Showing posts with label AIL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AIL. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 March 2025

there are many powers in heaven

Elohim and Creation
or
Gods and Creation







"there are many powers in heaven" Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5 - Sefaria. 

# **There Are Many Powers in Heaven**  

The Mishnah states, *"There are many powers in heaven."* (Sanhedrin 4:5, Sefaria). This statement, though brief, reflects an ancient belief that divine power is not singular in manifestation but operates through multiple agencies. Early Christian Gnostic sects were accused of heresy for teaching that the Deity is not the immediate creator of the world and humanity. The Valentinians taught that a creative agency called the Demiurge (meaning "craftsman" or "artisan") and the archons created and oversee the physical universe. These entities were seen as subordinate *Elohim* (gods or angels) to the spiritual *Logos*.  

But where does this teaching originate? Is it biblical?  

## **Historical Traditions of Multiple Powers in Heaven**  

This concept is not unique to Gnostic Christianity; it has deep roots in Jewish traditions. The *Tripartite Tractate*, a Valentinian text, highlights conflicting interpretations among Jewish sects regarding divine agency. It states:  

*"By interpreting them, they established many sects which exist to the present among the Jews. Some say that the God who made a proclamation in the ancient scriptures is one. Others say that he is many. Some say that God is simple and was a single mind in nature. Others say that his activity is linked with the establishment of good and evil. Still others say that he is the creator of that which has come into being. Still others say that it was by the angels that he created."* (*Tripartite Tractate*)  

Those who attribute creation to angels appear to be those who "say that he is many." This belief finds support in various Jewish writings, including the *Book of Jubilees*.  

### **The Book of Jubilees and Angelic Agency**  

The *Book of Jubilees* (dated to 160–150 BCE) presents a tradition where angels played an essential role in the revelation of divine laws and the creation of the world. It claims to be a record of Moses' revelations from angels on Mount Sinai:  

*"And He said to the angel of the presence: Write for Moses from the beginning of creation till My sanctuary has been built among them for all eternity."* (*Jubilees* 1:26)  

Chapter 2 of *Jubilees* speaks of the creation of the *Elohim*, called "spirits" and "angels" in the Ethiopic texts. If an original Hebrew text were available, the word for "angel" might have been *Elohim*, meaning "powers" or "mighty ones." The angels serve before the Deity in a structured hierarchy, with some controlling the natural world.  

The pronouns *"we"* and *"us"* in *Jubilees* are consistently applied to the angels acting on behalf of the Deity, never as a "royal we." For example:  

- *"And He gave us a great sign, the Sabbath day, that we should work six days, but keep Sabbath on the seventh day from all work."* (*Jubilees* 2:17)  
- *"And on the six days of the second week we brought, according to the word of God, unto Adam all the beasts, and all the cattle, and all the birds."* (*Jubilees* 3:1)  
- *"And the Lord said unto us: 'It is not good that the man should be alone: let us make a helpmeet for him.'"* (*Jubilees* 3:4)  

This perspective suggests that when Genesis 1:26 states, *"Let us make man in our image,"* it refers to God addressing His angels rather than using a plural form for Himself.  

## **The Book of Enoch and the Archangels**  

The *Book of Enoch* expands on the concept of heavenly hierarchies, listing seven archangels:  

*"These are the names of the holy angels who watch: Uriel, Raphael, Raguel, Michael, Saraqâêl, Gabriel, and Remiel."* (*Enoch* 20)  

Each archangel has a specific function:  

- Uriel: Over the world and Tartarus  
- Raphael: Over the spirits of men  
- Raguel: Over the luminaries  
- Michael: Over righteous humanity and chaos  
- Saraqâêl: Over the spirits who sin  
- Gabriel: Over Paradise and the cherubim  
- Remiel: Over those who rise at the Resurrection  

This understanding influenced the Gnostic concept of the *Hebdomad*, a group of seven archons governing the world.  

## **Jewish Views from Alexandrian Thought**  

Philo of Alexandria, a Jewish philosopher, distinguished between the supreme God and subordinate divine beings. He interprets Genesis 1:26 as referring to divine assistants:  

*"For no mortal thing could have been formed on the similitude of the supreme Father of the universe, but only after the pattern of the second deity, who is the Word of the supreme Being."* (*Questions and Answers on Genesis*, II)  

Philo describes the *Logos* as God’s reason, His firstborn son, and the instrument through which creation occurs:  

*"God, like a shepherd and a king, governs the earth, the water, the air, and the fire, appointing, as their immediate superintendent, His own right reason (*logos*), His firstborn son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred company as the lieutenant of the great king."* (*On Husbandry*)  

This aligns with John 1:1-3, where the *Logos* (Word) is described as the divine agent in creation.  

## **Gnostic Perspectives on Divine Powers**  

The Gnostic teacher Basilides held that angels created the world and governed nations:  

*"Those angels who occupy the lowest heaven, that, namely, which is visible to us, formed all the things which are in the world, and made allotments among themselves of the earth and of those nations which are upon it."* (*Irenaeus, Against Heresies*, I.24.4)  

Menander, another Gnostic teacher, taught that the world was created by angels, echoing Jewish and Platonic thought about intermediaries in creation.  

## **Conclusion**  

The idea that there are many powers in heaven is well-supported in both Jewish and early Christian traditions. The *Book of Jubilees*, the *Book of Enoch*, Philo, and early Gnostic writings all describe a structured hierarchy of divine beings who act as intermediaries in creation and governance. The *Elohim* of the Hebrew Bible are not necessarily a singular entity but a collective term for divine beings that assist in executing God’s will.  

Understanding Genesis 1:26, *"Let us make man in our image,"* in this context suggests a reference to divine intermediaries rather than a singular God speaking in plurality. The Christian *Logos*, identified with Jesus, was seen as the highest of these divine powers, the *firstborn of all creation* (Colossians 1:15), through whom all things were made.  

This ancient belief in multiple powers in heaven was not heretical but deeply embedded in Jewish thought, later influencing Christian theology.














Early Christian Gnostic sects were accused of heresy for teaching that the Deity, is not immediately the creator of our world, nor of our race. The Valentinians taught that creative agency called the Demiurge (meaning "craftsman" or "artisan") and the archons created and oversees the physical universe. The Demiurge and the archons are subordinate gods (Elohim), or angels to the spiritual Logos.

Where does this teaching come from is it biblical?

Well obviously these teachings must have a biblical foundation which we will look at later. But first we will look at the historical tradition of this teaching

First a look at the Tripartite Tractate which shows conflicting interpretations among Jewish sects as pairs of opposite views. Three such pairs are listed:

By interpreting them, they established many sects which exist to the present among the Jews. Some say that the God who made a proclamation in the ancient scriptures is one. Others say that he is many. Some say that God is simple and was a single mind in nature. Others say that his activity is linked with the establishment of good and evil. Still others say that he is the creator of that which has come into being. Still others say that it was by the angels that he created. (The Tripartite Tractate)

"that which has come into being" presumably "created things"


Those who attribute to the angels a mediating role at creation seem to be identical with those who "say that he is many."
Jewish Views From Palestinian  
The first historical text we will look at is the Book of Jubilees (the Oxford Annotated Bible and the Mercer Bible Dictionary conclude the work can be dated to 160–150 BC)

The Book of Jubilees claims to present "the history of the division of the days events of the years, the year-weeks, and the jubilees of the world" as revealed to Moses by angels while he was on Mount Sinai for forty days and forty nights.

