Showing posts with label Valentinian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Valentinian. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 January 2025

Who is the Demiurge? Hebrews 11:10

Who is the Demiurge?
Or 
What is the Demiurge? 
Hebrews 11:10











### The Demiurge in Valentinian and Biblical Contexts


The term "Demiurge," derived from the Greek *dēmiourgos* (craftsman or builder), holds a nuanced place in ancient religious and philosophical thought. While it is not explicitly used in the Bible outside of the Greek translation of Hebrews 11:10, its conceptual framework resonates within both biblical and Valentinian contexts.


#### The Demiurge in Valentinian Tradition


In Valentinian Gnosticism, the Demiurge is seen in a positive light, contrasting with the negative portrayal of Yaldabaoth in Sethian Gnosticism. For Valentinians, the Demiurge is not a malevolent creator but an entity that reflects the divine. As stated in the *Excerpts of Theodotus* (47:1-3), the Demiurge is described as "an image of the Father." Similarly, the *Tripartite Tractate* (100:21-30) identifies the Demiurge as "the lord of all of them," bearing titles like "father," "god," "demiurge," and "judge," signifying his role as a representation of the divine attributes.


This perspective aligns with Basilides’ exalted description of the Demiurge: “He is more ineffable than ineffables, more potent than potencies, wiser than the wise, superior to every excellence that one can name” (*Fragments of a Faith Forgotten*, p. 253). Such depictions emphasize the Demiurge's role as a craftsman who orders the material universe, reflecting the divine will.


#### The Demiurge in Biblical Texts


In Hebrews 11:10, the term *dēmiourgos* is translated as “builder” or “maker,” applied to God as the architect of a city with foundations, symbolizing the Heavenly Jerusalem. The verse states: “For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker (*dēmiourgos*) is God.” This reference underscores the providential role of God as the ultimate craftsman, shaping a transcendent reality that surpasses the material world.


This concept finds echoes in apocryphal and early Christian texts. For instance, *Wisdom of Solomon* 13:1 reflects on humanity’s failure to recognize the "craftsman" (*technitēs*) behind creation while marveling at the works of the universe. Similarly, 1 Clement 20:11 speaks of the Creator who "ordered" the cosmos in harmony, emphasizing the divine wisdom and intentionality behind creation.


#### Fragment 13 and Hebrews 11:10


Fragment 13 of Valentinian tradition offers a spiritual interpretation of John 2:13-16, where Jesus ascends to Jerusalem and cleanses the temple. This ascent is seen as symbolic of the transition from the material realm to the animate (psychic) place, an intermediate state that mirrors Jerusalem. The “sanctuary” represents the Holy of Holies, reserved for the spiritual, while the outer courts symbolize those who achieve salvation outside the Pleroma.


Connecting this to Hebrews 11:10, the "city with foundations" can be interpreted as the spiritual reality beyond the animate realm. Just as the sanctuary signifies the Holy of Holies accessible only to the spiritual, the Heavenly Jerusalem represents the ultimate dwelling place for those who transcend the material and psychic realms. The Demiurge, as the builder of the material universe, serves as an intermediary step in the divine plan, crafting the visible world as a precursor to the ultimate spiritual fulfillment in the Pleroma.


#### The Architect and the Divine Plan


The language of Hebrews 11:10 and Fragment 13 highlights the duality of creation as both material and spiritual. The Demiurge, as an image of the Father, fulfills a critical role in ordering the cosmos, making the material world a reflection of divine harmony. This ordered creation, in turn, points toward the ultimate reality of the Heavenly Jerusalem, a city not built by human hands but by God as the true Demiurge.


In Valentinian thought, this progression aligns with the journey of the soul (understood here as the physical body and animate being) from ignorance to knowledge, from material existence to spiritual communion. The sanctuary and the Holy of Holies represent stages in this ascent, mirroring the believer's journey toward the Pleroma.


#### Conclusion


The concept of the Demiurge, as understood in Valentinian tradition and hinted at in biblical texts, underscores the interconnectedness of creation and divine purpose. In Hebrews 11:10, God as the *dēmiourgos* points to the ultimate fulfillment of creation in the Heavenly Jerusalem. Fragment 13 complements this by illustrating the spiritual ascent through the temple’s symbolism. Together, they provide a profound vision of a cosmos ordered by the divine craftsman, leading humanity toward its ultimate destiny in the fullness of the Pleroma.


### Etymology of Demiurge


The word *demiurge* originates from the Greek *δημιουργός* (*dēmiourgos*), a compound of *dēmos* (a unified group of people) and *ergon* (work). Initially, it denoted a craftsman or artisan who worked for the public, gradually expanding to mean a producer or creator. Strong's Concordance (1217) defines *dēmiourgos* as a workman, builder, or framer, emphasizing the public or collective aspect of their labor. In classical texts, the term often referred to God as the cosmic craftsman, as seen in Plato's works and later in early Christian writings like *1 Clement* and *Wisdom of Solomon*.


In Hebrews 11:10, the term *dēmiourgos* is used to describe God as the "builder and maker" of the city with foundations, referring to the Heavenly Jerusalem. This highlights God's role as the divine architect who designs and actualizes a transcendent reality beyond the physical universe.


---


### Connection Between Demiurge and Arche


The word *archē* (ἀρχή) in Greek, meaning "beginning," "principle," or "rule," shares an etymological and conceptual relationship with *dēmiourgos*. Strong's Concordance (746) defines *archē* as "first in order," derived from the root *arch-* (to rule). It is also linked to *archon* (758), meaning "ruler" or "leader." Thus, *archē* implies both an origin point and authority, tying the concept of creation to governance or rulership.


