Who is the Demiurge? Hebrews 11:10

Who is the Demiurge?

Or 

What is the Demiurge? 

Hebrews 11:10

### The Demiurge in Valentinian and Biblical Contexts

The term "Demiurge," derived from the Greek *dēmiourgos* (craftsman or builder), holds a nuanced place in ancient religious and philosophical thought. While it is not explicitly used in the Bible outside of the Greek translation of Hebrews 11:10, its conceptual framework resonates within both biblical and Valentinian contexts.

#### The Demiurge in Valentinian Tradition

In Valentinian Gnosticism, the Demiurge is seen in a positive light, contrasting with the negative portrayal of Yaldabaoth in Sethian Gnosticism. For Valentinians, the Demiurge is not a malevolent creator but an entity that reflects the divine. As stated in the *Excerpts of Theodotus* (47:1-3), the Demiurge is described as "an image of the Father." Similarly, the *Tripartite Tractate* (100:21-30) identifies the Demiurge as "the lord of all of them," bearing titles like "father," "god," "demiurge," and "judge," signifying his role as a representation of the divine attributes.

This perspective aligns with Basilides’ exalted description of the Demiurge: “He is more ineffable than ineffables, more potent than potencies, wiser than the wise, superior to every excellence that one can name” (*Fragments of a Faith Forgotten*, p. 253). Such depictions emphasize the Demiurge's role as a craftsman who orders the material universe, reflecting the divine will.

#### The Demiurge in Biblical Texts

In Hebrews 11:10, the term *dēmiourgos* is translated as “builder” or “maker,” applied to God as the architect of a city with foundations, symbolizing the Heavenly Jerusalem. The verse states: “For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker (*dēmiourgos*) is God.” This reference underscores the providential role of God as the ultimate craftsman, shaping a transcendent reality that surpasses the material world.

This concept finds echoes in apocryphal and early Christian texts. For instance, *Wisdom of Solomon* 13:1 reflects on humanity’s failure to recognize the "craftsman" (*technitēs*) behind creation while marveling at the works of the universe. Similarly, 1 Clement 20:11 speaks of the Creator who "ordered" the cosmos in harmony, emphasizing the divine wisdom and intentionality behind creation.

#### Fragment 13 and Hebrews 11:10

Fragment 13 of Valentinian tradition offers a spiritual interpretation of John 2:13-16, where Jesus ascends to Jerusalem and cleanses the temple. This ascent is seen as symbolic of the transition from the material realm to the animate (psychic) place, an intermediate state that mirrors Jerusalem. The “sanctuary” represents the Holy of Holies, reserved for the spiritual, while the outer courts symbolize those who achieve salvation outside the Pleroma.

Connecting this to Hebrews 11:10, the "city with foundations" can be interpreted as the spiritual reality beyond the animate realm. Just as the sanctuary signifies the Holy of Holies accessible only to the spiritual, the Heavenly Jerusalem represents the ultimate dwelling place for those who transcend the material and psychic realms. The Demiurge, as the builder of the material universe, serves as an intermediary step in the divine plan, crafting the visible world as a precursor to the ultimate spiritual fulfillment in the Pleroma.

#### The Architect and the Divine Plan

The language of Hebrews 11:10 and Fragment 13 highlights the duality of creation as both material and spiritual. The Demiurge, as an image of the Father, fulfills a critical role in ordering the cosmos, making the material world a reflection of divine harmony. This ordered creation, in turn, points toward the ultimate reality of the Heavenly Jerusalem, a city not built by human hands but by God as the true Demiurge.

In Valentinian thought, this progression aligns with the journey of the soul (understood here as the physical body and animate being) from ignorance to knowledge, from material existence to spiritual communion. The sanctuary and the Holy of Holies represent stages in this ascent, mirroring the believer's journey toward the Pleroma.

#### Conclusion

The concept of the Demiurge, as understood in Valentinian tradition and hinted at in biblical texts, underscores the interconnectedness of creation and divine purpose. In Hebrews 11:10, God as the *dēmiourgos* points to the ultimate fulfillment of creation in the Heavenly Jerusalem. Fragment 13 complements this by illustrating the spiritual ascent through the temple’s symbolism. Together, they provide a profound vision of a cosmos ordered by the divine craftsman, leading humanity toward its ultimate destiny in the fullness of the Pleroma.

### Etymology of Demiurge

The word *demiurge* originates from the Greek *δημιουργός* (*dēmiourgos*), a compound of *dēmos* (a unified group of people) and *ergon* (work). Initially, it denoted a craftsman or artisan who worked for the public, gradually expanding to mean a producer or creator. Strong's Concordance (1217) defines *dēmiourgos* as a workman, builder, or framer, emphasizing the public or collective aspect of their labor. In classical texts, the term often referred to God as the cosmic craftsman, as seen in Plato's works and later in early Christian writings like *1 Clement* and *Wisdom of Solomon*.

In Hebrews 11:10, the term *dēmiourgos* is used to describe God as the "builder and maker" of the city with foundations, referring to the Heavenly Jerusalem. This highlights God's role as the divine architect who designs and actualizes a transcendent reality beyond the physical universe.

---

### Connection Between Demiurge and Arche

The word *archē* (ἀρχή) in Greek, meaning "beginning," "principle," or "rule," shares an etymological and conceptual relationship with *dēmiourgos*. Strong's Concordance (746) defines *archē* as "first in order," derived from the root *arch-* (to rule). It is also linked to *archon* (758), meaning "ruler" or "leader." Thus, *archē* implies both an origin point and authority, tying the concept of creation to governance or rulership.

In the Gospel of John 1:1-3, *archē* is used to introduce the Word (*Logos*):

> "In the beginning (*archē*), was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things were made through him, and without him, nothing was made that has been made."

This passage emphasizes the *Logos* as the origin (*archē*) and intermediary of creation. Ptolemy’s commentary on John further elaborates that the *Logos* emanates from the Father as the principle (*archē*) of all things. The *Logos*, in turn, energizes the Demiurge, enabling him to fashion the material cosmos.

