The Valentinian and the Sefirot

The Valentinian and the Sefirot








# **The Valentinian and the Sefirot**


The interplay between Valentinian thought and Jewish mysticism, particularly Kabbalah, reveals profound parallels in their descriptions of divine emanation and structure. Both traditions depict God as manifesting through stages, utilizing a system of paired attributes or emanations that define the divine order. The concept of the **Sefirot** in Kabbalah and the **Aeons** in Valentinianism function as metaphysical structures that reveal divine characteristics, emphasizing order, balance, and the gradual unfolding of divinity into the cosmos.


## **The Root of the All and the Emanation of the Four**


The Valentinian Exposition from the Nag Hammadi Library describes the ineffable Father as **"the Root of the All,"** an expression that evokes the image of a tree, similar to the **Sefirot** as the "Tree of Life" in Kabbalistic thought. The Father, before any manifestation, exists alone in silence:


> "He dwells alone in silence, and silence is tranquility since, after all, he was in fact One and nothing existed before him. He also exists as Twoness and as a Pair, and his partner is Silence. And he possessed the All dwelling within him." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


Here, the ineffable God first emanates into Two—representing a primordial polarity—and then into Four. The **Tetrad** in Valentinianism corresponds to this fourfold emanation: **Mind and Truth, Word and Life, Man and Church**. This Tetrad is the foundation of the Pleroma, analogous to the **four letters of the Tetragrammaton (YHWH)** in Jewish mysticism.


Further in the text, the expansion of the Father continues:


> "The Fourth accordingly is he who restricted himself in the Fourth: while dwelling in the Three-hundred-sixtieth, he first brought himself (forth), and in the Second he revealed his will, and in the Fourth he spread himself out." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


This reference to **360** represents the totality of divine emanation, linking it to the idea of a **full cycle or completion**. The number 360 corresponds to the **entirety of divine manifestation**, an idea that resonates with the mystical numerology found in Kabbalah.


## **The Tetrad and the Shemhamphorash**


In Jewish mystical traditions, the **Tetragrammaton (YHWH)** is permutated into **72 divine names**, known as the **Shemhamphorash**. This transformation reflects the idea that the divine name contains hidden dimensions, unfolding into the angelic hierarchy. Valentinianism similarly understands the **Tetrad as generating additional divine manifestations**, with the structure of the Aeons expanding into the **Decad (10 Aeons) and Dodecad (12 Aeons), forming a total of 30 Aeons in the Pleroma**.


> "That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church. [...] And the Tetrad is begotten [... ] the Decad from Word and Life, and the Dodecad from Man, and Church became a Triacontad." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


Here, the **Decad** (10 Aeons) mirrors the **Ten Sefirot**, which in Kabbalah serve as the divine attributes through which God interacts with the world. The **Dodecad (12 Aeons)** extends this manifestation, paralleling how **the 10 Sefirot are connected by 22 paths**, forming the **"32 Paths of Wisdom"**, a key structure in Kabbalah.


## **The Decad and the Sefirot**


The Valentinian **Decad** consists of paired emanations, much like the Sefirot, which function in dynamic relationships. The ten Valentinian Aeons of the Decad are:


1. **Bythios (Profound) and Mixis (Mixture)**
2. **Ageratos (Never old) and Henosis (Union)**
3. **Autophyes (Essential nature) and Hedone (Pleasure)**
4. **Acinetos (Immovable) and Syncrasis (Commixture)**
5. **Monogenes (Only-begotten) and Macaria (Happiness)**


In Kabbalistic thought, the **Sefirot** are similarly understood as divine attributes, each with its own function. The first three Sefirot—**Keter (Crown), Chokhmah (Wisdom), and Binah (Understanding)**—parallel the **Valentinian Mind (Nous), Word (Logos), and Life (Zoe)**. The **lower Sefirot**, such as **Chesed (Mercy) and Gevurah (Judgment)**, reflect **aspects of divine justice and balance**, which in Valentinianism manifest as the interplay between **male and female Aeons**.


## **The Father as the Tree and the Tree of Life**


Valentinian texts often describe the **Father as a tree**, which aligns with the **Tree of Life (Etz Chaim)** in Kabbalistic thought. The **Tripartite Tractate** states:


> "The Father is a single one, like a number, for he is the first one and the one who is only himself. Yet he is not like a solitary individual. Otherwise, how could he be a father? For whenever there is a 'father,' the name 'son' follows. But the single one, who alone is the Father, is like a root, with tree, branches and fruit." (*The Tripartite Tractate, Nag Hammadi Library*)


The **Sefirot** are arranged **in a tree-like pattern**, connected by **22 paths**, corresponding to the **22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet**. In Jewish mysticism, these paths serve as the channels through which divine energy flows. The **Valentinian Aeons** similarly exist in structured pairs, reflecting a dynamic process of emanation and return.


## **The Numerological Significance of the Tree of Life**


In both Valentinianism and Kabbalah, **numerology plays a crucial role** in the divine structure. The **10 Sefirot + 22 paths** create the **"32 Paths of Wisdom,"** a system mirrored in Valentinian teachings where the **Aeons form numerical structures representing divine totality**. Additionally, the **seven lights of the Jewish menorah**, symbolizing divine wisdom, can be understood in relation to the **Aeons and their functions within the Pleroma**.


> "The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp." (*Jewish Mystical Tradition*)


This **symbolism of divine light** is reflected in Valentinian descriptions of the **Aeons as divine attributes**, forming the **Pleroma**—the **fullness of divine presence**.


## **Conclusion**


The Valentinian system of **emanation** bears striking parallels to the **Sefirot** of Kabbalah. Both describe a structured process where the **divine manifests in stages**, forming a tree-like pattern of **paired attributes**. The **Tetrad of Valentinianism corresponds to the Tetragrammaton (YHWH), and the Decad to the Ten Sefirot**. Both traditions employ **numerological structures, divine names, and symbolic trees** to illustrate how **God emanates into the cosmos while maintaining transcendence**.


By examining these connections, we see that **Valentinianism and Kabbalah share a common mystical language**, revealing a deep-seated tradition of **divine emanation and structure**, shaping early Christian and Jewish esoteric thought.





















I will speak my mystery to those who are mine and to those who will be mine. Moreover it is these who have known him who is, the Father, that is, the Root of the All, the Ineffable One who exists as Oneness. He dwells alone in silence, and silence is tranquility since, after all, he was in fact One and nothing existed before him. He also exists as Twoness and as a Pair, and his partner is Silence. And he possessed the All dwelling within him. And as for Intention and Persistence, Love and Permanence, they are indeed unbegotten. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

God came forth: the Son, Mind of the All, that is, it is from the Root of the All that even his Thought stems, since he had this one (the Son) in Mind. For on behalf of the All, he received an alien Thought since there were nothing before him. From that place it is he who moved [...] a gushing spring. Now this is the Root of the All and Oneness without any one before him. Now the second spring exists in silence and speaks with him alone. And the Fourth accordingly is he who restricted himself in the Fourth: while dwelling in the Three-hundred-sixtieth, he first brought himself (forth), and in the Second he revealed his will, and in the Fourth he spread himself out. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

This passage is taken to mean that the root of the All the Father first spreads himself out into Two and than Four. From Four he also extends himself as far as Three Hundred Sixty, representing the ultimate edge of the Pleroma although in a distinct dimension of his transcendent essence he keeps himself restricted to the primal Four.

