mortal and subject to death. Throughout biblical literature, the soul is depicted in various contexts, but it is never attributed with inherent immortality. Rather, it is portrayed as inseparable from mortal life, capable of perishing and facing destruction. For instance, Matthew 10:28 highlights the mortality of both body and soul, refuting the notion of inherent immortality. Similarly, 1 Corinthians 15:54 speaks of mortality being transformed into immortality, suggesting that the soul's imperishability is contingent upon divine intervention rather than an innate quality.

In essence, the exploration of the nature of the soul from both Gnostic and biblical perspectives offers intriguing insights into fundamental questions about human existence and spirituality. While Gnosticism, particularly within the Valentinian tradition, emphasizes the mortal nature of the soul as part of its broader cosmological framework, biblical teachings consistently underscore the mortal condition of the soul, devoid of inherent immortality. These perspectives invite further contemplation and dialogue on the nature of the soul and its significance within the larger tapestry of human spirituality and theological inquiry.

**The Collective Nature of the Soul: Insights from Biblical Usage**

In the rich tapestry of religious and philosophical thought, the concept of the soul holds a central place, often provoking profound reflections on the nature of human existence. Delving into the Scriptures, we find intriguing examples of a singular noun used to denote a collective group, shedding light on the collective nature of the soul in certain biblical contexts.

A notable instance is the collective use of the term "Israel" in the Scriptures. It refers not just to an individual, but to all the descendants of Jacob collectively at any given time. This collective usage is evident in various biblical passages, including Exodus 9:4, Joshua 3:7, Ezra 2:2b, and Matthew 8:10. Similarly, the term "The Amorite" appears singular in the Hebrew text but is used collectively to denote the Canaanite tribe descended from the original Amorite. This collective understanding extends to other groups, such as the Hamitic race mentioned in Genesis 10:6, 15, 16 and 1 Chronicles 1:13, 14.


Genesis 14:21 After that the king of Sodom said to Abram: “Give me the souls, but take the goods for yourself.”

The souls,” (Hebrew., han·ne´phesh, singular. but used collectively)

23:7 Thereupon Abraham got up and bowed down to the natives, to the sons of Heth,
8 and spoke with them, saying: “If YOUR souls agree to bury my dead out of my sight, listen to me and urge Ephron the son of Zohar for me,
9 that he may give me the cave of Mach·pe´lah, which is his, which is at the extremity of his field. For the full amount of silver let him give it to me in the midst of YOU for the possession of a burial place.” (Genesis 23:7-9 NWT)　

NWT Footnote: Lit., "with your soul," used collectively. Heb., 'eth-naph·shekhem´; Gr., psy·khei´.

The concept of the soul also takes on a collective dimension in certain biblical verses, such as Genesis 14:21, Genesis 23:8, and Jeremiah 48:6. Genesis 14:21 presents an interesting use of the term "souls," emphasizing its collective nature. The king of Sodom requests Abram, saying, "Give me the souls, but take the goods for yourself." Here, the Hebrew term "han·ne´phesh" is singular but used collectively, suggesting a group of individuals.

Genesis 23:8 further exemplifies the collective use of the term "soul." In Abraham's conversation with the sons of Heth, the phrase "If your souls agree" is used collectively. The New World Translation (NWT) emphasizes the collective nature by providing a footnote stating that "lit., 'with your soul,' used collectively."

The nuances of the collective noun "soul" in these biblical passages provide a foundation for understanding its role in Gnostic teachings. The Gnostic text, *The Concept of Our Great Power*, introduces the notion of the soul-endowed aeon as the human race post-flood. This aeon, designated as the psychic one, is described as collective, suggesting a group of individuals with shared attributes and characteristics.

Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one, the man will come into being who knows the great Power. He will receive (me) and he will know me. He will drink from the milk of the mother, in fact. He will speak in parables; he will proclaim the aeon that is to come, just as he spoke in the first aeon of the flesh, as Noah. Now concerning his words, which he uttered, he spoke in all of them, in seventy-two tongues. And he opened the gates of the heavens with his words. And he put to shame the ruler of Hades; he raised the dead, and he destroyed his dominion. (The Concept of Our Great Power)

Here, the soul-endowed aeon (the psychic aeon) is depicted as encompassing the human race after the flood, representing a collective entity endowed with spiritual potential and eligibility for eternal life. The Gnostic text emphasizes the collective nature of this soul-endowed aeon, highlighting its distinctiveness from the fleshly aeon.