---

### The Demiurge as the First Archon

The connection between *archē* and *archon* (ruler) becomes significant when considering the Demiurge as the "first archon." In Valentinian tradition, the Demiurge is often portrayed as the craftsman working under the authority of the *Logos*. Heracleon, in his commentary on John 1:3, clarifies that "all things were made through him," meaning the *Logos* caused the Demiurge to create the world. The Demiurge operates as an agent or intermediary, crafting the material realm on behalf of the *Logos*.

This intermediary role aligns with the broader usage of *archē* to denote both origin and rule. For instance, in Colossians 1:16, Christ is described as the head of all principalities (*archai*):

> "For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers (*archai*) or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him."

The Demiurge, as the first *archon* from the *archē*, serves as a subordinate ruler within this hierarchy.

---

### Architect and the *Logos*

The term *dēmiourgos* can also be translated as "architect," derived from *archē* (beginning) and *tektōn* (craftsman). In this sense, the Demiurge functions as the cosmic architect, shaping the material universe according to the blueprint provided by the *Logos*. Heracleon’s commentary emphasizes this dynamic:

> "It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, but the one 'through whom' all things were made."

Here, the *Logos* energizes the Demiurge, providing the creative power and design necessary for the material cosmos. The Demiurge, while a creator, is ultimately subordinate to the *Logos*, working "on behalf of" the higher divine principle.

---

### Conclusion

The etymology of *dēmiourgos* and its connection to *archē* reveals a layered understanding of creation and authority. In Valentinian theology and the Gospel of John, the Demiurge is portrayed as an agent of the *Logos*, functioning as the first *archon* who shapes the material realm. This relationship highlights the interdependence between the *Logos* as the origin (*archē*) and the Demiurge as the craftsman (*dēmiourgos*), working together to fulfill the divine plan.

Thus, the Demiurge, while an artisan and ruler, remains subordinate to the *Logos*, whose emanation from the Father represents the true beginning and principle of all things. This layered cosmology underscores the harmony between creation, governance, and divine purpose.

### The Demiurge as the Personification of the Elohim  

The term *Demiurge*, derived from the Greek *dēmiourgos*, originally meant "craftsman" or "artisan." It signifies someone working on behalf of others, a concept reinforced in Strong’s Concordance (1217), which describes the *dēmiourgos* as someone laboring for a unified group or community. In the biblical sense, this aligns with the Elohim of Genesis, a collective term that represents "mighty ones" or divine beings who act under a singular guiding principle—the Spirit of God.


Though *Elohim* is plural, it is frequently paired with singular verbs, suggesting unity in purpose and action. For example, in Genesis 1:1, "Elohim created the heavens and the earth," portrays a coordinated effort of the heavenly host under the influence of God's Spirit (Genesis 1:2). This plurality united by a single divine will mirrors the role of the Demiurge as a craftsman working under the direction of a higher authority, the Logos or Word of God.


---


### The Archangel Michael as a Demiurge


The Archangel Michael, described in Scripture as the chief of angels, exemplifies the concept of the Demiurge as an agent of the Divine Will. The Book of Daniel (10:13, 12:1) presents Michael as a protector and leader of God's people, acting as an intermediary between God and creation. In this role, Michael administers the commands of the Deity to the angels below him, orchestrating their actions in harmony with the divine purpose.


Early Christian and Jewish traditions often depict Michael as the foremost among the Elohim, embodying the qualities and intentions of the Creator. This portrayal aligns with the understanding of the Demiurge as a craftsman who fashions the material world on behalf of the Supreme Deity. As described in *Excerpts of Theodotus* (33:4), the Demiurge, while possessing divine authority, is distinct from the uncreated and eternal God, functioning as an intermediary rather than the ultimate source of creation.


---


### The Demiurge as a Collective of Angels


The Elohim, described as God’s “family in heaven” (Ephesians 3:15), operate collectively as the Demiurge. These angels, emanations of the Divine Spirit, act as instruments of the Father’s will. Psalm 103:19-22 emphasizes their role:
> "Bless the Lord, all His hosts, you ministers of His, who do His will."


This portrayal of the Elohim as a unified body under the direction of God aligns with the Demiurge’s role as a craftsman working on behalf of a greater power. Genesis 1:2 further supports this idea, where the Spirit of God directs the creative actions of the Elohim, who collectively shape the material cosmos.


---


### Distinction Between the Demiurge and the Supreme Deity


While the Demiurge holds a vital role in creation, it is not synonymous with the Supreme Deity, the Uncreated and Eternal Spirit. Instead, the Demiurge is a divine agent or representative—often equated with the highest angelic being or a collective of angels. This distinction is crucial in understanding the relationship between the Creator and creation.


The Supreme Deity manifests His will through the angels, who serve as embodiments of His attributes and execute His purpose in the material world. These angels, collectively the Demiurge, reflect the Father's presence without being the Father Himself. This harmonizes with the Gospel of John 1:3, which attributes the creation of all things to the *Logos* ("through whom all things were made").


---


### The Demiurge and Yaldabaoth


Unlike Gnostic traditions that portray the Demiurge as the malevolent *Yaldabaoth*, the biblical and Hebraic concept of the Demiurge emphasizes its benevolence and alignment with divine justice. The Demiurge is not an evil spirit or a false god but an agent of the Creator, executing divine justice and facilitating prophecy.


As the Archangel Michael and the Elohim administer the will of the Supreme Deity, they embody the role of the Demiurge in crafting the material world. They are not autonomous or adversarial but operate in harmony with the divine purpose, serving as instruments of God's creative and redemptive plan.


---


### Conclusion


The Demiurge, understood through the lens of biblical theology, represents the Elohim, a collective of angels led by the Archangel Michael, who act under the authority of the Supreme Deity. Far from being a false god or malevolent force, the Demiurge embodies divine craftsmanship, executing the will of the Eternal Spirit through the *Logos*.


This framework maintains the distinction between the uncreated God and His agents, emphasizing their role as intermediaries who shape creation according to the divine plan. Whether seen as a single archangel or a collective body, the Demiurge is a real and benevolent force, fulfilling the Creator's purpose in the cosmos.


