The Four primal emanations maybe a symbol for the four worlds (Olam) in Kabbalah they could also stand as a symbol for 4 letters of the divine name YHWH or Tetragrammaton (meaning "consisting of four letters"). The Tetragrammaton was permutated into 72 angelic names by simply taking the yo da valve and mutating them

The Valentinians understood the four primal emanations as a refernce to the tetragrammaton which was permutated into 72 angelic names by simply taking the yo da valve and permutating them, that was known as the Shemhamphorash.

The different names of God in the Jewish mysticism current at the time of Jesus the names of God were understood to be emanations or divine attributes of God they were hypostasis or emanations of Godhead manifesting into existence as the world's are coming into existence Jewish mysticism

In Jewish angelology, the angels and archangels are manifested as coming forth and emanating from Godhead and originally all the angels were personifications of these things and they were named with a suffix EL which means of God for example Micha-EL the loving kindness of God Rapha-EL the healing of God and so on. In the Kabbalah the Sephirot became the emanation of the more abstract moral qualities of God in the Valentinian Pleroma of the Aeons Godhead was manifested in pairs male/female pairs

The Valentinian Exposition from the Nag Hammadi Library

That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church. Now the Uncreated One projected Word and Life. Word is for the glory of the Ineffable One while Life is for the glory of Silence, and Man is for his own glory, while Church is for the glory of Truth. This, then, is the Tetrad begotten according to the likeness of the Uncreated (Tetrad). And the Tetrad is begotten [... ] the Decad from Word and Life, and the Dodecad from Man, and Church became a Triacontad. Moreover, it is the one from the Triacontad of the Aeons who bear fruit from the Triacontrad. They enter jointly, but they come forth singly, fleeing from the Aeons and the Uncontainable Ones. And the Uncontainable Ones, once they had looked at him, glorified Mind since he is an Uncontainable One that exists in the Pleroma.
But the Decad from Word and Life brought forth decads so as to make the Pleroma become a hundred, and the Dodecad from Man and Church brought forth and made the Triacontad so as to make the three hundred sixty become the Pleroma of the year. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)



The Decad is the Sefirot
God emanated himself in stages to create the universe. There are ten aeons, which are vessels or containers called the Sephirot (the word Sephirot means emanations). These emanations or attribute that are manifested are powers and virtues, wisdom, knowledge, justice, mercy, and so on these are still referenced in attributions to the seven lights of the Jewish synagogue, which you will find on the altar in a synagogue with seven lights this seven lights will reference 10 Sefirot.

The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp.

There are 22 paths that connect these ten Sephirot and that makes 32 names of God. The root attributes of the powers and virtues of God were understood as a kind of tree like the tree of life. It was the image of God in mankind as the blind men said I see men as trees walking we find a lot of this tree language in this tree of life are ten Sefirot ten vessels

The tree of sefirot also has a numerological significance. Between the 10 sefirot run 22 channels or paths, which connect them, a number which can be associated with the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Together the spiritual forces of the 10 sefirot and the 22 connecting channels are called the "32 Paths of Wisdom".






Samuel Zinner writes:

Morever the name Theudas is curiously reminiscent of Syrian Jewish-Christian tradition and this might explain the many Jewish (actually; Jewish-Christian) Kabbalistic elements in the Valentino an system. Traditional scholarship over-emphasizer traditional scholarship over-elements the Valentnian system.aspects of Valentine's thought we therefore now turn to an examination of the possible Jewish components found in his metaphysics.First in the Valentnian system Logos. and Zoe (word and Life) emit ten emanations whereas the celestial Son of man and Ecclesia (Church) emit twelve emanations.These number correspond precisely to the ten sefirot and the twelve tribes of Israel whi Kabbalists add together in order to arrive at the number of the 22 Letters of the Hebrew alphabet. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

In later Valentnian school of Ptolemy we encounter a doctrine of two Sophia's precisely paralleled in the Kabbalah Upper and lower shekhinah, the upper being wholy righteous, the lower being morally ambiguous. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

The Jewish-Christian Ebionite distinction between the celestial Saviour the earthly Jesus. also seems to be reflected in Valentnian thought. The Valentnian system reflected in Valentnian thought. The Valentinian systems references to concepts such as the Father measure size or extent are all reminiscent of the ancients shi'ur qomah traditions. For Valentinus Sophia is the last of the aeonic emanations precisely as Shekinah is the final sefirah in Kabbalah . (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

According to Ptolemy all the aeons were Words which is exactly paralleled in the Kabbalah a teaching that the ten sefirot correspond to God's ten words of creative command in the Genesis creation account (nine explicit commands one implicit). (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

The Valentinian use of gematria in the Greek name iesous is also indicative of typical Kabbalistic procedures. Although gematria was by no means confined to Jewish circles in light of the other extensive specifically Jewish parallels in Valentinus' thought it is more natural to associate his practice of gematria with Judaism than with Hellenism. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

As the Zohar teaches that Hokhmah made the emanation Elohim (Binah understanding) so the Valentnian Ptolemy teaches that Sophia is exalted above the Demiurge. Naturally qualifications must be made with regard to various details but the overall general paradigms seem sufficient to indicate a strong Jewish or better Jewish-Christian component within Valentinianism and we would suggest that the best candidate for transmission of these ideas to Valentinus would be Theudas. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)


Since it is quite likely that the Nag Hammadi Gospel of Truth was written by Valentinus we should comment on it somewhat .Its Jewish Christian character is especially apparent in its divine Name Christology. We note that the word God occurs in this document only once and this is strongly suggestive of the traditional Jewish avoidance of the name God. There is a heavily Syrian Jewish-Christian complexion this text if this tendency had been mediated to Valentinus via Theudas this then might imply that the latter may have been of Syrian origin. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

According the Gospel of Truth 17 the obvious flaws in creation do not in actuality exist. For the mutable creation itself in contrast to the immutable Father can be said to be non_existent therefore the flaws in creation are no dishonor to God. In Folio 18 We find a point curiously Philo Oblivion did not emerg into existence from the Father even if it did come to because of him (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)


The image of the hypostatic Book in folios 19_23 is deeply Jewish-Christian in tone. 6In folio 23 we encounter a list of emanational attributes associat!ed with the supernal pleroma man of which curiously coincide to varying degrees with the Kabbalistic sefirot such as Wisdom Knowledge Forbearance. Crown Glory Love.Folio 24 reflects the Syrian Jewish-Christian idea that the feminine bosom of the Father is the Holy spirit Jewish-Christian as well is the Triad of Father Mother (=Holy Spirit) and Son ... into the Father into the Mother Jesus of the unending sweetness Folio 27 s lan_guage may indicate Knowledge of the traditions concerning pre-existence found in the Gospel of Thomas logion19 and this yet another Syrian feature of the Gospel of Truth...those come into existence... before they come into existence Fo-lios 38-39 present the Jewish-Christian doctrine of the Son as the Name of the Father.This passage implies that the Father essence is unnameable for his essence cannot be named there fore the Son is his name. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

Christian Kabbalah Pictographic Roots of the Name and Titles of God

Christian Kabbalah Pictographic Roots of the Name and Titles of God 

**Unlocking the Depth of Hebrew Names: A Pictographic Journey to Knowing God**

Understanding the names and titles of God in Hebrew is not merely an intellectual pursuit but a transformative journey that elevates the life and affections of those who seek to know Him. Each name and title is laden with significance, offering glimpses into the multifaceted nature of the Divine.