The reference to seventy-two tongues in *The Concept of Our Great Power* underscores the universality and diversity within this collective aeon. The individual within this aeon is portrayed as capable of opening the gates of the heavens with their words, challenging the dominion of Hades, and even raising the dead. This collective empowerment aligns with the biblical understanding of the soul as a collective noun, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individuals within a shared spiritual journey.

In conclusion, the exploration of the collective nature of the soul, as depicted in biblical passages and Gnostic teachings, unveils a nuanced understanding of the soul's role in the human experience. The collective noun "soul" not only reflects a shared identity within specific groups but also contributes to the broader discourse on spirituality, collective empowerment, and the transformative potential inherent in the human soul. As we delve into these diverse perspectives, we embark on a journey that transcends individual boundaries, inviting contemplation on the interconnectedness of souls in the unfolding narrative of human existence.


**The Soul as an Allegorical Representation: Unveiling the Symbolism in the Exegesis on the Soul**


In exploring the Exegesis on the Soul, it becomes apparent that a nuanced understanding of the text requires delving into its allegorical nature, rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions rather than Greek philosophy or mythology. The text employs symbolic language, personifying the soul as a woman, to convey deeper truths about the collective spiritual condition of a group of people. This allegorical approach refrains from literal interpretations and instead invites readers to discern spiritual truths within its symbolic narrative.

Central to this allegorical interpretation is the identification of the soul as representing the nation of Israel, utilized collectively to symbolize a group of people. Drawing parallels with biblical passages where the term "soul" is used collectively for groups of individuals, such as Genesis 14:21, Genesis 23:8, and Jeremiah 48:6, the Exegesis on the Soul employs similar symbolism to convey its message. The personification of the soul as a woman embodies the collective spiritual state of the nation of Israel, depicted allegorically as a wife fallen into prostitution, mirroring the biblical narrative where Israel is metaphorically portrayed as the wife of God who has strayed from righteousness.


The allegorical interpretation extends further to encompass the concept of repentance within the narrative. The call to repentance within the text is addressed to a collective group, identified as the spiritual Israel or the church. By utilizing the term "Israel" as a collective representation of the soul, the text emphasizes the collective responsibility for repentance and spiritual renewal. The symbolic language employed throughout the text underscores the interconnectedness of individuals within the spiritual community, highlighting the shared journey towards redemption and restoration.


At the conclusion of the Exegesis on the Soul, the allegorical interpretation becomes clearer as the text shifts from speaking about the soul to addressing the nation of Israel directly. This transition underscores the allegorical nature of the narrative, where the soul serves as a symbolic representation of the collective spiritual condition of the nation. The call to repentance, articulated within the allegorical framework, resonates with Jewish-Christian readers familiar with the concept of repentance as a fundamental aspect of spiritual renewal.

In essence, the Exegesis on the Soul offers a compelling allegorical narrative that delves into profound spiritual truths through symbolic language and imagery. By personifying the soul as a woman and utilizing the term "Israel" collectively, the text invites readers to contemplate the collective spiritual journey of a community and the imperative of repentance as a pathway to restoration. This allegorical interpretation, rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions, provides a deeper understanding of the text's symbolism and its relevance for spiritual reflection and renewal within the community of believers.

**The Symbolism of the Soul's Feminine Nature: Insights from The Exegesis on the Soul**

The Exegesis on the Soul, a profound Gnostic text, introduces the soul with a distinctive feminine persona, highlighting the symbolic and allegorical dimensions embedded in its narrative. Across languages such as Hebrew, Coptic, and Greek, the term "soul" inherently carries a feminine grammatical form. However, in this text, the soul is not merely a linguistic entity; rather, it emerges as a symbolic woman, serving as an allegory for both the natural seed of Israel and the spiritual Israel, represented by the Church.

