Saturday, 4 April 2026

Personality the New Self Romans 6:6

Personality the New Self


Romans 6:6 because we know that our old personality was impaled with [him], that our sinful body might be made inactive, that we should no longer go on being slaves to sin


Eph 4:20 But YOU did not learn the Christ to be so, 21 provided, indeed, that YOU heard him and were taught by means of him, just as truth is in Jesus, 22 that YOU should put away the old personality which conforms to YOUR former course of conduct and which is being corrupted according to the deceptive desires; 23 but that YOU should be made new in the spirit of your minds, 24 and should put on the new personality which was created according to God’s will in true righteousness and loyalty.


Col 3:9 Do not be lying to one another. Strip off the old personality with its practices, 10 and clothe yourselves with the new personality, which through accurate knowledge is being made new according to the image of the One who created it, 11 where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, foreigner, slave, freeman, but Christ is all, and in all


A Spirit is a character, a personality. It is 'you'.


Personality is that which constitutes and characterizes a person. The word "person" (Latin, persona) is derived from the mask through which an actor spoke his part (persona).


Personality is a veil or mask worn by man that conceals the real self, the Christ consciousness. Jesus shattered this mask and revealed Christ, the true man of God. Colossians 1:27 To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.


The personality is the unit of the entire rational being, perhaps most clearly represented by "the will"; or the thinking of the flesh, the carnal mind. The sum total of characteristics that man has personalized as distinct of himself, independent of others or the divine mind. 



changes in personality 


The Lord Jesus perceptively commented that hypocrisy is something which is within (Mt. 23:28)- it's about acting out a role inside ourselves, a split personality within a person, whereby they kid themselves they are someone whom they are not. Their real self and their shadow self are in conflict deep within their minds, in their own self-perceptions they act one way when their real self is something different. And this all goes on within the human mind. Hence Paul speaks of hypocrisy being essentially a lie which is told within the mind, and parallels it with a conscience which no longer functions properly (1 Tim. 4:2). The Lord's definition of hypocrisy therefore concerned an internal state of mind- and He warned that this is a yeast which inevitably spreads to others (Lk. 12:1). Thus Barnabas was carried away into hypocrisy by the hypocrisy of others (Gal. 2:13). Although it's so deeply internal, the dissonance between the real self and the portrayed self that goes on within human minds somehow becomes a spirit which influences others. And that's how society has become so desperately hypocritical. James 5:12 gives some good practical advice in all this- our yes should mean yes and our no should be no, or else we will fall into hypocrisy (Gk.- AV "condemnation" is a terribly misleading translation). James seems to be saying that we can guard against falling into the hypocritical life and mindset by ensuring that our words, feeling and intentions are directly and simply stated, with meaning to the words, with congruence between our real self and the words we speak.

We too need confidence resulting from accurate knowledge in order to shape our personality and to progress spiritually


Developing the Christlike “new personality” is also essential. How can this be done? A first step is to “strip off” those traits that are part of the old personality. (Colossians 3:9, 10) 


“Quit being fashioned after this system of things, but be transformed by making your mind over, that you may prove to yourselves the good and acceptable and perfect will of God.” (Rom. 12:2) This requires feeding the mind on God’s Word and thinking the right thoughts. (Matt. 4:4; Phil. 4:8) Yes, with the help of God’s Word and holy spirit, persons can strip off their old personality and “put on the new personality which [is] created according to God’s will.”—Eph. 4:22-24; Col. 3:8-10.



As the true Christ self emerges, personality decreases. The real self, the individuality, begins to express. "He must increase, but I must decrease" (John 3:30).



Psychology And Prayer


We need to recognize that different personality types will relate to God in different ways (1). For some, an emphasis on truth strikes a chord with their temperament. For others, the Biblical stress upon grace or the heights of the 'mystery' of what God has really done for us will appeal to their personality more strongly. Those Jung categorizes as 'feeling types' are, for example, less likely to be impressed by truth, falsehood and logic as 'thinking types' are. All of us must take care that we don't merely pray in a way that that is just a function of our old personality; it requires Biblically-guided effort. The 'intuitive type', to use Jung's classification further, may thus be liable to a prayer life that is more an exercise in psychological catharsis, a personal self-expression, rather than a relationship with the God of the Bible. Perfectionist personalities may be inclined to always defer praying until their mood or the situation is right. Yet God's tremendously high view of us must be allowed to influence us, to the point that we do not have the devalued self-image and self-appreciation which leads to the dis-ease of perfectionism. For depressive personalities, any kind of beginning is excruciating; and to begin to pray is hard, too. They may unconsciously react against duty, against whatever they sense to be an obligation. Perhaps their parents beset them with too high expectations or constant obligations, and these issues will later find expression in difficulties in prayer. These types must come to see prayer as a pleasure, a conversation with their Father which is not a duty. Depression is not a sin. Moses was depressed and suicidal in Num. 11:14,17 but there is no word of rebuke from God. He saw why Moses was like that- because of an over-extension of himself in doing his Father's work. Depression may bring about an inability to feel, which makes the prayers of David seem so far removed from us. Yet again, depression isn't a sin. It's how we are at some times. It shouldn't be allowed to hinder us from praying. And of course there is always a tendency to see our Heavenly Father in terms of our earthly father. Here the Truth of God should set us free; for the God of the Bible is a totally new revelation to us.


Notes


(1) Some useful books about this include C.G. Jung Types Of Personality, Paul Tournier, Psychoanalytical Technique And Religious Faith and also his Medicine And The Person.

Catharism as Heresy and the Papal Response

Catharism as Heresy and the Papal Response

From the standpoint of medieval Catholic orthodoxy, the Cathar movement represented not merely a theological deviation but a profound threat to the religious, social, and political order of Western Europe. Its rapid growth across southern France and northern Italy, its rejection of ecclesiastical authority, and its appeal to both the common people and the nobility made it impossible for the Catholic Church to ignore. To the Church, this movement was not an alternative expression of Christianity but a dangerous heresy that had to be eradicated.

Yet from the Cathar perspective, it was precisely the Catholic Church that had deviated from truth. What the Church labeled heresy, the Cathars understood as a recovery of authentic teaching. This mutual opposition set the stage for one of the most violent and transformative conflicts in medieval European history—a conflict that exposed the Catholic Church, in the eyes of its critics, as a counterfeit institution willing to employ force, destruction, and coercion to maintain its authority.


The Perceived Threat of Catharism

By the late twelfth century, Catharism had spread widely throughout the Languedoc region of southern France. It attracted not only peasants and townspeople but also influential nobles. Its teachings challenged the foundations of Catholic doctrine, rejecting the authority of the clergy, the validity of the sacraments, and the legitimacy of the Church itself.

To the Catholic hierarchy, this was intolerable. The Church claimed to be the sole mediator of salvation, the guardian of divine truth, and the rightful authority over Christian life. The Cathars denied all of these claims. They taught that the Church’s rituals were empty, its hierarchy corrupt, and its doctrines fundamentally mistaken.

Moreover, Catharism offered an alternative structure that was both simpler and more appealing. Its division between the perfect and the believers allowed for participation at different levels, while its emphasis on personal understanding and moral integrity resonated with many who were disillusioned with the wealth and power of the Catholic clergy.

From the perspective of the Church, such a movement could not be allowed to continue. It was seen as a “diabolic heresy,” a distortion of Christianity that threatened the unity and stability of Christendom.


Pope Innocent III and the Albigensian Crusade

The decisive response came under Pope Innocent III, one of the most powerful and influential popes of the medieval period. In 1209, he proclaimed the Albigensian Crusade, a military campaign aimed at destroying Catharism in southern France.

This crusade marked a turning point. Unlike earlier efforts to combat heresy through preaching or limited persecution, it mobilized large-scale military force. Secular rulers and knights were called upon to take up arms against the Cathars, and they were offered the same incentives as those who fought in the Crusades to the Holy Land: spiritual rewards in the form of indulgences and the promise of material gain.

The result was devastating. Papal armies descended upon the cities of Languedoc, including Toulouse, Béziers, and Carcassonne. Entire populations were massacred, often without distinction between Cathars and Catholics. The destruction was not limited to individuals but extended to the cultural and social fabric of the region. Churches, monasteries, and homes were destroyed, and sacred texts—particularly those associated with Cathar teaching—were burned.

This campaign revealed the extent to which the Catholic Church was willing to use violence to suppress dissent. In the eyes of the Cathars and their sympathizers, such actions confirmed that the Church was not the guardian of truth but its enemy—a counterfeit system that relied on force rather than understanding.


Political Dimensions of the Conflict

While the Albigensian Crusade was framed as a religious campaign, it was deeply entangled with political ambitions. The wealthy and relatively independent region of Languedoc had long been distinct from the northern French kingdom. Its culture, language, and social structure differed significantly, and its relative tolerance allowed movements like Catharism to flourish.

For northern French nobles, the crusade presented an opportunity to expand their influence and acquire land. The campaign thus became not only a war against heresy but also a war of conquest.

This dual nature of the conflict is particularly evident in the later stages of the crusade, when forces under the French crown, including those associated with Louis IX of France, moved into the region. For these rulers, the campaign was less about religious purification and more about territorial expansion.

The integration of Languedoc into the French kingdom marked a significant shift in the political landscape of France. It also reinforced the alliance between the monarchy and the Catholic Church, demonstrating how religious and political power could be combined to achieve mutual goals.