**Pictographic Insights:**

In Hebrew, the Name Yahweh is often combined with titles to form composite names of God. These combinations hold profound meanings, reflecting aspects of God's character and intentions. Delving into the original pictographic meanings of these names provides deeper insights into their significance.

For example, the name El Elyon, rendered "the most high God," combines two pictographic elements: El and Elyon. El, signifying Might or Power, is depicted as an ox head, symbolizing strength and leadership. Elyon, derived from halah meaning "to ascend," represents that which is elevated, lofty, or supreme. Together, El Elyon conveys the image of a powerful and exalted God, whose dominion extends over heaven and earth.

**Scriptural Context:**

The significance of a name or title is often illuminated by considering the circumstances of its original proclamation. The first use of El Elyon, for instance, occurs when Abram encounters Melchizedek after his victory over the kings. Melchizedek, bringing forth "bread and wine" as a type of Christ, foreshadows the future victory of the faithful and their blessing by the antitypical Melchizedek.

At this moment, Yahweh is revealed as the Lofty Power of the heavens, whose dominion extends to the earth. Abram, acknowledging God's role in his victory, worships Him as El Elyon, the most high God whose authority and dominion have been revealed through triumph.

**Prophetic Significance:**

The Name Yahweh is prophetic, proclaiming God's intention to manifest Himself without specifying the manner of manifestation. The addition of titles indicates the form of manifestation. For instance, Yahweh Tz'vaoth (the Lord of hosts) prophesies God's manifestation in an army, symbolizing the time when the Lord Jesus will lead the saints against the forces of darkness.

**Transformative Understanding:**

The study of Hebrew names and titles invites believers to ascend to a higher plane of understanding and affection. Just as El Elyon epitomizes God's authority, power, and dominion, believers are encouraged to set their affection on things above, transcending mere fleshly desires.

**Conclusion:**

In conclusion, the exploration of Hebrew names and titles offers a profound glimpse into the nature of God. Through pictographic analysis and scriptural context, we uncover layers of meaning that elevate our understanding and affection for the Divine. El Elyon, as an example, symbolizes the exalted power and authority of God, inspiring believers to aspire to higher spiritual planes. As we delve deeper into the significance of Hebrew names, we embark on a transformative journey of knowing and loving God.

אל EL

  The Hebrew term "אל" (Aleph-Lamed), known as "El," holds immense theological and linguistic significance in various contexts within the Hebrew Bible. This word, rooted in the original pictographic script, transcends mere phonetics, carrying layers of meaning that convey the foundational forces of power and strength.

**Pictographic Origins:**

In its earliest form, Hebrew script was pictographic, with each letter originating from a visual symbol representing a specific idea. The first letter, Aleph (א), was originally depicted as an ox head, symbolizing strength, leadership, and the primary source of power in ancient agrarian societies. The second letter, Lamed (ל), represented a shepherd's staff, signifying guidance, protection, and authority.

**Visual Representation:**

Combining these pictographs, "El" visually communicated the concept of a strong leader or a powerful shepherd—a figure of immense strength and authority, guiding and protecting his flock with unwavering might. This visual symbolism laid the foundation for the semantic richness and theological depth attributed to the word "El" in Hebrew scriptures and religious discourse.

**Theological Significance:**

In various passages throughout the Hebrew Bible, "El" is associated with power, might, and strength. Gesenius, a renowned Hebrew scholar, emphasizes that "El" consistently conveys the idea of strength and power to the Hebrews. Every member of the heavenly host is considered an Eloah, a mighty one, but only one is recognized as the original and self-existent "EL"—the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe.

**Yahweh as EL:**

Yahweh, the divine figure in the Hebrew Bible, identifies himself as EL in Isaiah 45:22, emphasizing his uniqueness and unparalleled power. The Hebrews are called to be witnesses to the truth that EL is the foundational force, unformed before Yahweh and not to be formed after, as echoed in Isaiah 43:10.

**New Testament Connection:**

In the teachings of Yeshua, humility is expressed in the acknowledgment that every member of the heavenly host, despite their might, is dependent on EL. This humility resonates with the idea that through the manifestation of EL's power, the seemingly impossible becomes possible, as affirmed in Luke 1:37.

**Psalms and Prophetic References:**

Psalms vividly express the idea that EL is the eternal dwelling place and the God (El) from everlasting to everlasting (Psalm 90:1-2). Throughout Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and other books, "El" is translated as "God," underscoring its pervasive presence in the Old Testament.

**Linguistic Analysis:**

Young's Index-Lexicon to the Old Testament provides a comprehensive overview of the various translations of El, with 212 instances translated as "God," 15 as "god," three as "power," four as "goodly," four as "mighty," and one each as "idol," "might," and "mighty one." The plural form, Elim, meaning powers, is also acknowledged in Num. 15:11 and Dan. 11:36, where it is rendered as "gods."

Pictographic Origins:

Beyond linguistic analysis, exploring the original pictographic nature of the Hebrew word "El" provides deeper insights. In its earliest form, "El" would have been represented by pictographs symbolizing strength, power, and perhaps a sense of elevation or exaltation. The combination of Aleph and Lamed as visual symbols of strength and guidance laid the foundation for the semantic richness and theological depth attributed to the word "El.

**Conclusion:**

In conclusion, the Hebrew word "El" transcends linguistic boundaries, encompassing a rich tapestry of meanings such as power, might, and strength. Rooted in the original pictographic script, EL emerges as a visual symbol of the foundational force in the universe. Whether expressed in the humility of Yeshua or the declarations in the Psalms and Isaiah, EL remains a central and profound concept in Hebrew thought, encapsulating the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe. The pictographic origins add a visual dimension to the understanding of EL, emphasizing its dynamic and impactful nature, making it a cornerstone in Hebrew scriptures and theological discourse..

In conclusion, the Hebrew word EL transcends linguistic boundaries, encompassing a rich tapestry of meanings such as power, might, and strength. Rooted in the original pictographic script, EL emerges as a visual symbol of the foundational force in the universe. Whether expressed in the humility of Yeshua or the declarations in the Psalms and Isaiah, EL remains a central and profound concept in Hebrew thought, encapsulating the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe.