The author of The Exegesis on the Soul notes that wise men of old ascribed a feminine name to the soul, emphasizing its feminine nature. The text transcends linguistic nuances, delving into a profound metaphorical representation. This feminine portrayal aligns with biblical usage, where the term "woman" is occasionally employed to depict a weak or vulnerable man, underscoring the nuanced gendered language present in both the text and broader biblical traditions (Isaiah 3:12; 19:16).

The assertion that the soul is "female in her nature" reaches beyond mere grammatical considerations. It invites readers to explore the metaphorical aspects of femininity, particularly through the reference to the soul having a womb. In this context, the womb symbolizes sin, drawing parallels with biblical passages that metaphorically associate sin with conception, birth, and the bearing of iniquity.

James 3:15 highlights the earthly origin of wisdom, describing it as "born of the soul" or "demoniacal" in Rotherham's Emphasized Bible. This imagery of earthly wisdom being born from the soul further reinforces the reproductive symbolism associated with the soul, indicating its role in the genesis of earthly desires and temptations.

The concept of the soul's womb is intricately linked to the notion of sin as a female principle. Psalm 7:14 portrays sinners as pregnant with what is hurtful, conceiving trouble, and giving birth to falsehood. Similarly, James 1:13-15 depicts the process of temptation and sin as akin to childbirth, where desire conceives and gives birth to sin, ultimately leading to death. This language of childbearing in connection with lust and sin underscores the reproductive aspect of the soul, illustrating its role in the genesis of sinful desires and actions.

Philo, a Jewish philosopher, further elaborates on the feminine nature of the soul's offspring, identifying wickedness and passion as female offspring of the soul. According to Philo, these female offspring lead to effeminacy in pursuits, contrasting with the masculine characters of good dispositions, which invigorate and strengthen individuals in their spiritual journey.


In essence, the feminine symbolism of the soul in The Exegesis on the Soul serves as a powerful allegory, highlighting the nurturing and reproductive aspects of the soul in its spiritual journey. The imagery of the soul as a woman with a womb underscores its role in the genesis of earthly desires and temptations, while also emphasizing the importance of cultivating virtuous dispositions to transcend the influence of sinful tendencies. Through this allegorical framework, the text invites readers to reflect on the transformative power of spiritual renewal and the journey towards overcoming the frailties of the soul in pursuit of divine wisdom and virtue.

**The Virgin Soul: Symbolism, Androgyny, and the Descent into Mortality**

In the labyrinth of allegorical prose within *The Exegesis on the Soul*, a striking revelation unfolds—“As long as she was alone with the father, she was virgin and in form androgynous.” This profound statement not only encapsulates the virginity of the soul but also introduces the concept of androgyny, a state of being both male and female. To unravel this enigma, we delve into the figurative use of the term “virgin” in biblical and literary contexts, uncovering its symbolic significance in the narrative.

The metaphorical use of "virgin" in connection with cities, places, or peoples is a recurring theme in biblical literature. Various references, such as the “virgin daughter” of Israel, Judah, and Zion, convey a sense of being unsubdued, untarnished by foreign conquerors. The symbolic virginity of a people or place implies an undisturbed and pristine state, unspoiled by external forces. In this context, the virginity of the soul in *The Exegesis on the Soul* takes on a symbolic dimension, signifying a state of purity and untarnished existence while in communion with the Father.

The narrative introduces the concept of androgyny, describing the soul as being both male and female in its form. This androgynous nature finds resonance in the symbolic understanding of Israel as the wife of God and, simultaneously, the sons of Israel. The spiritual unity and interconnectedness within this symbolism allow for the conception of trouble within the soul without the involvement of an external agent. The androgynous state of the soul reflects its dual nature—the feminine aspect as the wife of God and the masculine aspect as the sons of Israel, capturing the complexity of its spiritual identity.