The Fall of Montségur

One of the most symbolic moments in the suppression of Catharism was the سقوط of Montségur in 1244. This mountain fortress, located in the Pyrenees, had become a refuge for Cathar believers and a center of resistance.

After a prolonged siege, the fortress fell to the forces of the French crown. The consequences were severe. Many of the Cathars who had taken refuge there were executed, often by burning. The fall of Montségur effectively ended organized Cathar resistance in the region.

For the Catholic Church, this was a decisive victory. For the Cathars, it marked the beginning of a new phase—one of secrecy and survival rather than open practice.


The Inquisition and Systematic Suppression

Although the military campaigns dealt a severe blow to Catharism, they did not completely eliminate it. Many believers went into hiding, and communities continued to exist in secret. To address this, the Catholic Church developed a more systematic approach to identifying and eliminating heresy.

In 1233, Pope Gregory IX established the Inquisition, an institutional mechanism designed to investigate and prosecute heresy. This marked the beginning of a new phase in the Church’s response—one characterized by legal procedures, interrogation, and record-keeping.

The task of carrying out the Inquisition was entrusted to the Dominican order, whose members traveled throughout southern France and other regions, seeking out remnants of Cathar belief. They conducted interrogations, often under threat of punishment, and required individuals to confess and renounce their beliefs.

The Inquisition’s methods were thorough and relentless. Over time, it succeeded in identifying and eliminating most remaining Cathar communities. Yet it also preserved a detailed record of their beliefs and practices. Ironically, much of what is known about Catharism today comes from these inquisitorial records—documents created by those who sought to destroy it.


Cultural Destruction and the Loss of Occitan Civilization

The suppression of Catharism was not limited to theology or politics. It had profound cultural consequences. The region of Languedoc, once a vibrant center of artistic and intellectual life, was devastated.

Cities such as Toulouse, Béziers, Carcassonne, and Narbonne were left in ruins. The population declined dramatically, with some areas losing more than half their inhabitants after decades of war and persecution.

The cultural traditions of the region also suffered. The troubadours, who had created a rich body of poetic and musical work, were closely associated with the Cathar milieu. Many of them, such as Peire Cardenal, expressed strong anticlerical sentiments in their compositions.

As their patrons—the noble families of the south—were killed, dispossessed, or forced into submission, the troubadours lost their support. Their art declined, and the vibrant culture of the region faded.

This cultural destruction represents one of the most significant consequences of the crusade. It was not only a religious movement that was suppressed but an entire way of life. The shift from the langue d’oc of the south to the langue d’oïl of the north symbolized the broader transformation of French society.


Migration and Survival

Despite the intensity of the persecution, Catharism did not disappear immediately. Many believers fled to other regions, including Catalonia, Lombardy, and Bosnia, where related movements such as the Bogomils offered refuge.

These migrations allowed elements of Cathar belief to survive, at least for a time. However, without the social and political support they had enjoyed in Languedoc, these communities gradually declined.

The Catholic Church, through continued efforts of the Inquisition, ensured that any remaining traces of the movement were systematically eliminated. By the late medieval period, Catharism had largely disappeared as an organized force.


The Counterfeit Church Revealed

The response of the Catholic Church to Catharism reveals a fundamental tension between authority and truth. Faced with a movement that challenged its teachings and practices, the Church chose not to engage in open dialogue but to suppress it through force and coercion.

From the Cathar perspective, this response confirmed their critique. A true church, grounded in truth and goodness, would not need to rely on violence to maintain its position. The use of crusades, executions, and inquisitorial tribunals demonstrated that the Catholic Church was more concerned with preserving its power than with seeking truth.

This is why the Cathars regarded the Church as a counterfeit. It imitated the outward structure of a spiritual community but operated according to the principles of the material world—power, control, and domination.


Conclusion

The classification of Catharism as heresy and the subsequent papal response represent one of the most dramatic episodes in medieval history. What began as a theological disagreement escalated into a full-scale military campaign, followed by systematic persecution through the Inquisition.

The consequences were profound. The Cathar movement was effectively destroyed, its communities dispersed, and its culture largely erased. The region of Languedoc was transformed, both politically and culturally, as it was absorbed into the French kingdom.

Yet the legacy of this conflict endures. It highlights the tension between institutional authority and spiritual authenticity, between external conformity and inner understanding. It raises questions about the nature of the church and the means by which truth is preserved or suppressed.

In the end, the story of the Cathars and the Catholic Church is not only a historical account but a reflection on the nature of belief itself. It illustrates how the struggle between competing visions of truth can shape the course of history—and how, in that struggle, the line between authenticity and imitation becomes a matter of profound importance.

The Perfect and the Believers

The Perfect and the Believers

The Cathar movement in medieval southern France developed not only a distinctive theology but also a clearly structured community life. At the heart of this structure were two complementary groups: the perfect and the believers. These two orders did not represent opposing classes but rather stages or expressions of commitment within the same spiritual path. Together, they formed a living alternative to the institutional system of the Catholic Church, which the Cathars regarded as a counterfeit structure—outwardly organized but inwardly disconnected from truth.

This dual structure allowed the Cathar movement to balance strict spiritual discipline with broad social participation. It enabled ordinary people to engage with Cathar teaching without immediately adopting the severe asceticism required of the perfect, while also preserving a visible model of spiritual dedication.


The Perfect: The Living Ideal

The perfect—also known as parfaits, bonnes-hommes, elect, or purists—represented the highest level of commitment within the Cathar community. These individuals were not simply leaders but exemplars, embodying the principles of Cathar belief in their daily lives.

Their way of life was marked by rigorous asceticism. They renounced meat, cheese, and all animal products associated with reproduction, reflecting their rejection of the material world and its cycles. Sexual relations were forbidden, as procreation was understood to perpetuate the imprisonment of spirits within physical bodies. The perfect also avoided wealth, luxury, and personal possessions, living instead in simplicity and often relying on the support of the believer community.

This lifestyle was not imposed by external authority but chosen voluntarily. It was seen as the most direct path toward liberation from the material world. By minimizing their participation in material existence, the perfect sought to align themselves fully with the realm of light and truth.

The title bon homme—“good man”—is particularly significant. It reflects the Cathar emphasis on moral character rather than institutional rank. Unlike the Catholic clergy, who derived authority from ordination and hierarchy, the perfect were recognized for their way of life. Their authority was ethical and spiritual, not institutional.


The Consolamentum: Entry into the Perfect

The transition from believer to perfect was marked by a single, decisive rite known as the consolamentum. This was the central sacrament of the Cathar tradition, involving the laying on of hands.

Unlike the multiple sacraments of the Catholic Church, the consolamentum was both initiation and culmination. It represented a complete spiritual transformation, cleansing the individual and committing them to the life of the perfect. In many cases, believers delayed receiving the consolamentum until late in life, recognizing the difficulty of maintaining the strict discipline required afterward.

This practice highlights a fundamental difference between Catharism and the Catholic Church. In the Church, sacraments were administered throughout life and were often seen as necessary for salvation regardless of personal transformation. In the Cathar system, the consolamentum demanded a total change of life. It was not a ritual to be repeated but a definitive commitment to truth.


The Believers: The Broad Community

The majority of Cathars belonged to the second group: the believers, also known as credentes or hearers. These individuals formed the social and economic foundation of the movement.

Unlike the perfect, the believers were not required to follow strict ascetic rules. They lived ordinary lives as peasants, merchants, and members of the nobility. Their role was to support the perfect, learn from their teachings, and gradually move toward greater understanding.

The diversity of this group is striking. It included not only the rural poor but also members of the urban middle class and even high-ranking nobles such as Raymond VI of Toulouse and Roger II of Béziers and Carcassonne. This broad base of support demonstrates the appeal of Catharism across social boundaries.

Believers were “exceptionally free from ascetic restraints,” allowing them to participate fully in society while maintaining their spiritual affiliation. This flexibility made the Cathar movement accessible and sustainable, enabling it to spread widely without requiring immediate radical transformation from all adherents.


Women in the Cathar Community

One of the most remarkable features of the Cathar movement was the prominent role of women. Unlike the Catholic Church, which restricted leadership roles to men, the Cathars allowed women to become perfect and to participate actively in teaching and community life.

This inclusion reflects the Cathar emphasis on the spiritual nature of the individual. Since the true self was understood as a spirit rather than a body, distinctions based on gender were less significant. Women could pursue the same path of asceticism and spiritual development as men, and many did so with distinction.

The presence of women among both the perfect and the believers contributed to the vitality and inclusiveness of the movement. It also further distinguished Catharism from the hierarchical and patriarchal structure of the Catholic Church, reinforcing the perception that the Church was a counterfeit system that imposed artificial limitations on spiritual life.


Cultural Flourishing in Cathar Regions

The Cathar division between perfect and believers did not lead to cultural stagnation. On the contrary, the regions where Catharism flourished—particularly Toulouse and the wider Languedoc—became centers of artistic and intellectual activity.

Among the believers, engagement with the arts was not only permitted but encouraged. This openness created a vibrant cultural environment, in which poetry, music, and performance thrived. The troubadours of southern France developed a rich tradition of lyrical expression, producing works that explored themes of love, honor, and human experience.

These artistic forms included albas (morning songs), cansos (love songs), sirventes (political or satirical pieces), planhs (dirges), and pastorals. Performed by jongleurs or joglars, these works were accessible to a wide audience and contributed to a shared cultural identity.

In contrast, northern France was dominated by more rigid and formal literary traditions, such as epic poetry and the works of the trouveres. While these traditions had their own value, they lacked the same degree of spontaneity and wit found in the south.