The concept of the demiurge originates from the understanding that the Deity is not the immediate creator of the physical universe.


First it should be noted that Valentinians do not use the term Yaldabaoth. It should also be noted that Basildians and Valentinians speak about the Demiurge with positive terms unlike the Sethians who speak very negatively about Yaldabaoth:

Basilides: "After this, from the universal Seed and conglomeration of seed-mixture there burst forth and came into existence the Great Ruler, the head of the sensible universe, a beauty and magnitude and potency that naught can destroy." This is the demiurge; but let no mortal think that he can comprehend so great a being, "for he is more ineffable than ineffables, more potent than potencies, wiser than the wise, superior to every excellence that one can name. (Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, p. 253 by G.R.S. Mead )


According to Valentinian tradition, the Demiurge is formed as an "an image of the Father"(Excepts of Theodotus 47:1-3). A similar description occurs in the Tripartite Tractate: "He is the lord of all of them, that is, the countenance which the logos brought forth in his thought as a representation of the Father of the Totalities. Therefore, he is adorned with every name which is a representation of him, since he is characterized by every property and glorious quality. For he too is called 'father' and 'god' and 'demiurge' and 'king' and 'judge' and 'place' and 'dwelling' and 'law'" (Tripartite Tractate 100:21-30). Because he is seem as the image of the true God and Father, Valentinians have no problem using the terms "Father" and "God" to describe him (cf. also Against Heresies 1:5:1, Valentinian Exposition 38).




Is the word demiurge used in the Bible?


Yes in Hebrews 11:10




In Hebrews chapter 11:10 we get the only Biblical reference to the word Demiurge

Heb 11:10  For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker <1217> is God.

This is used as a prophecy about the Heavenly Jerusalem

The Greek word is used in the apocrypha 

Wisdom 13:1 For all men who were ignorant of God were foolish by nature;

and they were unable from the good things that are seen to know him who exists,
nor did they recognize the craftsman while paying heed to his works;

1Clem 20:11

All these things the great Creator and Master of the universe ordered to be in peace and concord, doing good unto all things, but far beyond the rest unto us who have taken refuge in His compassionate mercies through our Lord Jesus Christ

Notice that clement says the creation was "ordered" 

2Mac.4:1 This Simon now, of whom we spake afore, having been a betrayer of the money, and of his country, slandered Onias, as if he ha terrified Heliodorus, and been the worker of these evils.

The language here applied to God as the "architect" or framer of the universe is often used in the classic writers.

Heb 11:10  For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker <1217> is God.

Fragment 13, on John 2:13-16 The ascent to Jerusalem signifies the ascent of the Lord from material realm things to the animate (psychic) place, which is an image of Jerusalem. (In John 2:14, “In the sanctuary he found those who were selling oxen and sheep and pigeons, and the money-changers at their business.”) The words, "In the sanctuary, he found” and not "in the temple" are used so that it may not be thought to be the mere “calling” (animate), apart from the Spirit, which elicits help from the Lord. The sanctuary is the Holy of Holies, into which only the High-Priest enters, into which the spiritual go. The temple courtyard, where the Levites also enter, is a symbol of the animate ones who attain a salvation outside the Fullness (Pleroma).

The Demiurge is the maker of the psychic and material realms

Etymology of Demiurge

The word "demiurge" is an English word derived from demiurgus, a Latinised form of the Greek δημιουργός or dēmiourgos. It was originally a common noun meaning "craftsman" or "artisan", but gradually came to mean "producer", and eventually "creator". 

strong's concordance 1217 δημιουργός demiourgos day-me-oor-gos’ 

from 1218 and 2041; n m; TDNT-2:62,149;  {See TDNT 182 } 

AV-maker 1; 1 

1) a workman for the public 

2) the author of any work, an artisan, framer, builder 

dēmiourgós (from 1218 /dḗmos, "a unified group of people" and 2014 /epiphaínō, "work") – properly, someone working on behalf of a group of people (used only in Heb 11:10).

God is called ὁ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ δημιουργός in Plato, rep. 7, p. 530 a.; ὁ δημιουργός τῶν ὅλων in Josephus, Antiquities 1, 7, 1, and often in ecclesiastical writers from Clement of Rome, 1 Cor. 20, 11 [ET]; 26, 1 [ET]; 33, 2 [ET] on; (cf. Philo, de mut. nom. § 4; de opif. mund., Muller, edition, p. 133; Piper, Einl. in monument. Theol. § 26; Sophocles' Lexicon, under the word). In the Scriptures, besides, only in 2 Macc. 4:1 κακῶν δημιουργός). (Cf. Trench, § cv.)

The Gospel of John Chapter 1

The Gospel of John 1:1  ¶  Originally (746 ἀρχή), was, the Word, and, the Word, was, with God; and, the Word, was, God.
2  The same, was originally (746 ἀρχή), with God.
3  All things, through him, came into existence, and, without him, came into existence, not even one thing: that which hath come into existence, (Rotherham's Emphasized Bible)

Ptolemy's Commentary on The Gospel of John Prologue:

Now since he is speaking of the first origination, he does well to begin the teaching at the beginning, i.e with the Son and the Word. He speaks as follows: "The Word was in the beginning, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. It was in the beginning, with God." [Jn 1:1] First, he distinguishes three things: God; beginning; Word. Then he unites them: (Logos [Word], Theos [God], and Arche [beginning] are one) this is to show forth both the emanation of the latter two, i.e. the Son and the Word, and their union with one another, and simultaneously with the Father. For the beginning was in the Father and from the Father; and the Word was in the beginning and from the beginning. Well did he say, "The Word was in the beginning", for it was in the Son. "And the Word was with God." So was the beginning. "And the word was God"; reasonably so, for what is engendered from God is God. This shows the order of emanation. "The entirety was made through it, and without it was not anything made." [Jn 1:3] For the Word became the cause of the forming and origination of all the aeons that came after it.  (Ptolemy's Commentary on The Gospel of John Prologue)

The Greek term translated "word" is Logos. It signifies the outward form of inward thought or reason, or the spoken word as illustrative of thought, wisdom and doctrine.

