Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

Valentinian Interpretation of Genesis 1

By the late second century, Valentinian Gnosticism had developed a highly intricate cosmology. Though it exhibited some variations within its interpretations, a basic framework can still provide clarity for understanding its views on creation and the divine order.

From the Valentinian perspective, the creation narrative is seen as an unfolding of the divine emanations, beginning with a prologue that precedes the Judeo-Christian understanding of Genesis. This pre-creation phase involves the emanation of divine powers, or aeons, from the ultimate source, Bythos (the Depth), which represents the hidden and ineffable Father. The Valentinian cosmology views the material world as the culmination of a process of divine emanation, wherein the Pleroma, or spiritual fullness, gradually unfolds into the creation described in Genesis, revealing the deeper, mystical truths of divine order.

The Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as presented by Irenaeus in *Against All Heresies*, offers a deeply symbolic view of the creation narrative, aligning it with their understanding of the emanation of the Aeons from the ultimate source, the Father. This interpretation reflects the idea that all things in creation are a reflection of the divine, ordered in a pattern that mirrors the structure of the divine realm of Aeons. In this schema, the creation story becomes a representation of a hidden, invisible spiritual process that unfolds into the visible world, a world that mirrors the hidden, divine reality.

At the beginning of Genesis, when Moses declares, "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1:1), the Valentinians see this as a reference to the first Tetrad of divine principles. This Tetrad consists of **Bythos** (God), **Charis** (beginning), **Nous** (heaven), and **Aletheia** (earth). These four elements form the foundational principles of the cosmos, the first emanations of the divine source. **Bythos**, the unknowable depth, is the source from which all emanation begins. **Charis**, representing grace or the beginning, initiates the unfolding of divine power. **Nous**, or divine mind, is the principle of intellectuality, while **Aletheia**, or truth, represents the principle of reality or manifestation. Together, these four represent the unspoken, invisible foundation of all creation, much like the earth in Genesis is initially formless and void, unseen and unmanifest.

The second Tetrad, as described in the Valentinian system, is made up of four further Aeons: **Logos** (abyss), **Zoe** (darkness), **Anthropos** (water), and **Ecclesia** (Spirit). These are the next emanations from the first Tetrad. The second Tetrad represents an even deeper layer of spiritual principle, and like the first, it is described as invisible and hidden. The abyss (**Logos**) is the deep, the origin of the divine speech, while **Zoe**, representing life, emerges as the spiritual substance that gives all things existence. **Anthropos**, or the divine human, corresponds to the primal water, representing the potential for life, while **Ecclesia** (Spirit) corresponds to the divine principle that moves through the creation, unseen but vital for existence. These four principles are not yet visible in the physical realm but are rather the invisible causes of all that is to come.

Next, we encounter the Decad, represented by ten emanations that begin to take visible shape and form in the creation narrative. These Aeons correspond to the ten elements of the creation story as described in Genesis 1:3-13—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees. Each of these represents a further step in the unfolding of creation, moving from the invisible to the more manifest. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these ten are: **Bythios** (light), **Mixis** (day), **Ageratos** (night), **Henosis** (firmament), **Autophyes** (evening), **Hedone** (morning), **Acinetos** (dry land), **Syncrasis** (sea), **Monogenes** (plants), and **Macaria** (trees). These Aeons reflect the natural elements and phenomena of the created world, signifying the move from the hidden, spiritual realms to a more visible and tangible creation. The Decad represents the increasing visibility of the divine process as it emanates through the layers of reality, bridging the gap between the invisible and the visible.

The Duodecad, consisting of twelve Aeons, represents the most visible and manifest stage of creation, corresponding to the twelve elements in the Genesis account that follow the creation of trees. These are the sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and man. The Valentinian Aeons corresponding to these elements are: **Paracletus** (sun), **Pistis** (moon), **Patrikas** (stars), **Elpis** (seasons), **Metricos** (years), **Agape** (whales), **Ainos** (fishes), **Synesis** (reptiles), **Ecclesiasticus** (birds), **Macariotes** (quadrupeds), **Theletus** (wild beasts), and **Sophia** (man). This stage of creation is the most complete manifestation of the divine, and man, as the highest creation, embodies the fullness of the divine image.