The flourishing of the arts in Cathar regions reflects the movement’s broader philosophy. By allowing believers to engage fully with life while pursuing spiritual understanding, the Cathars created a balanced and dynamic society. This stands in contrast to the Catholic Church, which often sought to regulate and control cultural expression.


Courtly Love and Spiritual Symbolism

One of the most influential developments in this cultural environment was the concept of courtly love. The troubadours’ exploration of romantic and idealized love resonated deeply with Cathar themes of longing and transcendence.

Although not exclusively Cathar, this literary tradition reflects a shared sensibility. The emphasis on inner experience, emotional depth, and personal transformation parallels the Cathar focus on spiritual awakening.

The use of the vernacular language—Provençal—further enhanced the accessibility of these ideas. Just as the Cathars translated sacred texts into the language of the people, the troubadours expressed complex themes in a form that could be widely understood and appreciated.

This convergence of spiritual and cultural expression contributed to what has often been described as an early flowering of the Renaissance. Long before the celebrated developments in Italy, the Midi region of southern France exhibited many of the characteristics associated with later humanistic movements: intellectual curiosity, artistic creativity, and a focus on the individual.


The Balance Between Asceticism and Freedom

The division between perfect and believers allowed the Cathar movement to maintain a delicate balance. On one hand, the strict discipline of the perfect provided a clear model of spiritual commitment. On the other hand, the relative freedom of the believers ensured that the movement remained connected to everyday life.

This balance was crucial to the movement’s success. If all members had been required to adopt the lifestyle of the perfect, the movement would likely have remained small and isolated. By accommodating different levels of commitment, the Cathars created a flexible and inclusive community.

At the same time, this structure avoided the rigid hierarchy of the Catholic Church. Authority was not imposed from above but recognized from below, based on the example set by the perfect. This approach reinforced the Cathar critique of the Church as a counterfeit institution, one that relied on external authority rather than internal transformation.


The Counterfeit Church and the True Community

The contrast between the Cathar community and the Catholic Church is particularly evident in their respective approaches to authority and membership. The Church defined belonging through external criteria: baptism, adherence to doctrine, and obedience to clergy.

The Cathars, by contrast, emphasized understanding and personal commitment. The perfect represented the ideal, but the believers were not excluded. They were part of the same community, united by a shared pursuit of truth.

This inclusive yet principled approach exposed what the Cathars saw as the fundamental flaw of the Catholic Church. By prioritizing institutional control over spiritual authenticity, the Church created a system that imitated the outward form of the true community while lacking its substance.


Conclusion

The distinction between the perfect and the believers lies at the heart of Cathar social and spiritual life. It reflects a thoughtful and adaptive approach to community, one that accommodates different levels of commitment while maintaining a clear vision of the ultimate goal.

The perfect, through their ascetic discipline, embodied the highest ideals of the movement. The believers, through their participation in everyday life, ensured its vitality and reach. Together, they formed a dynamic and inclusive community that stood in stark contrast to the hierarchical and institutional structure of the Catholic Church.

In the flourishing culture of Languedoc—in its poetry, music, and intellectual life—we see the fruits of this approach. The Cathar movement was not only a theological alternative but a lived reality, shaping the social and cultural landscape of its time.

Against this vibrant and authentic community, the Catholic Church appears as a rigid and controlling system—a counterfeit that preserves the outward appearance of spirituality while suppressing its inner freedom. The Cathars, through their structure and their lives, offered a different vision: one rooted in truth, goodness, and the shared journey toward liberation.

Les Bonnes-Hommes and Popularism

# Les Bonnes-Hommes and Popularism


The Cathar movement, which flourished across southern France and northern Italy during the medieval period, was not only a theological challenge to the Catholic Church but also a social and cultural revolution. At the heart of this transformation was a distinctive populist ethos, inherited in part from the Bogomils and shaped by the lived realities of medieval European society. This ethos elevated simplicity, humility, and the dignity of ordinary people, in stark contrast to the wealth, hierarchy, and institutional control of the Catholic Church, which the Cathars regarded as a counterfeit system.


Central to this Cathar vision were the figures known as *les bonnes-hommes*—“the good men”—and their counterparts, *les bonnes femmes*. These individuals, often referred to as the “perfect” or “elect,” embodied the ideals of Cathar spirituality. Yet unlike the elaborate titles and ranks of the Catholic clergy, these names reflected humility and moral character rather than institutional authority. The Cathars deliberately avoided grandiose titles, emphasizing instead the ethical and spiritual quality of the individual. To be a “good man” or “good woman” was not to occupy an office, but to live in accordance with truth.


---


## The Meaning of “Good” in Cathar Thought


The concept of “the good” lay at the very center of Cathar belief. It was not merely a moral category but a theological principle. In the Cathar worldview, goodness was synonymous with the divine. This idea has led scholars such as Steven Runciman to observe:


> “The Cathars were essentially believers in pantheism throughout the celestial realm. That is to say, good to them was God.”


This statement captures a fundamental distinction between Catharism and the Catholic Church. While the Church presented God as a distant, authoritative ruler mediated through clergy and sacraments, the Cathars understood the divine as the very essence of goodness itself—present wherever truth, purity, and righteousness were found.


This understanding had profound implications. If God is identical with the good, then access to the divine is not restricted to an institution or hierarchy. It is available to all who pursue goodness and truth. This belief directly undermined the authority of the Catholic Church, which claimed exclusive control over spiritual knowledge and salvation.


---


## The Populist Ethos of the Cathars


The Cathars inherited from the Bogomils a strong populist orientation. They esteemed the poor, the humble, and the marginalized, seeing in them a closer alignment with spiritual truth than in the wealthy and powerful. Beggars, itinerant preachers, and peasants were not viewed as inferior but as exemplars of a life free from attachment to the material world.


This emphasis on simplicity stood in direct opposition to the opulence of the Catholic Church. Medieval observers could not fail to notice the contrast between the richly adorned clergy and the austere lifestyle of the Cathar perfect. While bishops and abbots accumulated wealth and exercised political power, the Cathars embraced poverty and service.


The title *bon homme* itself reflects this ethos. It suggests not authority but character—a person recognized by the community for their integrity and spiritual insight. This approach democratized spirituality, making it accessible to ordinary people rather than reserving it for a clerical elite.


---


## Knowledge and the Vernacular


One of the most significant aspects of Cathar populism was their commitment to making spiritual knowledge available to the people. In a time when the Catholic Church restricted access to scripture—often preserving it in Latin, a language inaccessible to most—the Cathars promoted translation into the vernacular, particularly Provençal.


This decision was revolutionary. It allowed ordinary people to engage directly with sacred texts, rather than relying on clergy to interpret them. In doing so, the Cathars challenged the Church’s monopoly on knowledge and interpretation.


For the Catholic Church, this was a direct threat. Control over scripture meant control over doctrine, and by extension, control over the faithful. By placing scripture in the hands of the people, the Cathars undermined this system and exposed what they saw as the Church’s role as a counterfeit authority—one that claimed to mediate truth while actually obscuring it.


---


## Anti-Clericalism and the Rejection of Hierarchy


Although the Cathars did develop their own internal structure, it was markedly different from that of the Catholic Church. Their hierarchy was minimal and functional rather than institutional and authoritarian. The perfect were respected for their spiritual discipline, not for their official status.


This stands in contrast to the elaborate hierarchy of the Catholic Church, with its bishops, archbishops, cardinals, and pope. For the Cathars, such structures were not only unnecessary but indicative of corruption. They represented an alignment with the material world—power, wealth, and control—rather than with the spiritual realm of truth and goodness.


The Cathars’ anti-clerical stance was not unique in the medieval period. Other movements, such as the Lollards in England and the Carmelite *descalzos* (the “unshod”) in Spain, also sought to return to a simpler, more authentic form of Christianity. These groups, like the Cathars, emphasized poverty, direct access to scripture, and a rejection of ecclesiastical authority.


Yet all of these movements faced the same fate: denunciation and persecution by the Catholic Church. Their challenge to the established order could not be tolerated, as it threatened both the theological and political foundations of the Church’s power.


---


## The Ideal of the Early Community


Underlying Cathar populism was a vision of the early Christian community as a fellowship of equals, united not by hierarchy but by shared commitment to truth. This ideal drew on the memory—whether historical or legendary—of the first followers of Jesus, who lived simply and communally.


In this vision, spiritual authority arises from understanding and practice, not from institutional appointment. The Cathars saw themselves as continuing this original tradition, in contrast to the Catholic Church, which they believed had deviated from it.


This perspective reinforced their identification of the Catholic Church as a counterfeit. By claiming continuity with the apostles while embracing wealth, power, and hierarchy, the Church presented an outward resemblance to the true community but lacked its substance.


---


## The Social Impact of Cathar Popularism


The populist orientation of the Cathars had significant social implications. By valuing the poor and promoting equality, they challenged the feudal structures of medieval society. Their emphasis on shared knowledge and communal values fostered a sense of solidarity among ordinary people.


In regions such as Languedoc, this contributed to a vibrant cultural and intellectual environment. The translation of texts into the vernacular encouraged literacy and critical thinking, while the presence of diverse religious movements created a climate of debate and exploration.


This environment has often been compared to a medieval “new Alexandria,” where different traditions and ideas intersected. Within this context, Catharism was not an isolated phenomenon but part of a broader movement toward spiritual and intellectual renewal.