Chapter 1:25 And do thou write down for thyself all these words which I declare unto thee on this mountain, the first and the last, which shall come to pass in all the divisions of the days in the law and in the testimony and in the weeks and the jubilees unto eternity, until I descend and dwell with them throughout eternity.'
26 And He said to the angel of the presence: Write for Moses from the beginning of creation till My sanctuary has been built among them for all eternity.


Angels were used to send down the Quran to Muhammad; it was not sent down directly from God. And this seems to apply in every context that We is used in the Quran.

Chapter 2 of the Book of Jubilees gives us information about the creation of the elohim who are called spirits and angels in the manuscripts of the Ethiopic texts which we have from 15th and 16th centuries. However I believe if we could see an Hebrew original manuscript text the word for angel would be elohim spirits of powers or Mighty Ones.

The spirits and the angels are the ones who serve before the Deity there is an hierarchy to the spirits/elohim the angels of the presence and sanctification would seem to be the archangels, other angles control the natural world each group controls different forces of nature: .


The “heavens and the earth”  were created in a beginning before the first “day” of creation began. (Gen. 1:1)

In the book of Jubilees the pronouns "we"  and "us" is always used of the angels who act on behalf of the Deity:

chapter 2:17 And He gave us a great sign, the Sabbath day, that we should work six days, but keep Sabbath on the seventh day from all work.

Chapter 3:1 And on the six days of the second week we brought, according to the word of God, unto Adam all the beasts, and all the cattle, and all the birds,


chapter 3:4 And the Lord said unto us: 'It is not good that the man should be alone: let us make a helpmeet for him.'

Chapter 3:15 And in the first week of the first jubilee, [1-7 A.M.] Adam and his wife were in the garden of Eden for seven years tilling and keeping it, and we gave him work and we instructed him to do everything that is suitable for tillage.

Chapter 10:22 And the Lord our God said unto us: Behold, they are one people, and (this) they begin to do, and now nothing will be withholden from them. Go to, let us go down and confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech, and they may be dispersed into cities and nations, and one purpose will no longer abide with them till the day of judgment.'
Chapter 14:20 And on that day we made a covenant with Abram, according as we had covenanted with Noah in this month; and Abram renewed the festival and ordinance for himself for ever.

Surah 50:16 And We have already created man and know what his soul whispers to him, and We are closer to him than [his] jugular vein (Surah Qaf [50:16])

According to Shia Islam God does not always do works himself directly he uses the angels to do them.

According to one 
French orientalist and scholar "we" refers to both God and Gabriel the Archangel.

So in the 
book of Jubilee  "We" is used of the angels it is never used as the "Royal WE" (just as in English for royalty). This is how Christians should understand the "We"  and "Us" used in the book of Genesis 1:26, 3:22; 11:7

Next we come to the book of Enoch which lists seven archangels. The Life of Adam and Eve lists the archangels as well: Michael, Gabriel, Uriel, Raphael and Joel. Although this passage does not speak about the angels involed with the creation it does show again an hierarchy among the angels Uriel is in charge of the world and Tartarus, 
Raphael controls or rules over the spirits of men, 

The understanding of seven archangels is also the foundation of the understand about the Hebdomad a group of seven archons which rule over the world and the physical universe

The book of Enoch chapter 20

1. And these are the names of the holy angels who watch.
2. Uriel, one of the holy angels, who is over the world and over Tartarus.
3. Raphael, one of the holy angels, who is over the spirits of men.
4. Raguel, one of the holy angels who †takes vengeance on† the world of the luminaries.
5. Michael, one of the holy angels, to wit, he that is set over the best part of mankind ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ over chaos.
6. Saraqâêl, one of the holy angels, who is set over the spirits, who sin in the spirit.
7. Gabriel, one of the holy angels, who is over Paradise and the serpents and the Cherubim.
8. Remiel, one of the holy angels, whom God set over those who rise.

Jewish Views from Alexandrian 

(1.227) For the scripture says: "I have seen what Laban does unto Thee,"{53}{#ge 31:12.} namely, things contrary to the benefits which I conferred on you, things impure, wicked, and altogether suited to darkness. But it is not right for the man who anchors on the hope of the alliance of God to crouch and tremble, to whom God says, "I am the God who was seen by thee in the place of God." (1.228) A very glorious boast for the soul, that God should think fit to appear to and to converse with it. And do not pass by what is here said, but examine it accurately, and see whether there are really two Gods. For it is said: "I am the God who was seen by thee;" not in my place, but in the place of God, as if he meant of some other God. (1.229) What then ought we to say? There is one true God only: but they who are called Gods, by an abuse of language, are numerous; on which account the holy scripture on the present occasion indicates that it is the true God that is meant by the use of the article, the expression being, "I am the God (ho Theos);" but when the word is used incorrectly, it is put without the article, the expression being, "He who was seen by thee in the place," not of the God (tou Theou), but simply "of God" (Theou); (1.230) and what he here calls God is his most ancient word, not having any superstitious regard to the position of the names, but only proposing one end to himself, namely, to give a true account of the matter; for in other passages the sacred historian, when he considered whether there really was any name belonging to the living God, showed that he knew that there was none properly belonging to him; but that whatever appellation any one may give him, will be an abuse of terms; for the living God is not of a nature to be described, but only to be.


(62) Why is it that he speaks as if of some other god, saying that he made man after the image of God, and not that he made him after his own image? (#Ge 9:6). Very appropriately and without any falsehood was this oracular sentence uttered by God, for no mortal thing could have been formed on the similitude of the supreme Father of the universe, but only after the pattern of the second deity, who is the Word of the supreme Being; since it is fitting that the rational soul of man should bear it the type of the divine Word; since in his first Word God is superior to the most rational possible nature. But he who is superior to the Word holds his rank in a better and most singular pre-eminence, and how could the creature possibly exhibit a likeness of him in himself? Nevertheless he also wished to intimate this fact, that God does rightly and correctly require vengeance, in order to the defence of virtuous and consistent men, because such bear in themselves a familiar acquaintance with his Word, of which the human mind is the similitude and form. (Questions and Answers on Genesis, II)


The logos is only God’s reason, His image, the instrument by which He created the world, or in a more anthropomorphic way, His “first-born son” or His superintendent (On Husbandry 51)


and let every one in his turn say the same thing, for it is very becoming to every man who loves God to study such a song as this, but above all this world should sing it. For God, like a shepherd and a king, governs (as if they were a flock of sheep) the earth, and the water, and the air, and the fire, and all the plants, and living creatures that are in them, whether mortal or divine; and he regulates the nature of the heaven, and the periodical revolutions of the sun and moon, and the variations and harmonious movements of the other stars, ruling them according to law and justice; appointing, as their immediate superintendent, his own right reason (logos), his first-born son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred company, as the lieutenant of the great king; for it is said somewhere, "Behold, I am he! I will send my messenger before thy face, who shall keep thee in the Road."{7}{#ex 23:20.} (On Husbandry)

The Greek word logos is translated reason in 1Peter 3:15 

1Pe 3:15  But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and [be] ready always to [give] an answer to every man that asketh you a reason <3056> of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

(109) For Moses says that he cannot be defiled neither in respect of his father, that is, the mind, nor his mother, that is, the external sense; {26} {#le 21:11.} because, I imagine, he has received imperishable and wholly pure parents, God being his father, who is also the father of all things, and wisdom being his mother, by means of whom the universe arrived at creation; ()

Philo had inferred from the expression "Let us make man" of the Book of Genesis that God had used other beings as assistants in the creation of man, and he explains in this way why man is capable of vice as well as virtue, ascribing the origin of the latter to God, of the former to his helpers in the work of creation

It is on this account that Moses says, at the creation of man alone that God said, "Let us make man," which expression shows an assumption of other beings to himself as assistants, in order that God, the governor of all things, might have all the blameless intentions and actions of man, when he does right attributed to him; and that his other assistants might bear the imputation of his contrary actions. Philo: On the Creation, XXIV"

The Logos or Word, (which was later manifested in the flesh of Jesus making the Christ), was the Master Worker that He used in creating all things. (John 1:1-3; Col 1:13-16; Pr 8:30) 


This Word, or Logos, was God’s only direct creation, the only-begotten son of God

Certainly the Word or Logos, whom God his Father used in bringing into existence all other creatures, was the chief or the firstborn among all the other angels whom the Hebrew Scriptures call elohím or “gods.” 



