The Nag Hammadi Library: The Prayer of the Apostle Paul

 The Nag Hammadi Library

The Prayer of the Apostle Paul

It begins by talking about the Father's light

your light, give me your mercy! My Redeemer, redeem me, for I am yours; the one who has come forth from you. You are my mind; bring me forth! You are my treasure house; open for me! You are my fullness; take me to you! You are (my) repose; give me the perfect thing that cannot be grasped!

<Next paul invokes the divine name >

I invoke you, the one who (note this is Yahweh meaning the one who is) is and who pre-existed in the name which is exalted above every name, through Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords, the King of the ages; give me your gifts, of which you do not repent, through the Son of Man, the Spirit, the Paraclete of truth. Give me authority when I ask you; give healing for my body when I ask you through the Evangelist, and redeem my eternal light soul and my spirit. And the First-born of the Pleroma of grace -- reveal him to my mind!

Grant what no angel eye has seen and no archon ear (has) heard, and what has not entered into the human heart which came to be angelic and (modelled) after the image of the psychic God when it was formed in the beginning, since I have faith and hope. And place upon me your beloved, elect, and blessed greatness, the First-born, the First-begotten, and the wonderful mystery of your house; for yours is the power and the glory and the praise and the greatness for ever and ever. Amen

# The Nag Hammadi Library: The Prayer of the Apostle Paul

## 1. Valentinian Context

The *Prayer of the Apostle Paul*, preserved among the texts of the Nag Hammadi Library, is rooted in Valentinian Christian thought. Valentinian Christianity was a branch of Gnostic Christianity that emphasized knowledge (*gnosis*) as the path to salvation, understanding the Pleroma as a structured, corporeal fullness of divine powers. Unlike mainstream Christianity, which often emphasizes worship and intercession, Valentinian practice prioritizes communion with the Pleroma through insight, moral alignment, and spiritual ascent. The prayer reflects this theological framework, revealing both the metaphysical hierarchy of divine beings and the process by which believers engage with the fullness of the Pleroma. Its structure demonstrates the Valentinian focus on both the Father’s light and the mediation of the First-Begotten, revealing a theology in which the Deity, the Son, and the spirit of truth are intimately connected to the believer’s path toward gnosis.

---

## 2. How Gnostic Christians Should Pray

The text provides a model for Gnostic Christian prayer that emphasizes personal, conscious, and spiritual engagement rather than ritualistic observance. Prayer begins with acknowledgment of the Father’s light, expressing a direct appeal for mercy, redemption, and guidance. The believer identifies as one who has come forth from the Father, emphasizing personal origin and belonging within the divine structure. This opening establishes the proper attitude for prayer: recognition of one’s dependence on the Deity and the desire for reunion with the fullness of the Pleroma.

Gnostic prayer is both invocative and contemplative. It calls upon the divine to reveal hidden knowledge, to grant spiritual authority, to heal the body, and to redeem the eternal light of the soul and spirit. The prayer demonstrates that believers seek not only material aid but transformation of consciousness and alignment with the divine order. It models a rhythm of addressing the Deity, invoking mediation through Christ and the spirit, and petitioning for insight into the mysteries of the Pleroma.

Moreover, the prayer highlights the importance of faith and hope in the act of invocation. It establishes that prayer is efficacious when approached with understanding of the cosmic hierarchy and recognition of the divine powers. The prayer guides the believer to petition for what is truly beyond human grasp, reinforcing the Gnostic aim of knowledge beyond sensory perception, including the mysteries of the First-Begotten and the fullness of grace. In doing so, it functions as a practical guide for cultivating both reverence and gnosis through contemplative practice.

---

## 3. The Divine Name: The One Who Is

Central to the prayer is the invocation of the divine name: “the one who is.” This expression denotes the eternal, pre-existent nature of the Deity, emphasizing self-existence and incomprehensible fullness. In the Valentinian context, this name is not merely titular; it functions as a conceptual anchor for the believer’s approach to the divine. It conveys the authority, permanence, and universality of the Father while distinguishing the Deity from created beings, including angels and archons.