**Unveiling the Essence of Eloah: Exploring the Pictographic Roots**

The Hebrew word "Eloah" stands as a linguistic doorway into the profound nature of divinity. Rooted in the ancient Hebrew script, Eloah transcends mere translation, beckoning us to delve into the original pictographic nuances that unveil a tapestry of power, might, and divine authority.

In its essence, Eloah is derived from the root "El," signifying power. The pictographic script of ancient Hebrew, a visual language in itself, weaves a narrative through symbols. The first letter, Aleph (א), visually represented as an ox head, encapsulates strength and primal power. Lamed (ל), the twelfth letter, symbolizes a shepherd's staff, connoting guidance and authority. Ayin (ע), the sixteenth letter, originally depicted an eye, suggesting insight and perception. Finally, Hei (ה), the fifth letter, represented a window or fence, denoting revelation or separation.

When these symbols converge to form Eloah (אֱלוֹהַ), the visual story unfolds. Aleph, the ox head, reflects primal power; Lamed, the shepherd's staff, portrays guidance; Ayin, the eye, symbolizes insight; and Hei, the window, signifies revelation. Together, they paint a vivid picture of a Mighty One infused with divine power, offering guidance, endowed with profound insight, and revealing the mysteries of existence.

Beyond the linguistic analysis, Eloah is not merely a term but a concept intricately woven into the fabric of theological discourse. It is not confined to a singular deity but extends to beings, including angels, who manifest divine power. This aligns seamlessly with the doctrine of God manifestation, where beings are strengthened by the divine power represented by El.

Isaiah's proclamation resounds, challenging the existence of any Eloah apart from Yahweh. The metaphorical use of "rock" underscores the steadfast and unshakeable nature of this divine power. David, in his contemplation, poses a rhetorical question, affirming that true strength exists only in union with Yahweh. Man, despite claiming Eloah status, stands in stark contrast to the omnipotent Yahweh, who holds the power to gather all life unto Himself.

The New Testament echoes this profound concept. Paul's teaching unveils a journey of believers in hope, aspiring to attain the glory of God. Peter's words amplify this, promising the bestowal of divine nature upon those who grasp the great and precious promises. Each believer, reaching this elevated state, becomes an Eloah, a Mighty One, reflecting the divine power infused within them.

In the amalgamation of believers, a collective Elohim emerges – Mighty Ones manifesting the divine power of El. This transcendent title signifies a communal expression of divine authority, where each individual Eloah contributes to the harmonious symphony of divine manifestation.

Within the scriptures, Eloah is interchangeably translated as "God" or "god." Its occurrence in various biblical books emphasizes its omnipresence, weaving through the tapestry of religious texts. From Deuteronomy to Psalms, Job to Isaiah, Eloah punctuates the sacred verses, etching its significance in the collective consciousness of ancient Israel.

As we navigate through the linguistic and theological landscape of Eloah, we encounter its Chaldee counterpart, Elah, and its plural form Eloheen. The book of Daniel, a treasure trove of Chaldean wisdom, unveils instances where "gods" appear in the plural, and "God" in the singular. An exception surfaces in Daniel 3:25, challenging the conventional rendering of "God" as plural, urging us to contemplate the nuanced meaning of "a son of the gods."

In conclusion, Eloah beckons us to journey beyond linguistic confines, inviting us to explore its original pictographic roots. In the symbolism of Aleph, Lamed, Ayin, and Hei, we discover a divine narrative that transcends words. Eloah emerges not just as a term but as a dynamic concept, weaving through the fabric of theological discourse, embracing believers as potential Mighty Ones in the symphony of divine manifestation. **ELOHIM: Unveiling the Plural Majesty in Ancient Hebrew Pictographs**

The Hebrew word "Elohim," resonating with divine significance, unfolds a captivating tale through its original pictographic roots. Composed of five letters, each symbolizing profound aspects of the divine, Elohim beckons us to explore the depths of its linguistic and theological essence.

In the ancient Hebrew script, the letters that constitute Elohim are symbols pregnant with meaning. Aleph (א), the first letter, with its ox head representation, speaks of primal strength and power. Lamed (ל), the twelfth letter, portrayed as a shepherd's staff, signifies guidance and authority. Hei (ה), the fifth letter, represented by a window or fence, implies revelation and separation. Yod (י), the tenth letter, symbolizes a hand, denoting action and creative power. Mem Sofit (ם), the final form of the letter Mem, the thirteenth letter, represents water, suggesting the flowing and life-giving nature of the divine.

Arranged harmoniously, these symbols give birth to Elohim (אֱלֹהִים), a plural form derived from Eloah. This plurality, however, does not indicate a multitude of gods but rather a majestic expression of the singular divine essence. Elohim occurs approximately 2,470 times in the Old Testament, offering a resounding testament to its prevalence in the sacred texts.

In Genesis 1 and 2, Elohim is translated as "God," aligning with the monotheistic understanding of the divine. However, an intriguing shift occurs in Genesis 3:5, where Elohim is translated as "gods." This linguistic nuance adds a layer of complexity to the divine narrative, inviting us to ponder the dynamics within the spiritual realm.

Psalm 8:5 further deepens our exploration, as Elohim is rendered as "angels." This translation finds validation in the New Testament, specifically in Hebrews 2:7, where Paul endorses the use of "angels" in Psalm 8:5. This revelation challenges traditional theological doctrines, suggesting that the term "God" extends to heavenly beings who manifest the attributes of the self-existent power.

The pivotal statement in Genesis 1:26, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness," has traditionally been interpreted in Christian doctrine as a reference to the Trinity. However, a closer examination within the linguistic and historical context reveals a different narrative. This "us" and "our" might well involve angels in mutual discussion about the work of creation, reframing the understanding of divine collaboration.

Elohim takes on diverse roles in the Old Testament, reflecting the multifaceted nature of divine authority. In Exodus 21:6, 22:8, 9, 22, 28, Elohim is translated as "judges." These judges were appointed to administer the law on behalf of Yahweh, invested with divine authority. The Revised Version, recognizing their representation of heavenly authority, often renders Elohim as "God" in these contexts.

In Exodus 7:1, Elohim assumes a unique application to Moses, as Yahweh declares, "I have made thee a god to Pharaoh." In this instance, Moses is elevated to a position where he acts with divine authority and power before the Egyptian ruler. This underscores the flexibility of the term Elohim, extending its application to mortal men who embody divine authority.

The application of Elohim to angels, mortal men, and even Moses challenges traditional theological boundaries. It paves the way for a nuanced understanding of the term's usage in referring to the Lord Yeshua (John 20:28) without necessarily endorsing the Trinitarian doctrine.

As we reflect on Elohim's pictographic roots, we find a language beyond words, a narrative woven into the symbols of Aleph, Lamed, Hei, Yod, and Mem Sofit. This divine tapestry invites us to contemplate the majesty of a singular, self-existent power expressed through the plurality of divine manifestations. Elohim, with its rich history and multifaceted applications, transcends linguistic confines, beckoning us to explore the depths of its sacred resonance.