Gnostic Views 

Irenaeus writes about the Basilides system Those angels who occupy the lowest heaven, that, namely, which is visible to us, formed all the things which are in the world, and made allotments among themselves of the earth and of those nations which are upon it. The chief of them is he who is thought to be the God of the Jews; (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, i. 24, 4.)

menander said that the world was made by the angels the Satornilians, who believed the world was made by only seven angels Epiphanius (Bishop of Constantia in Cyprus) (2009). The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Book I (sects 1-46)Like that of all else is the creation of mankind as well.


The spiritual Logos moved him invisibly, as he perfected him through the Demiurge and his angelic servants, who shared in the act of fashioning in multitudes, when he took counsel with his archons. Like a shadow is earthly man, so that he might be like those who are cut off from the Totalities. Also he is something prepared by all of them, those of the right and those of the left, since each one in the orders gives a form to the [...] in which it exists. (The Tripartite Tractate)


Ptolemy's Letter to Flora:

For it is evident that the Law was not ordained by the perfect God the Father, for it is secondary, being imperfect and in need of completion by another, containing commandments alien to the nature and thought of such a God.
On the other hand, one cannot impute the Law to the injustice of the opposite, God, for it is opposed to injustice. Such persons do not comprehend what was said by the Savior. For a house or city divided against itself cannot stand [Matt 12:25], declared our Savior. Furthermore, the apostle says that creation of the world is due to him, for Everything was made through him and apart from him nothing was made. [John 1:3] Thus he takes away in advance the baseless wisdom of the false accusers, and shows that the creation is not due to a God who corrupts but to the one who is just and hates evil. Only unintelligent men have this idea, men who do not recognize the providence of the creator and have blinded not only the eye of the soul but also of the body. (Ptolemy's Letter to Flora)

Biblical Interpretation

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth

Mr. Parkhurst, in his lexicon under the word alah, cites many passages where Elohim is associated with other plurals. Upon close examination there will be found no goood reason to question the conclusion, that Elohim [translated God in Gen. 1:1] is a noun plural, and signifies "gods" (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

 (Christopher Maddocks)

In the light of this revelation I understand the Mosaic record of the creation. It pleased the King Eternal nearly six thousand years ago to add a new habitable province to His dominion; not by an original creation of a globe, but by the re-constitution of one already existing as one of the solar planets. He commanded His angels to go and execute the work according to the order detailed by Moses. They hearkened unto the voice of His word; and in six days finished all they were commanded to do. (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

But among all these there was not one fit to exercise dominion over the animal world, or to reflect the divine attributes. Therefore, the Elohim said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the living creatures." So Elohim created man in His image; male and female created He them. Further details concerning the formation of the human pair are given in the second chapter of Genesis, verses 7, 18, 21-25. These passages belong to the work of the sixth day; while that from verse 8 to 14 pertains to the record of the third; and from 15 to 17 is parallel with chapter 1:28-31, which completes the history of the sixth. (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

Ge 3:5 For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.

In the Hebrew the word rendered "gods" is Elohim, the same as occurs throughout the first chapter. From what other source but the sight of its eyes, unless by divine inspiration, could the serpent have derived information about the "gods"? It spoke of what it had seen and heard. But the animals were still without a king; therefore, said the Chief of the Elohim, "Let us make man in our image." There was none like the Elohim of all the creatures they had made; therefore, they determined to make an animal after their form. They shaped him with head, limbs and body like their own; so that he stood before them the earthly image of the celestial Elohim. As much their image as Seth was the image of his father Adam. (Gen 5:3) (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

GOD... US: Elohim. Plural: "sons of God", ie angels (Job 38:7; Gen 3:22; Psa 8:5; cp Num 12:8; Act 7:38; Gen 32:30 with Hos 12:3,4; 1Ki 22:19). The plural prob relates to angels, although the verb here is singular. So God prob entered into consultation with His surrounding hosts and conferred with them on the creation of man in their joint image. Angels involved in creation: Job 38:4-7; Psa 148:2 (describing creative acts of Gen 1); Psa 104:4,5 -- again in a creative context.

"It is credible that they [the Elohim] were once animal men of other spheres; that in a former state they were made subject to vanity not willingly; that while in the flesh they believed and obeyed God; that they succumbed to death as mortal men; that they rose from the dead, and so attained to immortality as the Elohim of the Invisible God. ..."

"Mortal and corruptible beings like ourselves become Elohim, mighty in strength, and framers of new worlds."

"Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them;" and the Yahweh Elohim, on reviewing the stupendous and glorious creation elaborated by the Spirit, pronounced it "VERY GOOD." Then the Elohim, or "Morning Stars sang together, and all the Sons of God shouted for joy" (Job 38:4-7).


so that creation is not the work of ONE GOD only, but of many gods.


Brothers, behold, then, your Gods and Creators



Many early Jewish and Gnostic Christians taught that the work of creation was done by the angels or the logos some groups call these beings the Demiurge and and his angelic servants


Chapter 2:1 And the angel of the presence spake to Moses according to the word of the Lord, saying: Write the complete history of the creation, how in six days the Lord God finished all His works and all that He created, and kept Sabbath on the seventh day and hallowed it for all ages, and appointed it as a sign for all His works.
2 For on the first day He created the heavens which are above and the earth and the waters and all the spirits which serve before him -the angels of the presence, and the angels of sanctification, and the angels [of the spirit of fire and the angels] of the spirit of the winds, and the angels of the spirit of the clouds, and of darkness, and of snow and of hail and of hoar frost, and the angels of the voices and of the thunder and of the lightning, and the angels of the spirits of cold and of heat, and of winter and of spring and of autumn and of summer and of all the spirits of his creatures which are in the heavens and on the earth, (He created) the abysses and the darkness, eventide <and night>, and the light, dawn and day, which He hath prepared in the knowledge of his heart.
3 And thereupon we saw His works, and praised Him, and lauded before Him on account of all His works; for seven great works did He create on the first day.


The angels themselves are ordered in hierarchical fashion and have been since their creation.

Three levels or ranks may be distinguished: the angels of the presence and the holy ones; the angels appointed over the elements and natural phenomena; and the angels appointed over the powers and other created entities (2:2). 

From the names of the two groups—the angels of the presence and the holy angels—one learns how closely related they are to God and why they are rightly styled the two great kinds (2:18). 

Most of the author references to angels are to these two elite classes.

41:1 2-3 record the creations of the first day, seven in number, viz. heaven, earth, the waters, spirits, the abysses, darkness, light.