In the Gospel of John 1:1-3, *archē* is used to introduce the Word (*Logos*):
> "In the beginning (*archē*), was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things were made through him, and without him, nothing was made that has been made."


This passage emphasizes the *Logos* as the origin (*archē*) and intermediary of creation. Ptolemy’s commentary on John further elaborates that the *Logos* emanates from the Father as the principle (*archē*) of all things. The *Logos*, in turn, energizes the Demiurge, enabling him to fashion the material cosmos.


---


### The Demiurge as the First Archon


The connection between *archē* and *archon* (ruler) becomes significant when considering the Demiurge as the "first archon." In Valentinian tradition, the Demiurge is often portrayed as the craftsman working under the authority of the *Logos*. Heracleon, in his commentary on John 1:3, clarifies that "all things were made through him," meaning the *Logos* caused the Demiurge to create the world. The Demiurge operates as an agent or intermediary, crafting the material realm on behalf of the *Logos*.


This intermediary role aligns with the broader usage of *archē* to denote both origin and rule. For instance, in Colossians 1:16, Christ is described as the head of all principalities (*archai*):
> "For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers (*archai*) or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him."


The Demiurge, as the first *archon* from the *archē*, serves as a subordinate ruler within this hierarchy.


---


### Architect and the *Logos*


The term *dēmiourgos* can also be translated as "architect," derived from *archē* (beginning) and *tektōn* (craftsman). In this sense, the Demiurge functions as the cosmic architect, shaping the material universe according to the blueprint provided by the *Logos*. Heracleon’s commentary emphasizes this dynamic:
> "It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, but the one 'through whom' all things were made."


Here, the *Logos* energizes the Demiurge, providing the creative power and design necessary for the material cosmos. The Demiurge, while a creator, is ultimately subordinate to the *Logos*, working "on behalf of" the higher divine principle.


---


### Conclusion


The etymology of *dēmiourgos* and its connection to *archē* reveals a layered understanding of creation and authority. In Valentinian theology and the Gospel of John, the Demiurge is portrayed as an agent of the *Logos*, functioning as the first *archon* who shapes the material realm. This relationship highlights the interdependence between the *Logos* as the origin (*archē*) and the Demiurge as the craftsman (*dēmiourgos*), working together to fulfill the divine plan.


Thus, the Demiurge, while an artisan and ruler, remains subordinate to the *Logos*, whose emanation from the Father represents the true beginning and principle of all things. This layered cosmology underscores the harmony between creation, governance, and divine purpose.


### The Demiurge as the Personification of the Elohim  

The term *Demiurge*, derived from the Greek *dēmiourgos*, originally meant "craftsman" or "artisan." It signifies someone working on behalf of others, a concept reinforced in Strong’s Concordance (1217), which describes the *dēmiourgos* as someone laboring for a unified group or community. In the biblical sense, this aligns with the Elohim of Genesis, a collective term that represents "mighty ones" or divine beings who act under a singular guiding principle—the Spirit of God.


Though *Elohim* is plural, it is frequently paired with singular verbs, suggesting unity in purpose and action. For example, in Genesis 1:1, "Elohim created the heavens and the earth," portrays a coordinated effort of the heavenly host under the influence of God's Spirit (Genesis 1:2). This plurality united by a single divine will mirrors the role of the Demiurge as a craftsman working under the direction of a higher authority, the Logos or Word of God.


---


### The Archangel Michael as a Demiurge


The Archangel Michael, described in Scripture as the chief of angels, exemplifies the concept of the Demiurge as an agent of the Divine Will. The Book of Daniel (10:13, 12:1) presents Michael as a protector and leader of God's people, acting as an intermediary between God and creation. In this role, Michael administers the commands of the Deity to the angels below him, orchestrating their actions in harmony with the divine purpose.


Early Christian and Jewish traditions often depict Michael as the foremost among the Elohim, embodying the qualities and intentions of the Creator. This portrayal aligns with the understanding of the Demiurge as a craftsman who fashions the material world on behalf of the Supreme Deity. As described in *Excerpts of Theodotus* (33:4), the Demiurge, while possessing divine authority, is distinct from the uncreated and eternal God, functioning as an intermediary rather than the ultimate source of creation.


---


### The Demiurge as a Collective of Angels


The Elohim, described as God’s “family in heaven” (Ephesians 3:15), operate collectively as the Demiurge. These angels, emanations of the Divine Spirit, act as instruments of the Father’s will. Psalm 103:19-22 emphasizes their role:
> "Bless the Lord, all His hosts, you ministers of His, who do His will."


This portrayal of the Elohim as a unified body under the direction of God aligns with the Demiurge’s role as a craftsman working on behalf of a greater power. Genesis 1:2 further supports this idea, where the Spirit of God directs the creative actions of the Elohim, who collectively shape the material cosmos.


---


### Distinction Between the Demiurge and the Supreme Deity


While the Demiurge holds a vital role in creation, it is not synonymous with the Supreme Deity, the Uncreated and Eternal Spirit. Instead, the Demiurge is a divine agent or representative—often equated with the highest angelic being or a collective of angels. This distinction is crucial in understanding the relationship between the Creator and creation.


The Supreme Deity manifests His will through the angels, who serve as embodiments of His attributes and execute His purpose in the material world. These angels, collectively the Demiurge, reflect the Father's presence without being the Father Himself. This harmonizes with the Gospel of John 1:3, which attributes the creation of all things to the *Logos* ("through whom all things were made").