Finally, the Valentinian view teaches that the Ogdoad, the eight invisible Aeons, is hidden within the body of man. The Ogdoad is the unspeakable and invisible power, located within the inner recesses of the human being, symbolizing the hidden spiritual forces that shape and sustain creation. These Aeons are reflected in the human body’s faculties, as man is created in the image of the ultimate source, containing within him the same spiritual structure as the divine.

In conclusion, the Valentinian understanding of Genesis 1 reveals a profound and symbolic reading of the creation narrative. Through the Tetrad, Decad, Duodecad, and Ogdoad, the Valentinian system shows the unfolding of the divine emanations, which begin as invisible, formless principles and gradually take visible, manifest shape in the creation of the world, culminating in the creation of man as the image of the divine.

In reconstructing the Valentinian teaching on Genesis 1 based on Irenaeus' *Against Heresies*, we can observe the Valentinian perspective on the creation narrative as an unfolding of divine emanations through a system of Aeons. The Valentinian system divides the Aeons into various groups, each group symbolized through different aspects of the natural world, as articulated by Moses in Genesis. The description unfolds in a symbolic manner, illustrating the structure and hierarchy of these emanations, as well as the divine image in human creation.

### The First Tetrad

The first Tetrad, representing the foundation of all existence, is composed of four central principles that are the ultimate source from which all other Aeons emanate. These principles are represented by the following:

1. **God (Bythos)** – This principle stands as the ultimate, ineffable source. Bythos signifies the depth or abyss of the divine being, the root from which all emanations emerge.

2. **Beginning (Charis)** – Charis, or grace, represents the commencement of creation and the first movement of divine will that flows out from Bythos. It is the generative force that enables the unfolding of reality.

3. **Heaven (Nous)** – Nous, or the divine mind, is the first intellectual emanation from the divine source. It governs and arranges the cosmos, serving as the rational principle behind all that exists.

4. **Earth (Aletheia)** – Aletheia, or truth, is the foundation of material existence, symbolizing the grounded reality that is hidden and formless, much like the earth before it was shaped.

This Tetrad represents the hidden, invisible source of creation, much like the earth before it was formed, as Irenaeus mentions. These four principles are indivisible and transcend visible creation, embodying the most profound and abstract aspects of the divine.

### The Second Tetrad

The second Tetrad emanates from the first, representing a further development of divine forces in the creation process. These four are:

1. **Abyss (Logos)** – Logos, representing divine reason and speech, is the medium through which the divine will is expressed and communicated into the material world.

2. **Darkness (Zoe)** – Zoe, or life, is the principle of vitality and existence. It is the foundation of the inner life of the cosmos, bringing forth life from the darkness of the unmanifest.

3. **Water (Anthropos)** – Anthropos, representing humanity, signifies the potential for consciousness and reflection. As water is the source of life in the physical world, so too does Anthropos represent the potential for rational, conscious existence.

4. **Spirit (Ecclesia)** – Ecclesia, or the assembly, embodies the unifying force of the divine, bringing together the disparate elements of creation into a coherent whole, much like the Spirit that moves upon the waters in Genesis.

This second Tetrad is still largely hidden, as the divine powers remain veiled in abstraction, but they begin to take more defined form within the structure of creation.

### The Decad

The Decad consists of ten Aeons that represent a more visible manifestation of divine order. These ten are reflected in various natural elements as Moses describes them:

1. **Light (Bythios)** – Bythios, the Aeon of light, signifies illumination and revelation, bringing clarity and structure to creation.

2. **Day (Mixis)** – Mixis represents the concept of harmony and balance, signifying the separation of light and dark and the establishment of cycles.

3. **Night (Ageratos)** – Ageratos, the eternal night, represents the mystery and the unmanifested potential of creation, balancing the visible day.

4. **Firmament (Henosis)** – Henosis, unity, represents the separation of the heavens from the earth, a divine order bringing together disparate elements.

5. **Evening (Autophyes)** – Autophyes, the self-born, embodies the cyclical nature of existence, where one cycle ends, making way for the next.