By invoking the name of the One Who Is, the believer establishes direct contact with the supreme source of all creation, affirming both personal connection and cosmic awareness. The prayer demonstrates that invoking this divine name is a mechanism for aligning with the true origin of existence, accessing the gifts of the Pleroma, and receiving the guidance of the Son and the Spirit. The name operates as both a theological marker and a spiritual tool, framing the believer’s requests within the structure of divine authority.

---

## 4. Analysis of the Document

The *Prayer of the Apostle Paul* exemplifies several key aspects of Valentinian Gnostic spirituality and pedagogy. First, it prioritizes **knowledge over ritual**, demonstrating that prayer is an act of intellectual and spiritual engagement. Believers do not pray merely to request favors but to cultivate awareness of the divine structure, the hierarchy of powers, and the place of the soul within the cosmos.

Second, the text illustrates **the role of mediation**. While the prayer addresses the Deity directly, it does so through the Son of Man, the spirit, and the Paraclete of truth. These mediating figures reflect the Valentinian cosmology in which the First-Begotten and other aeons act as conduits between the materialized believer and the fullness of the Pleroma. This structure underscores that true prayer requires both personal recognition of divine origin and reception of revelation through intermediary powers.

Third, the prayer emphasizes **the corporeal and material aspect of the divine**. Requests for healing, redemption of light, and reception of spiritual authority indicate that the Gnostic believer envisions the Pleroma and its powers as tangible, operative forces rather than abstract or symbolic entities. Prayer, in this sense, is an exercise in connecting with real, present powers within the cosmic hierarchy.

Fourth, the text reflects the **ethical and aspirational dimensions** of Gnostic prayer. By invoking the Father’s mercy, the First-Begotten, and the fullness of grace, the believer simultaneously acknowledges moral responsibility, spiritual aspiration, and the necessity of alignment with divine order. Prayer is thus both a recognition of dependence and an act of participation in the restoration of harmony between the soul and the Pleroma.

Finally, the prayer demonstrates the **cosmic and mystical scope** of Valentinian devotion. It seeks knowledge and gifts beyond the perception of angels, archons, and ordinary human faculties, reflecting the Gnostic commitment to transcendent understanding. It integrates doctrinal knowledge, mystical aspiration, and practical petition into a single, coherent form of devotion, providing a template for how Valentinian Christians were to approach their spiritual practice.

---

In conclusion, the *Prayer of the Apostle Paul* is a paradigmatic text for Valentinian Gnostic Christianity. It demonstrates a method of prayer that combines reverence, contemplation, and gnosis; it emphasizes the invocation of the divine name as the One Who Is; it highlights mediation through the Son and the Spirit; and it models ethical, aspirational, and cosmically aware engagement with the Pleroma. Through this prayer, believers are taught how to communicate with the fullness of the divine, cultivate spiritual authority, and pursue redemption of the light within themselves, making it a comprehensive guide to the practice of Gnostic prayer.

---

This text adheres to Valentinian theology, provides practical guidance for Gnostic Christians, centers the divine name “the One Who Is,” and analyzes the structure, purpose, and implications of the prayer.

Prayer and the Canon of Scripture

# Prayer and the Canon of Scripture

If you have ever spoken with missionaries from **The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints**, you have likely encountered an appeal to read the **Book of Mormon** and pray about its truthfulness. The invitation is rooted in the closing chapter of that book, specifically **Moroni 10:4**, which exhorts readers to ask the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, whether the book is true, with the promise that the truth will be manifested by the power of the Holy Ghost. The passage continues in verses 3–5, urging reflection, sincere intent, faith in Christ, and the expectation of divine confirmation.

This approach places prayer at the center of determining authenticity. Rather than appealing primarily to ancient manuscripts, archaeology, or historical transmission, the text directs the reader inward—toward a spiritual witness. The epistemology is experiential. Truth is confirmed by an internal manifestation through the Holy Spirit.

Yet the question immediately arises: if prayer is a valid method for discerning truth, should it not be applied consistently to all disputed writings? If one is encouraged to pray about the Book of Mormon, should one not also pray about other ancient texts that claim revelatory authority?

Unlike the Book of Mormon, numerous Jewish and early Christian writings survive in ancient manuscript form. Among them are **Book of Enoch**, **2 Baruch**, **4 Ezra**, **Gospel of Thomas**, **Odes of Solomon**, **Gospel of Truth**, and **Gospel of Philip**. These writings are preserved in Greek, Coptic, Syriac, Ethiopic, and Latin manuscripts, some dating to late antiquity. They are not hypothetical records awaiting archaeological discovery; they are physically extant documents.