---


### The Demiurge and Yaldabaoth


Unlike Gnostic traditions that portray the Demiurge as the malevolent *Yaldabaoth*, the biblical and Hebraic concept of the Demiurge emphasizes its benevolence and alignment with divine justice. The Demiurge is not an evil spirit or a false god but an agent of the Creator, executing divine justice and facilitating prophecy.


As the Archangel Michael and the Elohim administer the will of the Supreme Deity, they embody the role of the Demiurge in crafting the material world. They are not autonomous or adversarial but operate in harmony with the divine purpose, serving as instruments of God's creative and redemptive plan.


---


### Conclusion


The Demiurge, understood through the lens of biblical theology, represents the Elohim, a collective of angels led by the Archangel Michael, who act under the authority of the Supreme Deity. Far from being a false god or malevolent force, the Demiurge embodies divine craftsmanship, executing the will of the Eternal Spirit through the *Logos*.


This framework maintains the distinction between the uncreated God and His agents, emphasizing their role as intermediaries who shape creation according to the divine plan. Whether seen as a single archangel or a collective body, the Demiurge is a real and benevolent force, fulfilling the Creator's purpose in the cosmos.


















The concept of the demiurge originates from the understanding that the Deity is not the immediate creator of the physical universe.


First it should be noted that Valentinians do not use the term Yaldabaoth. It should also be noted that Basildians and Valentinians speak about the Demiurge with positive terms unlike the Sethians who speak very negatively about Yaldabaoth:

Basilides: "After this, from the universal Seed and conglomeration of seed-mixture there burst forth and came into existence the Great Ruler, the head of the sensible universe, a beauty and magnitude and potency that naught can destroy." This is the demiurge; but let no mortal think that he can comprehend so great a being, "for he is more ineffable than ineffables, more potent than potencies, wiser than the wise, superior to every excellence that one can name. (Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, p. 253 by G.R.S. Mead )


According to Valentinian tradition, the Demiurge is formed as an "an image of the Father"(Excepts of Theodotus 47:1-3). A similar description occurs in the Tripartite Tractate: "He is the lord of all of them, that is, the countenance which the logos brought forth in his thought as a representation of the Father of the Totalities. Therefore, he is adorned with every name which is a representation of him, since he is characterized by every property and glorious quality. For he too is called 'father' and 'god' and 'demiurge' and 'king' and 'judge' and 'place' and 'dwelling' and 'law'" (Tripartite Tractate 100:21-30). Because he is seem as the image of the true God and Father, Valentinians have no problem using the terms "Father" and "God" to describe him (cf. also Against Heresies 1:5:1, Valentinian Exposition 38).




Is the word demiurge used in the Bible?


Yes in Hebrews 11:10




In Hebrews chapter 11:10 we get the only Biblical reference to the word Demiurge

Heb 11:10  For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker <1217> is God.

This is used as a prophecy about the Heavenly Jerusalem

The Greek word is used in the apocrypha 

Wisdom 13:1 For all men who were ignorant of God were foolish by nature;
and they were unable from the good things that are seen to know him who exists,
nor did they recognize the craftsman while paying heed to his works;

1Clem 20:11
All these things the great Creator and Master of the universe ordered to be in peace and concord, doing good unto all things, but far beyond the rest unto us who have taken refuge in His compassionate mercies through our Lord Jesus Christ

Notice that clement says the creation was "ordered" 

2Mac.4:1 This Simon now, of whom we spake afore, having been a betrayer of the money, and of his country, slandered Onias, as if he ha terrified Heliodorus, and been the worker of these evils.

The language here applied to God as the "architect" or framer of the universe is often used in the classic writers.


Heb 11:10  For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker <1217> is God.

Fragment 13, on John 2:13-16 The ascent to Jerusalem signifies the ascent of the Lord from material realm things to the animate (psychic) place, which is an image of Jerusalem. (In John 2:14, “In the sanctuary he found those who were selling oxen and sheep and pigeons, and the money-changers at their business.”) The words, "In the sanctuary, he found” and not "in the temple" are used so that it may not be thought to be the mere “calling” (animate), apart from the Spirit, which elicits help from the Lord. The sanctuary is the Holy of Holies, into which only the High-Priest enters, into which the spiritual go. The temple courtyard, where the Levites also enter, is a symbol of the animate ones who attain a salvation outside the Fullness (Pleroma).

The Demiurge is the maker of the psychic and material realms

Etymology of Demiurge

The word "demiurge" is an English word derived from demiurgus, a Latinised form of the Greek δημιουργός or dēmiourgos. It was originally a common noun meaning "craftsman" or "artisan", but gradually came to mean "producer", and eventually "creator". 

strong's concordance 1217 δημιουργός demiourgos day-me-oor-gos’ 

from 1218 and 2041; n m; TDNT-2:62,149;  {See TDNT 182 } 


AV-maker 1; 1 


1) a workman for the public 


2) the author of any work, an artisan, framer, builder 


dēmiourgós (from 1218 /dḗmos, "a unified group of people" and 2014 /epiphaínō, "work") – properly, someone working on behalf of a group of people (used only in Heb 11:10).

God is called ὁ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ δημιουργός in Plato, rep. 7, p. 530 a.; ὁ δημιουργός τῶν ὅλων in Josephus, Antiquities 1, 7, 1, and often in ecclesiastical writers from Clement of Rome, 1 Cor. 20, 11 [ET]; 26, 1 [ET]; 33, 2 [ET] on; (cf. Philo, de mut. nom. § 4; de opif. mund., Muller, edition, p. 133; Piper, Einl. in monument. Theol. § 26; Sophocles' Lexicon, under the word). In the Scriptures, besides, only in 2 Macc. 4:1 κακῶν δημιουργός). (Cf. Trench, § cv.)

