Showing posts with label angels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label angels. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 March 2026

The Concept of the Great Power in Relation to EL and Elohim




The Concept of the Great Power in Relation to EL and Elohim

The notion of a “Great Power” has long intrigued scholars of the Nag Hammadi Library, particularly writing 28 of Codex VI, known as The Concept of the Great Power. While often mistaken for Valentinian literature, this text presents an independent Gnostic vision of cosmic order, power, and human salvation. My theory centers on the understanding that the "Great Power" refers to EL, the corporeal and substantial Higher Power, while the term Elohim corresponds to the powers emanating from EL. EL is not an abstract or metaphorical concept but tangible power, and Elohim are corporeal emanations, reflecting the magnitude and authority of the One True Power.

In the text, the direct experience of this Great Power is described as transformative: "He who will know our great Power will become invisible, and fire will not be able to consume him. But it will purge and destroy all of your possessions. For everyone in whom my form will appear will be saved, from (the age of) seven days up to one hundred and twenty years. (Those) whom I constrained to gather all that is fallen - and the writings of our great Power, in order that he may inscribe your name in our great light - and their thoughts and their works may be ended, that they may be purged, and be scattered and be destroyed, and be gathered in the place which no one in it sees. But you will see me, and you will prepare your dwelling places in our great Power." This passage emphasizes both protection and purgation, showing the dual role of EL: as savior for those aligned with the Power, and as a force of destruction for the unprepared. EL’s corporeal nature allows it to act upon the world directly, in a material way that is perceptible to those attuned to it.

The text further elaborates on the interplay between the darkness and the Great Power: "Then the darkness together with Hades took the fire. And he (the darkness) will release from himself what is mine. His eyes were not able to endure my light. After the spirits and the waters moved, the remainder came into being: the whole aeon of the creation, and their . The fire came forth from them and the Power came in the midst of the powers. Psalm 104:4Psalm 97:3Deuteronomy 4:24 And the powers desired to see my image. And the soul became its replica." Here, the emergence of the powers (Elohim) from the original Power (EL) is described, showing a structured emanation from the corporeal source. Biblical references reinforce the idea of divine or cosmic authority acting within creation, while the soul, as a corporeal entity, reflects the image of this Power, connecting the human to the cosmic hierarchy.

The narrative of Noah is presented not merely as mythic storytelling but as a demonstration of the mechanics of the Great Power: "And thus Noah was saved with his sons. For if indeed the ark had not been meant for man to enter, then the water of the flood would not have come. In this way he intended (and) planned to save the gods and the angels, and the powers, the greatness of all of these, and the and the way of life. And he moves them from the aeon (and) nourishes them in the permanent places. And the judgment of the flesh was unleashed. Only the work of the Power stood up." This passage illustrates the Great Power’s role in preserving and organizing life and celestial powers, safeguarding the integrity of creation through its tangible influence.

The emergence of a man who knows the Great Power further demonstrates the accessibility of EL to human consciousness: "Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one, the man will come into being who knows the great Power. He will receive (me) and he will know me. He will drink from the milk of the mother, in fact. He will speak in parables; he will proclaim the aeon that is to come, just as he spoke in the first aeon of the flesh, as Noah. Now concerning his words, which he uttered, he spoke in all of them, in seventy-two tongues. And he opened the gates of the heavens with his words. And he put to shame the ruler of Hades; he raised the dead, and he destroyed his dominion." The human reception of EL and the subsequent empowerment to overcome archonic forces illustrates the corporeal and practical dimension of the Great Power, which directly intervenes in worldly and cosmic affairs.

The conflict with the archons and the trial of the man reveal the opposition faced by those aligned with EL: "Then a great disturbance took place. The archons raised up their wrath against him. They wanted to hand him over to the ruler of Hades. Then they recognized one of his followers. A fire took hold of his soul. He (Judas?) handed him over, since no one knew him (Jesus?). They acted and seized him. They brought judgment upon themselves. And they delivered him up to the ruler of Hades. And they handed him over to Sasabek for nine bronze coins. He prepared himself to go down and put them to shame. Then the ruler of Hades took him. And he found that the nature of his flesh could not be seized, in order to show it to the archons. But he was saying: 'Who is this? What is it? His word has abolished the law of the aeon. He is from the Logos of the power of life.' And he was victorious over the command of the archons, and they were not able by their work to rule over him." This emphasizes the corporeal strength of the Power in overcoming material and spiritual adversaries, further affirming the tangible, not abstract, nature of EL.