---


## Persecution and Suppression


The very qualities that made Catharism appealing to the people also made it dangerous to the Catholic Church. Its rejection of hierarchy, its emphasis on personal understanding, and its critique of ecclesiastical authority undermined the Church’s position.


As a result, the Cathars were labeled heretics and subjected to intense persecution. The Albigensian Crusade, launched in the early thirteenth century, was a brutal campaign aimed at eradicating the movement. It was followed by the establishment of the Inquisition, which sought to identify and eliminate remaining adherents.


This persecution highlights the extent to which the Cathars were perceived as a threat. Their vision of a decentralized, egalitarian spirituality stood in stark contrast to the centralized power of the Catholic Church.


---


## Continuity with Other Movements


The Cathars were not alone in their challenge to ecclesiastical authority. The Lollards and the Carmelite *descalzos*, among others, represent parallel efforts to recover a more authentic form of Christianity. These movements shared key features with Catharism:


* Emphasis on poverty and simplicity

* Rejection of clerical authority

* Promotion of vernacular scripture

* Commitment to personal understanding


All were condemned as heretical by the Catholic Church, reinforcing the pattern in which alternative expressions of Christianity were suppressed in favor of a single, institutional model.


---


## The Counterfeit Church and the True Community


From the Cathar perspective, the contrast between their movement and the Catholic Church could not be more stark. The Church, with its wealth, hierarchy, and control over knowledge, represented a counterfeit version of the true community. It imitated the outward form of Christianity while aligning itself with the material world and its structures of power.


The Cathars, by contrast, sought to embody the true principles of goodness, truth, and simplicity. Their use of humble titles such as *bon homme* reflects this commitment. It emphasizes that spiritual authority lies not in position but in character.


Their populism, far from being a mere social preference, was a theological statement. It affirmed that the divine is accessible to all and that truth cannot be monopolized by an institution.


---


## Conclusion


The concept of *les bonnes-hommes* encapsulates the essence of Cathar populism. It represents a vision of spirituality rooted in goodness, humility, and accessibility. By rejecting the elaborate hierarchy and exclusivity of the Catholic Church, the Cathars created a model of religious life that empowered ordinary people and emphasized inner transformation over external conformity.


Their commitment to vernacular scripture, their esteem for the poor, and their critique of ecclesiastical authority all point to a broader vision of a true community—one defined not by institutional boundaries but by alignment with truth.


In this light, the Catholic Church appears not as the guardian of that truth but as its imitation—a counterfeit system that preserves the outward structure of Christianity while obscuring its inner reality. The Cathars, through their populist ethos and spiritual insight, sought to restore that reality, offering an alternative that continues to resonate as a challenge to authority and a call to authenticity.


The Role of Christ in Cathar Theology

# The Role of Christ in Cathar Theology

The role of Christ within Cathar theology stands at the center of its religious vision, yet it is also one of the most complex and varied elements of their belief system. Like many aspects of Cathar thought, the understanding of Christ is not uniform but reflects a range of interpretations shaped by earlier Gnostic traditions, Bogomil influence, and independent theological reflection. What unites these perspectives, however, is a decisive rejection of the Christ presented by the Catholic Church and a redefinition of his identity, mission, and relationship to the divine.

Cathar teachings concerning Christ must be understood within their broader cosmology. This cosmology, like that found in many Gnostic systems, is poetic, symbolic, and often internally diverse. Much of what is known about Cathar belief comes from records preserved by the medieval Inquisition, meaning that the surviving descriptions are often filtered through hostile observers. As a result, reconstructing a precise and unified doctrine is difficult. Nevertheless, consistent themes emerge, especially regarding the nature and function of Christ.

---

## Christ as the First Angel

One of the most consistent elements across Cathar texts is the rejection of the idea that Christ is the son of God in the sense taught by the Catholic Church. He is not identified as God himself, nor as a co-equal divine being within a unified deity. Instead, Christ is understood as the first and highest of God’s angels.

This conception aligns with earlier Gnostic and dualist traditions, in which intermediary beings serve as messengers between the divine realm and the material world. Christ, in this framework, is not the creator of the world nor the object of worship in the same way as the supreme God. Rather, he is the emissary of the good God, sent to reveal truth and guide souls back to their origin.

Some Cathar traditions suggest that Christ earned the title “son of God” through his actions rather than possessing it inherently. Because he resisted the corruption of the evil principle and remained pure, he was granted this title as a mark of honor. However, this title is understood symbolically, not literally. It reflects his role and achievement rather than his essence.

This sharply contrasts with the Catholic Church, which teaches that Christ is uniquely divine and the literal son of God. For the Cathars, such a claim confuses the hierarchy of spiritual beings and obscures the distinction between the supreme God and his messengers. In their view, this confusion is part of the broader pattern in which the Catholic Church distorts spiritual truth, presenting a counterfeit version of Christ that serves its institutional authority.

---

## Variations Within Cathar Thought

Although Cathars shared a general framework, their interpretations of Christ were not entirely uniform. Among the mitigated dualists, some held that Christ’s soul was identical with God. This view suggests a closer relationship between Christ and the divine, though it still stops short of identifying him as God in the full sense.

Others maintained a stricter distinction, emphasizing that Christ remained an angelic being throughout his mission. These differences reflect the broader division between absolute and mitigated dualism. In absolute dualism, the separation between God and all other beings is more rigid, making it less likely that Christ would be seen as sharing in the divine essence.

Despite these variations, all Cathar groups agreed on key points: Christ is not the creator of the material world, he is not identical with the supreme God, and his role is to reveal truth rather than to mediate salvation through sacrifice in the way taught by the Catholic Church.

---

## The Descent of Christ

Central to Cathar theology is the belief that Christ descended from the spiritual realm into the material world in order to save souls. This descent is not understood as an incarnation in the traditional sense. Rather, it is an act of divine intervention, in which a being of pure spirit enters a realm of corruption and illusion.

The purpose of this descent is twofold. First, Christ comes to awaken the souls trapped in material bodies, reminding them of their true origin and guiding them toward liberation. Second, he comes to expose the falsehood of the religious system that dominates the world—specifically, the system upheld by the Catholic Church.

According to Cathar teaching, the god worshiped in the established churches is not the true God but the creator of the material world, identified with the devil. Christ’s mission, therefore, includes revealing this deception and redirecting worship toward the true, invisible God.

This teaching directly challenges the authority of the Catholic Church, which bases its legitimacy on its claim to represent God on earth. By identifying the church’s god with the devil, the Cathars present the Church not as a guardian of truth but as an instrument of error—a counterfeit institution that misleads humanity.

---

## Docetism and the Nature of Christ’s Suffering

A major point of variation within Cathar theology concerns the nature of Christ’s suffering. This issue reflects the influence of docetism, a belief found in earlier Gnostic traditions that Christ’s physical body and suffering were only apparent, not real.

Some Cathars held that Christ did not possess a physical body at all. Instead, he appeared in a phantom form, giving the illusion of being human. His suffering and death were therefore not real events but symbolic demonstrations intended to convey spiritual truths. This interpretation preserves the purity of Christ by ensuring that he is not contaminated by material existence.

Other Cathars, however, believed that Christ did assume a physical body and truly suffered. This view emphasizes the depth of his commitment to saving humanity, suggesting that he was willing to endure the conditions of the material world in order to accomplish his mission.

Despite these differences, both perspectives reject the Catholic understanding of Christ’s suffering as a sacrificial atonement that redeems humanity through the shedding of blood. For the Cathars, salvation does not come through the physical death of Christ but through the knowledge he brings. His suffering, whether real or apparent, serves as a teaching rather than a transaction.

---

## Christ as Teacher and Revealer

The primary role of Christ in Cathar theology is that of a teacher and revealer of truth. He does not come to establish a church, institute sacraments, or create a hierarchical system. Instead, he brings knowledge—gnosis—that enables individuals to recognize their true nature and escape the bondage of the material world.

This emphasis on knowledge sets Catharism apart from the Catholic Church, which prioritizes faith, obedience, and participation in rituals. For the Cathars, these external practices are insufficient and often misleading. True salvation requires an inner transformation, a realization of the soul’s origin and destiny.

Christ’s teachings, therefore, are not simply moral instructions but revelations of cosmic truth. They expose the nature of the world, the identity of its creator, and the path to liberation. In this sense, Christ functions as a guide, leading souls out of darkness and into light.

---

## Christ and the Rejection of the Old Testament

A crucial aspect of Christ’s mission, according to the Cathars, is the rejection of the Old Testament and its deity. The god depicted in these texts is seen as the creator of the material world, a being associated with power, violence, and deception.

Christ’s teachings, by contrast, reveal a different God—one of pure goodness and light, entirely separate from the material realm. By presenting this alternative vision, Christ challenges the authority of the Old Testament and the religious institutions that uphold it.

This rejection extends to the Catholic Church, which incorporates the Old Testament into its canon and bases much of its theology on it. For the Cathars, this reliance on the Old Testament is further evidence that the Church serves the wrong god. Christ’s role is to expose this error and redirect believers toward the true source of spiritual life.

---

## Christ and the Path of Salvation

In Cathar theology, salvation is not a matter of forgiveness but of liberation. The soul, trapped in the material world, must be freed from its bondage and returned to the realm of light. Christ provides the knowledge necessary for this process, but the individual must undertake the journey.

This journey involves ethical discipline, spiritual understanding, and, in some cases, ascetic practices. The perfect, or elect, embody this path most fully, renouncing material attachments and dedicating themselves to spiritual growth.