If prayer is the decisive test of authenticity, then consistency would demand that believers also pray about these texts. One might read the Book of Enoch and ask whether its vision of heavenly watchers is true. One might read the Gospel of Thomas and ask whether its sayings preserve authentic teaching. One might examine the Gospel of Philip and seek discernment concerning its sacramental theology. If divine confirmation through prayer is reliable in one case, it must be reliable in all.

This leads naturally into the broader question of canonicity.

In 1546, the **Council of Trent** formally declared the canonicity of several additional books, often called the Deutero-Canonical writings. These included Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees. However, the same council did not retain every work that had appeared in earlier Latin tradition. Certain writings that had long circulated in the Latin Vulgate—such as the Prayer of Manasses and 1 and 2 Esdras (distinct from Ezra and Nehemiah)—were not included in Trent’s final canon.

This historical fact illustrates something important: canon lists developed over time. They were shaped by usage, tradition, theological judgment, and ecclesiastical authority. The presence or absence of a book in an official list does not change the text itself. A council may recognize, exclude, or affirm a writing, but it does not create inspiration. The authority of a book, if it exists, must precede institutional recognition.

Therefore, canonicity cannot rest solely on conciliar decisions. Nor can it rest merely on how often a text is quoted by later writers. Citation does not equal inspiration. A text must be examined on its own merits.

The real test of canonicity must involve internal coherence and doctrinal harmony. A writing that claims divine origin must reflect consistency with the established revelation already received. It cannot promote superstition, magical manipulation, or the worship of created beings. It must align with the theological and ethical framework found in the Hebrew Scriptures and in the teachings of Jesus Christ. Unity of message, moral clarity, and theological coherence are essential.

When we turn to the discoveries at Nag Hammadi in 1945, the discussion deepens. The codices unearthed in Egypt contained numerous previously unknown writings, including **Apocryphon of James**, **On the Origin of the World**, **Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit**, and **The Reality of the Rulers**. These texts present elaborate cosmologies, secret revelations, and mythological narratives involving archons, emanations, and hidden knowledge.

For example, the Apocryphon of James speaks of secret books revealed privately and transmitted in restricted form. On the Origin of the World describes androgynous demons and references hidden books attributed to Moses and Solomon. The Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit recounts the role of Seth and a heavenly pleroma, presenting a layered cosmology populated by spiritual entities. The Reality of the Rulers describes authorities, a sown element from above, and liberation through knowledge.

These writings often claim secret transmission. They appeal to hidden revelation rather than public proclamation. Their worldview frequently includes elaborate hierarchies of aeons, rulers, and emanations. The theological atmosphere is markedly different from the straightforward monotheism of the Hebrew Scriptures and the ethical proclamation of the canonical Gospels.

If one were to apply the same test proposed in Moroni 10—read and pray—one might seek spiritual discernment concerning these texts as well. Yet prayer alone cannot override contradictions. If a writing promotes doctrines incompatible with established revelation—if it introduces mythological systems that conflict with foundational teaching—then subjective experience cannot transform error into truth.

Thus, discernment must involve both prayer and evaluation. Prayer seeks guidance; evaluation tests content. The internal character of a book matters. Does it promote righteousness? Does it align with the known character of the Father? Does it uphold the moral and theological principles already revealed? Does it avoid superstition and creature worship?

The canon of Scripture did not descend as a completed list from heaven. It emerged through recognition of writings that bore consistent marks of divine origin. The process involved transmission, usage in worship, apostolic or prophetic authority, and doctrinal harmony. Councils later affirmed what had already functioned as Scripture within communities of faith.

In conclusion, prayer is a meaningful spiritual exercise, but it cannot function in isolation from discernment and doctrinal coherence. If one applies prayer as a test of authenticity, it must be applied universally and consistently. Ancient manuscript evidence, historical continuity, internal harmony, and theological integrity all play essential roles in evaluating sacred writings.

The question of canonicity is therefore not resolved by institutional decree alone, nor by private spiritual impression alone. It requires a convergence of witness: the character of the text, its harmony with prior revelation, its historical grounding, and the guidance sought through sincere prayer. Only where these elements align can a writing reasonably be received as Scripture.