The establishment of authority and governance is shown in the passage: "Then the appointed time came and drew near. And he changed the commands. Then the time came until the child had grown up. When he had come to his maturity, then the archons sent the imitator to that man in order that they might know our great Power. And they were expecting from him that he would perform for them a sign. And he bore great signs. And he reigned over the whole earth and all those who are under heaven. He placed his throne upon the end of the earth, for 'I shall make you god of the world'. He will perform signs and wonders. Then they will turn from me, and they will go astray." Through this, the text demonstrates how the corporeal Power influences authority and human perception of divinity.

Apocalyptic imagery illustrates the cleansing and ultimate purification under the Great Power: "When he has completed the established time of the kingdom of the earth, then the cleansing of the souls will come, since wickedness is stronger than you. All the powers of the sea will tremble and dry up, And the firmament will not pour down dew. The springs will cease. The rivers will not flow down to their springs. And the waters of the springs of the earth will cease. Then the depths will be laid bare and they will open. The stars will grow in size, and the sun will cease." Likewise, "Then he will come to destroy all of them. And they will be chastised until they become pure. Moreover their period, which was given to them to have power, which was apportioned to them, (is) fourteen hundred and sixty years. When the fire has consumed them all, and when it does not find anything else to burn, then it will perish by its own hand. Then the [...] will be completed [...] the second power [...] the mercy will come [...] through wisdom [...]. Then the firmaments will fall down into the depth. Then the sons of matter will perish; they will not be, henceforth." These passages portray the Great Power as an active, corporeal force bringing restoration and order to the cosmos, rather than as an abstract principle.

Finally, the text concludes with the ultimate restoration of the faithful: "Then the souls will appear, who are holy through the light of the Power, who is exalted, above all powers, the immeasurable, the universal one, I and all those who will know me. And they will be in the aeon of beauty of the aeon of judgment, since they are ready in wisdom, having given glory to him who is in the incomprehensible unity; and they see him because of his will, which is in them. And they all have become as reflections in his light. They all have shone, and they have found rest in his rest." Similarly, "And he will release the souls that are being punished, and they will come to be in purity. And they will see the saints and cry out to them, 'Have mercy on us, O Power who art above all powers!' For [...] and in the tree of iniquity that exists [...] to him their eyes. And they do not seek him because they do not seek us, nor do they believe us, but they acted according to the creation of the archons and its other rulers. We also have come to be in the unchangeable aeon." The culmination of these events emphasizes the salvific and restorative function of EL and the Elohim as corporeal forces acting through the cosmos, manifesting the Higher Power in tangible form.

In conclusion, the concept of the Great Power as presented in the Nag Hammadi text highlights the corporeal, tangible nature of EL and its emanations, the Elohim. EL is the substantive force underlying all creation, while the Elohim serve as the extensions of this power. Misinterpretations that translate these terms simply as “God” obscure the text’s precise cosmological and metaphysical message. Recognizing EL and the Elohim as real, substantial forces brings clarity to the work, demonstrating that the universe is governed by a hierarchy of corporeal powers and that human knowledge of this Power grants both protection and cosmic insight.



Sunday, 9 March 2025

The Greater and Lesser Yahweh Exodus 23:21





# The Greater and Lesser Yahweh  

## *Two Powers in Heaven (Shtei Rashuyot Ba-Shamayim)*  

During the Second Temple period, some Jewish texts introduced the idea of a second divine figure, either beside YHWH or beneath Him. This concept developed into the belief that there were multiple "powers in heaven" (*shtei rashuyot ba-shamayim*), a teaching later deemed heretical in rabbinic Judaism (Mishnah *Sanhedrin* 4:5 – Sefaria).  