6. **Morning (Hedone)** – Hedone, pleasure, signifies the beginning of a new cycle and the renewal of life.

7. **Dry Land (Acinetos)** – Acinetos represents stability and foundation, signifying the creation of solid matter from the chaos.

8. **Sea (Syncrasis)** – Syncrasis represents the fluid, mutable aspects of creation, the realm of change and potentiality.

9. **Plants (Monogenes)** – Monogenes, the only begotten, signifies life that grows from the earth, the beginning of creation’s fertility and productivity.

10. **Trees (Macaria)** – Macaria represents the completion of the physical world, the final manifestation of nature’s abundance.

The Decad signifies the visible, structured world, with these Aeons representing elements of creation that are seen and experienced by beings within the material universe.

### The Duodecad and Ogdoad

Finally, the Duodecad represents the twelve most manifest Aeons, including the sun, moon, stars, and animals, culminating in the creation of man. These Aeons embody the fullest expression of the divine in the world. Man, created in the image of the divine, reflects the ultimate source and contains within himself the same abilities and faculties as the Aeons. The Ogdoad, invisible and unspeakable, is hidden within the human body, representing the ineffable and ungraspable elements of divine reality.

In this Valentinian schema, the world is not merely a creation ex nihilo but an unfolding process of emanation, where the divine nature is progressively revealed through Aeons. Each level of creation mirrors and reflects the structure of the divine, with humanity as the image of the ultimate source, containing within himself the potential for the divine within the created order.

1 In the Valentinian interpretation of Genesis 1, as outlined by Irenaeus in *Against Heresies*, the creation narrative is understood as a symbolic representation of the divine emanations, or *aeons*, that form the structure of the spiritual fullness, or *Pleroma*. Valentinian Gnosticism uses the account of creation to outline the cosmic principles through the use of symbolic numbers and hidden divine entities. This framework can be understood through the four primary groups that reflect various emanations from the ultimate source: the Tetrad, the second Tetrad, the Decad, the Duodecad, and the Ogdoad.

The *first Tetrad* represents the primal source of all existence, which is invisible and formless, much like the earth before creation was made visible. The grouping of four—God (*Bythos*), beginning (*Charis*), heaven (*Nous*), and earth (*Aletheia*)—symbolizes the fundamental powers at the origin of all creation. These powers are thought to represent the essential building blocks of the universe and the divine order. They are the first emanations from the ultimate source, the *Pleroma*, and signify both the generative force and the inherent hidden nature of the cosmos before it takes visible form. The earth, described in Genesis 1:2 as formless and void, aligns with this understanding, symbolizing the mystery and hiddenness of the initial creation, much like the divine powers before they manifest.

Next, the *second Tetrad* emerges as a further emanation, representing four more divine principles: abyss (*Logos*), darkness (*Zoe*), water (*Anthropos*), and spirit (*Ecclesia*). These principles are also hidden and invisible, signifying the beginning of the process of creation but still in a potential or unmanifest state. The second Tetrad brings forth the conditions necessary for formation, with water representing the latent potential within creation and the Spirit moving over it, ready to bring order out of chaos.

As the narrative progresses, Moses introduces the *Decad*, a group of ten divine powers that emanate from the second Tetrad. These principles—light, day, night, firmament, evening, morning, dry land, sea, plants, and trees—mark the first tangible manifestations of creation. These ten elements represent the unfolding of divine thought, gradually moving from the abstract (such as light and day) to more structured forms (such as land and plants). In the Valentinian worldview, these manifestations are the first clear reflections of divine qualities in the material world. The Decad symbolizes the dynamic and ordered progression of creation, with each act in Genesis reflecting a more defined, structured layer of the Pleroma's emanation.

The *Duodecad*, or the twelve emanations, represents the final phase of creation. The twelve principles—sun, moon, stars, seasons, years, whales, fishes, reptiles, birds, quadrupeds, wild beasts, and humanity—mirror the completion of divine manifestation in the physical universe. These principles are not only more visible and tangible but also embody the diversity of the material world. Humanity, as the final creation, represents the culmination of the divine image and bears the reflection of the Pleroma in the material world. The twelve components also align with the twelvefold nature of creation, symbolizing completeness and the full expression of divine attributes within creation.