The Gospel of John Chapter 1
The Gospel of John 1:1  ¶  Originally (746 ἀρχή), was, the Word, and, the Word, was, with God; and, the Word, was, God.
2  The same, was originally (746 ἀρχή), with God.
3  All things, through him, came into existence, and, without him, came into existence, not even one thing: that which hath come into existence, (Rotherham's Emphasized Bible)

Ptolemy's Commentary on The Gospel of John Prologue:

Now since he is speaking of the first origination, he does well to begin the teaching at the beginning, i.e with the Son and the Word. He speaks as follows: "The Word was in the beginning, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. It was in the beginning, with God." [Jn 1:1] First, he distinguishes three things: God; beginning; Word. Then he unites them: (Logos [Word], Theos [God], and Arche [
beginning] are one) this is to show forth both the emanation of the latter two, i.e. the Son and the Word, and their union with one another, and simultaneously with the Father. For the beginning was in the Father and from the Father; and the Word was in the beginning and from the beginning. Well did he say, "The Word was in the beginning", for it was in the Son. "And the Word was with God." So was the beginning. "And the word was God"; reasonably so, for what is engendered from God is God. This shows the order of emanation. "The entirety was made through it, and without it was not anything made." [Jn 1:3] For the Word became the cause of the forming and origination of all the aeons that came after it. 
 (Ptolemy's Commentary on The Gospel of John Prologue)

The Greek term translated "word" is Logos. It signifies the outward form of inward thought or reason, or the spoken word as illustrative of thought, wisdom and doctrine.

John is teaching that in the beginning, God's purpose, wisdom or revelation had been in evidence. It was "with God" in that it emanated from him; it "was God" in that it represented Him to mankind and it became the motive power of all that God did, for all was made with it in mind, and it presented the hope of life to mankind (see John 1: 3-4).


The logos is the cause of the forming and origination of Pleroma not the physical universe this can be seen from Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John 1:3

The Demiurge in Ptolemy's Commentary is the beginning or Arche

Beginning
What does he mean by beginning? You see some can argue that he means beginning as in God forever and eternal past. But if that’s the case, there really is no beginning with God others might argue well beginning in the sense that when God conceived of creating the perfect sons and daughters of God the human beings. Whatever other beings he might have created in the universe that was the beginning and the son was there from the beginning.

The message here is that God has everything in mind from the beginning. Whatever he produces from the beginning and as the Brethren of that beginning Christ is the eternal forever in the past or at the beginning at the time of which he conceived the concept of the son as being part of the story of humankind. This does not really matter because for us humans from our perspective it is the beginning of everything anyway and that’s really all we need to know and we’ll probably likely ever know anyway.

The Greek word ἀρχή arche translated beginning has a connection to the word ruler or Archon

746 ἀρχή arche ar-khay’ 

from 756; n f; TDNT-1:479,81;  {See TDNT 102 } 


AV-beginning 40, principality 8, corner 2, first 2, misc 6; 58 


746. ἀρχή arche ar-khay’; from 756; (properly abstract) a commencement, or (concretely) chief (in various applications of order, time, place, or rank): —  beginning, corner, (at the, the) first (estate), magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule. 


BEGINNING: "Archee"; signifying "first in order", from the root "arch, archon" = a ruler. 


strong's concordance 756 ἄρχομαι archomai ar’-khom-ahee middle voice of 757

strong's concordance 757. ἄρχω archo ar’-kho; a primary verb; to be first (in political rank or power): —  reign (rule) over. 

NASB Translation

began (62), begin (7), beginning (8), begins (2), begun (1), proceed (1), rule (1), rulers (1), starting (2). 

This brings us to the next Greek word 758 ἄρχων archon

strong's concordance 758 ἄρχων archon ar’-khone 

present participle of 757; n m; TDNT-1:488,81;  {See TDNT 102 } 


AV-ruler 22, prince 11, chief 2, magistrate 1, chief ruler 1; 37 


1) a ruler, commander, chief, leader 

Archon (historical, Ancient Greece) The title of a magistrate in a number of states of Ancient Greece, and in the city states (poleis) of the Achaean League.

Archon (Greek: ἄρχων, árchon, plural: ἄρχοντες, árchontes) is a Greek word that means "ruler", frequently used as the title of a specific public office. It is the masculine present participle of the verb stem αρχ-, meaning "to rule", derived from the same root as monarch and hierarchy. 

The Greek word Archon is connected to the Greek word Archee (Beginning) 

In the Gospel of John the Demiurge is the first archon from the Greek word Archee translated beginning Archee 746 ἀρχή it is also translated principality or principalities in Eph 1:21 Eph 3:10 Eph 6:12 Col 1:16

Christ the head of all Principalities {#Eph 1:21 Col 1:16 2:10 } 


Demiurge can be translated Architect from Arche (Gr. "beginning") 

Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John: 

John 1:3, “All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made.”) The sentence: "All things were made through him" means the world and what is in it. It excludes what is better than the world. The Aeon (i.e. the Fullness), and the things in it, were not made by the Word; they came into existence before the Word. . . “Without him, nothing was made” of what is in the world and the creation. . . "All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word “from whom” or “by whom,” but the one “through whom (all things were made).”. . . It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, for "through whom" means that another made them and the Word provided the energy (
Heracleon: Fragments from his 
Commentary on the Gospel of John)

The Demiurge is working on behalf of someone else that is the word or logos 

The Demiurge is a personification of the Elohim

Though Elohim is in the plural, and signifies "mighty ones," it is most frequently used with a verb in the singular number, as in Gen. 1:1. This suggests that the Elohim, though constituting a great number of immortal beings, are being motivated by a single power, "the spirit of God" (Gen. 1:2). The Elohim, therefore, comprise a great company united as one, and obeying in unison the motivating power of the great Increate. The Psalmist declared: "Yahweh hath prepared His throne in the heavens; and His kingdom ruleth over all. Bless Yahweh, ye His angels, that excel in strength, that do His commandments, hearkening unto the voice of His word. Bless ye Yahweh, all ye His hosts; ye ministers of His, that do His pleasure. Bless Yahweh, all His works in all places of His dominion" (Psalm 103:19-22).
Yahweh is spirit (John 4:24), and His angels are spirit beings (Psalm 104:4; Heb. 1:7). They are "His family in heaven" (Eph. 3:15), being emanations of Him, and doing His will through His all-pervading spirit (Gen. 1:2). Thus they act as a unit, though being innumerable in number.