In conclusion, Elohim emerges as a dynamic concept, transcending linguistic confines to embody divine plurality, authority, and judgment. Its pictographic origins, rooted in the ancient Hebrew script, unveil a tapestry of primal power, guidance, revelation, creative force, and finality. As we navigate through the theological labyrinth of Elohim, we unravel a profound narrative of divine manifestation and authority, echoing through the corridors of ancient texts and theological discourse.

 **Unveiling Shaddai: The Plural Power in Ancient Hebrew Pictographs**

The Hebrew term "Shaddai," translated as "Almighty," extends an invitation to explore the rich tapestry of its original pictographic roots. Rooted in a language that transcends mere translation, Shaddai beckons us to delve into the symbols that give life to its profound meaning.

Shaddai, according to Hebraists, is not merely a singular expression but a plural word. It emerges from the root "shadad," meaning to be strong or powerful. In its essence, Shaddai signifies the strength of the powerful ones, a manifestation of El, the mighty God. The plural nature of Shaddai suggests a collective power, a union of mighty beings acting in unison. This concept aligns with the idea that El Shaddai is not just a solitary force but a manifestation through the ministers of Deity.

The Hebrew letters composing Shaddai add another layer of meaning. Shin (ש), the twenty-first letter, carries the visual representation of teeth or a crown, symbolizing sharpness and authority. Dalet (ד), the fourth letter, resembles a door, representing a pathway or a gateway. Yod (י), the tenth letter, signifies a hand, denoting action and creative power. Together, these symbols form the visual representation of Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), offering a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of its meaning.

In biblical narratives, Shaddai comes alive through its interaction with Abraham. It is revealed as the strength of the powerful ones when several of them, appearing as three, condescend to partake in Abraham's hospitality. The narrative of Sodom and Gomorrah unfolds, showcasing the tremendous power of Shaddai when exerted upon the wicked. However, in contrast, Shaddai becomes a beneficent force, a ministering spirit towards the heirs of salvation, exemplifying goodness and protection.

The duality within the meaning of Shaddai is encapsulated in its derivation from the Hebrew root. The same root, with different vowel points, can signify either a nourisher (breast - Hebrew: shad) or a destroyer (shadad). This duality is evident in the contrasting roles of Shaddai – nourishing Abraham while simultaneously destroying the wicked cities of the Plain.

The duality in the nature of Shaddai reflects a broader theological truth. Yahweh, referred to as El Shaddai, can be either a nourisher or a destroyer based on how individuals respond to Him and His Word. This concept finds resonance in Psalms 18:24-27, highlighting the transformative power of one's relationship with the Almighty.

Shaddai is often joined with El, creating a powerful combination – "The Strength of the Destroyers" or "Nourishers." This union encapsulates the dynamic nature of the divine, capable of both nurturing and wielding destruction based on the adherence to divine principles.

As we reflect on Shaddai, it is crucial to acknowledge its pluriform nature. The term signifies not just a singular, overpowering force but a collective strength, an amalgamation of mighty beings aligned with divine purpose. The pictographic representation of Shaddai beckons us to see beyond mere letters, inviting us to explore the visual language that communicates authority, pathways, and creative power.

In conclusion, Shaddai stands as a linguistic masterpiece, woven with layers of meaning and depth. Its original pictographic nature, depicted through Shin, Dalet, and Yod, reveals a dynamic force that can both nurture and destroy. The narrative of Shaddai in biblical accounts emphasizes its plural essence, highlighting the strength of the powerful ones collectively manifesting the might of El. As we unravel the symbolism within Shaddai, we embark on a journey into the heart of divine power, where the plurality of strength meets the singularity of purpose.

**Unveiling the Power of Shaddai: Exploring the Pictographic Roots**

The Hebrew word "Shaddai" resounds with divine significance, offering a glimpse into the majestic power of the Almighty. Rooted in ancient Hebrew pictographs, Shaddai unveils a profound narrative of strength, nourishment, and divine authority.

In its essence, Shaddai is derived from the Hebrew root "shadad," meaning to be strong or powerful. The pictographic script of ancient Hebrew, a visual language rich in symbolism, paints a vivid picture of the word's meaning. The letters that constitute Shaddai carry deep symbolic significance, inviting us to delve into the layers of its linguistic and theological essence.

Shin (ש), the twenty-first letter in the Hebrew alphabet, is depicted as teeth or flames, representing sharpness and consuming power. Dalet (ד), the fourth letter, symbolizes a door, signifying entrance, protection, and provision. Yod (י), the tenth letter, is represented by a hand, connoting action, strength, and divine intervention.

When these symbols converge to form Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), the visual narrative unfolds. Shin, with its sharpness and consuming power, portrays the overwhelming might of the Almighty. Dalet, as a door, signifies divine provision and protection, offering a sanctuary for those under the shelter of Shaddai. Yod, the hand, symbolizes divine action and intervention, showcasing the omnipotent authority of the Almighty to accomplish His will.

The plural nature of Shaddai, according to Hebraists, adds a layer of complexity to its meaning. It signifies "mighty" or "powerful ones," reflecting the collective strength and authority inherent in the Almighty. This plurality is not indicative of multiple gods but rather emphasizes the multifaceted expressions of divine power.

Throughout the Old Testament, Shaddai is associated with the manifestation of divine power in both nourishment and destruction. The story of Abraham exemplifies this duality, as Shaddai nourished him while also bringing destruction upon the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. This dual aspect of Shaddai underscores the dynamic nature of divine intervention, offering nourishment to the righteous while executing judgment upon the wicked.

The root of Shaddai, according to Hebrew vowel points, can signify either "nourisher" or "destroyer." This dual interpretation encapsulates the multifaceted nature of the Almighty, who nurtures and sustains the righteous while also executing judgment upon the unrighteous. Thus, Yahweh can be to us either a nourisher or a destroyer, depending on our response to Him and His Word.

In biblical texts, Shaddai is often joined with El, emphasizing the combined strength and authority of the Almighty. As "The Strength of the Destroyers" or "Nourishers," Shaddai stands as a testament to the divine power to both nurture and destroy, depending on the response of humanity to the divine will.

In conclusion, the word Shaddai offers a profound glimpse into the majestic power and authority of the Almighty. Rooted in ancient Hebrew pictographs, its visual symbolism paints a vivid narrative of divine strength, nourishment, and intervention. As we unravel the layers of its meaning, we encounter a multifaceted deity who nurtures the righteous and executes judgment upon the wicked, embodying the dynamic nature of divine power and authority.

*Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh: Unveiling the Pictographic Essence of Divine Becoming**

The sacred expression "Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh," rooted in the profound Hebrew language, unravels a timeless narrative embedded within its pictographic symbols. Each letter in this divine triad — Ehyeh, Asher, and Ehyeh — carries a wealth of meaning, offering a glimpse into the dynamic nature of Yahweh's being and becoming.

**Ehyeh (אֶהְיֶה): The Unfolding Essence**

The first term, Ehyeh, comprises three Hebrew letters: Aleph (א), Hei (ה), and Yod (י). Each of these letters, when understood pictographically, adds layers of significance to the divine declaration.