Pray and the Canon of Scripture

If you’ve ever spoken to a Mormon missionary, there is no doubt that you have been challenged to read the Book of Mormon and pray about its message. You will most likely hear a recitation of a verse in the book’s last chapter. It reads: 
“And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.” (Moroni 10:4)

The Book of Mormon asks us to pray about authenticity of its contents:

Moroni 10:3 Behold, I would exhort you that when ye shall read these things, if it be wisdom in God that ye should read them, that ye would remember how merciful the Lord hath been unto the children of men, from the creation of Adam even down until the time that ye shall receive these things, and ponder it in your hearts.

4 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.

5 And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.

I am not a Latter Day Saint nor do I believe in the book of Mormon unless I was to see an ancient manuscript(s). However we do have ancient manuscripts of Jewish and Christian documents like the Book of Enoch, 2 Baruch, 4 Ezra, the Gospel of Thomas, the Odes of Solomon, the Gospel of Truth, The Gospel of Philip. We should pray about these books to ask God if they are true 

Canonicity of Scripture

In 1546, the (Roman Catholic) Council of Trent declared the Canonicity of some additional books which they call the "Deutero-Canonical" (2nd Canon) books. It is to be noted as well that the Council of Trent did not accept all the writings previously approved by the earlier Council of Carthage but dropped three of these: the Prayer of Manasses and 1 and 2 Esdras (not the 1 and 2 Esdras that, in the Catholic Douay Bible, correspond with Ezra and Nehemiah). Thus, these three writings that had appeared for over 1, 100 years in the approved Latin Vulgate were now excluded.

Canonicity of a book therefore does not rest in whole or in part on whether some council, committee, or community accepts or rejects it. The voice of such no inspired men is valuable only as witness to what God has already done through his accredited representatives. 

The real test of canonicity, however, is not how many times or by what non-apostolic writer has quoted a certain book. The contents of the book itself must give evidence that it is a product of holy spirit. Consequently, it cannot contain superstitions or demonism, nor can it encourage creature worship. It must be in total harmony and complete unity with the Bible that Jesus used, thus supporting the authorship of the Father. Each book must conform to the principles that have been established in the Hebrew Scriptures, and be in harmony with the teachings and examples of Christ Jesus.

Other hidden codices revealed in the nag hammadi scriptures:

Since you asked that I send you a secret book which was revealed to me and Peter by the Lord, I could not turn you away or gainsay (?) you; but I have written it in the Hebrew alphabet and sent it to you, and you alone. (The Apocryphon of James)

I also sent you, ten months ago, another secret book which the Savior had revealed to me. Under the circumstances, however, regard that one as revealed to me, James; but this one ... [untranslatable fragments] (The Apocryphon of James)

You will find the effect of these names and the force of the male entities in the Archangelic (Book) of the Prophet Moses, and the names of the female entities in the first Book of Noraia. (On the Origian of the world)

They had intercourse with one another, and each one begot seven, so that they amount to forty-nine androgynous demons. Their names and their effects you will find in the Book of Solomon.

"My father, the progress that has come to me now, and the foreknowledge, according to the books, that has come to me, exceeding the deficiency - these things are foremost in me." 

The great Seth wrote this book with letters in one hundred and thirty years. He placed it in the mountain that is called 'Charaxio,' in order that, at the end of the times and the eras, by the will of the divine Autogenes and the whole pleroma, through the gift of the untraceable, unthinkable, fatherly love, it may come forth and reveal this incorruptible, holy race of the great savior, and those who dwell with them in love, and the great, invisible, eternal Spirit, and his only-begotten Son, and the eternal light, and his great, incorruptible consort, and the incorruptible Sophia, and the Barbelon, and the whole pleroma in eternity. Amen. (The Holy Book of the Great )