The Archangel Michael is the highest of all the angels as stated before, the angels are emanations of the uncreated and eternal spirit or Deity, Michael relays the commandments and orders of the Deity to all the angels below him, being the highest of all. So in a way, he could be seen as Hebraic religious idea of a "Demiurge" who fashioned the world for God.

See the post Yahweh is the head angel in the Old Testament

The Archangel Michael could be seen as the "Demiurge" who fashioned the world for the Deity.
-spiritual nature. In comparison with the true God he is rather "coarse" or "rough" (Excerpts of Theodotus 33:4).


The term "demiurge" does not refer to the One True Deity, though the demiurge may very well be seen as a god, angel or elohim. The Demiurge is simply the craftsman of the universe, but is not the Supreme Intelligence of the universe the Uncreated and Eternal Spirit. In other word, whether the Demiurge is a god or not, it is not God or "THE One True Deity."

The Deity manifests himself through his angels, these angels are ever present, embodiment of the qualities of the Father, and thus manifesting the Father's will and presence in this world, without being the Father Deity themselves. These angels are always serving the Father and creating by his will and collectively are the Demiurge of the world through whom the Father administers his will.



The 
Demiurge is never referred to has Yaldabaoth 


The Demiurge is a real god, not a "false god".


The Demiurge is an elohim or angel

The Demiurge is not Satan, he is not a demon, and he is not an evil spirit or the personification of evil .The Creator or archangel Michael implements the Father's will and administers justice.

After all, he rendered the prophecies and reality of the Saviour.



Thursday, 26 December 2024

The Ritual of Redemption as an Acted Parable in the Gospel of Philip

The Ritual of Redemption as an Acted Parable in the Gospel of Philip
or
Redemption in the Gospel of Philip


ἡ ἀπολύτρωσις




**Document 1: The Ritual of Redemption as an Acted Parable in the Gospel of Philip**

The Gospel of Philip offers a distinctive perspective on early Christian rituals, portraying them not simply as religious observances but as “sacred secrets” or “acted parables.” One of the central elements of these rituals is redemption (ἀπολύτρωσις), a concept that holds significant theological weight in Valentinian Christianity. Alongside other pivotal rituals such as baptism, chrism, eucharist, and the bridal chamber, redemption plays an essential role in understanding the process of spiritual transformation in Valentinian thought.

The Gospel of Philip specifically links redemption with a deeper, symbolic understanding of salvation. The text introduces the concept of five primary rituals: baptism, chrism, eucharist, redemption, and the bridal chamber. These rituals are often referred to as “sacred secrets” or “acted parables,” implying that their true meaning is hidden and can only be understood through divine insight or spiritual revelation. The phrase "The Lord did everything sacred secret: a baptism and a chrism and a eucharist and a redemption and a bridal chamber" (Gospel of Philip 69:14-25) emphasizes this notion, suggesting that each of these rituals is more than just a rite—it is an embodiment of spiritual truths that point to the hidden nature of the divine.

Redemption, as discussed in the Gospel of Philip, is connected to the idea of repurchase or "buying back." The term “redemption” has its roots in various Hebrew and Greek concepts, often associated with a ransom paid to free someone from captivity or bondage. However, in the context of Valentinian Christianity, redemption is not merely a transactional concept; it represents the spiritual act of recovering one's soul from the clutches of ignorance and the material world. In this sense, redemption can be seen as a process of spiritual renewal, one that is deeply intertwined with other rituals, particularly baptism.

The Gospel of Philip further explores the significance of redemption by linking it to the idea of the Temple in Jerusalem. It states that baptism corresponds to “the holy place,” redemption to “the holy of the holy,” and the bridal chamber to “the holy of holies” (Gospel of Philip 69:14-25). These associations suggest a hierarchical understanding of the spiritual journey, with each ritual representing a higher level of initiation and spiritual ascent. The “holy of the holy,” or redemption, is seen as a crucial point in this journey, signifying a deeper encounter with divine truth.

The ritual of redemption is not simply a singular event; rather, it is part of a broader spiritual process that encompasses resurrection and purification. The Gospel of Philip explains that baptism entails both resurrection and redemption, with redemption being fulfilled in the bridal chamber. This metaphorical connection implies that redemption is not an isolated act but one that is intimately tied to the ongoing transformation of the believer. As the individual progresses through the rituals, from baptism to chrism to redemption, they undergo a profound spiritual renewal that brings them closer to the divine.

In Valentinian Christianity, the concept of redemption is closely linked to the figure of Christ. The Gospel of Philip explains that Christ came to “purchase” or “redeem” humanity, rescuing the soul from the “robbers” of ignorance and sin. This idea echoes the notion of Christ as the redeemer, a figure who not only brings salvation to humanity but also facilitates the spiritual journey through the rituals of baptism, chrism, and redemption. As the believer participates in these rituals, they are said to receive the redemptive power that was first bestowed upon Christ, symbolizing the restoration of the soul and its eventual return to the divine realm.