- **Aleph (א): The Ox Head**

  The Aleph, symbolizing an ox head, is often associated with strength and the idea of the leader or first. In Ehyeh, it signifies the primacy of Yahweh's being and the source of all existence.

- **Hei (ה): The Window or Fence**

  The Hei, resembling a window or fence, embodies the concept of revelation and separation. In Ehyeh, it portrays the Divine as the One who reveals Himself to humanity, while maintaining a distinction between the Creator and the created.

- **Yod (י): The Hand**

  Yod, represented as a hand, is a symbol of action and strength. In Ehyeh, it signifies the active involvement of Yahweh in the unfolding of existence, the Divine hand guiding and shaping all things.

Together, Ehyeh encapsulates the idea of the Almighty being the primal source, the revealer of truth, and the active force shaping the ongoing narrative of creation.

**Asher (אֲשֶׁר): The Plural Relative Pronoun**

The term Asher, encompassing Aleph (א), Shin (שׁ), and Resh (ר), holds a unique position within the divine declaration. As a relative pronoun, it introduces a sense of multiplicity, encompassing both singular and plural, masculine and feminine.

- **Aleph (א): The Ox Head**

  Just as in Ehyeh, the Aleph in Asher emphasizes the primacy and strength of the Divine.

- **Shin (שׁ): Teeth or Flames**

  The Shin, resembling teeth or flames, signifies sharpness and consuming power. In Asher, it symbolizes the dynamic and all-encompassing nature of Yahweh.

- **Resh (ר): Head**

  The Resh, symbolizing a head, portrays authority and leadership. In Asher, it underscores Yahweh's role as the head or source of all that exists.

Together, Asher introduces a level of complexity, signifying the multitude of ways in which Yahweh is revealed, both singular and plural, masculine and feminine.

**Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh: The Divine Becoming**

Combining Ehyeh and Asher, the divine declaration unfolds as "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be." Ehyeh, as the first person singular future tense of the verb hahyah, signifies the continuous becoming and unfolding of the Divine. It is the declaration of Yahweh as the One who causes all things to become, the primal source manifesting in strength, revelation, and action.

Asher introduces the idea that Yahweh is the One who encompasses all possibilities. It is both singular and plural, masculine and feminine, reflecting the diverse ways in which the Divine reveals Himself. This multiplicity does not diminish the oneness of Yahweh but emphasizes the richness of His manifestations.

In etymology, Ehyeh is linked to the Hebrew verb hawah´ meaning "He Causes To Become." This portrays Yahweh as the Divine Craftsman, continually causing all things to become and fulfilling promises with unfailing precision.

In conclusion, Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh stands as a testament to the dynamic and multifaceted nature of Yahweh. Rooted in pictographic symbolism, it paints a vivid picture of the Divine as the primal source, the active force guiding creation, and the One who encompasses all possibilities. The continuous becoming of Ehyeh, coupled with the multiplicity of Asher, unfolds a divine narrative that transcends linguistic confines, inviting contemplation into the unfathomable depths of Yahweh's being and becoming.

 **Yahweh: Unveiling the Divine Name and Its Pictographic Essence**

In the sacred tapestry of Hebrew letters, the name Yahweh stands as a profound revelation, carrying within its letters a timeless promise and a glimpse into the eternal nature of the Divine. Comprised of four Hebrew letters, Yod (י), Hei (ה), Vav (ו), and Hei (ה), Yahweh not only reveals the name of the Almighty but encapsulates the very essence of existence.

The first letter, Yod (י), symbolizes a hand or arm, representing strength and action. The second letter, Hei (ה), signifies a window or fence, denoting revelation and separation. The third letter, Vav (ו), is shaped like a peg or nail, embodying connection and linkage. The fourth and final letter, Hei (ה), repeats the symbolism of revelation and separation.

In the name Yahweh, we encounter a pictographic narrative that unfolds with profound significance. Yod, the hand, signifies the mighty hand of the Divine, actively engaged in the affairs of creation and the lives of humanity. The first Hei, the window or fence, portrays the revelation of the Divine nature, offering a glimpse into the transcendent realm. Vav, the peg or nail, symbolizes the connection between the Divine and the created, a linkage that is unbreakable and enduring. The second Hei, repeating the symbolism of revelation and separation, reinforces the idea of ongoing communication and the distinction between the Creator and the created.

The meaning of Yahweh, rooted in the verb hahyah, "to be or become," unravels a profound truth about the nature of the Eternal One. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be" reflects an ongoing and continuous existence, portraying Yahweh as the One who continually manifests Himself. It is a declaration of unfailing promises, a proclamation that encapsulates the eternal unfolding of God's plans and purposes.

The term Ehyeh, etymologically linked to Yahweh, further emphasizes this continuous becoming and being. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be," articulated as Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh, reveals the dynamic nature of the Divine, the constant manifestation and fulfillment of His promises. Ehyeh is the first person singular of the future tense, emphasizing the unfolding and becoming nature of Yahweh.

The additional term Asher, meaning "who," introduces a sense of plurality and diversity. It is both singular and plural, masculine and feminine, pointing to the multifaceted expressions of the Divine. In the divine proclamation to Moses, "I WILL BE WHO I WILL BE," the relative pronoun Asher encompasses the entire spectrum of creation and existence. Yahweh declares Himself as the One who encompasses all, from the singular to the multitude, from the masculine to the feminine.

The memorialized words in Exodus 3:14-15, where Elohim instructs Moses, unveil the profound mystery of the Divine name. "I WILL BE WHO I WILL BE" becomes a timeless declaration, not confined to a specific era or generation. Yahweh identifies Himself as the Mighty Ones of the patriarchs, emphasizing continuity and the eternal nature of His promises.

In conclusion, the name Yahweh, rooted in the ancient Hebrew letters and their pictographic meanings, is a gateway to understanding the dynamic and eternal nature of the Divine. From the mighty hand of Yod to the revelation symbolized by Hei, the enduring connection represented by Vav, and the ongoing revelation and separation in the second Hei, Yahweh encapsulates the essence of existence itself. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be" resonates through the ages, a declaration of the eternal unfolding of the Divine plan, promising continuity and fulfillment to all generations.

God is Corporeal Spirit John 4:24

John 4:24  "God is spirit; and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth" (RSV) 

PROBLEM: This verse is quoted to show that God is not tangible.

Most people misunderstand this verse and assume or declare that Spiritual beings are immaterial.

SOLUTION: Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial

Jesus is concerned with redemption and worship that is acceptable not with a description of whether God is tangible or not. cf. v.7 - 23.

It is in the framework of this purpose that men must worship the Father4. Jesus was teaching the woman that in the redemption he had brought, he had living waters5 to offer so that they could worship God "in spirit".

4 "To be spiritually minded is life". (Rom. 8:6).

5 the teaching of the Spirit (i.e. Word of God) (cf. v.14).