John is teaching that in the beginning, God's purpose, wisdom or revelation had been in evidence. It was "with God" in that it emanated from him; it "was God" in that it represented Him to mankind and it became the motive power of all that God did, for all was made with it in mind, and it presented the hope of life to mankind (see John 1: 3-4).

The logos is the cause of the forming and origination of Pleroma not the physical universe this can be seen from Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John 1:3

The Demiurge in Ptolemy's Commentary is the beginning or Arche

Beginning

What does he mean by beginning? You see some can argue that he means beginning as in God forever and eternal past. But if that’s the case, there really is no beginning with God others might argue well beginning in the sense that when God conceived of creating the perfect sons and daughters of God the human beings. Whatever other beings he might have created in the universe that was the beginning and the son was there from the beginning.

The message here is that God has everything in mind from the beginning. Whatever he produces from the beginning and as the Brethren of that beginning Christ is the eternal forever in the past or at the beginning at the time of which he conceived the concept of the son as being part of the story of humankind. This does not really matter because for us humans from our perspective it is the beginning of everything anyway and that’s really all we need to know and we’ll probably likely ever know anyway.

The Greek word ἀρχή arche translated beginning has a connection to the word ruler or Archon

746 ἀρχή arche ar-khay’ 

from 756; n f; TDNT-1:479,81;  {See TDNT 102 } 

AV-beginning 40, principality 8, corner 2, first 2, misc 6; 58 

746. ἀρχή arche ar-khay’; from 756; (properly abstract) a commencement, or (concretely) chief (in various applications of order, time, place, or rank): —  beginning, corner, (at the, the) first (estate), magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule. 

BEGINNING: "Archee"; signifying "first in order", from the root "arch, archon" = a ruler. 

strong's concordance 756 ἄρχομαι archomai ar’-khom-ahee middle voice of 757

strong's concordance 757. ἄρχω archo ar’-kho; a primary verb; to be first (in political rank or power): —  reign (rule) over. 

NASB Translation

began (62), begin (7), beginning (8), begins (2), begun (1), proceed (1), rule (1), rulers (1), starting (2). 

This brings us to the next Greek word 758 ἄρχων archon

strong's concordance 758 ἄρχων archon ar’-khone 

present participle of 757; n m; TDNT-1:488,81;  {See TDNT 102 } 

AV-ruler 22, prince 11, chief 2, magistrate 1, chief ruler 1; 37 

1) a ruler, commander, chief, leader 

Archon (historical, Ancient Greece) The title of a magistrate in a number of states of Ancient Greece, and in the city states (poleis) of the Achaean League.

Archon (Greek: ἄρχων, árchon, plural: ἄρχοντες, árchontes) is a Greek word that means "ruler", frequently used as the title of a specific public office. It is the masculine present participle of the verb stem αρχ-, meaning "to rule", derived from the same root as monarch and hierarchy. 

The Greek word Archon is connected to the Greek word Archee (Beginning) 

In the Gospel of John the Demiurge is the first archon from the Greek word Archee translated beginning Archee 746 ἀρχή it is also translated principality or principalities in Eph 1:21 Eph 3:10 Eph 6:12 Col 1:16

Christ the head of all Principalities {#Eph 1:21 Col 1:16 2:10 } 

Demiurge can be translated Architect from Arche (Gr. "beginning") 

Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John: 

John 1:3, “All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made.”) The sentence: "All things were made through him" means the world and what is in it. It excludes what is better than the world. The Aeon (i.e. the Fullness), and the things in it, were not made by the Word; they came into existence before the Word. . . “Without him, nothing was made” of what is in the world and the creation. . . "All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word “from whom” or “by whom,” but the one “through whom (all things were made).”. . . It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, for "through whom" means that another made them and the Word provided the energy (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John)

The Demiurge is working on behalf of someone else that is the word or logos 

The Demiurge is a personification of the Elohim

Though Elohim is in the plural, and signifies "mighty ones," it is most frequently used with a verb in the singular number, as in Gen. 1:1. This suggests that the Elohim, though constituting a great number of immortal beings, are being motivated by a single power, "the spirit of God" (Gen. 1:2). The Elohim, therefore, comprise a great company united as one, and obeying in unison the motivating power of the great Increate. The Psalmist declared: "Yahweh hath prepared His throne in the heavens; and His kingdom ruleth over all. Bless Yahweh, ye His angels, that excel in strength, that do His commandments, hearkening unto the voice of His word. Bless ye Yahweh, all ye His hosts; ye ministers of His, that do His pleasure. Bless Yahweh, all His works in all places of His dominion" (Psalm 103:19-22).

Yahweh is spirit (John 4:24), and His angels are spirit beings (Psalm 104:4; Heb. 1:7). They are "His family in heaven" (Eph. 3:15), being emanations of Him, and doing His will through His all-pervading spirit (Gen. 1:2). Thus they act as a unit, though being innumerable in number.

The Archangel Michael is the highest of all the angels as stated before, the angels are emanations of the uncreated and eternal spirit or Deity, Michael relays the commandments and orders of the Deity to all the angels below him, being the highest of all. So in a way, he could be seen as Hebraic religious idea of a "Demiurge" who fashioned the world for God.

See the post Yahweh is the head angel in the Old Testament

The Archangel Michael could be seen as the "Demiurge" who fashioned the world for the Deity.-spiritual nature. In comparison with the true God he is rather "coarse" or "rough" (Excerpts of Theodotus 33:4).

The term "demiurge" does not refer to the One True Deity, though the demiurge may very well be seen as a god, angel or elohim. The Demiurge is simply the craftsman of the universe, but is not the Supreme Intelligence of the universe the Uncreated and Eternal Spirit. In other word, whether the Demiurge is a god or not, it is not God or "THE One True Deity."

The Deity manifests himself through his angels, these angels are ever present, embodiment of the qualities of the Father, and thus manifesting the Father's will and presence in this world, without being the Father Deity themselves. These angels are always serving the Father and creating by his will and collectively are the Demiurge of the world through whom the Father administers his will.