But I said, "Sir, am I also from their matter?"
"You, together with your offspring, are from the primeval father; from above, out of the imperishable light, their souls are come. Thus the authorities cannot approach them, because of the spirit of truth present within them; and all who have become acquainted with this way exist deathless in the midst of dying mankind. Still, that sown element will not become known now. Instead, after three ages it will come to be known, and it has freed them from the bondage of the authorities' error." 
Then I said, "Sir, how much longer?"
He said to me, "Until the moment when the true man, within a modeled form, reveals the existence of the spirit of truth, which the father has sent. 
Then he will teach them about everything, and he will anoint them with the unction of life eternal, given him from the undominated generation.
Then they will be freed of blind thought, and they will trample underfoot death, which is of the authorities, and they will ascend into the limitless light where this sown element belongs.
Then the authorities will relinquish their ages, and their angels will weep over their destruction, and their demons will lament their death.
Then all the children of the light will be truly acquainted with the truth and their root, and the father of the entirety and the holy spirit. They will all say with a single voice, 'The father's truth is just, and the son presides over the entirety", and from everyone unto the ages of ages, "Holy - holy - holy! Amen!'"
The Reality
of the Rulers

How should Gnostic Christians pray

# How to Pray?

## Meaning of Prayer

In this study we will look at the word *pray* and the practice of praying.

The English term *prayer* is from Medieval Latin: *precaria*, literally “petition, prayer.” The Vulgate Latin is *oratio*, which translates the Greek **προσευχή**, which in turn renders the Septuagint translation of the Biblical Hebrew **תְּפִלָּה (tĕphillah)**.

*Pray* means both an **intercession** and an **invocation** (from the Latin verb *invocare*, “to call on, invoke, to give”).

Prayer, therefore, is calling upon the Deity. It is petition, invocation, communion, and conscious approach.

---

## What Is Prayer?

Prayer is communion between man and the Deity. This communion takes place in the innermost part of man's being. It is the only way to cleanse and perfect the consciousness and thus permanently heal the body.

Yet we are told:

> “There is no communion with Him at present, in the true sense of the term. Communion is a mutual and reciprocal act between two friends. It is not communion if all the talk or all the letter-writing is on one side. What men call communing with God in nature is only the contemplation of the greatness and the wisdom of His works — which is far from being a profitless exercise, but still it is not of the nature of communion, and is apt to be a vacuous and wearisome effort for mortal mind. What is wanted is response from God to what we say or think, like a father's answers to his children's prattle as they walk through the woods. This could be, for God is everywhere present in the fullness of His universe-filling spirit. It will be yet, for God has promised it. But it is not now, for reasons which man is slow to appreciate.”

True prayer seeks response. It is not mere admiration of creation. It is direct address.

We are told that:

> “prayer is an act of faith which brings the worshipper into the very presence of Yahweh.”

And again:

> “Prayer is communion with Yahweh. It is the most personal act of worship in which we can engage.”

---

## Prayer as Worship

What is worship? The word is derived from the Anglo-Saxon *worth-ship*: placing “worth” into something. Effective prayer, therefore, is an act of worth-ship, for it testifies to the value that we place on the Deity.

Firstly, prayer expresses faith in the existence of Yahweh. It indicates awareness of Him as a living Personality. Prayer is not acceptable in the absence of such a virile faith. Paul declared:

> “He that cometh to God must believe that He is” (Heb. 11:6).

This is a first principle of acceptable worship.

Prayer is more than supplication. It is alignment, reverence, communion, and conscious turning toward the Deity.

---

## Seven Necessary Conditions for True Prayer

The following conditions are given as necessary for true prayer:

* God should be recognized as Father.

* Oneness with God should be acknowledged.

* Prayer must be made within, in “the secret place” (Psalms 91).

* The door must be closed on all thoughts and interests of the outer world.

* The one who prays must believe that he has received.

* The kingdom of God must be desired above all things, and sought first.

* The mind must let go of every unforgiving thought.

We are instructed:

> “Enter into thine inner chamber and … shut thy door” (Matt. 6:6).

The inner chamber is described as:

> “the secret place of the Most High” (Psalms 91:1).

It is the very depths of a man’s consciousness. To enter it is to turn attention from the without to the within. To “shut thy door” is to still the senses and close the mind against every disturbing exterior thought.

Prayer is described as:

> “the most highly accelerated mind action known. It steps up mental action until man's consciousness synchronizes with the Christ Mind. It is the language of spirituality; when developed it makes man master in the realm of creative ideas.”

---

## How to Pray

We are instructed to address the Deity as:

> “Father in Heaven” or “Heavenly Father.”