Humanity itself is considered to be an image of the divine order of the *Triacontad*, the thirty *aeons* of the Pleroma. Through the human body, the various divine emanations are mirrored. The four faculties of sight, hearing, smell, and taste reflect the Tetrad. The ten fingers mirror the Decad, and the twelve primary body parts correspond to the Duodecad. Additionally, the *Ogdoad*, a mysterious and invisible grouping of eight divine principles, is understood to be hidden within the human body, especially within the internal organs, symbolizing a profound, secret aspect of divine reality.

In this Valentinian framework, the Genesis creation account is more than a literal narrative; it serves as an esoteric key to understanding the divine order and the emanation of the *aeons*. The creation story, through its symbolic use of numbers and principles, reveals the unfolding of the divine order from the highest, most hidden source to the most manifest and material aspects of existence. Through this lens, humanity itself becomes a microcosm of the divine structure, reflecting the Pleroma’s organization and the hidden mysteries of creation.

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons

The Journey of Consciousness: The Path of the Aeons  

The ascent of consciousness toward the higher realms of the Pleroma is a transformative process that requires study, contemplation, and prayer. It is not the immortality of consciousness but its refinement and elevation through deliberate engagement with divine wisdom. This journey involves transcending the limitations of the carnal mind, the outward senses, and embracing the attributes of the aeons, the manifestations of divine realities.  

Central to this process is the concept of **telepathic communication** and **spiritual motion**, which connect consciousness to the divine mind. Telepathic communication is accomplished by the Logos, understood not merely as a spoken word or saying but as the active reason, thought, and intention of Theos/EL. The Logos serves as the medium through which divine wisdom, purpose, and will flow to humanity.  

**Telepathic Communication**  

Telepathic communication represents the instantaneous transmission of divine will and intention to the consciousness. Through this medium, the Logos—emanating from the corporeal substance of Theos—bridges the gap between the infinite and the finite. As the mind of Theos, the Logos conveys not only the spoken decrees of God but also the deeper, unspoken intentions that guide creation and spiritual growth.  

**Spiritual Motion**  

Spiritual motion further elucidates how God, as a corporeal being transcending linear time, interacts with creation. It is the dynamic activity of God's will and energy, operating beyond the constraints of physical laws. Unlike physical motion, which moves matter through space, spiritual motion represents the emanation of God's essence, shaping and sustaining creation.  

This dual framework of telepathic communication and spiritual motion allows for a deeper understanding of the transformative journey of consciousness as it aligns with the divine will and the aeons.  

---

### **The Steps of Consciousness Ascension**  

**Step 1: Sophia (Wisdom) and Theletus (Perfection)**  

The journey begins with a desire for Gnosis—a yearning for divine knowledge and self-improvement. It is marked by the recognition that material possessions and worldly pursuits are vanity and must be relinquished. This initial step demands introspection and a shift in priorities, fostering a commitment to spiritual growth.  

**Step 2: Ecclesiasticus (Son of the Church) and Macariotes (Blessedness)**  

Through communion with divine truth, the consciousness aligns itself with righteousness. This stage involves doing what is true and just, embracing the blessings that come from giving and receiving with sincerity. It is a step toward spiritual reciprocity and harmony with the divine will.  

**Step 3: Ainos (Praise) and Synesis (Discernment)**  

Here, consciousness awakens to the goodness of God, cultivating gratitude and reverence through praise. Discernment grows through the study of the Word and reflection on divine guidance. By seeking understanding, the individual aligns their thoughts and actions with divine truth, striving for righteousness and prayerful devotion.  

**Step 4: Metricos (Mother) and Agape (Love)**  

The consciousness begins to manifest love in its purest form—selfless, creative, and life-renewing. This stage signifies the power to nurture and to bring forth renewal, embodying the essence of resurrection. Love transforms the individual, fueling further ascent.  

**Step 5: Patricos (Father) and Elpis (Hope)**  

In this stage, consciousness takes on responsibility for protecting and cultivating a legacy that transcends the self. Hope inspires commitment to a future grounded in faith, enabling transcendence of personal limitations and alignment with divine purpose.  