Ultimately, the ritual of redemption in the Gospel of Philip is an acted parable—a symbolic representation of the believer's journey from ignorance to enlightenment, from bondage to spiritual freedom. Through baptism, chrism, and redemption, the individual is initiated into a process of spiritual transformation that leads to the ultimate goal: union with the divine in the bridal chamber. This ritual, and the teachings surrounding it, reflect the Valentinian understanding of salvation as a process of internal, mystical renewal rather than an external, ritualistic observance.

---

**Document 2: The Ritual of Redemption and Spiritual Ascent in the Gospel of Philip**

In the Gospel of Philip, redemption is not merely a concept of salvation but a critical step in a spiritual process that involves resurrection, purification, and ultimate union with the divine. The text associates redemption with the ritual of the bridal chamber, suggesting that it is through this process that the believer experiences the highest form of spiritual redemption. The Gospel of Philip’s depiction of redemption provides a profound understanding of the Valentinian view of salvation, highlighting the role of knowledge, transformation, and spiritual ascent.

The Gospel of Philip states, “Baptism entails resurrection and redemption, and redemption is in the bridal chamber” (Gospel of Philip 69:14-25). This line underscores the connection between these rituals, indicating that they form a continuous chain of spiritual events. Baptism is the first step, initiating the believer into the Christian path through the act of resurrection, symbolizing the death of the old self and the beginning of the new. Redemption follows as the next crucial step, representing a deeper spiritual purification and an encounter with divine truth. Finally, the bridal chamber represents the culmination of this journey, where the believer experiences the ultimate union with the divine and achieves the perfection of the soul.

The concept of redemption in Valentinian Christianity is closely tied to the idea of spiritual knowledge. According to the Gospel of Philip, knowledge is the key to spiritual liberation and redemption. It is through understanding and internalizing the divine truths that the believer is redeemed from the ignorance and limitations of the material world. This emphasis on knowledge as the path to redemption is consistent with the Gnostic tradition, where spiritual enlightenment is seen as the ultimate means of overcoming the bondage of the physical realm.

In this context, redemption is not just a one-time event but an ongoing process of spiritual growth. The Gospel of Philip presents the act of redemption as part of a larger narrative of salvation that involves progressive steps toward enlightenment. The ritual of redemption, associated with the bridal chamber, is not just about the believer’s individual salvation but about their participation in a cosmic drama of spiritual ascent. It is through these rituals that the believer undergoes a transformative journey, moving from the ignorance of the material world to the knowledge of divine truth.

In Valentinian thought, redemption is also linked to the resurrection of the individual soul. The Gospel of Philip explains that baptism entails resurrection, suggesting that the act of baptism is not only a symbolic gesture but a transformative experience that leads to spiritual rebirth. Redemption, then, is the next step in this process of rebirth, wherein the believer is purified and prepared for the ultimate union with the divine in the bridal chamber.

The connection between redemption and the bridal chamber highlights the Valentinian view of salvation as a mystical, intimate experience. The bridal chamber represents the union of the soul with the divine, a state of perfect spiritual fulfillment. It is within this sacred space that the believer fully experiences the fruits of redemption—purification, enlightenment, and union with the divine. Through the rituals of baptism, chrism, and redemption, the believer is gradually prepared for this ultimate spiritual goal, moving from one stage of transformation to the next.

Ultimately, the ritual of redemption in the Gospel of Philip is not just about the individual’s personal salvation but about the believer’s participation in a greater spiritual narrative. Through the acted parables of baptism, chrism, eucharist, redemption, and the bridal chamber, the Valentinian Christian is initiated into a process of spiritual ascent, culminating in union with the divine. Redemption, as portrayed in the Gospel of Philip, is both a personal and cosmic event, a key step in the believer’s journey toward spiritual perfection and divine communion.




**The Use of the Divine Name in the Redemption Ritual**  

In early Christian mystical traditions, including the Valentinian branch, the use of the divine Name plays a critical role in the process of redemption. The Gospel of Philip, as well as other Gnostic texts, highlights the power of divine names in the context of sacred rituals, particularly in their ability to align the initiate with the divine essence and facilitate spiritual liberation. This connection between the divine Name and the redemption ritual illustrates the transformative process by which the initiate is liberated from the material realm and united with the divine.

### **The Divine Name and its Power**  

In the Gospel of Philip and related Gnostic writings, the divine Name is a powerful symbol of God's essence and a key element in the ritual of redemption. Redemption, in this context, is not merely a symbolic or moral act but an actual participation in the divine nature through the invocation of sacred names. The Gospel of Philip makes clear that the act of baptism, in particular, involves receiving the reality of the divine Name. In the ritual, the initiate partakes in the essence of the Name, which is tied to the nature of God and the person of Christ.

The divine Name, often invoked during the ritual of anointing or baptism, serves as a means to effect spiritual redemption. This Name, as depicted in various Gnostic texts, holds an essential role in the transformation of the initiate. The anointing, in this sense, becomes a ritual means by which the initiate is not only physically consecrated but spiritually aligned with the divine through the reception of the sacred Name.

### **The Divine Name in the Gospel of Philip**  

The Gospel of Philip specifically connects the acquisition of the divine Name with the process of redemption. In the Valentinian understanding, Jesus' baptism at the Jordan River is a pivotal moment of receiving the divine Name, which establishes his identity as the Son of God and enables him to redeem humanity. The Gospel of Philip speaks about the reality of the Name being acquired in the anointing, which serves as a key element in the redemption of the individual.