In mystical and esoteric Jewish traditions, these two powers were sometimes referred to as the *Greater Yahweh* and the *Lesser Yahweh*. This distinction is found in Merkabah texts such as *3 Enoch*, where the angel Metatron is called "the Lesser YHWH" (3 Enoch 48B:1[44]; 48D:1[90]). Similarly, in Gnostic literature such as *Pistis Sophia* and the *Book of Jeu*, we encounter "Great Iao" and "Little Iao" (*Pistis Sophia*, chs. 7 [twice], 86, 140; *Book of Jeu*, ch. 50), possibly corresponding to these designations.  

## Two Yahwehs in the Bible  

The idea of two Yahwehs is suggested in passages where one Yahweh appears to speak or act on behalf of another Yahweh.  

### *The Angel of Yahweh in Exodus 23:20-21*  

> *"See, I am sending an angel ahead of you to guard you along the way and to bring you to the place I have prepared. Pay attention to him and listen to what he says. Do not rebel against him; he will not forgive your rebellion, since my Name is in him."* (Exodus 23:20-21)  

This angel carries the divine Name and possesses authority to judge sin, suggesting an identity closely tied to Yahweh Himself.  

### *Yahweh Speaking to Yahweh in Exodus 24:1-2*  

> *"And to Moses He (Yahweh) said: 'Go up to Yahweh...'"* (Exodus 24:1)  

Here, Yahweh commands Moses to approach another Yahweh, reinforcing the idea of two Yahwehs.  

### *Elohim and El in Genesis 35:1*  

> *"Then Elohim said to Jacob, 'Arise, go up to Bethel and dwell there; and make an altar there to El, who appeared to you when you fled from the face of Esau your brother.'"*  

This passage differentiates between *Elohim* and *El*, suggesting a hierarchy within the divine realm.  

### *Yahweh Calling Upon Yahweh in Genesis 19:24*  

> *"Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the LORD out of heaven."*  

One Yahweh appears to act on behalf of another Yahweh, further supporting the concept of two Yahwehs.  

### *Amos 4:11 – The Lesser Yahweh and the Greater Yahweh*  

> *"I overthrew some of you, As Elohim overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, And you were like a burning stick plucked from the burning; Yet you have not returned to me," Says Yahweh.*  

Here, the "I" (Yahweh) overthrows like *Elohim* overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. This implies a Yahweh distinct from Elohim.  

## Yahweh as the Head Angel  

Jewish angelology often presents Yahweh as manifesting through angelic figures. Genesis 18 describes Yahweh appearing to Abraham, yet the text states that three men (*Elohim*) stood before him. The lead figure in this group is later identified as Yahweh, suggesting an angelic Yahweh figure.  

## Second-Century Jewish Literature: *Metatron as the Lesser Yahweh*  

### *The Third Book of Enoch (3 Enoch 12:1-5)*  

Metatron, identified as Enoch after his transformation, is called the "Lesser YHWH":  

> *"And He called me THE LESSER YHWH in the presence of all His heavenly household; as it is written (Ex. 23:21): 'For my name is in him.'"* (*3 Enoch* 12:5)  

Metatron is thus depicted as a divine figure bearing the Name of Yahweh.  

### *3 Enoch 48C – Metatron’s Exaltation*  

> *"I made honor, majesty, and glory his garment; beauty, pride, and strength, his outer robe, and a kingly crown, 500 times 500 parasangs, his diadem. I bestowed on him some of my majesty, some of my magnificence, some of the splendor of my glory... and I called him by my name, 'The Lesser YHWH, Prince of the Divine Presence, knower of secrets.'”*  

This passage reflects the belief that Yahweh's authority could be delegated to a principal angelic figure.  

## The Logos as the Mediator and Energizer of Angels  

The Logos, as described by Philo of Alexandria, serves as the intermediary between God and creation. Philo attributes to the Logos the role of empowering and sustaining angelic beings.  