The Demiurge is never referred to has Yaldabaoth 

The Demiurge is a real god, not a "false god".

The Demiurge is an elohim or angel

The Demiurge is not Satan, he is not a demon, and he is not an evil spirit or the personification of evil .The Creator or archangel Michael implements the Father's will and administers justice.

After all, he rendered the prophecies and reality of the Saviour.

Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

By the late second century, Valentinian Gnosticism had developed a highly intricate cosmology. Though it exhibited some variations within its interpretations, a basic framework can still provide clarity for understanding its views on creation and the divine order.

From the Valentinian perspective, the creation narrative is seen as an unfolding of the divine emanations, beginning with a prologue that precedes the Judeo-Christian understanding of Genesis. This pre-creation phase involves the emanation of divine powers, or aeons, from the ultimate source, Bythos (the Depth), which represents the hidden and ineffable Father. The Valentinian cosmology views the material world as the culmination of a process of divine emanation, wherein the Pleroma, or spiritual fullness, gradually unfolds into the creation described in Genesis, revealing the deeper, mystical truths of divine order.

The Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as presented by Irenaeus in *Against All Heresies*, offers a deeply symbolic view of the creation narrative, aligning it with their understanding of the emanation of the Aeons from the ultimate source, the Father. This interpretation reflects the idea that all things in creation are a reflection of the divine, ordered in a pattern that mirrors the structure of the divine realm of Aeons. In this schema, the creation story becomes a representation of a hidden, invisible spiritual process that unfolds into the visible world, a world that mirrors the hidden, divine reality.

At the beginning of Genesis, when Moses declares, "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1:1), the Valentinians see this as a reference to the first Tetrad of divine principles. This Tetrad consists of **Bythos** (God), **Charis** (beginning), **Nous** (heaven), and **Aletheia** (earth). These four elements form the foundational principles of the cosmos, the first emanations of the divine source. **Bythos**, the unknowable depth, is the source from which all emanation begins. **Charis**, representing grace or the beginning, initiates the unfolding of divine power. **Nous**, or divine mind, is the principle of intellectuality, while **Aletheia**, or truth, represents the principle of reality or manifestation. Together, these four represent the unspoken, invisible foundation of all creation, much like the earth in Genesis is initially formless and void, unseen and unmanifest.

The second Tetrad, as described in the Valentinian system, is made up of four further Aeons: **Logos** (abyss), **Zoe** (darkness), **Anthropos** (water), and **Ecclesia** (Spirit). These are the next emanations from the first Tetrad. The second Tetrad represents an even deeper layer of spiritual principle, and like the first, it is described as invisible and hidden. The abyss (**Logos**) is the deep, the origin of the divine speech, while **Zoe**, representing life, emerges as the spiritual substance that gives all things existence. **Anthropos**, or the divine human, corresponds to the primal water, representing the potential for life, while **Ecclesia** (Spirit) corresponds to the divine principle that moves through the creation, unseen but vital for existence. These four principles are not yet visible in the physical realm but are rather the invisible causes of all that is to come.

Next, we encounter the Decad, represented by ten emanations that begin to take visible shape and form in the creation narrative. These Aeons correspond to the ten elements of the creation story as described in Genesis 1:3-13—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees. Each of these represents a further step in the unfolding of creation, moving from the invisible to the more manifest. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these ten are: **Bythios** (light), **Mixis** (day), **Ageratos** (night), **Henosis** (firmament), **Autophyes** (evening), **Hedone** (morning), **Acinetos** (dry land), **Syncrasis** (sea), **Monogenes** (plants), and **Macaria** (trees). These Aeons reflect the natural elements and phenomena of the created world, signifying the move from the hidden, spiritual realms to a more visible and tangible creation. The Decad represents the increasing visibility of the divine process as it emanates through the layers of reality, bridging the gap between the invisible and the visible.

The Duodecad, consisting of twelve Aeons, represents the most visible and manifest stage of creation, corresponding to the twelve elements in the Genesis account that follow the creation of trees. These are the sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and man. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these elements are: **Paracletus** (sun), **Pistis** (moon), **Patrikas** (stars), **Elpis** (seasons), **Metricos** (years), **Agape** (whales), **Ainos** (fishes), **Synesis** (reptiles), **Ecclesiasticus** (birds), **Macariotes** (quadrupeds), **Theletus** (wild beasts), and **Sophia** (man). This stage of creation is the most complete manifestation of the divine, and man, as the highest creation, embodies the fullness of the divine image.

Finally, the Valentinian view teaches that the Ogdoad, the eight invisible Aeons, is hidden within the body of man. The Ogdoad is the unspeakable and invisible power, located within the inner recesses of the human being, symbolizing the hidden spiritual forces that shape and sustain creation. These Aeons are reflected in the human body’s faculties, as man is created in the image of the ultimate source, containing within him the same spiritual structure as the divine.

In conclusion, the Valentinian understanding of Genesis 1 reveals a profound and symbolic reading of the creation narrative. Through the Tetrad, Decad, Duodecad, and Ogdoad, the Valentinian system shows the unfolding of the divine emanations, which begin as invisible, formless principles and gradually take visible, manifest shape in the creation of the world, culminating in the creation of man as the image of the divine.

In reconstructing the Valentinian teaching on Genesis 1 based on Irenaeus' *Against Heresies*, we can observe the Valentinian perspective on the creation narrative as an unfolding of divine emanations through a system of Aeons. The Valentinian system divides the Aeons into various groups, each group symbolized through different aspects of the natural world, as articulated by Moses in Genesis. The description unfolds in a symbolic manner, illustrating the structure and hierarchy of these emanations, as well as the divine image in human creation.

### The First Tetrad

The first Tetrad, representing the foundation of all existence, is composed of four central principles that are the ultimate source from which all other Aeons emanate. These principles are represented by the following:

1. **God (Bythos)** – This principle stands as the ultimate, ineffable source. Bythos signifies the depth or abyss of the divine being, the root from which all emanations emerge.