The verse does not say that we must have received some divine effluent from God into our hearts before we can worship correctly. The context shows that: 

correct knowledge ("in truth") is one necessity, "salvation is of the Jews". (v. 22). 

attitude of mind ("in spirit" i.e. sincerity, Josh. 24:14) is the other necessity6. 

"Ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father." (v. 21). 

6) It was not where the worship occurred (empty tradition or letter) that mattered but the attitude of the worshipper that mattered i.e. a positive response showing love and zeal for the truth. cf. 2 Cor. 3:5, 6.

God is Corporeal

"We should not assume that anything we cannot see or hear or touch is by nature, by its basic character, silent, immaterial or invisible. We cannot see God who is Spirit. We cannot, today, see angels who are spirits. We hear no voice from heaven. Yet we know that some men heard, saw and touched things which are eternal, things which may be described as eternal." 2

Stephen saw the "heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God",3 Acts 7:56 while those around saw nothing. So we cannot argue that God, Jesus and the angels are immaterial because we by our limited senses cannot see or touch them.4

Angels appeared as ordinary men to Abraham ("three men stood by Him", Gen.18:2).

In the future the "inhabitants of Jerusalem ... shall look upon me (Jesus) whom they have pierced". (Zech. 12:10). They will say unto him, "What are these wounds in thine hands?" 

That conception of God which thinks of Him as mere abstract power, intangible, universal, without person or locality is not true. We cannot worship abstract universal power and claim we worship God.

The phrase "God is Spirit" is sometimes offered as evidence that He is immaterial but Jesus (whom we know to be a corporeal being) is called the Lord the Spirit in 2 Cor. 3:17,18. "He is now no longer flesh and blood; but Holy Spirit Nature a flesh and bones embodiment of Spirit."

Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” (John 20:27).

"And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish,....and he (Jesus) took it, and did eat before them" (Luke 24:43).

Dr. Thomas’ comments as follows: 

"The spiritual body is constituted of flesh and bones energized by the spirit. This appears from the testimony concerning Jesus. On a certain occasion, he unexpectedly stood in the midst of his disciples, at which they were exceedingly alarmed, supposing they beheld a spirit, or ghost, as at a former time. But, that they might be assured that it was really he himself, he invited them to handle him, and examine his hands and feet: "For", said he, "a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have". He gave them further proof by eating a piece of fish and. Thomas placed his hand into his side, and was convinced that he was the same who had been crucified. What stronger proof can we need of this that the spiritual body is corporeal and tangible in nature? It is the animal body purified, not evaporated into gas, or vapour. It is a bloodless body; for in the case of Jesus he had poured out his blood on the cross. The life of the animal body is in the blood: but not so that of the spiritual body: the life of this resides with the Father." (Elpis Israel)

Since Jesus has flesh and bones it seems inconsistent that his Father would not. The writer to the Hebrews says that Christ was "the very image of his substance"

The angels are "ministering spirits" but they were seen by men many times.

Many passages in scripture show that God is corporeal and shares emotions that we do:

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." (Gen. l:26).

"God created man, in the likeness10 of God made he him" (Gen. 5:1, 3).

"He that sitteth in the heaven shall laugh" (Psa. 2:4).

"Hide not thy face . . . incline thine ear unto me" (Psa. 102:2).

"He hath looked down from the height of His sanctuary" (Psa. 102:19).

" ... sat on the right hand of God" (Mark 16:19).

"Man... is the image ... of God" (1 Cor. 11:7).

"Christ, who is the image of God"11 (2 Cor. 4:4).

"Men, which are after the similitude of God" (James 3:9).

Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial nor is he just referring to the nature of God, but is stating that God is acting in a specific manner for the redemption of man, as he once acted in the past. 

We should continually remember that to Israel God was Spirit, an Angel bearing His Name. This statement can be verified by an analysis of Isaiah 48:16, 17, 20.
"The Lord Yahweh, and his Spirit hath sent me. Thus saith Yahweh, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am Yahweh thy God ... which leadeth thee the way that thou shouldest go."

Note that the Spirit is "the Holy One of Israel".

In this Spirit activity of redemption, there was to be corresponding spirit in their worship.

So if God is spirit - and the Bible emphatically declares this truth - it does not mean that he does not have material form! It is consistent to say that God, *in the sense of an individual person* has a body of spirit

The fact that Israel believed God has a human form is quite clear from Gen 1:26 where God makes man in their image (demut), and their likeness (tselem). That this image and likeness refers to *genetic* resemblance is made clear from Gen 5:1,3 where Adam begets a son after his own likeness (tselem) after his image (demut) and called his name Seth.

Notice that "Adam begat a son in his likeness, after his image." If this language is understood, then surely it can be seen that we are created in the image of God even as Jesus was the express image of Him. 

If we are to be one with God even as Jesus is one with the Father (John 17:22) then we must be physically and morally like Jesus was after his glorification. 

2nd Century Understanding 

Also for early Christians like Origen, Heracleon, and Theodotus understood God to be Corporeal:

Heracleon understands this verse to refer to the nature of worship and not the nature of God:

Fragment 24, on John 4:24 (In John 4:24a, it says,) “God is spirit.” Undefiled, pure, and invisible is his divine nature. (In John 4:24b, it says,) “Those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth." Worthily of the one who is worshipped, in a spiritual, not a fleshly fashion.....and they worship in truth, not in error, as the Apostle teaches when he calls this kind of piety “ a rational service.” (Romans 12:2) (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John)

Theodotus understood the spirit world to have shape and body: 

10 But neither the spiritual nor the intellectual things, nor the archangels <and> those created first, nor even he is shapeless and formless and figureless and incorporeal, but he also has his own shape and body proportionate to his superiority over all spiritual things, just as also those created first (have their own shape and body) proportionate to their superiority over the beings beneath them.

For in general what has come to be is not without substance, but unlike the bodies in this world, they have form and body. For male and female here differ from each other, but there the Only-Begotten and uniquely intellectual one has been furnished with his own form and substance that is utterly pure and sovereign, and he has the immediate benefit of the Father’s power. The ones created first, even if in number they are distinct and each is bounded and delineated, in any case the likeness of their deeds demonstrates their unity, equality, and likeness. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)

14 The demons are said to be incorporeal, not because they have no bodies (for they have even shape and are, therefore, capable of feeling punishment), but they are said to be incorporeal because, in comparison with the spiritual bodies which are saved, they are a shade. And the angels are bodies; at any rate they are seen. Why even the soul is a body, for the Apostle says, “It is sown a body of soul, it is raised a body of spirit.” And how can the souls which are being punished be sensible of it, if they are not bodies? Certainly he says, “Fear him who, after death, is able to cast soul and body into hell.” Now that which is visible is not purged by fire, but is dissolved into dust. But, from the story of Lazarus and Dives, the soul is directly shown by its possession of bodily limbs to be a body. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)

The Deity is Transcendent The Elohim Handle all the Personal Appearances 1 Timothy 6:14-16

The Deity is Transcendent The Elohim Handle all the Personal Appearances 1 Timothy 6:14-16

The Transcendence of God 

The title of his subject is the "Transcendence of God" but before we look at the meaning of the word transcendent, we will first have an introductory reading from 1 Timothy 6:14-16

1 Timothy 6:14 that you keep this commandment without spot, blameless until our Lord Jesus Christ’s appearing, 15 which He will manifest in His own time, He who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, 16 who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see, to whom be honor and everlasting power. Amen. (1 Timothy 6:14-16)

Meaning of Transcendent

transcend

verb: transcend; 3rd person present: transcends; past tense: transcended; past participle: transcended; gerund or present participle: transcending

be or go beyond the range or limits of (a field of activity or conceptual sphere).

surpass (a person or achievement).

transcendent

beyond or above the range of normal or physical human experience.
"the search for a transcendent level of knowledge"

(of God) existing apart from and not subject to the limitations of the material universe.