Christ serves as both the model and the guide for this process. His descent into the material world and his resistance to its corruption demonstrate the possibility of overcoming evil. His teachings provide the roadmap for achieving this goal.

In contrast, the Catholic Church presents salvation as something mediated through its sacraments and authority. For the Cathars, this approach is fundamentally flawed. It places control in the hands of an institution rather than empowering individuals to seek truth directly.

---

## Christ and the Exposure of the Counterfeit Church

Perhaps the most radical aspect of Cathar Christology is its claim that Christ was sent to expose the deception of the established church. According to this view, the religious system that dominates society is not aligned with the true God but with the creator of the material world.

Christ’s mission, therefore, includes revealing that “the god they worshiped in the churches, the god of the Bible, was none other than the devil.” This statement encapsulates the Cathar critique of the Catholic Church. It is not merely mistaken but fundamentally inverted, worshiping the wrong deity and leading people away from truth.

By presenting an alternative understanding of God, Christ undermines the authority of the Church and calls individuals to seek a deeper, more authentic spirituality. This message, combined with the Cathars’ rejection of church structures and rituals, posed a direct threat to the power of the Catholic hierarchy.

---

## Conclusion

The role of Christ in Cathar theology is both central and transformative. He is not the divine figure of Catholic doctrine but a messenger, a teacher, and a revealer of truth. As the first angel of God, he descends into the material world to awaken souls, expose deception, and guide humanity toward liberation.

Despite variations in interpretation, all Cathar traditions agree on the essential points: Christ is distinct from the supreme God, his mission is to reveal knowledge rather than to offer sacrificial redemption, and his teachings stand in opposition to the religious system represented by the Catholic Church.

In this framework, the Catholic Church emerges as a counterfeit institution, presenting a distorted image of Christ and obscuring his true message. The Cathar understanding, by contrast, seeks to recover the original purpose of his mission: the awakening of the soul and the restoration of its connection to the realm of light.

Through this lens, Christ is not merely a figure of history but a guide to transformation, pointing the way beyond illusion and toward the ultimate reality of truth and freedom.

Cathar Brands of Dualism

 

Cathar Brands of Dualism

The Cathars of medieval Europe represent one of the most sophisticated and developed expressions of dualist thought in Western history. Emerging from earlier Bogomil influences and rooted in a broader Gnostic tradition, Cathar theology was not monolithic but divided into two principal systems: absolute dualism and mitigated dualism. These two branches, while sharing a common rejection of the material world and the authority of the Catholic Church, diverged significantly in their understanding of the origin of evil, the nature of God, and the structure of reality.

This division reveals not confusion, but depth. It shows that Cathar thinkers were not merely repeating inherited doctrines but actively engaging in theological reflection, refining their understanding of the cosmic struggle between good and evil. At the same time, both systems stood in direct opposition to the Catholic Church, which they regarded as a corrupt and counterfeit institution—one that claimed divine authority while aligning itself with the material world and its structures of power.


Absolute and Mitigated Dualism

Cathar dualism can broadly be divided into two categories. Absolute dualism, often associated with the Albanenses, represents a more rigorous and consistent system, closely aligned with earlier Manichaean and Bogomil traditions. Mitigated dualism, more widespread among the Cathars of France, presents a modified version in which the separation between good and evil is less radical.

Absolute dualism posits two eternal and opposing principles: the good God and the evil principle. These are not derived from one another but exist independently. The good God is entirely pure, entirely good, and entirely separate from anything associated with evil or materiality. The evil principle, by contrast, is the source of the material world, corruption, and all forms of imperfection.

Mitigated dualism, however, begins with a single original principle: the good God. From this God emanate both Christ and Lucifer. Lucifer, initially good, becomes corrupted and falls, bringing about the existence of evil. This system attempts to explain the origin of evil without positing two independent eternal principles, but in doing so, it introduces a degree of ambiguity that absolute dualists rejected.


The Gospel of the Secret Supper and Mitigated Dualism

One of the key texts used by the Cathars was the Gospel of the Secret Supper, also known as John’s Interrogation. This text, transmitted from the Bogomils into Western Europe, reflects a mitigated dualist perspective. Unlike classical Manichaean writings, it does not employ traditional Gnostic terminology such as aeons, archons, or Sophia. Nor does it explicitly reference Mani.

Instead, it is deeply rooted in the Gospel tradition, particularly the Gospel of John, which Gnostic groups consistently favored for its symbolic and spiritual depth. The text takes the form of a dialogue between John and the Lord, addressing fundamental questions about creation, the fall of Satan, the nature of humanity, and the process of salvation.

This reliance on Johannine themes is significant. The Gospel of John, with its emphasis on light and darkness, spirit and flesh, lends itself naturally to dualist interpretation. Cathar exegetes read it not as a literal account but as a symbolic revelation of the cosmic struggle between opposing principles.

The Gospel of the Secret Supper presents a reinterpretation of Christian myth. It explores the fall of Satan, the creation of Adam and Eve, and the descent of Christ in a framework that emphasizes spiritual liberation rather than material redemption. Baptism, for example, is understood not as a physical ritual but as a spiritual transformation, aligning with the Cathar rejection of Catholic sacramentalism.


The Book of the Two Principles and Absolute Dualism

In contrast to the mitigated dualism of the Gospel of the Secret Supper, the Book of the Two Principles represents the clearest expression of absolute dualism. This text articulates a stark and uncompromising vision of reality, in which the good God and the evil principle are entirely separate and fundamentally opposed.

The struggle between these principles is relentless. The material world is the domain of evil, while the spiritual realm belongs to the good God. Human souls, originating from the realm of light, are trapped in material bodies, subject to suffering and ignorance.

According to this text, the good God does not create evil and cannot be the source of anything corrupt. Evil arises from a separate principle, often associated with nonbeing. This concept is crucial: evil is not merely a distortion of good but an entirely different reality, opposed to being itself.

The text also introduces a narrative of cosmic struggle. A primordial human and the good angels attempt to resist evil but fail. Their victory, however, is not immediate. It lies in the eventual dissolution of the material world, when evil annihilates itself and the souls of light return to their original state.

This stands in sharp contrast to the Catholic Church’s emphasis on immediate judgment, punishment, and hierarchical mediation. The Cathars rejected such notions as part of the counterfeit system imposed by the Church, which sought to control believers through fear and ritual rather than guiding them toward true understanding.


The Nature of God in Absolute Dualism

One of the most striking aspects of absolute dualism is its conception of God. The good God is entirely pure and entirely good, but this purity comes with a limitation. Because God cannot do evil, he cannot create beings capable of evil. This means that free will, as understood in Catholic theology, does not originate from the good God.

Instead, free will—and the capacity for evil—is associated with the evil principle. This creates a radically different understanding of human existence. Humans are not sinners by choice but victims of entrapment, their spirits imprisoned in material bodies by a hostile power.

This view eliminates the need for punishment and condemnation, central features of Catholic doctrine. Instead, it emphasizes liberation and restoration. The role of the good God is not to judge but to rescue, guiding souls back to the realm of light.

Despite this limitation, the good God ultimately triumphs. As taught by figures such as Jean de Lugio, the good principle will overcome the evil principle in eternity. Being will conquer nonbeing, and all souls, except the principle of evil itself, will be redeemed—even Satan.


Mythological Differences Between the Two Systems

The differences between absolute and mitigated dualism extend beyond abstract principles into their respective mythologies. Absolute dualists rejected the idea that evil could ever have entered the realm of the good God. For them, the heavens remained untouched by corruption.

Mitigated dualists, however, allowed for the possibility that Lucifer, originally part of the divine realm, fell and brought corruption into creation. This difference reflects a deeper philosophical divide. Absolute dualism insists on total separation, while mitigated dualism allows for interaction and transformation.

To the absolute dualists, the idea that Lucifer could have existed within the divine realm was unacceptable. It implied that the good God was somehow responsible for the existence of evil. By maintaining a strict separation, they preserved the purity and integrity of the divine.


Emanation and the Origin of Evil

Emanation plays a central role in mitigated dualism. In this system, all things originate from the good God, including Lucifer. Evil arises not from an independent principle but from the corruption of what was originally good.

This concept allows for a more unified view of reality but introduces tension. If all things come from the good God, how can evil exist without implicating God in its creation? Absolute dualists rejected this framework precisely because it compromised the purity of the divine.

In absolute dualism, the origin of evil is clear: it belongs to a separate principle, entirely distinct from the good God. This preserves the integrity of the divine but creates a more radical division of reality.


The Material World and Human Existence

For both branches of Catharism, the material world is the domain of evil. It is a place of corruption, suffering, and deception. Human bodies, composed of matter, are prisons for the spirit.

This understanding led to a rejection of the Old Testament, which was associated with the creator god of the material world. Figures such as Abraham and Moses were viewed negatively, while certain poetic and prophetic texts, such as the Psalms and the Song of Songs, were accepted for their spiritual insight.

The material world was not to be embraced but transcended. This stands in direct opposition to the Catholic Church, which sanctified material objects through sacraments, relics, and rituals. To the Cathars, such practices represented a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of reality and further evidence that the Catholic Church was a counterfeit institution.


Ethical Practices and the Perfect

Cathar ethics reflected their dualist worldview. The perfect, or elect, committed themselves to a life of strict asceticism. They abstained from meat, sexual activity, and material wealth, seeking to minimize their involvement with the material world.