**Step 6: Paracletus (Helper) and Pistis (Faith)**  

Faith becomes the foundation for building trust and reciprocity, both with others and with God. This stage emphasizes the necessity of mutual support and the role of faith as a catalyst for spiritual growth. It is a turning point where consciousness becomes anchored in divine assurance.  

---

### **Entering the Realm of the Divine**  

**Step 7: Monogenes (Originality) and Macaria (Happiness)**  

Consciousness begins to explore its true nature, discovering the unique creative potential endowed by God. This stage brings a sense of inner happiness, as the individual builds an inner compass guided by divine inspiration and authenticity.  

**Step 8: Acinetos (Immovable) and Syncrasis (Intercourse)**  

Through spiritual stability and communion with others, consciousness finds new possibilities and insights. By merging with the attributes of others, deeper understandings of self and divine purpose emerge, leading to transformative realizations.  

**Step 9: Autophyes (Self-Made) and Hedone (Pleasure)**  

Consciousness reaches a state of satisfaction through the fruits of its labor, recognizing that what it brings forth benefits not only itself but also others. This step reflects the balance between self-fulfillment and service to the collective.  

**Step 10: Ageratos (Eternal) and Henosis (Union)**  

True intimacy and unity are realized, unveiling the secret of eternal life through togetherness. Consciousness understands that immortality lies in the harmonious union with others and with the divine.  

**Step 11: Bythos (Depth) and Mixis (Interplay)**  

Infinite growth becomes possible through the deep exploration of self and the dynamic interactions with others of equal depth. This stage represents the ongoing interplay that stirs consciousness toward boundless understanding and divine connection.  

**Step 12: Anthropos (Mankind) and Ecclesia (Congregation)**  

The journey culminates in achieving cohesion between personal and collective being. Consciousness integrates body, mind, and spirit into a harmonious whole, finding balance within the community of believers. This final stage reflects the fulfillment of divine intention, as individual and collective consciousness merge in unity.  

---

Through these steps, the consciousness ascends to the heavenly places in Christ, aligning with the aeons and the fullness of God’s attributes. Telepathic communication and spiritual motion are vital elements of this journey, enabling a deeper connection to divine wisdom and purpose. It is a path not of immortality but of transformation, driven by prayer, study, and contemplation.

Unveiling Symbolism: Exploring Political Interpretations and Figurative Language in The Exegesis on the Soul

**The Exegesis on the Soul: Unveiling a Valentinian Gnostic Text**

The Nag Hammadi Library presents us with a treasure trove of ancient texts, each offering unique insights into early Christian thought and spirituality. Among these, The Exegesis on the Soul stands out as a profound yet enigmatic work whose authorship and precise historical context remain shrouded in mystery. Dating back to a period likely spanning the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, this text offers a captivating narrative that delves into the nature of the soul, its fall from grace, and its ultimate redemption.




Contrary to typical Gnostic cosmological themes prevalent in other texts of the Nag Hammadi Library, The Exegesis on the Soul chooses a different path. It remains notably silent on concepts such as the pleroma, aeons, Yaldabaoth, and the Demiurge. Instead, it unfolds as an allegorical exposition, inviting readers to explore its depths through comparisons within its own scripture-like narrative. Rather than delving into myths surrounding the fall of Sophia, the text encourages an allegorical interpretation rooted in scripture itself.

The narrative within The Exegesis on the Soul is not presented in a linear or straightforward manner. Instead, it weaves a tapestry of allegorical storytelling, interspersed with commentary, quotations from Old and New Testament scriptures, and even references to Homer's Odyssey. This eclectic mix underscores the author's syncretistic background and suggests a Valentinian Gnostic context, likely originating in Alexandria at the dawn of the third century.

Central to the text is the allegorical portrayal of the soul as a fallen woman, symbolizing humanity's descent from a state of perfection into spiritual degradation. Drawing parallels with biblical motifs, particularly from Lamentations 2:1, the text paints a vivid picture of the soul's journey through metaphorical prostitution and eventual redemption. The overarching theme revolves around the soul's reunion with the divine, symbolized by an androgynous union between the soul and the Spirit within the nuptial chamber.