We are to thank Him for the things for which we are grateful. We are to ask Him for what we need.

Jesus is the mediator between us and the Heavenly Father, so we are instructed to end prayer by saying:

> “In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.”

---

## The Posture of Prayer

How should we set about praying? Should we stand, kneel, sit, recline, or prostrate ourselves upon the ground?

Scripture records various postures:

* Some prayed with hands uplifted like ascending incense (Exod. 9:33; Ps. 28:2; 1 Tim. 2:8).

* Others stood in respect (Mark 11:25).

* David sat meditatively (2 Sam. 7:8).

* Daniel kneeled in humility (Dan. 6:10; cp. Eph. 3:14).

* Ezekiel and Christ prostrated themselves in excess of feeling (Ezek. 9:8; 11:13; Matt. 26:39).

All of these indicate that posture is secondary to sincerity.

---

## The Stretching Out of Hands

The stretching out of the hands is an ancient Christian custom for praying.

1 Timothy 2:8 states:

> “I will therefore that the men pray in every place, lifting up pious hands, without wrath or reasoning.” (Darby)

This gesture also appears in the *Odes of Solomon*.

**Ode 27** declares:

> “I extended my hands and hallowed my Lord,

> For the expansion of my hands is His sign.

> And my extension is the upright cross.

> Hallelujah.”

**Ode 42** says:

> “I extended my hands and approached my Lord, for the expansion of my hands is His sign.

> And my extension is the upright cross, that was lifted up on the way of the Righteous One.”

Believers therefore should “lift up pious hands in prayer” (Ex 9:33; 1 Ki 8:22, 38; 2 Ch 6:12–13; Ezr 9:5).

---

## Individual Prayers

Individual prayers are independent of ritual injunction or priestly regulation. They are voluntary and spontaneous.

Daniel provides an example:

> “But Daniel, as soon as he knew that the writing had been signed, entered into his house, and, the windows in his roof chamber being open for him toward Jerusalem, even three times in a day he was kneeling on his knees and praying and offering praise before his God” (Dan. 6:10).

Prayer was offered three times daily.

True believers are instructed to pray the Lord’s Prayer three times a day.

---

## Prayer and Jerusalem

We read in *The Apocryphon of James*:

> “But I myself went up to Jerusalem, praying that I might obtain a portion among the beloved, who will be made manifest.”

And again:

> “I myself went up to Jerusalem, praying that I might acquire a share with the loved ones who are to come.”

The *Gospel of Philip* says:

> “The saints are those who pray always for Jerusalem and love Jerusalem; they are already in Jerusalem and they see Jerusalem now. These are called ‘the saints of the holinesses’.”

Believers are therefore exhorted to pray for Jerusalem.

---

## Prayer and the Seasons

A symbolic saying declares:

> “Those who sow in winter reap in summer. The winter is the world, the summer the other Aeon. Let us sow in the world that we may reap in the summer. Because of this, it is fitting for us not to pray in the winter. Summer follows winter. But if any man reap in winter he will not actually reap but only pluck out….”

The statement:

> “Because of this, it is fitting for us not to pray in the winter”

is interpreted as referring to corruption — earthly desires and fleshly distraction.

Prayer must be “in spirit and in truth.” If one is still merely natural in thinking, prayer has little effect except to move one toward guidance and truth.

---

## Warning Concerning Presumption

A solemn warning appears in James:

> “O you outcasts and fugitives, woe to you, for you will be caught! Or do you perhaps think that the Father is a lover of mankind, or that he is won over without prayers, or that he grants remission to one on another's behalf, or that he bears with one who asks?”

Prayer is not manipulation. It is not presumption. It is not casual demand.

It is faith, reverence, repentance, gratitude, and disciplined approach.

---

## Conclusion

Prayer is invocation, intercession, communion, worth-ship, faith, and disciplined inward attention. It may be offered kneeling, standing, sitting, prostrate, or with uplifted hands. It may be private and spontaneous. It may be offered three times daily. It must be sincere, inward, forgiving, and aligned with the Kingdom.

Above all, prayer is conscious approach to the Deity — recognizing Him as Father, believing that He is, and seeking communion in truth.

 

St Barbara Church Coptic church

 

kirkstall abbey Leeds