Some even practiced endura, a form of voluntary death through fasting, as a means of escaping the material realm. While extreme, this practice illustrates the seriousness with which Cathars approached the problem of existence.

Believers, however, were not held to the same strict standards. They lived more ordinary lives but were expected to support the perfect and move toward spiritual understanding. Interestingly, Cathar ethics allowed certain freedoms not permitted by the Catholic Church, particularly regarding marriage and sexuality, which were seen as secondary concerns compared to the overarching goal of spiritual liberation.


Opposition to the Catholic Church

The differences between Catharism and the Catholic Church were not merely theological but existential. The Cathars rejected the Church’s authority, hierarchy, sacraments, and doctrines. They viewed it as aligned with the material world and therefore with the principle of evil.

Practices such as the veneration of the cross, the use of relics, and the accumulation of wealth were seen as evidence of corruption. The Church’s claim to mediate salvation through rituals and clergy was rejected as false.

This opposition made the Cathars a direct threat to the Church’s authority. Their existence demonstrated that an alternative form of Christianity was possible—one that did not rely on hierarchy or institutional control.


Conclusion

The division between absolute and mitigated dualism within Catharism reveals a rich and complex tradition of theological reflection. Both systems, despite their differences, shared a commitment to spiritual purity, the rejection of the material world, and opposition to the authority of the Catholic Church.

Absolute dualism offered a more radical and consistent vision, preserving the purity of the good God through complete separation from evil. Mitigated dualism, while more flexible, introduced a unified origin that attempted to explain the existence of evil within a single framework.

Together, these systems represent the final flowering of Gnostic dualism in Western Europe. They stand as a testament to the enduring human search for truth and the persistent challenge to institutional authority.

In contrast, the Catholic Church emerges not as the guardian of truth but as its imitation—a counterfeit that preserves outward forms while obscuring inner reality. The Cathars, in their diversity and depth, expose this contradiction and offer an alternative vision rooted in knowledge, purity, and liberation from the material world.

Friday, 3 April 2026

Valentinian Realized Eschatology

 **Valentinian Realized Eschatology**


**Introduction**


Eschatology, speculation about the last things, plays an important role in virtually all religious systems. Questions concerning the fate of humanity, the end of the world, and the final destiny of existence have occupied the minds of thinkers across cultures and centuries. Within Gnostic traditions, and particularly within Valentinian theology, eschatology takes on a distinctive and transformative character. Rather than being confined to a distant future or a post-mortem expectation, eschatology becomes an immediate, experiential reality.


Valentinian thought dissolves the conventional boundary between present salvation and future fulfillment. The “end” is not merely an event awaiting history’s conclusion; it is something that unfolds within the individual through knowledge—gnosis. This perspective is inseparable from the Valentinian understanding of the origin of the world. Humanity, often mythologically represented as Sophia, originates within the Fullness (pleroma), a unified and perfect state of being. The emergence of the world corresponds to a fall into ignorance, deficiency, and suffering. Physical existence itself is identified with this state of lack.


Restoration, therefore, is not simply a future cosmic event but a present transformation. Through gnosis, the individual returns to the Fullness, and in doing so, participates in what would traditionally be called the “end of the world.” This is why Valentinian eschatology is often described as “realized eschatology”: the culmination of all things is experienced here and now by those who attain knowledge.


This document will first examine the mythological framework Valentinians used to describe the end of the world and restoration to the Fullness. It will then explore how this myth was understood not as a distant prophecy, but as a present reality accessible through gnosis, ritual, and visionary experience.


---


**The Myth**


In Valentinian teaching, the destiny of each person depends on whether they have attained gnosis. Those who remain in ignorance are subject to judgment and remain within the domain of the Craftsman (Demiurge) and the intermediate realm. As it is written, those without knowledge are judged by the powers in the “Middle” (Gospel of Philip 66:7–20).


By contrast, the spiritual person—one who possesses gnosis—undergoes a profound transformation. This individual rises in a spiritual body and begins an ascent beyond the limitations of the lower realms. Passing through the levels associated with the soul, the person transcends the authority of the Demiurge and enters the higher, spiritual domain.


In the Eighth heaven, the realm beyond the seven levels associated with the soul, the saved gather in a state of unity and celebration. This is described as the “wedding feast common to all the saved until all become equal and mutually recognize one another” (Excerpts of Theodotus 63:1). Here, the spiritual community—often called the true Church—is prepared for union in the “bridal chamber.”


At the culmination of this process, the spiritual beings enter the Fullness along with Sophia. Sophia is united with her bridegroom, the Savior, and the redeemed are joined with their angelic counterparts. As stated: “They all attain to the vision of the Father and become intellectual Aeons, entering into the intelligible and eternal union in marriage” (Excerpts of Theodotus 64:1). The Fullness itself becomes the universal bridal chamber in which all divisions are overcome.


This final union is accompanied by the dissolution of the world. The material realm, identified with deficiency and ignorance, is consumed and brought to nothing. As described: “The fire which is hidden in the world will blaze up and ignite and destroy all matter and consume itself at the same time and pass into nothingness” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1:7:1). With the destruction of matter, deficiency is eliminated, and restoration is complete.


On the surface, this myth appears to describe events occurring after death or at the end of time. However, within Valentinian theology, this interpretation is incomplete. The myth is not merely about the future—it is a symbolic description of a present reality.


---


**Gnosis and the Myth**


The distinctive feature of Valentinian eschatology is that its mythological narrative is understood as something to be experienced in the present. The events described—resurrection, ascent, union, and the dissolution of the world—are not postponed until the end of history. They occur within the life of the individual through gnosis.


Reports from early critics highlight this belief. Valentinians claimed that they were already “in the heights beyond every power” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1:13:6) and that they were “neither in heaven nor on earth but have passed within the Fullness and have already embraced their angel” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3:15:2). These statements reflect an experiential understanding of salvation as something already accomplished.


Gnosis itself is described as a form of rebirth. Drawing on language associated with spiritual regeneration, it is seen as the true resurrection from the dead—not from physical death, but from ignorance. As stated, through this knowledge, the individual participates in the resurrection: “We have suffered with him, arisen with him and ascended with him” (Treatise on the Resurrection 45:23–27).


Valentinian texts emphasize that this resurrection must occur during one’s lifetime. The Gospel of Philip makes this explicit: “People who believe they will die first and then rise up are mistaken. If they do not first receive resurrection while they are alive, once they have died they will receive nothing” (Gospel of Philip 73:1–5). The resurrection is not future—it is present.


Ritual practices played a central role in facilitating this transformation. Baptism, for example, symbolized participation in death and resurrection. Through immersion, the old person is put to death, and a new spiritual person is raised. This is expressed in various texts describing the transition from the old state to the new (Gospel of Philip 67:9–19; Valentinian Exposition 41:21–22).


The anointing associated with baptism is linked to restoration. In this rite, individuals renounce their connection to the lower realm and affirm their origin in the higher reality. Baptism is described as both a descent and an ascent: “the descent which is the upward progression, that is our exodus into the Aeon” (On the Baptism A). It marks the transition “from the created into the Fullness” (On the Baptism B).


Resurrection is closely connected with ascension. As one text explains: “This is the resurrection that is from the dead. This is the upward journey of ascent to heaven” (Exegesis on the Soul 134:6–14). The initiate experiences a movement beyond the realm governed by the Craftsman into the higher, spiritual domain.


This ascent was not merely symbolic. It was often understood as a visionary experience. Accounts describe vivid encounters involving heavenly realms, angelic beings, and divine realities. One such description reads: “We heard with our ears and saw with our eyes… hymns and angelic praises and angelic jubilation… and we ourselves were jubilant” (Apocryphon of James 15:6–25).


Such experiences reinforced the belief that the initiate had transcended the ordinary structure of reality. No longer bound to the lower realms, the individual existed in a state beyond both “heaven” and “earth.” This reflects a transformation in perception as much as a change in status.


The Eucharist was also interpreted in this framework. It was understood as the “wedding feast” of the saved, corresponding to the celebration in the Eighth heaven. The bread and wine were seen as vehicles of spiritual nourishment and participation in the resurrected state. Through this ritual, the initiate partook in the reality of union and transformation.


Central to Valentinian experience was the idea of union with an angelic counterpart. This union symbolized the restoration of completeness and unity. As it is written: “We are raised equal to angels, restored to the males, member to member, to form a unity” (Excerpts of Theodotus 22:2). This union was believed to result in a transformed existence characterized by freedom from deficiency.


Gnosis also had cosmological implications. Since matter was associated with ignorance, the attainment of knowledge was seen as dissolving the very foundation of the material world. As expressed: “Since deficiency came into being when the Father was unknown… when the Father is known… the deficiency will no longer exist” (Gospel of Truth 24:28–32). Knowledge eliminates ignorance, and with it, the world as it is experienced.


This transformation is described vividly: “Within knowledge he will purify himself from multiplicity into Unity, consuming matter within himself like a fire and darkness by light, death by life” (Gospel of Truth 25:10–20). The dissolution of the world is not an external catastrophe but an internal realization.


For the one who attains gnosis, reality itself is transformed. “The world has already become the eternal realm” (Gospel of Philip 86:11–14). The distinction between present and future collapses entirely.


---


**Conclusion**


Valentinian realized eschatology represents a profound reimagining of the concept of the end. Rather than locating fulfillment in a distant future, it situates it within present experience. The myth of fall and restoration serves as a symbolic framework describing an inner transformation brought about through gnosis.