2. **Beginning (Charis)** – Charis, or grace, represents the commencement of creation and the first movement of divine will that flows out from Bythos. It is the generative force that enables the unfolding of reality.

3. **Heaven (Nous)** – Nous, or the divine mind, is the first intellectual emanation from the divine source. It governs and arranges the cosmos, serving as the rational principle behind all that exists.

4. **Earth (Aletheia)** – Aletheia, or truth, is the foundation of material existence, symbolizing the grounded reality that is hidden and formless, much like the earth before it was shaped.

This Tetrad represents the hidden, invisible source of creation, much like the earth before it was formed, as Irenaeus mentions. These four principles are indivisible and transcend visible creation, embodying the most profound and abstract aspects of the divine.

### The Second Tetrad

The second Tetrad emanates from the first, representing a further development of divine forces in the creation process. These four are:

1. **Abyss (Logos)** – Logos, representing divine reason and speech, is the medium through which the divine will is expressed and communicated into the material world.

2. **Darkness (Zoe)** – Zoe, or life, is the principle of vitality and existence. It is the foundation of the inner life of the cosmos, bringing forth life from the darkness of the unmanifest.

3. **Water (Anthropos)** – Anthropos, representing humanity, signifies the potential for consciousness and reflection. As water is the source of life in the physical world, so too does Anthropos represent the potential for rational, conscious existence.

4. **Spirit (Ecclesia)** – Ecclesia, or the assembly, embodies the unifying force of the divine, bringing together the disparate elements of creation into a coherent whole, much like the Spirit that moves upon the waters in Genesis.

This second Tetrad is still largely hidden, as the divine powers remain veiled in abstraction, but they begin to take more defined form within the structure of creation.

### The Decad

The Decad consists of ten Aeons that represent a more visible manifestation of divine order. These ten are reflected in various natural elements as Moses describes them:

1. **Light (Bythios)** – Bythios, the Aeon of light, signifies illumination and revelation, bringing clarity and structure to creation.

2. **Day (Mixis)** – Mixis represents the concept of harmony and balance, signifying the separation of light and dark and the establishment of cycles.

3. **Night (Ageratos)** – Ageratos, the eternal night, represents the mystery and the unmanifested potential of creation, balancing the visible day.

4. **Firmament (Henosis)** – Henosis, unity, represents the separation of the heavens from the earth, a divine order bringing together disparate elements.

5. **Evening (Autophyes)** – Autophyes, the self-born, embodies the cyclical nature of existence, where one cycle ends, making way for the next.

6. **Morning (Hedone)** – Hedone, pleasure, signifies the beginning of a new cycle and the renewal of life.

7. **Dry Land (Acinetos)** – Acinetos represents stability and foundation, signifying the creation of solid matter from the chaos.

8. **Sea (Syncrasis)** – Syncrasis represents the fluid, mutable aspects of creation, the realm of change and potentiality.

9. **Plants (Monogenes)** – Monogenes, the only begotten, signifies life that grows from the earth, the beginning of creation’s fertility and productivity.

10. **Trees (Macaria)** – Macaria represents the completion of the physical world, the final manifestation of nature’s abundance.

The Decad signifies the visible, structured world, with these Aeons representing elements of creation that are seen and experienced by beings within the material universe.

### The Duodecad and Ogdoad

Finally, the Duodecad represents the twelve most manifest Aeons, including the sun, moon, stars, and animals, culminating in the creation of man. These Aeons embody the fullest expression of the divine in the world. Man, created in the image of the divine, reflects the ultimate source and contains within himself the same abilities and faculties as the Aeons. The Ogdoad, invisible and unspeakable, is hidden within the human body, representing the ineffable and ungraspable elements of divine reality.

In this Valentinian schema, the world is not merely a creation ex nihilo but an unfolding process of emanation, where the divine nature is progressively revealed through Aeons. Each level of creation mirrors and reflects the structure of the divine, with humanity as the image of the ultimate source, containing within himself the potential for the divine within the created order.

1 In the Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as outlined by Irenaeus in *Against Heresies*, the creation narrative is understood as a symbolic representation of the divine emanations, or *aeons*, that form the structure of the spiritual fullness, or *Pleroma*. Valentinian Gnosticism uses the account of creation to outline the cosmic principles through the use of symbolic numbers and hidden divine entities. This framework can be understood through the four primary groups that reflect various emanations from the ultimate source: the Tetrad, the second Tetrad, the Decad, the Duodecad, and the Ogdoad.

The *first Tetrad* represents the primal source of all existence, which is invisible and formless, much like the earth before creation was made visible. The grouping of four—God (*Bythos*), beginning (*Charis*), heaven (*Nous*), and earth (*Aletheia*)—symbolizes the fundamental powers at the origin of all creation. These powers are thought to represent the essential building blocks of the universe and the divine order. They are the first emanations from the ultimate source, the *Pleroma*, and signify both the generative force and the inherent hidden nature of the cosmos before it takes visible form. The earth, described in Genesis 1:2 as formless and void, aligns with this understanding, symbolizing the mystery and hiddenness of the initial creation, much like the divine powers before they manifest.

Next, the *second Tetrad* emerges as a further emanation, representing four more divine principles: abyss (*Logos*), darkness (*Zoe*), water (*Anthropos*), and spirit (*Ecclesia*). These principles are also hidden and invisible, signifying the beginning of the process of creation but still in a potential or unmanifest state. The second Tetrad brings forth the conditions necessary for formation, with water representing the latent potential within creation and the Spirit moving over it, ready to bring order out of chaos.

As the narrative progresses, Moses introduces the *Decad*, a group of ten divine powers that emanate from the second Tetrad. These principles—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees—mark the first tangible manifestations of creation. These ten elements represent the unfolding of divine thought, gradually moving from the abstract (such as light and day) to more structured forms (such as land and plants). In the Valentinian worldview, these manifestations are the first clear reflections of divine qualities in the material world. The Decad symbolizes the dynamic and ordered progression of creation, with each act in Genesis reflecting a more defined, structured layer of the Pleroma's emanation.