According to our Book the angels were created on the first day, and this probably represents the view of earlier Judaism.

18 And all the angels of the presence, and all the angels of sanctification, these two great classes -He hath bidden us to keep the Sabbath with Him in heaven and on earth.

Cf. ii. 18, xv. 27, xxxi. 14. These are the two chief orders of angels. The "angels of sanctification" sing praises to God.

41:4 The various classes of angels that follow constitute the third or lowest order. They preside over the elements and natural phenomena; cf. 1 Enoch lx. 12-21, lxxv., lxxx.; 2 Enoch xix. 1-4, For the "angels of the winds," cf. Rev. vii. 1 f.; 1 Enoch xviii. 1-5, xxxiv.-xxxvi., lxxvi.



Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth

"God created" — The Hebrew is bar a Elohim: a verb in the singular number combined with a noun in the plural : "Mighty ones he created" (J. Thomas, Phanerosis p. 51). The use of a singular verb with a plural noun suggests one motivating power manifested through a multiplicity of agents. The one motivating power in creation was the "Spirit of God" (v. 2) or Yahweh Who worked through the angels to bring the creation into existence. 

This intimate relationship, so intimate as to constitute a Unity in plurality, (but not a plurality in the absolute and primary Power the source of all) is expressed in Isaiah 45:18, "Thus, saith Yahweh, that created the heavens hu ha-Elohim, He the Elohim that formed the earth and made it; He hath established it. He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited. I Yahweh, and none without." In this text Yahweh is twice repeated. This expresses one, being in the singular number; but Elohim is plural expressing two or a multitude; 

and this noun of multitude is prefaced, not by they as they the Elohim; but by 'He', as He the Elohim. This unusual feature is doctrinal not accidental, nor an arbitrary custom of language, but designed. It teaches that the creation was produced from one power ex ou, out of which, are all things, and that this one power operated through a plurality of agents, or Elohim, who are the spirit-embodiments of its rays" {Phanerosis p. 52).

SPIRIT OF GOD: Heb "ruach Elohim": "The spirit strength of the Mighty Ones". "Spirit" = the "wisdom" of Pro 8:22-26

“By the Word of Yahweh were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth” (Psa. 33:6).

Yahweh gave the command, and the Angels obeyed. He said: “let there be light, and there was light” (Gen. 1:3). “He spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast” (cp. Psa. 33:9). So it was that the Angels (Hebrew: Elohim—see Psa. 8:5) were the agents through which the Almighty accomplished His Will in creating the Heavens and Earth. So it is that we read in Genesis chapter 1: “In the beginning, Elohim created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1).

Saturday, 24 February 2024

Christian Kabbalah Pictographic Roots of the Name and Titles of God

Christian Kabbalah Pictographic Roots of the Name and Titles of God 





**Unlocking the Depth of Hebrew Names: A Pictographic Journey to Knowing God**

Understanding the names and titles of God in Hebrew is not merely an intellectual pursuit but a transformative journey that elevates the life and affections of those who seek to know Him. Each name and title is laden with significance, offering glimpses into the multifaceted nature of the Divine.

**Pictographic Insights:**

In Hebrew, the Name Yahweh is often combined with titles to form composite names of God. These combinations hold profound meanings, reflecting aspects of God's character and intentions. Delving into the original pictographic meanings of these names provides deeper insights into their significance.

For example, the name El Elyon, rendered "the most high God," combines two pictographic elements: El and Elyon. El, signifying Might or Power, is depicted as an ox head, symbolizing strength and leadership. Elyon, derived from halah meaning "to ascend," represents that which is elevated, lofty, or supreme. Together, El Elyon conveys the image of a powerful and exalted God, whose dominion extends over heaven and earth.

**Scriptural Context:**

The significance of a name or title is often illuminated by considering the circumstances of its original proclamation. The first use of El Elyon, for instance, occurs when Abram encounters Melchizedek after his victory over the kings. Melchizedek, bringing forth "bread and wine" as a type of Christ, foreshadows the future victory of the faithful and their blessing by the antitypical Melchizedek.

At this moment, Yahweh is revealed as the Lofty Power of the heavens, whose dominion extends to the earth. Abram, acknowledging God's role in his victory, worships Him as El Elyon, the most high God whose authority and dominion have been revealed through triumph.

**Prophetic Significance:**

The Name Yahweh is prophetic, proclaiming God's intention to manifest Himself without specifying the manner of manifestation. The addition of titles indicates the form of manifestation. For instance, Yahweh Tz'vaoth (the Lord of hosts) prophesies God's manifestation in an army, symbolizing the time when the Lord Jesus will lead the saints against the forces of darkness.

**Transformative Understanding:**

The study of Hebrew names and titles invites believers to ascend to a higher plane of understanding and affection. Just as El Elyon epitomizes God's authority, power, and dominion, believers are encouraged to set their affection on things above, transcending mere fleshly desires.

**Conclusion:**

In conclusion, the exploration of Hebrew names and titles offers a profound glimpse into the nature of God. Through pictographic analysis and scriptural context, we uncover layers of meaning that elevate our understanding and affection for the Divine. El Elyon, as an example, symbolizes the exalted power and authority of God, inspiring believers to aspire to higher spiritual planes. As we delve deeper into the significance of Hebrew names, we embark on a transformative journey of knowing and loving God.

אל EL

  The Hebrew term "אל" (Aleph-Lamed), known as "El," holds immense theological and linguistic significance in various contexts within the Hebrew Bible. This word, rooted in the original pictographic script, transcends mere phonetics, carrying layers of meaning that convey the foundational forces of power and strength.



**Pictographic Origins:**

In its earliest form, Hebrew script was pictographic, with each letter originating from a visual symbol representing a specific idea. The first letter, Aleph (א), was originally depicted as an ox head, symbolizing strength, leadership, and the primary source of power in ancient agrarian societies. The second letter, Lamed (ל), represented a shepherd's staff, signifying guidance, protection, and authority.



**Visual Representation:**

Combining these pictographs, "El" visually communicated the concept of a strong leader or a powerful shepherd—a figure of immense strength and authority, guiding and protecting his flock with unwavering might. This visual symbolism laid the foundation for the semantic richness and theological depth attributed to the word "El" in Hebrew scriptures and religious discourse.



**Theological Significance:**

In various passages throughout the Hebrew Bible, "El" is associated with power, might, and strength. Gesenius, a renowned Hebrew scholar, emphasizes that "El" consistently conveys the idea of strength and power to the Hebrews. Every member of the heavenly host is considered an Eloah, a mighty one, but only one is recognized as the original and self-existent "EL"—the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe.



**Yahweh as EL:**

Yahweh, the divine figure in the Hebrew Bible, identifies himself as EL in Isaiah 45:22, emphasizing his uniqueness and unparalleled power. The Hebrews are called to be witnesses to the truth that EL is the foundational force, unformed before Yahweh and not to be formed after, as echoed in Isaiah 43:10.



**New Testament Connection:**

In the teachings of Yeshua, humility is expressed in the acknowledgment that every member of the heavenly host, despite their might, is dependent on EL. This humility resonates with the idea that through the manifestation of EL's power, the seemingly impossible becomes possible, as affirmed in Luke 1:37.



**Psalms and Prophetic References:**

Psalms vividly express the idea that EL is the eternal dwelling place and the God (El) from everlasting to everlasting (Psalm 90:1-2). Throughout Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and other books, "El" is translated as "God," underscoring its pervasive presence in the Old Testament.