### *Logos as the Chief of Angels*  

> *“And even if there be not as yet any one who is worthy to be called a son of God, nevertheless let him labor earnestly to be adorned according to his first-born word [Logos], the eldest of his angels, as the great archangel of many names; for he is called the authority, and the name of God, and the Word, and man according to God's image, and he who sees Israel.”*  
— *On the Confusion of Tongues* 146  

### *The Logos as the Mediator of Divine Energy*  

> *“For God, as shepherd and king, governs (περιαντλεῖ) the universe in accordance with law and justice, setting over it His true Logos, His first-born son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred flock, as though he were the lieutenant of a great king.”*  
— *On the Husbandry* 51  

### *The Logos as the Source of Angelic Motion and Action*  

> *“This same Word [Logos] is continually a suppliant to the immortal God on behalf of the mortal race, which is exposed to affliction and misery; and is also the ambassador sent by the Ruler of all to the subject race.”*  
— *Who is the Heir of Divine Things?* 205  

### *The Logos as the Power Behind Angelic Visions*  

> *“For it was indispensable that the man devoted to God should make use of the ministrations of the divine Word [Logos], which is superior to all the angels, inasmuch as it has been called the eldest of all, the archangel with many names.”*  
— *On Dreams* 1.157  

Philo describes the Logos as the chief angel, the firstborn of God, who energizes and sustains the angels in their roles.  

## The Demiurge and the Logos  

According to Heracleon’s commentary on John 1:3:  

> *“All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word ‘from whom’ or ‘by whom,’ but the one ‘through whom (all things were made).’”*  

This suggests that the Demiurge, often equated with the *Elohim*, operates under the influence of the Logos.  

### *Elohim as the Demiurge*  

Ptolemy, a Valentinian teacher, explains that the Law was given through angels (*Elohim*), aligning with Acts 7:53, Galatians 3:19, and Hebrews 2:2. This suggests that the *Elohim*, as intermediaries, function as the Demiurge—divine agents governing the material world.  

### *Conclusion: The Logos and the Lesser Yahweh*  

While *3 Enoch* attributes the title of *Lesser YHWH* to Metatron, the broader tradition suggests that this role aligns more closely with the Logos. The Logos serves as the intermediary power, energizing the angelic host and directing the Demiurge in shaping the cosmos. This perspective bridges Jewish angelology with early Christian thought, positioning the Logos as the ultimate mediator between the divine and the created world.

https://youtu.be/Kab_farFCOA

Monday, 28 November 2022

Azazel the scapegoat Leviticus 16

Azazel the scapegoat Leviticus 16









Leviticus 16:7 “And he must take the two goats and make them stand before Jehovah at the entrance of the tent of meeting. 8 And Aaron must draw lots over the two goats, the one lot for Jehovah and the other lot for Azazel. 

The word “Azazel” occurs four times in the Bible, in regulations pertaining to Atonement Day.—Lev 16:8, 10, 26.

"And the other lot for the scapegoat"

— The word "scapegoat" is altogether wrong. The Hebrew word is azazel it is derived from 2 hebrew words « "goat" from a root denoting strength, and the other hebrew word meaning "to go away, to disappear". The word therefore signifies The Goat of Departure, or The Goat of Removal. It represented one that has the strength to bear away the "sins" to be figuratively placed upon it.

Shall be presented alive before Yahweh"

— The two goats are prophetic of Christ's work. Both in life and in death he glorified the Father (John 17:4-5). This goat was preserved alive, and presented to Yahweh to foreshadow the resurrection of the Lord after he had successfully completed his function as a sin offering. Hence Paul wrote: "Jesus our Lord . . . was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification" (Rorn. 4:25). The type foreshadowed the provision of a living advocate on behalf of Yahweh's people, as is provided in (he Lord Jesus Christ. The resurrection of the Lord witnessed to the effectiveness of the atonement accomplished by his sacrifice (Rom. 1:1-4).

As Paul explained, by Jesus’ offering of his own life as a sacrifice for the sins of mankind, he accomplished far more than had been achieved by “the blood of bulls and of goats.” (Heb 10:4, 11, 12) He thus served as “the scapegoat,” being the ‘carrier of our sicknesses,’ the one “pierced for our transgression.” (Isa 53:4, 5; Mt 8:17; 1Pe 2:24) He ‘carried away’ the sins of all who exercise faith in the value of his sacrifice. He demonstrated the provision of God to take sinfulness into complete oblivion. In these ways the goat “for Azazel” pictures the sacrifice of Jesus Christ

Sending 
The Goat of Departure (Azazel--removed, separated, sent away) out into the wilderness demonstrates the Renouncing of error, the putting away sin, or releasing from the consciousness all belief in and thought of sin and evil.