The *Duodecad*, or the twelve emanations, represents the final phase of creation. The twelve principles—sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and humanity—mirror the completion of divine manifestation in the physical universe. These principles are not only more visible and tangible but also embody the diversity of the material world. Humanity, as the final creation, represents the culmination of the divine image and bears the reflection of the Pleroma in the material world. The twelve components also align with the twelvefold nature of creation, symbolizing completeness and the full expression of divine attributes within creation.

Humanity itself is considered to be an image of the divine order of the *Triacontad*, the thirty *aeons* of the Pleroma. Through the human body, the various divine emanations are mirrored. The four faculties of sight, hearing, smell, and taste reflect the Tetrad. The ten fingers mirror the Decad, and the twelve primary body parts correspond to the Duodecad. Additionally, the *Ogdoad*, a mysterious and invisible grouping of eight divine principles, is understood to be hidden within the human body, especially within the internal organs, symbolizing a profound, secret aspect of divine reality.

In this Valentinian framework, the Genesis creation account is more than a literal narrative; it serves as an esoteric key to understanding the divine order and the emanation of the *aeons*. The creation story, through its symbolic use of numbers and principles, reveals the unfolding of the divine order from the highest, most hidden source to the most manifest and material aspects of existence. Through this lens, humanity itself becomes a microcosm of the divine structure, reflecting the Pleroma’s organization and the hidden mysteries of creation.

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons  

The ascent of consciousness toward the higher realms of the Pleroma is a transformative process that requires study, contemplation, and prayer. It is not the immortality of consciousness but its refinement and elevation through deliberate engagement with divine wisdom. This journey involves transcending the limitations of the carnal mind, the outward senses, and embracing the attributes of the aeons, the manifestations of divine realities.  

Central to this process is the concept of **telepathic communication** and **spiritual motion**, which connect consciousness to the divine mind. Telepathic communication is accomplished by the Logos, understood not merely as a spoken word or saying but as the active reason, thought, and intention of Theos/EL. The Logos serves as the medium through which divine wisdom, purpose, and will flow to humanity.  

**Telepathic Communication**  

Telepathic communication represents the instantaneous transmission of divine will and intention to the consciousness. Through this medium, the Logos—emanating from the corporeal substance of Theos—bridges the gap between the infinite and the finite. As the mind of Theos, the Logos conveys not only the spoken decrees of God but also the deeper, unspoken intentions that guide creation and spiritual growth.  

**Spiritual Motion**  

Spiritual motion further elucidates how God, as a corporeal being transcending linear time, interacts with creation. It is the dynamic activity of God's will and energy, operating beyond the constraints of physical laws. Unlike physical motion, which moves matter through space, spiritual motion represents the emanation of God's essence, shaping and sustaining creation.  

This dual framework of telepathic communication and spiritual motion allows for a deeper understanding of the transformative journey of consciousness as it aligns with the divine will and the aeons.  

---

### **The Steps of Consciousness Ascension**  

**Step 1: Sophia (Wisdom) and Theletus (Perfection)**  

The journey begins with a desire for Gnosis—a yearning for divine knowledge and self-improvement. It is marked by the recognition that material possessions and worldly pursuits are vanity and must be relinquished. This initial step demands introspection and a shift in priorities, fostering a commitment to spiritual growth.  

**Step 2: Ecclesiasticus (Son of the Church) and Macariotes (Blessedness)**  

Through communion with divine truth, the consciousness aligns itself with righteousness. This stage involves doing what is true and just, embracing the blessings that come from giving and receiving with sincerity. It is a step toward spiritual reciprocity and harmony with the divine will.  

**Step 3: Ainos (Praise) and Synesis (Discernment)**  

Here, consciousness awakens to the goodness of God, cultivating gratitude and reverence through praise. Discernment grows through the study of the Word and reflection on divine guidance. By seeking understanding, the individual aligns their thoughts and actions with divine truth, striving for righteousness and prayerful devotion.  

**Step 4: Metricos (Mother) and Agape (Love)**  

The consciousness begins to manifest love in its purest form—selfless, creative, and life-renewing. This stage signifies the power to nurture and to bring forth renewal, embodying the essence of resurrection. Love transforms the individual, fueling further ascent.  

**Step 5: Patricos (Father) and Elpis (Hope)**  

In this stage, consciousness takes on responsibility for protecting and cultivating a legacy that transcends the self. Hope inspires commitment to a future grounded in faith, enabling transcendence of personal limitations and alignment with divine purpose.  

**Step 6: Paracletus (Helper) and Pistis (Faith)**  

Faith becomes the foundation for building trust and reciprocity, both with others and with God. This stage emphasizes the necessity of mutual support and the role of faith as a catalyst for spiritual growth. It is a turning point where consciousness becomes anchored in divine assurance.  

---

### **Entering the Realm of the Divine**  

**Step 7: Monogenes (Originality) and Macaria (Happiness)**  

Consciousness begins to explore its true nature, discovering the unique creative potential endowed by God. This stage brings a sense of inner happiness, as the individual builds an inner compass guided by divine inspiration and authenticity.  

**Step 8: Acinetos (Immovable) and Syncrasis (Intercourse)**  

Through spiritual stability and communion with others, consciousness finds new possibilities and insights. By merging with the attributes of others, deeper understandings of self and divine purpose emerge, leading to transformative realizations.  

**Step 9: Autophyes (Self-Made) and Hedone (Pleasure)**  

Consciousness reaches a state of satisfaction through the fruits of its labor, recognizing that what it brings forth benefits not only itself but also others. This step reflects the balance between self-fulfillment and service to the collective.  

**Step 10: Ageratos (Eternal) and Henosis (Union)**  

True intimacy and unity are realized, unveiling the secret of eternal life through togetherness. Consciousness understands that immortality lies in the harmonious union with others and with the divine.  

**Step 11: Bythos (Depth) and Mixis (Interplay)**  

Infinite growth becomes possible through the deep exploration of self and the dynamic interactions with others of equal depth. This stage represents the ongoing interplay that stirs consciousness toward boundless understanding and divine connection.  