However, the narrative takes a poignant turn as it describes the soul's descent into mortality. The transition from being alone with the Father to descending into a body signifies a profound shift—from a state of purity and androgyny to a state of bondage or servitude to sin. The choice of the term "body" in this context holds significant weight. In Greek, the word translated as "body" (Strong’s 4983) can also be rendered as "slave." This nuanced interpretation introduces a layer of depth, suggesting that the soul, once in union with the Father, becomes a servant to sin upon its descent into mortality.

The descent into life, characterized by alienation from the life of God and the blindness of the heart, aligns with biblical concepts of spiritual estrangement due to ignorance. The narrative draws parallels with the idea that friendship with the world is enmity with God, emphasizing the transformative impact of worldly influences on the soul's spiritual state. The symbolism within this descent echoes the biblical notion of falling away from divine communion into a state of spiritual separation.

In essence, the allegorical narrative in *The Exegesis on the Soul* unveils a profound journey—from the virgin and androgynous state of the soul, in harmonious communion with the Father, to its descent into mortality and bondage to sin. The use of symbolism, androgyny, and the metaphorical understanding of virginity enriches the narrative, offering readers a contemplative exploration of the soul's complex spiritual identity and its profound relationship with divinity. As the soul navigates the realms of purity, duality, and mortality, the narrative invites reflection on the intricate interplay between the spiritual and the earthly, urging readers to delve into the profound mysteries concealed within the allegorical depths of the text.

**The Symbolic Descent: Figurative Language in the Exegesis on the Soul**

In the labyrinth of *The Exegesis on the Soul*, a profound revelation echoes - "When she fell down into a body and entered this life, then she fell into the hands of thieves." This statement, laden with symbolism and figurative language, unfolds a narrative of spiritual descent and apostasy. To decipher its depths, we embark on a journey through biblical allegory, exploring the nuanced meanings of falling, bodies, and the hands of thieves.

The notion of falling from heaven is not foreign to biblical literature. Figuratively understood, it represents a loss of authority or a descent from a position of prominence. In Isaiah 14, the demise of the king of Babylon is expressed as a fall from heaven, a metaphorical expression signifying a loss of dominion. This figurative descent is also applied to the nation of Israel in Lamentations 2:1, where the daughter of Zion is beclouded and thrown down from heaven to earth. Luke 11:23 further emphasizes the concept, illustrating how Capernaum, despite its previous exalted state, will descend to Hades. This figurative language is not about celestial realms but political and spiritual authority.

Theologian Matthew Henry, in his commentary, interprets such figurative language as political speeches. For example, in his analysis of Revelation 6, he sees the earthquake, darkened sun, and falling stars as symbols of political upheaval and the collapse of the Jewish church and state. This perspective aligns with a figurative understanding of the Exegesis on the Soul, urging readers to interpret its symbolic language as reflections of spiritual and political realities.

In interpreting passages that describe descent or falling, such as those encountered in the Exegesis on the Soul, Matthew Henry adopts a figurative approach. Instead of interpreting these depictions as literal falls from physical heights, he discerns them as symbolic representations of political or spiritual declines. This interpretative strategy reflects a broader trend in biblical scholarship that endeavors to unveil layers of meaning beyond the literal sense of the text.

Matthew Henry, an English Presbyterian minister whose Complete Commentary on the Bible remains influential, demonstrates a keen awareness of the figurative language employed in biblical narratives. In his commentary on Revelation 6, where cataclysmic events are described, Henry sees these occurrences not as literal cosmic disturbances but as political upheavals. The great earthquake, the darkened sun, and the falling stars are, for him, symbols of significant political changes, reflecting the collapse of the Jewish church and state. This approach showcases an inclination to view dramatic and cosmic language in the Bible as conveying deeper, symbolic truths about political and spiritual realities.

This interpretive stance aligns with a broader trend in biblical scholarship that seeks to move beyond a rigidly literal understanding of scripture. Scholars often recognize the rich tapestry of symbolic language woven throughout the Bible to convey profound truths. The use of metaphor, allegory, and symbolism is acknowledged as a common and intentional feature in ancient texts, allowing for layers of meaning beyond the surface narrative.