**Linguistic Analysis:**

Young's Index-Lexicon to the Old Testament provides a comprehensive overview of the various translations of El, with 212 instances translated as "God," 15 as "god," three as "power," four as "goodly," four as "mighty," and one each as "idol," "might," and "mighty one." The plural form, Elim, meaning powers, is also acknowledged in Num. 15:11 and Dan. 11:36, where it is rendered as "gods."



Pictographic Origins:



Beyond linguistic analysis, exploring the original pictographic nature of the Hebrew word "El" provides deeper insights. In its earliest form, "El" would have been represented by pictographs symbolizing strength, power, and perhaps a sense of elevation or exaltation. The combination of Aleph and Lamed as visual symbols of strength and guidance laid the foundation for the semantic richness and theological depth attributed to the word "El.



**Conclusion:**

In conclusion, the Hebrew word "El" transcends linguistic boundaries, encompassing a rich tapestry of meanings such as power, might, and strength. Rooted in the original pictographic script, EL emerges as a visual symbol of the foundational force in the universe. Whether expressed in the humility of Yeshua or the declarations in the Psalms and Isaiah, EL remains a central and profound concept in Hebrew thought, encapsulating the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe. The pictographic origins add a visual dimension to the understanding of EL, emphasizing its dynamic and impactful nature, making it a cornerstone in Hebrew scriptures and theological discourse..


In conclusion, the Hebrew word EL transcends linguistic boundaries, encompassing a rich tapestry of meanings such as power, might, and strength. Rooted in the original pictographic script, EL emerges as a visual symbol of the foundational force in the universe. Whether expressed in the humility of Yeshua or the declarations in the Psalms and Isaiah, EL remains a central and profound concept in Hebrew thought, encapsulating the absolute, omnipotent, and independent power of the universe.

**Unveiling the Essence of Eloah: Exploring the Pictographic Roots**



The Hebrew word "Eloah" stands as a linguistic doorway into the profound nature of divinity. Rooted in the ancient Hebrew script, Eloah transcends mere translation, beckoning us to delve into the original pictographic nuances that unveil a tapestry of power, might, and divine authority.



In its essence, Eloah is derived from the root "El," signifying power. The pictographic script of ancient Hebrew, a visual language in itself, weaves a narrative through symbols. The first letter, Aleph (א), visually represented as an ox head, encapsulates strength and primal power. Lamed (ל), the twelfth letter, symbolizes a shepherd's staff, connoting guidance and authority. Ayin (ע), the sixteenth letter, originally depicted an eye, suggesting insight and perception. Finally, Hei (ה), the fifth letter, represented a window or fence, denoting revelation or separation.



When these symbols converge to form Eloah (אֱלוֹהַ), the visual story unfolds. Aleph, the ox head, reflects primal power; Lamed, the shepherd's staff, portrays guidance; Ayin, the eye, symbolizes insight; and Hei, the window, signifies revelation. Together, they paint a vivid picture of a Mighty One infused with divine power, offering guidance, endowed with profound insight, and revealing the mysteries of existence.



Beyond the linguistic analysis, Eloah is not merely a term but a concept intricately woven into the fabric of theological discourse. It is not confined to a singular deity but extends to beings, including angels, who manifest divine power. This aligns seamlessly with the doctrine of God manifestation, where beings are strengthened by the divine power represented by El.



Isaiah's proclamation resounds, challenging the existence of any Eloah apart from Yahweh. The metaphorical use of "rock" underscores the steadfast and unshakeable nature of this divine power. David, in his contemplation, poses a rhetorical question, affirming that true strength exists only in union with Yahweh. Man, despite claiming Eloah status, stands in stark contrast to the omnipotent Yahweh, who holds the power to gather all life unto Himself.



The New Testament echoes this profound concept. Paul's teaching unveils a journey of believers in hope, aspiring to attain the glory of God. Peter's words amplify this, promising the bestowal of divine nature upon those who grasp the great and precious promises. Each believer, reaching this elevated state, becomes an Eloah, a Mighty One, reflecting the divine power infused within them.



In the amalgamation of believers, a collective Elohim emerges – Mighty Ones manifesting the divine power of El. This transcendent title signifies a communal expression of divine authority, where each individual Eloah contributes to the harmonious symphony of divine manifestation.



Within the scriptures, Eloah is interchangeably translated as "God" or "god." Its occurrence in various biblical books emphasizes its omnipresence, weaving through the tapestry of religious texts. From Deuteronomy to Psalms, Job to Isaiah, Eloah punctuates the sacred verses, etching its significance in the collective consciousness of ancient Israel.



As we navigate through the linguistic and theological landscape of Eloah, we encounter its Chaldee counterpart, Elah, and its plural form Eloheen. The book of Daniel, a treasure trove of Chaldean wisdom, unveils instances where "gods" appear in the plural, and "God" in the singular. An exception surfaces in Daniel 3:25, challenging the conventional rendering of "God" as plural, urging us to contemplate the nuanced meaning of "a son of the gods."



In conclusion, Eloah beckons us to journey beyond linguistic confines, inviting us to explore its original pictographic roots. In the symbolism of Aleph, Lamed, Ayin, and Hei, we discover a divine narrative that transcends words. Eloah emerges not just as a term but as a dynamic concept, weaving through the fabric of theological discourse, embracing believers as potential Mighty Ones in the symphony of divine manifestation. **ELOHIM: Unveiling the Plural Majesty in Ancient Hebrew Pictographs**



The Hebrew word "Elohim," resonating with divine significance, unfolds a captivating tale through its original pictographic roots. Composed of five letters, each symbolizing profound aspects of the divine, Elohim beckons us to explore the depths of its linguistic and theological essence.



In the ancient Hebrew script, the letters that constitute Elohim are symbols pregnant with meaning. Aleph (א), the first letter, with its ox head representation, speaks of primal strength and power. Lamed (ל), the twelfth letter, portrayed as a shepherd's staff, signifies guidance and authority. Hei (ה), the fifth letter, represented by a window or fence, implies revelation and separation. Yod (י), the tenth letter, symbolizes a hand, denoting action and creative power. Mem Sofit (ם), the final form of the letter Mem, the thirteenth letter, represents water, suggesting the flowing and life-giving nature of the divine.



Arranged harmoniously, these symbols give birth to Elohim (אֱלֹהִים), a plural form derived from Eloah. This plurality, however, does not indicate a multitude of gods but rather a majestic expression of the singular divine essence. Elohim occurs approximately 2,470 times in the Old Testament, offering a resounding testament to its prevalence in the sacred texts.



In Genesis 1 and 2, Elohim is translated as "God," aligning with the monotheistic understanding of the divine. However, an intriguing shift occurs in Genesis 3:5, where Elohim is translated as "gods." This linguistic nuance adds a layer of complexity to the divine narrative, inviting us to ponder the dynamics within the spiritual realm.



Psalm 8:5 further deepens our exploration, as Elohim is rendered as "angels." This translation finds validation in the New Testament, specifically in Hebrews 2:7, where Paul endorses the use of "angels" in Psalm 8:5. This revelation challenges traditional theological doctrines, suggesting that the term "God" extends to heavenly beings who manifest the attributes of the self-existent power.



The pivotal statement in Genesis 1:26, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness," has traditionally been interpreted in Christian doctrine as a reference to the Trinity. However, a closer examination within the linguistic and historical context reveals a different narrative. This "us" and "our" might well involve angels in mutual discussion about the work of creation, reframing the understanding of divine collaboration.