The two goats of Leviticus 16 signify the twofold operation in consciousness that attends the putting away of sin. Sacrificing one goat as a sin offering to Jehovah signifies the process of uplifting and refining the energies that lie back of all action and have been used to do evil. These energies are good and must be refined and elevated to spiritual expression in the consciousness and organism of man, that he may become perfect even as the Father is perfect. (See Matt. 5: 48.)

Sending 
The Goat of Departure (Azazel--removed, separated, sent away) out into the wilderness indicates denial of error, putting away sin, or releasing from the consciousness all belief in and thought of sin and evil, and all condemnation for sin.

"As far as the east is from the west,So far hath he removed our transgressions from us" (Psa. 103:12).

"For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin will I remember no more" (Jer. 31:34).

The two goats symbolizes resistance and opposition. It is a phase of personality. We resist Spirit on one hand, and we resist our fellows on the other. These two instances of resistance symbolize the two goats of Leviticus 16:5-22. They are both to be denied. Resistance to the Lord is to be killed out entirely and resistance to our fellows is to be sent into the wilderness--denied a place in consciousness.

This also illustrates the difference between sins toward God and sins toward man. There must be a complete and full union of the Father and child; every thought of obstruction and resistance must be done away with. It is very important that we make complete at-one-ment with the Father.

Resistance toward evil is not to be wholly destroyed, but consciousness of the nothingness of the thoughts of evil is to be dumped into the wilderness of sense. This is the scapegoat that carries away all the iniquities of the Children of Israel and loses them in the outer void.

Our relations to our fellow men are so complex that we are excused in a measure if we fall short in observing the law of nonresistance in its entirety. Yet in superconsciousness we can rise with Jesus Christ and "resist not him that is evil"; we must do it before we can become like Him and see Him even a He is (I John 3:2).

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

The Book of Tobit




The book of Tobit has all the outer trappings of a historical account however the book is best understood as an allegorical story. The story is intended to edify and to inspire faith in God

the author of Tobit uses Job as a model for Tobit  the two persons are both men of outstandingly good deeds and rightousness who thought they suffered and were tested job 1:6-2:10 Tobit 12:14 did not loss their faith job 31:37 Tobit 3:2-6  and ultimately were rewarded with even greater blessings job 42:10-16 Tobit 14:1-2

the moral sense of the book of tobit is that God answers our prayers

Tobit is a symbol of Israel's blindness 1enoch 93:8
Tobias is a symbol of redeemed Israel
Raphael is a symbol of God redeeming Israel
Sarah is a symbol of the nation of Israel in exile
Asmodeus – ruler of lust,the demon is an aspect of the misfortunes of Israel in exile in a gentile land
the demon is also a symbol of the fallen priesthood

Tobiah's marriage to Sarah can be taken as an allegory of Christ's mystical marriage to His Bride the Church. 


Just as Tobiah's marriage was made possible by the exorcism of a demon, Christ's marriage to the Church was made possible through the defeat of the Devil.

 Just as Christ's resurrection from the dead took place at the conclusion of the seventh day of the week-i.e., the ``eighth'' day-so Tobiah was the eighth husband of Sarah.

Christians who were used to symbolising Jesus as a fish would naturally see the fish of the Book of Tobit as a type of Christ. Just as Christ healed the sick and cast out demons, so it was the miraculous medicinal powers of the fish's organs that made possible the exorcism of Asmodeus and the healing of Tobit's blindness. 

The blindness and poverty of Tobit would represent Adam's bondage to sin and death, so Tobiah's healing of his father is like Christ's spiritual healing of Adam's sin. 

Hannah's grief at the departure of her only son Tobiah also reminds us of Mary's grief at the suffering and death of her son Jesus (Luke 2:34-35).

Again, the Sadducees' rhetorical example of a woman with seven husbands (Matt. 22:23-28) might be an oblique reference to Sarah,

the demon was "bound up by the angel" (ch.8:3)
neither the liver nor the heart or the bile of the fish per se were the objects that cured and drove out the demon, but were merely SYMBOLIC means, through which God performed the miraculous cure of Tobit, and the expulsion of the demon.