This initiation, through the acquisition of the divine Name, is an essential step in the believer's journey toward spiritual redemption. The Name represents not only the identity of Christ but also the divine essence that flows through the cosmos and all creation. By receiving the Name, the initiate aligns with this divine essence, entering into a new relationship with the divine and participating in the redemptive work of Christ.

### **The Invocation of Sacred Names**  

The ritual of redemption also involves the recitation of sacred names such as *Yahweh*, *Eloah*, *Yahweh Elohim*, and *Yahweh Sabaoth*. These invocations, typically recited in Hebrew, are powerful affirmations of the initiate's alignment with the divine and their liberation from the constraints of the material world. Each of these names holds a specific significance in the mystical traditions of early Christianity, with each one representing a particular aspect of the divine or a stage in the initiate's spiritual journey.

The names *Yahweh* and *Eloah* are associated with God’s essential nature, while *Yahweh Elohim* and *Yahweh Sabaoth* invoke the divine presence in its fullness, suggesting a higher, more transcendent level of spiritual knowledge and participation. These sacred names, when invoked during the redemption ritual, serve to release the initiate from the “carnal mind,” allowing the soul to ascend toward the divine light.

In these names, the initiate is called to participate in the divine emanation, which is seen as the flow of divine light or wisdom that comes from the higher realms. The total number of letters in these sacred names—30—is significant in Valentinian and other Gnostic traditions. Each letter represents an emanation of the Æons, the divine principles that govern the universe, with the numbers aligning with the full flow of divine knowledge and power.

The number 30 is particularly important, symbolizing the full emanation of the divine across different levels of existence. The four letters of *Yahweh*, the four of *Eloah*, the ten of *Yahweh Elohim*, and the twelve of *Yahweh Sabaoth* add up to thirty, illustrating the complete flow of divine emanation. This number reflects the Valentinian cosmology, where the Æons—the divine principles—are thought to flow from the highest realm, creating and sustaining the spiritual and material worlds.

### **Liberation and Alignment with the Divine Christ**  

Through the invocation of these divine names and the reception of the divine essence through baptism and anointing, the initiate undergoes a spiritual transformation. The ritual acts to release the soul from its bondage to the material world, symbolized by the "carnal mind," and align the soul with the divine Christ. This process is understood as a liberation from ignorance and sin, bringing the initiate into a direct connection with the higher realms.

The divine Name, through its association with Christ, becomes a key means of spiritual redemption. Christ, having received the Name during his baptism, serves as the model for all believers. By receiving the Name in baptism, the initiate partakes in Christ’s own redemptive work, experiencing spiritual renewal and liberation from the constraints of the material world.

### **Conclusion**  

In the redemption ritual, the use of the divine Name is central to the transformative experience of the initiate. Through the invocation of sacred names such as *Yahweh*, *Eloah*, *Yahweh Elohim*, and *Yahweh Sabaoth*, the initiate is spiritually realigned with the divine, receiving the redemptive power of Christ. These rituals symbolize not just an external act but an inner spiritual transformation that brings the initiate closer to the divine light, freeing the soul from the "carnal mind" and aligning it with the higher realms. The divine Name thus serves as both the means and the symbol of redemption, linking the believer with the redemptive work of Christ and the cosmic flow of divine emanation.








The Lord [did] everything in a sacred secret: a baptism and a chrism and a eucharist and a redemption and a bridal chamber


From the Gospel of Philip we learn that the number of  Valentinian sacraments is five

they are a baptism and a chrism and a eucharist and a redemption and a bridal chamber


the fourth Sacrament is called redemption so what is redemption


first The English word "redemption" means 'repurchase' or 'buy back'. In the various Hebrew and Greek terms translated “ransom” and “redeem,” the inherent similarity lies in the idea of a price, or thing of value, given to effect the ransom, or redemption.


Jesus’s Names
The apostles who came before us used the names Isous nazraios messias, which means “Jesus the Nazorean, the Christ.” The last name is “Christ,” the first name is “Jesus,” the middle name is “the Nazarene.” Messias has two meanings, “Christ” and “measured.” In Hebrew “Jesus” means “redemption.” Nazara means “truth,” and so “the Nazarene” means “truth.” “Christ” has been “measured,” thus “the Nazarene” and “Jesus” have been measured out.

Jesus is the name of redemption, faith, Nazorean is the name of the Truth, the church, Christ is the name of the saints. But the saints must be sealed with the anointing spirit

Christ came to purchase some, to save some, to redeem some. He purchased strangers and made them his own,

There were three structures for sacrifice in Jerusalem. One opened to the west and was called the holy place; a second opened to the south and was called the holy of the holy; the third opened to the east and was called the holy of holies, where only the high priest could enter. The holy place is baptism; the holy of the holy is redemption; the holy of holies is the bridal chamber.


there is an association in The Gospel of Philip between Valentinian sacraments and the Temple in Jerusalem. It says in 69.14-25, “Baptism is ‘the holy’ building. Redemption is ‘the holy of the holy.’ ‘The holy of the holies’ is the bridal chamber."

"Baptism entails resurrection and redemption, and redemption is in the bridal chamber."

Baptism includes the resurrection and the redemption; the redemption (takes place) in the bridal chamber. But the bridal chamber is in that which is superior

The verses that follow these references to the Temple associate baptism with resurrection and redemption, redemption with bridal chamber, and makes note that bridal chamber is superior.


Aside from this mysterious mention of baptism as redemption and redemption as bridal chamber the sacrament of redemption is not further discussed.


Clem. Alex. once refers to baptism as “the seal and the redemption” (Quis dives 49),


Redemption takes place in baptism as if by a chain reaction: by receiving the Saviour in the ritual, the baptismal candidate receives also the redemptive power that first descended on the Saviour himself at his own baptism.