**Step 12: Anthropos (Mankind) and Ecclesia (Congregation)**  

The journey culminates in achieving cohesion between personal and collective being. Consciousness integrates body, mind, and spirit into a harmonious whole, finding balance within the community of believers. This final stage reflects the fulfillment of divine intention, as individual and collective consciousness merge in unity.  

---

Through these steps, the consciousness ascends to the heavenly places in Christ, aligning with the aeons and the fullness of God’s attributes. Telepathic communication and spiritual motion are vital elements of this journey, enabling a deeper connection to divine wisdom and purpose. It is a path not of immortality but of transformation, driven by prayer, study, and contemplation.

The Christ left Jesus On The Cross The Gospel of Philip

The Christ left Jesus 

On The Cross

“My God, my God, why, lord, have you forsaken me?” He spoke these words on the cross, for he had departed from that place. The Gospel of Philip

My God, my God, why, lord, have you forsaken me?” He spoke these words on the cross, for he had departed from that place. The Gospel of Philip

“My God, my God, why, lord, have you forsaken me?” (Jesus felt the removal of the Holy Spirit ) He spoke these words on the cross, for he (The Father the Logos) had departed from that place (Jesus on the cross).

Christ, the Word, who “in the beginning laid the foundations of the earth,” Hebrews 1:10 therefore pre-existed before the birth of “the body prepared” of the substance of Mary, and which lay dead in the tomb. That body named Jesus, had no existence until developed by the Christ-Power. Federally, indeed, it pre-existed in the loins of Abraham and in Adam, as Levi was in Abraham, and we in Adam, before birth; but not otherwise. (On the Nature of Christ February 22nd, 1867)

Here there is a difference between Jesus and the logos that anointing spirit which is the Father

The pre-existent Christ, or Deity, was not the less Deity because he veiled himself in flesh, in our “sinful flesh,” or “sin’s flesh,” and styled himself JESUS, or he who shall be Saviour. Jesus Christ in the day of his weakness, had two natures —the one, DEITY; the other, MAN—the Eternal Christ-Power veiled in, and manifested through the flesh created from the ground; which flesh had wilfully transgressed the Divine Law, the penalty of which sent it back into the dust from whence it came. This is Jesus Christ the true Deity, whom to know is life eternal. (On the Nature of Christ February 22nd, 1867)

The spirit descended upon him in bodily shape at his baptism in the Jordan, and took possession of him. This was the anointing which constituted him Christ (or the anointed), and which gave him the superhuman powers of which he showed himself possessed. (Christendom Asray Robert Roberts)

Jesus, who in his discourses, always maintained the distinction between what he called “mine own self” and “the Father Himself” who dwelt in him by His spirit. “The Son,” said he, “can do nothing of himself,” and this he repeated in the same discourse, saying, “I can of mine own self do nothing.” He refers all the doctrine taught, and all the miracles performed, to the Father whose emanating spirit rested upon him and filled him. If this be remembered, it will make the “hard sayings” of his teaching easy to be understood.

Now, Jesus was one and the Father was another . . . it is written in the law of Moses, that the testimony of two men is credible—I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father who sent me (the other witness). He beareth witness of me.—(Jno. 5:30; 7:16; 8:17, 18.) Here, then, are two persons. The Father Himself being Deity or power, but when associated with the Son of Man, who when so associated was powerful—anointed with the Holy Spirit and with power—He was (EL Eloahh) strength of power that is power of the Powerful One, the power by mediation manifested; the power being one and the medium of manifestation another Powerful One (Eloahh). (Phanerosis by Dr. John Thomas) 

My Power (EL), my Power (EL), why hast Thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?' My Power (my EL), 'why hast thou forsaken me? 'O my God, I cry in the daytime, but thou' (answereth) 'not:' (not hearest not, we can see that in verse 21, thou hearest). 'In the daytime thou answereth not' (at that time). And in verse 6 he says, 'I am a worm, and no man' (the man 'ish', no great man) 'a reproach of men' (the Adam) 'and despised of the people' (Isaiah 53 - 'despised and rejected of men') 

The anointing spirit forsook Jesus when he cried out upon the cross, "My Power (EL), my Power (EL), why hast Thou forsaken me?" Jesus felt the removal of the Holy Spirit. The out-flowing power by which he had taught and worked was withdrawn from him for some time before he died. The Spirit no longer rested upon him, yet he continued to live as other men. In process of time he expired. He was now, like the Veil of the Temple, "rent in twain." It was no longer affirmable that "I and the Father are one"; but that "I and the Father are twain"; for the Father was no longer in him, nor he in the Father. In the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, the body was in the condition predicted in Psalm 38: "Yahweh's arrows stuck fast in it, and His hand pressed it sore. There was no soundness in the flesh; its wounds stank; and its loins were filled with a loathsome disease; feeble and sore broken, his lovers and friends stood aloof from His stroke, which had consumed him, and laid him low in a horrible pit." This was the death state of the Cherub. (Phanerosis by Dr. John Thomas) 

But, Jesus also said “ Father, into your hands I commend my spirit! ”. It could also, be seen, that Jesus did participate in returning His Spirit ( Sophia, Wisdom, The Holy Spirit ) back to His Father, into " The Pleroma " from where She (Sophia) originally came from. By this statement, He manifested Himself, that His Spirit was "The Elect", "The Anointing Spirit". The Gnostic Redeemer of Souls that did fell, by non fault of their own, into the pit ( matter ).


Extracts from the Works of Theodotus

And he died at the departure of the Spirit which had descended upon him in the Jordan, not that it became separate but was withdrawn in order that death might also operate on him, since how did the body die when life was present in him? For in that way death would have prevailed over the Saviour himself, which is absurd. But death was out-generalled by guile. For when the body died and death seized it, the Saviour sent forth the ray of power which had come upon him and destroyed death and raised up the mortal body which had put off passion. In this way, therefore, the psychic elements are raised and are saved, but the spiritual natures which believe receive a salvation superior to theirs, having received their souls as “wedding garments.”