In the case of passages discussing falling or descent, the figurative interpretation is rooted in the recognition that these expressions carry more than just physical or geographical implications. Instead, they often signify shifts in political authority, spiritual states, or moral conditions. This nuanced approach respects the literary conventions of the time and the cultural context in which these texts were written.

For example, when the Exegesis on the Soul speaks of the soul falling into a body, the figurative understanding embraces the idea that this descent is not a literal fall from a celestial realm but a symbolic representation of a spiritual and political decline. The body, in this context, takes on a dual meaning—it can be understood both as a collective entity or a societal organization and as a state of servitude or slavery to sin. This figurative interpretation allows for a more nuanced and layered comprehension of the text.

In conclusion, Matthew Henry's figurative approach to passages describing descent or falling in the Bible is part of a broader trend in biblical scholarship that seeks to uncover deeper layers of meaning. Embracing the symbolic and metaphorical aspects of biblical language allows scholars and readers alike to appreciate the intricate tapestry of truths woven into these ancient texts, transcending literal constraints to reveal profound insights into spiritual and political realities.

So, when the Exegesis speaks of the soul falling into a body, we enter the realm of metaphorical richness. The Greek word for body, Strong’s 4983, carries a dual meaning—it can be translated as both "body" and "slave." This opens a nuanced interpretation, suggesting that the soul, once in unity with the Father, becomes a "slave" or "servant" to sin upon its descent. Moreover, the term "body" is used in various contexts in the Bible, ranging from the temple of the Holy Spirit to the spiritual unity of believers. In this context, it symbolizes a collective whole or a totality, hinting at a political body or an organized society.

The Exegesis draws parallels with Ezekiel 37, where a valley full of bones symbolizes Israel in a state of political death and captivity. The restoration of the bones signifies the revival of the nation from its dispersed and captive state. Likewise, when the soul falls into a body, it implies a political descent for Israel, losing its place of preeminence and falling into a state of spiritual death—the body of sin.

However, delving deeper, the word "body" is also a versatile term, portraying a social, ethical, or mystical unity, such as the church. It casts a shadow, a reflection of truth. Thus, the soul's descent into a body is not a mere physical journey but a profound transformation—a transition from a higher state to a lower one, signifying servitude to sin or dwelling in a house of sin. 

The narrative unfolds further, proclaiming that the soul, in its descent, enters this life—an existence marked by alienation from the life of God. Drawing on biblical wisdom, the text invokes Ephesians 4:18, portraying the ignorance and blindness that shroud the hearts of those separated from divine understanding. The stark dichotomy is emphasized by the declaration that friendship with the world is enmity with God, solidifying the soul's predicament as an enemy of God when entangled in the pursuits of worldly allure.

The hands of thieves, in the narrative, represent the agents of spiritual decay and apostasy. This figurative language finds resonance in biblical passages where thieves are associated with destruction and plundering. The soul's descent into the hands of thieves encapsulates the spiritual fall and corruption of the nation of Israel.

In essence, the Exegesis on the Soul weaves a tapestry of figurative language, drawing from biblical allegory to convey the spiritual descent and apostasy of Israel. The fall from heaven, the descent into a body/slave, and the hands of thieves collectively depict a narrative of political and spiritual decline. As readers navigate the symbolic terrain of this text, they are beckoned to unravel the layers of meaning, recognizing the rich tapestry of metaphorical language employed to articulate profound truths about the spiritual journey of the soul and the fate of nations.

Female Angels Genesis 1:26

Female Angels

The concept of female angels is a fascinating topic that invites reflection on the nature of divinity and the role of gender within spiritual realms. A deep dive into the scriptures and theological interpretations provides insight into the creation of humanity and its reflection of divine qualities, suggesting that the divine encompasses both masculine and feminine attributes.

In Genesis 1:26, the Hebrew term "Elohim" is used to describe God. Elohim is a plural noun, often interpreted as a collective, which opens the door to understanding the divine as encompassing multiple aspects or persons. The passage states, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the living creatures." The phrase "in our image" implies that both male and female were created to reflect the image of the Elohim. This suggests that the divine image is not solely masculine but also includes feminine characteristics. The creation narrative concludes with, "So Elohim created man in His image; male and female created He them," affirming that both genders reflect the divine image.