God is Transcendent

So the Father is transcendent--that means the Deity exist above and beyond our physical universe.

The Father existed outside of time and space before he created the heavens and the earth:

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

The Father is the only truly transcendent Being. Yahweh Elohim created all things on the earth, and in the heavens above, yet He exists above and independent from them

The Deity is far removed from man in fact he is not seen in the bible at all by mortals, man can not see the Deity

John 6:46  Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he that is from God, he hath seen the Father.

The ONE SELF-EXISTENT ETERNAL Deity hath never been seen by any mortal man -- that He is an undivided and invisible unity, pre-existent before the beginning of all things, intelligent and material; He dwells in unapproachable light; and SPIRIT emanates from His substance; (Phanerosis)

God in his nature also transcends that of creation:

Isaiah 57:15 For this is what the High and Lofty One, who is residing forever and whose name is holy, has said: “In the height and in the holy place is where I reside, 

The word translated forever is the Hebrew word Olam עוֹלָם the septuagint has αιωνα

1tim 6:16 the one alone having immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, whom not one of men has seen or can see. To him be honor and might everlasting. Amen.

3  who being the brightness of the glory, and the impress of His subsistence, bearing up also the all things by the saying of his might — through himself having made a cleansing of our sins, sat down at the right

Heb 12:10  For they indeed for a few days chastened us as seemed good to them; but he for our profit, that we may be partakers of his holiness.

2Peter 1:4  whereby he hath granted unto us his precious and exceeding great promises; that through these ye may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in that world by lust.

From the bible we learn that God has a substance Hebrews 1:3 and this substance is his divine nature 2Peter 1:4 so God is corporeal and SPIRIT emanates from His substance. Therefore God is both corporeal and incorporeal at the same time

 Omnipresent

God is above in the highest heaven far removed from the earth but he is not inaccessible we can reach him by prayer which is personal communion with God knowledge of him is obtained by the bible and thus the spirit-word engraved on our hearts becomes a manifestation of God within us later allowing the holy spirit to dwell within us which is a manifestation of the father and the son within us

To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory. Colossians 1:27

God is present everywhere by his spirit power and at the same time God also has unlimited power. However the Deity himself is located in the Highest Heaven.

"Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me. If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day" (Psalm 139:7-12).

The Elohim Handle all the Personal Appearances

Transcendence

God is called "invisible" in 1Tim 1:17. Much sport has been made of the Bible by shallow men who claim to see a contradiction in this. They read such passages as Exo 33:11 to prove that Moses saw God (Elohim or Angel) face to face, but they neglect other passages like Acts 7:35, which show that the angels were God's messengers to communicate with man: "Behold, I send an Angel before thee... Beware of him, and obey his voice... for My name is in him" (Exo 23:20,21). 

God could direct one of His angels so that the angel became in effect God. Cp, for example, Gen 32:30 with Hos 12:3-5. Abraham was said to have talked to God, but a careful look at Gen 18:1,2; 19:1 shows that he dealt only with angels. "No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared Him" (John 1:18). 

Elohim

Elohim stands for “powerful ones.” It was often translated by the English non-word “God.” It isn’t that far from being true, though, for it was Elohim who manipulated the planet and placed humans on it. It was Elohim who said 'Let us form the human in our own image.' It was Elohim who appeared to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Isaiah, Ezekiel, David, and Josiah, to name a few. EL (the Deity) has never been seen by anyone.

The Elohim handle all the personal appearances. We know this because Scripture clearly teaches that all creation was produced from One Power (out of and through which are all things) but this One Power operates by way of a multitude of agents (Elohim) who are spirit-embodiments of its power. “But what if some poor human sees Elohim going about El’s business and he thinks they are something else ... like men from Mars?” Beg pardon?

If humans become what they eat is it odd to think humans see what they want to see and think what they want to think? A person who eats, sees, and believes things that aren’t true and proper is bound to have problems somewhere along the line. Tough, isn’t it?

Summary

God is transcendent in that he exists outside all that is the physical universe. God is immanent in that he exists within all the physical universe by his spirit.

The Deity himself does not directly interaction with the creation this is done by the Elohim or the angels Hebrews 1:14 Hebrews 2:5

"I will be who I will be" But who will He be? Exodus 3:14

I am that I am exodus 3:14

He existed before anything other than himself came into being. The Father is singular while being many, for he is the first one and the one who is only himself. Yet he is not like a solitary individual. Otherwise, how could he be a father? For whenever there is a "father," the name "son" follows. But the single one, who alone is the Father, is like a root, with tree, branches and fruit. (The Tripartite Tractate)

God told Israel that His Name was YAHWEH, meaning "I am that I am" or, more correctly translated, 'I will be who I will be' (Ex.3:13-15). This name was then slightly extended: "God said moreover (i.e. in addition) unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, Yahweh God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob...this is My name for ever, and my memorial to all generations" (Ex.3:15).

Thus God's full name is therefore Yahweh God or "Yahweh Elohim".

The Old Testament was written mostly in Hebrew, and our English translation inevitably misses out a lot of detail when it comes to translating the Hebrew words for 'God'. One of the common Hebrew words translated 'God' is 'Elohim', meaning 'mighty ones'. God's "memorial", the Name by which He wants us to remember Him, is therefore

YAHWEH ELOHIM

meaning

HE WHO WILL BE REVEALED IN A GROUP OF MIGHTY ONES.

It is therefore God's purpose to reveal His character and His essential being in a large group of people. By obedience to His word we can develop some of God's characteristics in ourselves now, so that in a very limited sense God is revealing Himself in the true believers in this life. But God's Name is a prophecy of the time to come when the earth will be filled with people who are like Him, both in character and by nature (cp. 2 Pet.1:4 by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust). 

If we wish to be associated with the purpose of God and to become like God to die no more, living for ever in complete moral perfection, then we must associate ourselves with His Name. The way to do this is to be baptized into the Name - i.e. Yahweh Elohim (Matt.28:19). This also makes us the descendants ("seed") of Abraham (Gal.3:27-29) who were promised the eternal inheritance of the earth (Gen.17:8; Rom.4:13) - the group of 'mighty ones' ('Elohim') in whom the prophecy of God's Name will be fulfilled.