This perspective challenges conventional interpretations of resurrection, judgment, and the end of the world. These are not events to be awaited but realities to be realized. As one text asserts: “Do not suppose that the resurrection is an illusion. It is not an illusion; rather it is something real. Instead… the world is an illusion” (Treatise on the Resurrection 48:12–17).


The Valentinian vision thus reverses ordinary expectations. What appears solid and real—the world—is transient and rooted in ignorance. What appears symbolic or mythological—the restoration to Fullness—is the true reality.


Through gnosis, the individual experiences the end of the world, the resurrection, and the return to unity. Time itself is overcome, and the distinction between beginning and end disappears. The eschaton is not ahead—it is already here, revealed in knowledge.


In this way, Valentinian eschatology is not merely a doctrine about the future. It is a description of a lived, transformative experience in which the individual participates in the ultimate reality of existence.


Psychology and Salvation

 Psychology and Salvation: The Three Elements Within the Human Being

Valentinian theology presents a profound and intricate understanding of human psychology and salvation, grounded in a threefold structure within the human being. This framework explains not only the inner constitution of humanity but also the process by which salvation is attained. Rather than viewing human nature as a simple unity, Valentinian thought interprets it as a composite of three distinct yet interrelated elements: the irrational carnal soul, the rational animating soul, and the spiritual seed. These elements originate from the myth of Sophia (Wisdom), whose fall and restoration give rise to corresponding states of human consciousness.

According to this tradition, the human being is a microcosm of a larger cosmic drama. Sophia’s descent into deficiency and suffering produced the lower aspects of existence, while her turning back and receiving knowledge (gnosis) generated higher principles. Thus, the human constitution reflects her story: from deficiency comes the irrational carnal soul; from her pleading and conversion comes the rational soul; and from her attainment of knowledge comes the spiritual seed.

This tripartite structure is not merely theoretical but is rooted in an allegorical interpretation of the Book of Genesis. The creation of humanity is described as a layered process involving different sources and essences. The Craftsman and his angels formed the human being “in the image of the pre-existing Humanity” (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:5:2, Excerpts of Theodotus 51:1). From “dust” (Genesis 2:7), understood not as literal soil but as deficiency and suffering, they fashioned the irrational or carnal soul. Into this they breathed the animating rational soul, described as the “breath of life” (Genesis 2:7), which derives from their own substance. Finally, Sophia secretly implanted the spiritual seed within the human being, completing the threefold constitution.

The irrational carnal soul represents the lowest aspect of human nature. It originates in deficiency and ignorance and is characterized by unthinking, instinctual drives. This aspect is described as a burden distributed among humanity so that, through knowledge, it may ultimately be consumed and destroyed. Valentinus writes: “You wished to distribute death (i.e. deficiency) amongst yourselves so as to consume it and annihilate it and so that death might die in and through you.” (Valentinus Fragment 4). This striking statement reveals a central idea: the presence of deficiency within humanity serves a purpose—it is to be overcome and dissolved.

The carnal nature is associated with instinctual impulses and self-gratification. It is described symbolically as a “tare” (Matthew 13:22) and a “seed of the Devil” (Matthew 13:28). It is also identified with what Paul calls “the law which wars against the law of my mind” (Romans 7:23). In this framework, the “Devil” is not an external being but a personification of the internal, irrational forces that oppose understanding and order. This element within human nature is inherently resistant to transformation; “by its very nature, the carnal is not open to salvation in any form.” It represents the inertia of ignorance and the persistence of unreflective desire.

In contrast, the rational animating soul occupies a middle position. It is what makes human beings conscious and capable of thought, emotion, and decision-making. This is the ordinary level of human experience—the realm of shared reality constructed through perception and reasoning. Because of its role in shaping and organizing experience, it is symbolically referred to as a “Craftsman,” echoing the figure responsible for forming the world.

The rational soul is distinguished by its capacity for free choice. As stated in the Excerpts of Theodotus, it possesses the ability to choose between good and evil (55:3). This capacity makes it central to the process of salvation, for it is through deliberate choice that a person aligns with higher or lower tendencies. Unlike the carnal nature, which is bound by instinct, the rational soul can respond to instruction, discipline, and moral teaching. However, it remains limited: it can construct order and understanding, but it cannot by itself attain the highest knowledge.

Salvation at this level depends on ethical action. The rational soul “can only be saved if the person chooses good deeds rather than evil ones.” It is therefore a transitional state—capable of ascending toward the spiritual but also susceptible to falling back into the carnal. Its role is crucial, as it provides the framework within which transformation can occur.

The highest element within the human being is the spiritual seed. This is the true inner self, present as a latent potential rather than an active force in most individuals. It originates from Sophia’s gnosis and represents the capacity for direct knowledge, creativity, and insight. Unlike the rational soul, which operates through reasoning, the spiritual seed is associated with intuitive understanding and immediate awareness.

This seed is described as something precious hidden within a lowly condition. It is compared to “gold or a pearl cast into mud” (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:6:2, Gospel of Philip 62:17-25), emphasizing both its value and its obscured state. The Gospel of Philip states: “it is a precious thing and it has come to reside in a lowly body” (56:24-25). The task of the individual is to cultivate this seed so that it may grow and bear fruit.

The spiritual seed is not automatically active. It must be awakened through exposure to the Word and the attainment of knowledge. As one text explains, it was sent “to be formed here along with the animate soul and to be brought up and elevated with it.” (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:6:1). This indicates that the development of the spiritual element occurs in conjunction with the rational soul—it is through the experiences and choices of ordinary life that the higher potential is realized.

When the spiritual seed becomes active, the individual attains the highest form of salvation. This is not merely moral improvement but a transformation of consciousness—a movement from ignorance to knowledge. It is the fulfillment of the human purpose as envisioned in Valentinian thought.

The presence of the spiritual seed within humanity has significant implications. According to Valentinus, its introduction into Adam resulted in an unexpected elevation of his awareness. Adam began to speak “superior to what his origins justified” (Valentinus Fragment 1), indicating that something within him transcended his constructed nature. This caused fear among the Craftsman and his angels, who “became envious of the human being ‘because they were separated from the spiritual union’” (Gospel of Philip 70:26-29).

In response, they concealed their creation within a “coat of skins” (Genesis 3:21), interpreted as the physical body (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:5:5, 1:18:2, Excerpts of Theodotus 52:1). This act symbolizes the obscuring of the spiritual element by the outer layers of existence. The human being thus becomes a hidden reality, containing within it a higher principle that is not immediately visible.

The narrative of the Garden of Eden is also reinterpreted in terms of the threefold nature. The trees in the garden correspond to the three elements within the human being. There are ordinary carnal trees, representing the lower nature; the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil,” representing the rational soul; and the “Tree of Life,” representing the spiritual principle.

Humanity is said to have eaten from the carnal trees and the Tree of Knowledge rather than the Tree of Life (Gospel of Philip 71:22-24, Tripartite Tractate 106:25-107:18). The Tree of Knowledge is associated with the Law and the dual awareness of good and evil. As the Gospel of Philip explains: “It has the power to give knowledge of good and evil. It neither removed him from evil, nor did it set him in the good. Instead it created death for those who ate of it. For when it said, ‘Eat this. Do not eat that.’ it became the beginning of death.” (74:3-11).

This passage highlights a key insight: the rational understanding of moral distinctions, while necessary, is not sufficient for true transformation. It introduces division and conflict rather than resolving them. By focusing on external rules, the individual remains within the realm of the animate soul and does not access the deeper unity of the spiritual.

The consequence of this choice is separation—symbolized by the division of Adam and Eve. Eve represents the spiritual principle, and her separation from Adam signifies the loss of direct connection with the higher element. This state is described as spiritual death (Gospel of Philip 70:10-12), not in the sense of annihilation but as a condition of disconnection and ignorance.

Valentinian teaching also categorizes humanity into three types based on which element is dominant. These are symbolized by the three children of Adam and Eve: Cain, Abel, and Seth. Cain represents the carnal type, governed by instinct and ignorance. Abel represents the animate type, characterized by moral awareness and rationality. Seth represents the spiritual type, in whom the higher seed has been activated (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:7:5, Excerpts of Theodotus 54:1).

This classification is closely linked to the parable of the sower. The different types of soil correspond to different responses to the message of salvation. Those who reject it are “the seeds that fell on the path” (Matthew 13:4), representing the carnal. Those who receive it partially are “the seeds that fell among the thorns” (Matthew 13:7), representing the animate. Those who fully accept and understand it are “the seeds sown in the good earth” (Matthew 13:8), representing the spiritual.

Importantly, these categories are not fixed. They are stages of development rather than predetermined identities. Every human being possesses the spiritual seed, but its realization depends on response and effort. The divisions among people reflect differences in awareness and maturity, not inherent worth.

Transformation occurs through two major transitions. The first is the movement from the carnal to the animate, where instinct is brought under the guidance of reason and moral understanding. The second is the movement from the animate to the spiritual, where rational knowledge gives way to direct insight and gnosis. These transitions are the essence of salvation in Valentinian thought.

Thus, salvation is not an external event but an internal process. It involves the gradual alignment of the human being with the highest element within. The carnal is overcome, the rational is refined, and the spiritual is awakened. Through this process, ignorance is destroyed and true knowledge is attained.

In this way, Valentinian psychology offers a comprehensive vision of the human condition. It explains the presence of conflict within the individual, the possibility of growth, and the ultimate goal of existence. By understanding the three elements within, one gains insight into both the problem and the solution—into the nature of deficiency and the path to its resolution.