Through copious quotations from both Old Testament prophets, New Testament gospels, and the epistles of Paul, the author establishes a rich tapestry of scripture. Interestingly, the inclusion of Homer's Odyssey alongside biblical texts suggests a broader understanding of scripture encompassing Greek legend and mythology. This inclusive approach underscores the author's view of diverse sources as potential sources of spiritual wisdom.

Understanding The Exegesis on the Soul as a Valentinian Gnostic text sheds light on its theological framework and thematic underpinnings. While the text touches upon sacramental themes, it does so with a subtlety distinct from other Valentinian writings in the Nag Hammadi Library. This nuanced exploration of sacramental themes further enriches our understanding of the text's theological milieu.

In conclusion, The Exegesis on the Soul emerges as a captivating Valentinian Gnostic text that challenges readers to delve into its allegorical depths. Through its intricate narrative, rich symbolism, and eclectic scriptural references, it offers a unique perspective on the nature of the soul, its fall from grace, and its journey towards redemption. As we unravel its mysteries, we embark on a spiritual journey that transcends conventional boundaries, inviting us to explore the depths of the human soul and its quest for divine reunion.

**Exploring the Nature of the Soul: Perspectives from Gnosticism and Biblical Teachings**

The concept of the soul has been a subject of profound philosophical and theological inquiry throughout history, with diverse perspectives emerging from different religious and philosophical traditions. In the context of Gnosticism, particularly among the Valentinian school, and within the framework of biblical teachings, the nature of the soul takes on varied interpretations that shape fundamental beliefs about human existence and spirituality.

April D. DeConick, in her seminal work *The Gnostic New Age*, elucidates the prevailing view among most Gnostics regarding the mortality of the soul. Contrary to Plato's notion of the immortal soul, Gnostics, particularly those within the Jewish-Christian tradition like the Valentinians, believed that the soul shares the same mortality as the physical body. According to DeConick, the soul is not endowed with eternal existence but is subject to the same fate of impermanence and eventual demise as the physical form it inhabits.

April D. DeConick in her book The Gnostic New Age "most Gnostics thought that the psyche, or soul, was mortal." page 21

According to most Gnostics, the soul is not immortal, as Plato thought. Rather, it is mortal, just like the physical body, and will not endure. (The Gnostic New Age P. 212 April D. DeConick)

This perspective finds resonance in the teachings of Heracleon, a prominent figure within the Valentinian Gnostic tradition who flourished around AD 175. Described by Clement of Alexandria as the most esteemed of the school of Valentinus, Heracleon's insights shed light on the Valentinian rejection of the doctrine of the immortal soul. Fragment 40 from Heracleon's commentary on the Gospel of John provides a nuanced interpretation of biblical passages, particularly John 4:46-53, emphasizing the mortal nature of the soul. By dissecting the symbolism within the biblical narrative, Heracleon argues against the notion of the immortal soul, asserting instead that the soul possesses only a disposition towards salvation and is susceptible to destruction in death.

Fragment 40, on John 4:46-53 (In John 4:46, “So he came again to Cana in Galilee, where he had made the water wine. And at Capernaum, there was an official whose child was ill.) The official was the Craftsman, for he himself ruled like a king over those under him. Because his domain is small and transitory, he was called an “official,” like a petty princeling who is set over a small kingdom by the universal king. The “child” “in Capernaun” is one who is in the lower part of the Middle (i.e. of animate substance), which lies near the sea, that is, which is linked with matter. The child’s proper person was sick, that is, in a condition not in accordance with the child’s proper nature, in ignorance and sins. (In John 4:47, “When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went and begged him to come down and heal his child , for it was at the point of death.”) The words “from Judea to Galilee” mean ‘from the Judea above.’. . . By the words “it was at the point of death,” the teaching of those who claim that the soul is immortal is refuted. In agreement with this is the statement that “the body and soul are destoyed in Hell.” (Matthew 10:28) The soul is not immortal, but is possessed only of a disposition towards salvation, for it is the perishable which puts on imperishability and the mortal which puts on immortality when “its death is swallowed up in victory.” (1 Corinthians 15:54) (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John.)