Elohim takes on diverse roles in the Old Testament, reflecting the multifaceted nature of divine authority. In Exodus 21:6, 22:8, 9, 22, 28, Elohim is translated as "judges." These judges were appointed to administer the law on behalf of Yahweh, invested with divine authority. The Revised Version, recognizing their representation of heavenly authority, often renders Elohim as "God" in these contexts.



In Exodus 7:1, Elohim assumes a unique application to Moses, as Yahweh declares, "I have made thee a god to Pharaoh." In this instance, Moses is elevated to a position where he acts with divine authority and power before the Egyptian ruler. This underscores the flexibility of the term Elohim, extending its application to mortal men who embody divine authority.



The application of Elohim to angels, mortal men, and even Moses challenges traditional theological boundaries. It paves the way for a nuanced understanding of the term's usage in referring to the Lord Yeshua (John 20:28) without necessarily endorsing the Trinitarian doctrine.



As we reflect on Elohim's pictographic roots, we find a language beyond words, a narrative woven into the symbols of Aleph, Lamed, Hei, Yod, and Mem Sofit. This divine tapestry invites us to contemplate the majesty of a singular, self-existent power expressed through the plurality of divine manifestations. Elohim, with its rich history and multifaceted applications, transcends linguistic confines, beckoning us to explore the depths of its sacred resonance.


In conclusion, Elohim emerges as a dynamic concept, transcending linguistic confines to embody divine plurality, authority, and judgment. Its pictographic origins, rooted in the ancient Hebrew script, unveil a tapestry of primal power, guidance, revelation, creative force, and finality. As we navigate through the theological labyrinth of Elohim, we unravel a profound narrative of divine manifestation and authority, echoing through the corridors of ancient texts and theological discourse.



 **Unveiling Shaddai: The Plural Power in Ancient Hebrew Pictographs**



The Hebrew term "Shaddai," translated as "Almighty," extends an invitation to explore the rich tapestry of its original pictographic roots. Rooted in a language that transcends mere translation, Shaddai beckons us to delve into the symbols that give life to its profound meaning.



Shaddai, according to Hebraists, is not merely a singular expression but a plural word. It emerges from the root "shadad," meaning to be strong or powerful. In its essence, Shaddai signifies the strength of the powerful ones, a manifestation of El, the mighty God. The plural nature of Shaddai suggests a collective power, a union of mighty beings acting in unison. This concept aligns with the idea that El Shaddai is not just a solitary force but a manifestation through the ministers of Deity.



The Hebrew letters composing Shaddai add another layer of meaning. Shin (ש), the twenty-first letter, carries the visual representation of teeth or a crown, symbolizing sharpness and authority. Dalet (ד), the fourth letter, resembles a door, representing a pathway or a gateway. Yod (י), the tenth letter, signifies a hand, denoting action and creative power. Together, these symbols form the visual representation of Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), offering a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of its meaning.



In biblical narratives, Shaddai comes alive through its interaction with Abraham. It is revealed as the strength of the powerful ones when several of them, appearing as three, condescend to partake in Abraham's hospitality. The narrative of Sodom and Gomorrah unfolds, showcasing the tremendous power of Shaddai when exerted upon the wicked. However, in contrast, Shaddai becomes a beneficent force, a ministering spirit towards the heirs of salvation, exemplifying goodness and protection.



The duality within the meaning of Shaddai is encapsulated in its derivation from the Hebrew root. The same root, with different vowel points, can signify either a nourisher (breast - Hebrew: shad) or a destroyer (shadad). This duality is evident in the contrasting roles of Shaddai – nourishing Abraham while simultaneously destroying the wicked cities of the Plain.



The duality in the nature of Shaddai reflects a broader theological truth. Yahweh, referred to as El Shaddai, can be either a nourisher or a destroyer based on how individuals respond to Him and His Word. This concept finds resonance in Psalms 18:24-27, highlighting the transformative power of one's relationship with the Almighty.



Shaddai is often joined with El, creating a powerful combination – "The Strength of the Destroyers" or "Nourishers." This union encapsulates the dynamic nature of the divine, capable of both nurturing and wielding destruction based on the adherence to divine principles.



As we reflect on Shaddai, it is crucial to acknowledge its pluriform nature. The term signifies not just a singular, overpowering force but a collective strength, an amalgamation of mighty beings aligned with divine purpose. The pictographic representation of Shaddai beckons us to see beyond mere letters, inviting us to explore the visual language that communicates authority, pathways, and creative power.



In conclusion, Shaddai stands as a linguistic masterpiece, woven with layers of meaning and depth. Its original pictographic nature, depicted through Shin, Dalet, and Yod, reveals a dynamic force that can both nurture and destroy. The narrative of Shaddai in biblical accounts emphasizes its plural essence, highlighting the strength of the powerful ones collectively manifesting the might of El. As we unravel the symbolism within Shaddai, we embark on a journey into the heart of divine power, where the plurality of strength meets the singularity of purpose.







**Unveiling the Power of Shaddai: Exploring the Pictographic Roots**



The Hebrew word "Shaddai" resounds with divine significance, offering a glimpse into the majestic power of the Almighty. Rooted in ancient Hebrew pictographs, Shaddai unveils a profound narrative of strength, nourishment, and divine authority.



In its essence, Shaddai is derived from the Hebrew root "shadad," meaning to be strong or powerful. The pictographic script of ancient Hebrew, a visual language rich in symbolism, paints a vivid picture of the word's meaning. The letters that constitute Shaddai carry deep symbolic significance, inviting us to delve into the layers of its linguistic and theological essence.



Shin (ש), the twenty-first letter in the Hebrew alphabet, is depicted as teeth or flames, representing sharpness and consuming power. Dalet (ד), the fourth letter, symbolizes a door, signifying entrance, protection, and provision. Yod (י), the tenth letter, is represented by a hand, connoting action, strength, and divine intervention.



When these symbols converge to form Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), the visual narrative unfolds. Shin, with its sharpness and consuming power, portrays the overwhelming might of the Almighty. Dalet, as a door, signifies divine provision and protection, offering a sanctuary for those under the shelter of Shaddai. Yod, the hand, symbolizes divine action and intervention, showcasing the omnipotent authority of the Almighty to accomplish His will.



The plural nature of Shaddai, according to Hebraists, adds a layer of complexity to its meaning. It signifies "mighty" or "powerful ones," reflecting the collective strength and authority inherent in the Almighty. This plurality is not indicative of multiple gods but rather emphasizes the multifaceted expressions of divine power.



Throughout the Old Testament, Shaddai is associated with the manifestation of divine power in both nourishment and destruction. The story of Abraham exemplifies this duality, as Shaddai nourished him while also bringing destruction upon the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. This dual aspect of Shaddai underscores the dynamic nature of divine intervention, offering nourishment to the righteous while executing judgment upon the wicked.



The root of Shaddai, according to Hebrew vowel points, can signify either "nourisher" or "destroyer." This dual interpretation encapsulates the multifaceted nature of the Almighty, who nurtures and sustains the righteous while also executing judgment upon the unrighteous. Thus, Yahweh can be to us either a nourisher or a destroyer, depending on our response to Him and His Word.



In biblical texts, Shaddai is often joined with El, emphasizing the combined strength and authority of the Almighty. As "The Strength of the Destroyers" or "Nourishers," Shaddai stands as a testament to the divine power to both nurture and destroy, depending on the response of humanity to the divine will.