Resurrection is associated with baptism in GPh: “Baptism entails resurrection and redemption, and redemption is in the bridal chamber.”50 It is specififically related to the anointing: “from chrism comes resurrection.”

Baptism and chrism refer to a initiation rite whereas the eucharist and redemption) would be Sacraments regularly celebrated by the believers

there are five Sacraments in Valentinian Christianity

The second baptism is the Sacrament of redemption
Theodotus: Excerpta ex Theodoto
22 And when the Apostle said, “Else what shall they do who are baptised for the dead?” . . . For, he says, the angels of whom we are portions were baptised for us. But we are dead, who are deadened by this existence, but the males are alive who did not participate in this existence.

“If the dead rise not why, then, are we baptised?” Therefore we are raised up “equal to angels,” and restored to unity with the males, member for member. Now they say “those who are baptised for us, the dead,” are the angels who are baptised for us, in order that when we, too, have the Name, we may not be hindered and kept back by the Limit and the Cross from entering the Pleroma. Wherefore, at the laying on of hands they say at the end, “for the angelic redemption” that is, for the one which the angels also have, in order that the person who has received the redemption may, be baptised in the same Name in which his angel had been baptised before him. Now the angels were baptised in the beginning, in the redemption of the Name which descended upon Jesus in the dove and redeemed him. And redemption was necessary even for Jesus, in order that, approaching through Wisdom, he might not be detained by the Notion of the Deficiency in which he was inserted, as Theodotus says.





Sacraments
The master [did] everything in a mystery: baptism, chrism, eucharist, redemption, and bridal chamber.

The Temple in Jerusalem

There were three structures for sacrifice in Jerusalem. One opened to the west and was called the holy place; a second opened to the south and was called the holy of the holy; the third opened to the east and was called the holy of holies, where only the high priest could enter. The holy place is baptism; the holy of the holy is redemption; the holy of holies is the bridal chamber. Baptism entails resurrection and redemption, and redemption is in the bridal chamber. The bridal chamber is within a realm superior to [what we belong to], and you cannot find anything [like it…. These] are the ones who worship [in spirit and in truth, for they do not worship] in Jerusalem. There are people in Jerusalem who [do worship] in Jerusalem, and they await [the mysteries] called [the holy] of holies, the curtain [of which] was torn. [Our] bridal chamber is the image [of the bridal chamber] [70] above. That is why its curtain was torn from top to bottom, for some people from below had to go up

Laughing

The master put it very well: “Some have gone into heaven’s kingdom laughing, and they have come out [laughing].”

Someone said, “[That is] a Christian.”

The person said [again, “That is the one who went] down into the water and came [up as master] of all. [Redemption is no] laughing matter, but [a person goes laughing into] heaven’s kingdom out of contempt for these rags. If the person despises [the body] and considers it a laughing matter, [the person will come out] laughing.”
So it is also [75] with bread, the cup, and oil, though there are mysteries higher than these.
Christ Came
Christ came [53] to purchase some, to save some, to redeem some. He purchased strangers and made them his own, and he brought back his own whom he had laid down of his own will as a deposit. Not only when he appeared did he lay the soul of his own will as a deposit, but from the beginning of the world he laid down the soul, for the proper moment, according to his will. Then he came forth to take it back, since it had been laid down as a deposit. It had fallen into the hands of robbers and had been stolen, but he saved it. And he redeemed the good in the world, and the bad.


"For the perfection is majestic. He is pure, immeasurable mind. He is an aeon-giving aeon. He is

life-giving life. He is a blessedness-giving blessed one. He is knowledge-giving knowledge. He is
goodness-giving goodness. He is mercy and redemption-giving mercy. He is grace-giving grace,
not because he possesses it, but because he gives the immeasurable, incomprehensible light.

“the redemption,” was highly important

in this branch of early Christianity. The ritual of redemption may be said to constitute, alongside protological theory and the doctrine about the incarnation of the Saviour, one of the three basic dimensions of Valentinianism as a religious system.

“But others reject all of this, and say that one ought not to perform the mystery of the ineffable

and invisible Power by means of visible and perishable created things, nor the inconceivable
and incorporeal by means of what is sensible and corporeal. Rather, the perfect redemption is
the very act of knowing the ineffable Greatness. For from ignorance derived deficiency and
passion, and through knowledge will the entire structure derived from ignorance be dissolved.
Therefore knowledge is the redemption of the inner man. And it is not corporeal, because the
body perishes, nor psychic, because the soul as well derives from deficiency and is (only) the
dwelling-place of the spirit. In fact, the inner, spiritual man is redeemed through knowledge,
and for them it suffices to have knowledge of all things: this is the true redemption” (Iren. Haer.
1.24.4).


Exc. 22.6 speaks about “the redemption of the Name that descended upon Jesus

in the dove and redeemed him.” This Name is also received by the initiates in
baptism. In Exc. it is identified with the “seal” and is received during water baptism,

Exc. 76:1: “Just as

the birth of the Saviour takes us away from birth and Fate, so also his baptism removes us from
the fire, and his passion from passion, so that we may follow him in all things”

GT refers to the Name of the Father being rceived by and resting upon the heads of the initiates (28:17–18, 38:28–30.36–38)

– here, anointing more likely is the specific ritual context.33 GPh speaks about acquiring
the reality of the Name in the anointing

It is this

divine Name that is received by Jesus at the Jordan,37 establishing his identity
with the Son and effecting redemption through him. Receiving the Name in
baptism therefore fundamentally means to partake in the divine essence contained
in the Name.