Carnal, Animate, and Spiritual Humanity: The Threefold Path of Salvation

Valentinian theology offers a detailed and penetrating analysis of the human condition by distinguishing three types of people—carnal (choic), animate (psychic), and spiritual (pneumatic). These are not merely categories of personality, but states of consciousness determined by which element within the human being is dominant. Each type reflects a different relationship to knowledge, ignorance, and salvation, and each corresponds to a stage in the process of transformation.

At the lowest level are the carnal human beings. In such individuals, the irrational or carnal soul dominates entirely, obscuring all higher awareness. This condition is described in the Gospel of Truth as a kind of intoxication or stupor. The irrational element “acts like a drug that makes them forget their true origin and become a creature of the world” (Gospel of Truth 22:17-18). This forgetfulness is not passive but deeply immersive, enveloping the individual in a false sense of reality.

The carnal state is vividly portrayed as a nightmare, a condition of confusion, fear, and helplessness: “As when one falls soud asleep and finds oneself in the midst of nightmares: running towards somewhere, powerless to get away while being pursued--in hand to hand combat--being beaten--falling from a great height..sometimes too it seems that one is being murdered..or killing one's neighbours, with whose blood one is smeared..” (Gospel of Truth 29:8-25). This imagery captures the chaotic and violent nature of existence when dominated by ignorance and instinct.

Carnal individuals live entirely for immediate gratification. Their actions are governed by impulse and desire, without consideration for others or for higher principles. As Paul states, “Their god is their bodily desires..they think only of things that belong to this world” (Philippians 3:19). This condition is one of enslavement. The Gospel of Philip explains: “If we are ignorant of it, it sinks its roots within us and yields its crops within our hearts. It dominates us. We are its slaves. It takes us captive so that we do the things we do not want and do not do the things we want.” (Gospel of Philip 83:22-28).

Cain is presented as the archetype of the carnal human being. He embodies the destructive tendencies of this state—envy, violence, and the lust for power. He is described as a “child of the Devil” (John 1:44 cf. Herakleon 46, Gospel of Philip 66:4-6), not in a literal sense, but as one whose nature is aligned with the lower impulses. Driven by this inner force, “he became a murderer just like his father and killed his brother” (Gospel of Philip 66:6-10). The story of Cain thus illustrates the inevitable outcome of a life governed by the carnal element.

Those who remain in this state are described in the parable of the sower as “the seeds that fell along the path” (Matthew 13:18). They hear the message of salvation but cannot understand it, because it has no resonance within them (cf. Matthew 13:19). As Valentinus explains, “The material ones were strangers and did not see his (i.e. Jesus') likeness and had not known him, for he came by means of a fleshly form.” Such individuals are called “creature[s] of oblivion” (Gospel of Truth 2:35), emphasizing their disconnection from true knowledge.

The fate of the carnal is dissolution. At death, they are said to be “scattered into the outer darkness and pass into nonexistence” (Gospel of Truth 2:35-36, Excerpts of Theodotus 37, 55:3, Ireneus Against Heresies 1:6:1, Ep 7:6). This is because they were never truly alive in the higher sense. As the texts state, they were not alive spiritually (Treatise on the Resurrection 48:23-24, Gospel of Philip 52:15-17). Their existence was confined entirely to the realm of ignorance.

The second category is the animate or psychic human being. This state represents a significant development beyond the carnal, as it involves awakening and transformation. The transition begins with a “call from above,” which disrupts the unconscious state of the individual. This awakening brings with it an acute awareness of suffering—grief, fear, and confusion that had previously been suppressed.

This experience leads to repentance, which is central to the animate condition. As the Exegesis on the Soul states: “The beginning of salvation is repentance. Therefore before Christ's appearance came John preaching the baptism of repentance. And repentance takes place in distress and grief” (Exegesis on the Soul 135:21-26). Repentance is not merely regret but a turning point—a recognition of one’s condition and a plea for transformation.

Through this process, the individual “ascends” to the level of the Craftsman, symbolizing the rational soul. However, this state remains incomplete. The animate person is still ignorant of the highest reality, just as the Craftsman is ignorant of Wisdom (cf. Ireneus Against Heresies 1:5:1, Excerpts of Theodotus 47:2). Although guided unconsciously by the spiritual element, the animate individual believes that all actions originate from oneself (Excerpts of Theodotus 53:4).

Animate people are characterized by faith and ethical striving. They seek to live rightly and are strengthened by good works (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:6:2). However, because they lack direct knowledge, they depend on external rules and instructions. They remain subject to the Law and its demands (Galatians 3:23-24), as well as to internal temptations described as “demons,” or selfish thoughts (cf. Gospel of Philip 65:1-7, 85:32-86:6).

A powerful metaphor describes the soul in this state as an inn: “vandalized by its visitors” (Valentinus Fragment 2, Hip 34:6). This image conveys the instability of the animate condition, constantly influenced by competing desires and external pressures. Like the carnal, the animate person may still be driven by ambition and conflict, leading to struggles both within and without (Tripartite Tractate 79:20-80:11).

In the parable of the sower, these are “the seeds who fell amongst the thorns” (Matthew 13:22). They receive the message and understand it, but they are hindered by hesitation and attachment to worldly concerns. “Worries about this world and the love for riches choke the message” (Matthew 13:22). As a result, they do not attain full knowledge and remain in a state of partial understanding.

In their ignorance, animate individuals misdirect their devotion. As Herakleon observes, “They worshipped the creation and not the true creator” (Herakleon Fragment 23 cf. Romans 1:25). Nevertheless, they retain the capacity for salvation. By choosing good over evil and resisting temptation, they can be saved (Excerpts of Theodotus 55:3, Ep 7:3, 7:9).

After death, those who are saved in this state dwell with the Craftsman. However, they do not achieve their full potential until a later stage. If, on the other hand, they choose evil, they become “children of the Devil” by intent (Herakleon 46 cf. John 8:44) and fall back into the carnal condition, sharing its ultimate fate.

The highest category is the spiritual or pneumatic human being. This state is attained through gnosis—a direct and transformative knowledge of the Deity. Unlike faith or reasoning, this knowledge is immediate and experiential. The individual encounters the risen Christ inwardly, often described symbolically as a personal angel.

As the texts explain, just as Sophia was formed through knowledge, so too the spiritual person is formed by divine influence: “they themselves are formed according to knowledge by the angels who will be their bridegrooms” (cf. Excerpts of Theodotus 61, Exegesis on the Soul 132:9-23). This union represents the completion of the individual’s transformation.

The spiritual person no longer relies on external authority. As Herakleon states, they “come to believe from the Truth itself” (Herakleon 39). Freed from ignorance, they awaken to their true identity. They remember their origin and destiny: “I trace my origins to the Pre-existent One. I am returning to my own from whence I came” (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:21:5, 1 Apocalypse of James 34:17-18).

This realization is described as resurrection—not a future event, but a present transformation. It is the awakening from the death of ignorance. As the Gospel of Philip teaches: “People who believe they will die first and then rise up are mistaken. If they do not first receive resurrection while they are alive, once they have died they will receive nothing” (Gospel of Philip 73:1-5).

Through this awakening, the individual undergoes a profound change. “Imperishability descends upon the perishable” (Treatise on the Resurrection 48:38-49:1), and they “shall never die” (John 11:26). This is not the continuation of ordinary life but the attainment of a higher state of existence.

The culmination of this process is union with the Fullness. The spiritual person enters into a state described as the “bridal chamber,” where they achieve complete integration. As one text states, they “attain to the vision of the Father and become intellectual Aeons, entering into the intelligible and eternal union in marriage” (Excerpts of Theodotus 64:1). In this state, “the world has already become the eternal realm” (Gospel of Philip 86:11-14).

Valentinus describes this condition beautifully: “The Father is within them and they are within the Father, being perfect, being undivided in the truly good one, being in no way deficient in anything, but they are refreshed in the Spirit” (Gospel of Truth 42:27-33). This is the complete resolution of deficiency and the restoration of unity.

The attainment of knowledge also transforms the individual’s relationship to the world. As ignorance dissolves, so too does the system built upon it. “Since deficiency came into being when the Father was unknown, therefore when the Father is known, from that moment on , the deficiency will no longer exist.” (Gospel of Truth 24:28-32). The “realm of appearance” fades away, “pass[ing] away in the harmony of unity” (Gospel of Truth 25:1-6).

This transformation is both personal and cosmic. Each individual who attains knowledge contributes to the dissolution of ignorance. The world itself is described as being dissolved by knowledge (Ireneus Against Heresies 1:21:4). Those who have awakened “rule over creation and the whole of corruption” (Valentinus Fragment 4).

The path to this state requires discipline and detachment. One must live “in the world” but not “of the world” (John 17:11, 17:14). As the Treatise on the Resurrection advises: “Everyone should practice in many ways to gain release from this element so that one might not wander aimlessly but rather might recover one's former state of being” (49:30-36).

Ultimately, knowledge restores the individual to their original condition. It purifies and unifies. As the Gospel of Truth declares: “It is within Unity that each one will attain himself; within knowledge he will purify himself from multiplicity into Unity, consuming matter (i.e. the carnal element) within himself like a fire and darkness by light, death by life” (25:10-20).

Thus, the threefold division of humanity is not a final separation but a dynamic process. Through knowledge, the lower is overcome, the middle is transformed, and the highest is realized. The human being is reintegrated, and the purpose of existence is fulfilled.