In conclusion, the word Shaddai offers a profound glimpse into the majestic power and authority of the Almighty. Rooted in ancient Hebrew pictographs, its visual symbolism paints a vivid narrative of divine strength, nourishment, and intervention. As we unravel the layers of its meaning, we encounter a multifaceted deity who nurtures the righteous and executes judgment upon the wicked, embodying the dynamic nature of divine power and authority.



*Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh: Unveiling the Pictographic Essence of Divine Becoming**


The sacred expression "Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh," rooted in the profound Hebrew language, unravels a timeless narrative embedded within its pictographic symbols. Each letter in this divine triad — Ehyeh, Asher, and Ehyeh — carries a wealth of meaning, offering a glimpse into the dynamic nature of Yahweh's being and becoming.

**Ehyeh (אֶהְיֶה): The Unfolding Essence**


The first term, Ehyeh, comprises three Hebrew letters: Aleph (א), Hei (ה), and Yod (י). Each of these letters, when understood pictographically, adds layers of significance to the divine declaration.

- **Aleph (א): The Ox Head**


  The Aleph, symbolizing an ox head, is often associated with strength and the idea of the leader or first. In Ehyeh, it signifies the primacy of Yahweh's being and the source of all existence.


- **Hei (ה): The Window or Fence**

  The Hei, resembling a window or fence, embodies the concept of revelation and separation. In Ehyeh, it portrays the Divine as the One who reveals Himself to humanity, while maintaining a distinction between the Creator and the created.


- **Yod (י): The Hand**

  Yod, represented as a hand, is a symbol of action and strength. In Ehyeh, it signifies the active involvement of Yahweh in the unfolding of existence, the Divine hand guiding and shaping all things.

Together, Ehyeh encapsulates the idea of the Almighty being the primal source, the revealer of truth, and the active force shaping the ongoing narrative of creation.


**Asher (אֲשֶׁר): The Plural Relative Pronoun**

The term Asher, encompassing Aleph (א), Shin (שׁ), and Resh (ר), holds a unique position within the divine declaration. As a relative pronoun, it introduces a sense of multiplicity, encompassing both singular and plural, masculine and feminine.


- **Aleph (א): The Ox Head**


  Just as in Ehyeh, the Aleph in Asher emphasizes the primacy and strength of the Divine.


- **Shin (שׁ): Teeth or Flames**

  The Shin, resembling teeth or flames, signifies sharpness and consuming power. In Asher, it symbolizes the dynamic and all-encompassing nature of Yahweh.

- **Resh (ר): Head**

  The Resh, symbolizing a head, portrays authority and leadership. In Asher, it underscores Yahweh's role as the head or source of all that exists.

Together, Asher introduces a level of complexity, signifying the multitude of ways in which Yahweh is revealed, both singular and plural, masculine and feminine.


**Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh: The Divine Becoming**


Combining Ehyeh and Asher, the divine declaration unfolds as "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be." Ehyeh, as the first person singular future tense of the verb hahyah, signifies the continuous becoming and unfolding of the Divine. It is the declaration of Yahweh as the One who causes all things to become, the primal source manifesting in strength, revelation, and action.

Asher introduces the idea that Yahweh is the One who encompasses all possibilities. It is both singular and plural, masculine and feminine, reflecting the diverse ways in which the Divine reveals Himself. This multiplicity does not diminish the oneness of Yahweh but emphasizes the richness of His manifestations.

In etymology, Ehyeh is linked to the Hebrew verb hawah´ meaning "He Causes To Become." This portrays Yahweh as the Divine Craftsman, continually causing all things to become and fulfilling promises with unfailing precision.

In conclusion, Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh stands as a testament to the dynamic and multifaceted nature of Yahweh. Rooted in pictographic symbolism, it paints a vivid picture of the Divine as the primal source, the active force guiding creation, and the One who encompasses all possibilities. The continuous becoming of Ehyeh, coupled with the multiplicity of Asher, unfolds a divine narrative that transcends linguistic confines, inviting contemplation into the unfathomable depths of Yahweh's being and becoming.



 **Yahweh: Unveiling the Divine Name and Its Pictographic Essence**

In the sacred tapestry of Hebrew letters, the name Yahweh stands as a profound revelation, carrying within its letters a timeless promise and a glimpse into the eternal nature of the Divine. Comprised of four Hebrew letters, Yod (י), Hei (ה), Vav (ו), and Hei (ה), Yahweh not only reveals the name of the Almighty but encapsulates the very essence of existence.

The first letter, Yod (י), symbolizes a hand or arm, representing strength and action. The second letter, Hei (ה), signifies a window or fence, denoting revelation and separation. The third letter, Vav (ו), is shaped like a peg or nail, embodying connection and linkage. The fourth and final letter, Hei (ה), repeats the symbolism of revelation and separation.

In the name Yahweh, we encounter a pictographic narrative that unfolds with profound significance. Yod, the hand, signifies the mighty hand of the Divine, actively engaged in the affairs of creation and the lives of humanity. The first Hei, the window or fence, portrays the revelation of the Divine nature, offering a glimpse into the transcendent realm. Vav, the peg or nail, symbolizes the connection between the Divine and the created, a linkage that is unbreakable and enduring. The second Hei, repeating the symbolism of revelation and separation, reinforces the idea of ongoing communication and the distinction between the Creator and the created.


The meaning of Yahweh, rooted in the verb hahyah, "to be or become," unravels a profound truth about the nature of the Eternal One. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be" reflects an ongoing and continuous existence, portraying Yahweh as the One who continually manifests Himself. It is a declaration of unfailing promises, a proclamation that encapsulates the eternal unfolding of God's plans and purposes.

The term Ehyeh, etymologically linked to Yahweh, further emphasizes this continuous becoming and being. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be," articulated as Ehyeh´ ´Asher´ ´Ehyeh, reveals the dynamic nature of the Divine, the constant manifestation and fulfillment of His promises. Ehyeh is the first person singular of the future tense, emphasizing the unfolding and becoming nature of Yahweh.


The additional term Asher, meaning "who," introduces a sense of plurality and diversity. It is both singular and plural, masculine and feminine, pointing to the multifaceted expressions of the Divine. In the divine proclamation to Moses, "I WILL BE WHO I WILL BE," the relative pronoun Asher encompasses the entire spectrum of creation and existence. Yahweh declares Himself as the One who encompasses all, from the singular to the multitude, from the masculine to the feminine.


The memorialized words in Exodus 3:14-15, where Elohim instructs Moses, unveil the profound mystery of the Divine name. "I WILL BE WHO I WILL BE" becomes a timeless declaration, not confined to a specific era or generation. Yahweh identifies Himself as the Mighty Ones of the patriarchs, emphasizing continuity and the eternal nature of His promises.

In conclusion, the name Yahweh, rooted in the ancient Hebrew letters and their pictographic meanings, is a gateway to understanding the dynamic and eternal nature of the Divine. From the mighty hand of Yod to the revelation symbolized by Hei, the enduring connection represented by Vav, and the ongoing revelation and separation in the second Hei, Yahweh encapsulates the essence of existence itself. "I Shall Be Who I Shall Be" resonates through the ages, a declaration of the eternal unfolding of the Divine plan, promising continuity and fulfillment to all generations.

Tuesday, 18 April 2023

God is Corporeal Spirit John 4:24









John 4:24  "God is spirit; and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth" (RSV) 

PROBLEM: This verse is quoted to show that God is not tangible.