The creation of Eve further deepens this understanding. Genesis 2:21-22 describes how God formed Eve from Adam's side, using the Hebrew word "tsela," which is typically translated as "rib" but more accurately means "side." This implies that Eve was not just a derivative of Adam but was created to complement him fully, possessing qualities that were integral to humanity's complete reflection of the divine. If Adam alone was made in the image of Elohim, then the creation of Eve from Adam's side suggests that her existence also mirrors aspects of the divine, possibly those aligned with the feminine qualities within Elohim.

The interpretation that the divine includes feminine aspects is further supported by the concept that "man" in the Genesis account is a generic term encompassing both male and female. Thus, when Elohim says, "Let us make man in our image," it is not just Adam who reflects the divine image but Eve as well. This dual-gender creation in God's image implies that the divine itself possesses both masculine and feminine qualities. Therefore, it stands to reason that some of the Elohim could be represented by Adam’s form and others by Eve’s, suggesting the presence of both masculine and feminine aspects within the divine assembly.

This interpretation aligns with the notion that, when humanity is resurrected, they will rise as immortal men and women. Jesus, in the Gospels, states that in the resurrection, people "are equal to the angels," indicating that gender distinctions persist in some form even in the afterlife. This raises the possibility that angels, often perceived as genderless beings, could also reflect both masculine and feminine qualities, just as humans do.

The evidence from theological discourse further supports the idea of a neuter or gender-inclusive personality within the divine Spirit. The Greek word "Pneuma," used for Spirit, is neuter, though its gender might be understood as either masculine or feminine depending on the context. This linguistic nuance suggests that the Holy Spirit could embody a range of qualities beyond the limitations of human gender constructs.

Thus, while traditional representations of angels are often masculine, there is theological and scriptural evidence to support the existence of female angels or divine beings that embody feminine qualities. The feminine aspect of divinity, reflected in the creation of Eve, suggests that female angels could exist as counterparts to their male counterparts, completing the divine reflection in the spiritual realm just as Eve completed Adam in the physical realm.

In conclusion, the creation narrative in Genesis, along with various theological interpretations, supports the idea that the divine image encompasses both masculine and feminine qualities. This suggests that female angels, or divine beings reflecting feminine attributes, are a plausible and meaningful concept within the broader understanding of divine and spiritual realms.

Genesis 1:26 the Elohim said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the living creatures." So Elohim created man in His image; male and female created He them.

The Deity itself must be masculine and feminine, in order to make man in its image and likeness, 'male and female'"

She was not formed in the image of man, though she may have been in the image of some of the Elohim. "Man" is generic of both sexes. When, therefore, Elohim said "let us make man in our image;" and it is added, "male and female created he them;" it would seem that both the man and the woman were created in the image and likeness of Elohim. In this case, some of the Elohim are represented by Adam's form, and some by Eve's. I see no reason why it should not be so. 

When mankind rises from the dead, they will doubtless rise as immortal men and women; and then, says Jesus, "they are equal to the angels;" on an equality with them in every respect. Adam only was in the image of Him that created him; but then, the Elohim that do the commandments of the invisible God, are the virile portion of their community: 

she was after the image and likeness of some of those comprehended in the pronoun "our." and both "very good according to the sub-angelic nature they possessed. Elpis Israel Chapter Two

The evidence before us, as far as the import of words and phrases is concerned, seems to indicate the neuter personality of the Spirit, the masculine words having relation to something else that is affirmed of it, and being masculine from the custom of the language. Though the word Pneuma be neuter, the gender of the spirit might be masculine or feminine. HERALD KINGDOM AND AGE TO COME 1852

"And He took one of his ribs" —The word tsela, from tsala "to incline," is nowhere else used for "rib," but is translated "side" (e.g. Exod. 25:12). Exactly what part, or how much, of Adam's side was taken from him is not revealed. But whatever part it was, it transferred the feminine qualities of the man to Eve, his wife (Eph. 5:22). She became his counterpart; and she, complementing him, made him complete.genesis expositor