Most people misunderstand this verse and assume or declare that Spiritual beings are immaterial.

SOLUTION: Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial

Jesus is concerned with redemption and worship that is acceptable not with a description of whether God is tangible or not. cf. v.7 - 23.

It is in the framework of this purpose that men must worship the Father4. Jesus was teaching the woman that in the redemption he had brought, he had living waters5 to offer so that they could worship God "in spirit".

4 "To be spiritually minded is life". (Rom. 8:6).

5 the teaching of the Spirit (i.e. Word of God) (cf. v.14).

The verse does not say that we must have received some divine effluent from God into our hearts before we can worship correctly. The context shows that: 
correct knowledge ("in truth") is one necessity, "salvation is of the Jews". (v. 22). 
attitude of mind ("in spirit" i.e. sincerity, Josh. 24:14) is the other necessity6. 
"Ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father." (v. 21). 

6) It was not where the worship occurred (empty tradition or letter) that mattered but the attitude of the worshipper that mattered i.e. a positive response showing love and zeal for the truth. cf. 2 Cor. 3:5, 6.
God is Corporeal
"We should not assume that anything we cannot see or hear or touch is by nature, by its basic character, silent, immaterial or invisible. We cannot see God who is Spirit. We cannot, today, see angels who are spirits. We hear no voice from heaven. Yet we know that some men heard, saw and touched things which are eternal, things which may be described as eternal." 2

Stephen saw the "heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God",3 Acts 7:56 while those around saw nothing. So we cannot argue that God, Jesus and the angels are immaterial because we by our limited senses cannot see or touch them.4

Angels appeared as ordinary men to Abraham ("three men stood by Him", Gen.18:2).
In the future the "inhabitants of Jerusalem ... shall look upon me (Jesus) whom they have pierced". (Zech. 12:10). They will say unto him, "What are these wounds in thine hands?" 


That conception of God which thinks of Him as mere abstract power, intangible, universal, without person or locality is not true. We cannot worship abstract universal power and claim we worship God.

The phrase "God is Spirit" is sometimes offered as evidence that He is immaterial but Jesus (whom we know to be a corporeal being) is called the Lord the Spirit in 2 Cor. 3:17,18. "He is now no longer flesh and blood; but Holy Spirit Nature a flesh and bones embodiment of Spirit."

Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” (John 20:27).

"And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish,....and he (Jesus) took it, and did eat before them" (Luke 24:43).

Dr. Thomas’ comments as follows: 

"The spiritual body is constituted of flesh and bones energized by the spirit. This appears from the testimony concerning Jesus. On a certain occasion, he unexpectedly stood in the midst of his disciples, at which they were exceedingly alarmed, supposing they beheld a spirit, or ghost, as at a former time. But, that they might be assured that it was really he himself, he invited them to handle him, and examine his hands and feet: "For", said he, "a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have". He gave them further proof by eating a piece of fish and. Thomas placed his hand into his side, and was convinced that he was the same who had been crucified. What stronger proof can we need of this that the spiritual body is corporeal and tangible in nature? It is the animal body purified, not evaporated into gas, or vapour. It is a bloodless body; for in the case of Jesus he had poured out his blood on the cross. The life of the animal body is in the blood: but not so that of the spiritual body: the life of this resides with the Father." (Elpis Israel)

Since Jesus has flesh and bones it seems inconsistent that his Father would not. The writer to the Hebrews says that Christ was "the very image of his substance"

The angels are "ministering spirits" but they were seen by men many times.

Many passages in scripture show that God is corporeal and shares emotions that we do:

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." (Gen. l:26).

"God created man, in the likeness10 of God made he him" (Gen. 5:1, 3).

"He that sitteth in the heaven shall laugh" (Psa. 2:4).

"Hide not thy face . . . incline thine ear unto me" (Psa. 102:2).

"He hath looked down from the height of His sanctuary" (Psa. 102:19).

" ... sat on the right hand of God" (Mark 16:19).

"Man... is the image ... of God" (1 Cor. 11:7).

"Christ, who is the image of God"11 (2 Cor. 4:4).

"Men, which are after the similitude of God" (James 3:9).

Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial nor is he just referring to the nature of God, but is stating that God is acting in a specific manner for the redemption of man, as he once acted in the past. 

We should continually remember that to Israel God was Spirit, an Angel bearing His Name. This statement can be verified by an analysis of Isaiah 48:16, 17, 20.
"The Lord Yahweh, and his Spirit hath sent me. Thus saith Yahweh, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am Yahweh thy God ... which leadeth thee the way that thou shouldest go."

Note that the Spirit is "the Holy One of Israel".

In this Spirit activity of redemption, there was to be corresponding spirit in their worship.

So if God is spirit - and the Bible emphatically declares this truth - it does not mean that he does not have material form! It is consistent to say that God, *in the sense of an individual person* has a body of spirit

The fact that Israel believed God has a human form is quite clear from Gen 1:26 where God makes man in their image (demut), and their likeness (tselem). That this image and likeness refers to *genetic* resemblance is made clear from Gen 5:1,3 where Adam begets a son after his own likeness (tselem) after his image (demut) and called his name Seth.

Notice that "Adam begat a son in his likeness, after his image." If this language is understood, then surely it can be seen that we are created in the image of God even as Jesus was the express image of Him. 
If we are to be one with God even as Jesus is one with the Father (John 17:22) then we must be physically and morally like Jesus was after his glorification. 


2nd Century Understanding 
Also for early Christians like Origen, Heracleon, and Theodotus understood God to be Corporeal:

Heracleon understands this verse to refer to the nature of worship and not the nature of God:

Fragment 24, on John 4:24 (In John 4:24a, it says,) “God is spirit.” Undefiled, pure, and invisible is his divine nature. (In John 4:24b, it says,) “Those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth." Worthily of the one who is worshipped, in a spiritual, not a fleshly fashion.....and they worship in truth, not in error, as the Apostle teaches when he calls this kind of piety “ a rational service.” (Romans 12:2) (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John)

Theodotus understood the spirit world to have shape and body: 

10 But neither the spiritual nor the intellectual things, nor the archangels <and> those created first, nor even he is shapeless and formless and figureless and incorporeal, but he also has his own shape and body proportionate to his superiority over all spiritual things, just as also those created first (have their own shape and body) proportionate to their superiority over the beings beneath them.

For in general what has come to be is not without substance, but unlike the bodies in this world, they have form and body. For male and female here differ from each other, but there the Only-Begotten and uniquely intellectual one has been furnished with his own form and substance that is utterly pure and sovereign, and he has the immediate benefit of the Father’s power. The ones created first, even if in number they are distinct and each is bounded and delineated, in any case the likeness of their deeds demonstrates their unity, equality, and likeness. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)


14 The demons are said to be incorporeal, not because they have no bodies (for they have even shape and are, therefore, capable of feeling punishment), but they are said to be incorporeal because, in comparison with the spiritual bodies which are saved, they are a shade. And the angels are bodies; at any rate they are seen. Why even the soul is a body, for the Apostle says, “It is sown a body of soul, it is raised a body of spirit.” And how can the souls which are being punished be sensible of it, if they are not bodies? Certainly he says, “Fear him who, after death, is able to cast soul and body into hell.” Now that which is visible is not purged by fire, but is dissolved into dust. But, from the story of Lazarus and Dives, the soul is directly shown by its possession of bodily limbs to be a body. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)