This perspective aligns with biblical teachings found in both the Old and New Testaments, which consistently portray the soul as mortal and subject to death. Throughout biblical literature, the soul is depicted in various contexts, but it is never attributed with inherent immortality. Rather, it is portrayed as inseparable from mortal life, capable of perishing and facing destruction. For instance, Matthew 10:28 highlights the mortality of both body and soul, refuting the notion of inherent immortality. Similarly, 1 Corinthians 15:54 speaks of mortality being transformed into immortality, suggesting that the soul's imperishability is contingent upon divine intervention rather than an innate quality.

In essence, the exploration of the nature of the soul from both Gnostic and biblical perspectives offers intriguing insights into fundamental questions about human existence and spirituality. While Gnosticism, particularly within the Valentinian tradition, emphasizes the mortal nature of the soul as part of its broader cosmological framework, biblical teachings consistently underscore the mortal condition of the soul, devoid of inherent immortality. These perspectives invite further contemplation and dialogue on the nature of the soul and its significance within the larger tapestry of human spirituality and theological inquiry.

**The Collective Nature of the Soul: Insights from Biblical Usage**

In the rich tapestry of religious and philosophical thought, the concept of the soul holds a central place, often provoking profound reflections on the nature of human existence. Delving into the Scriptures, we find intriguing examples of a singular noun used to denote a collective group, shedding light on the collective nature of the soul in certain biblical contexts.

A notable instance is the collective use of the term "Israel" in the Scriptures. It refers not just to an individual, but to all the descendants of Jacob collectively at any given time. This collective usage is evident in various biblical passages, including Exodus 9:4, Joshua 3:7, Ezra 2:2b, and Matthew 8:10. Similarly, the term "The Amorite" appears singular in the Hebrew text but is used collectively to denote the Canaanite tribe descended from the original Amorite. This collective understanding extends to other groups, such as the Hamitic race mentioned in Genesis 10:6, 15, 16 and 1 Chronicles 1:13, 14.


Genesis 14:21 After that the king of Sodom said to Abram: “Give me the souls, but take the goods for yourself.”

The souls,” (Hebrew., han·ne´phesh, singular. but used collectively)

23:7 Thereupon Abraham got up and bowed down to the natives, to the sons of Heth,
8 and spoke with them, saying: “If YOUR souls agree to bury my dead out of my sight, listen to me and urge Ephron the son of Zohar for me,
9 that he may give me the cave of Mach·pe´lah, which is his, which is at the extremity of his field. For the full amount of silver let him give it to me in the midst of YOU for the possession of a burial place.” (Genesis 23:7-9 NWT)　

NWT Footnote: Lit., "with your soul," used collectively. Heb., 'eth-naph·shekhem´; Gr., psy·khei´.

The concept of the soul also takes on a collective dimension in certain biblical verses, such as Genesis 14:21, Genesis 23:8, and Jeremiah 48:6. Genesis 14:21 presents an interesting use of the term "souls," emphasizing its collective nature. The king of Sodom requests Abram, saying, "Give me the souls, but take the goods for yourself." Here, the Hebrew term "han·ne´phesh" is singular but used collectively, suggesting a group of individuals.

Genesis 23:8 further exemplifies the collective use of the term "soul." In Abraham's conversation with the sons of Heth, the phrase "If your souls agree" is used collectively. The New World Translation (NWT) emphasizes the collective nature by providing a footnote stating that "lit., 'with your soul,' used collectively."

The nuances of the collective noun "soul" in these biblical passages provide a foundation for understanding its role in Gnostic teachings. The Gnostic text, *The Concept of Our Great Power*, introduces the notion of the soul-endowed aeon as the human race post-flood. This aeon, designated as the psychic one, is described as collective, suggesting a group of individuals with shared attributes and characteristics.

Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one, the man will come into being who knows the great Power. He will receive (me) and he will know me. He will drink from the milk of the mother, in fact. He will speak in parables; he will proclaim the aeon that is to come, just as he spoke in the first aeon of the flesh, as Noah. Now concerning his words, which he uttered, he spoke in all of them, in seventy-two tongues. And he opened the gates of the heavens with his words. And he put to shame the ruler of Hades; he raised the dead, and he destroyed his dominion. (The Concept of Our Great Power)

Here, the soul-endowed aeon (the psychic aeon) is depicted as encompassing the human race after the flood, representing a collective entity endowed with spiritual potential and eligibility for eternal life. The Gnostic text emphasizes the collective nature of this soul-endowed aeon, highlighting its distinctiveness from the fleshly aeon.

The reference to seventy-two tongues in *The Concept of Our Great Power* underscores the universality and diversity within this collective aeon. The individual within this aeon is portrayed as capable of opening the gates of the heavens with their words, challenging the dominion of Hades, and even raising the dead. This collective empowerment aligns with the biblical understanding of the soul as a collective noun, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individuals within a shared spiritual journey.

In conclusion, the exploration of the collective nature of the soul, as depicted in biblical passages and Gnostic teachings, unveils a nuanced understanding of the soul's role in the human experience. The collective noun "soul" not only reflects a shared identity within specific groups but also contributes to the broader discourse on spirituality, collective empowerment, and the transformative potential inherent in the human soul. As we delve into these diverse perspectives, we embark on a journey that transcends individual boundaries, inviting contemplation on the interconnectedness of souls in the unfolding narrative of human existence.


**The Soul as an Allegorical Representation: Unveiling the Symbolism in the Exegesis on the Soul**


In exploring the Exegesis on the Soul, it becomes apparent that a nuanced understanding of the text requires delving into its allegorical nature, rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions rather than Greek philosophy or mythology. The text employs symbolic language, personifying the soul as a woman, to convey deeper truths about the collective spiritual condition of a group of people. This allegorical approach refrains from literal interpretations and instead invites readers to discern spiritual truths within its symbolic narrative.

Central to this allegorical interpretation is the identification of the soul as representing the nation of Israel, utilized collectively to symbolize a group of people. Drawing parallels with biblical passages where the term "soul" is used collectively for groups of individuals, such as Genesis 14:21, Genesis 23:8, and Jeremiah 48:6, the Exegesis on the Soul employs similar symbolism to convey its message. The personification of the soul as a woman embodies the collective spiritual state of the nation of Israel, depicted allegorically as a wife fallen into prostitution, mirroring the biblical narrative where Israel is metaphorically portrayed as the wife of God who has strayed from righteousness.


The allegorical interpretation extends further to encompass the concept of repentance within the narrative. The call to repentance within the text is addressed to a collective group, identified as the spiritual Israel or the church. By utilizing the term "Israel" as a collective representation of the soul, the text emphasizes the collective responsibility for repentance and spiritual renewal. The symbolic language employed throughout the text underscores the interconnectedness of individuals within the spiritual community, highlighting the shared journey towards redemption and restoration.


At the conclusion of the Exegesis on the Soul, the allegorical interpretation becomes clearer as the text shifts from speaking about the soul to addressing the nation of Israel directly. This transition underscores the allegorical nature of the narrative, where the soul serves as a symbolic representation of the collective spiritual condition of the nation. The call to repentance, articulated within the allegorical framework, resonates with Jewish-Christian readers familiar with the concept of repentance as a fundamental aspect of spiritual renewal.

In essence, the Exegesis on the Soul offers a compelling allegorical narrative that delves into profound spiritual truths through symbolic language and imagery. By personifying the soul as a woman and utilizing the term "Israel" collectively, the text invites readers to contemplate the collective spiritual journey of a community and the imperative of repentance as a pathway to restoration. This allegorical interpretation, rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions, provides a deeper understanding of the text's symbolism and its relevance for spiritual reflection and renewal within the community of believers.

**The Symbolism of the Soul's Feminine Nature: Insights from The Exegesis on the Soul**

The Exegesis on the Soul, a profound Gnostic text, introduces the soul with a distinctive feminine persona, highlighting the symbolic and allegorical dimensions embedded in its narrative. Across languages such as Hebrew, Coptic, and Greek, the term "soul" inherently carries a feminine grammatical form. However, in this text, the soul is not merely a linguistic entity; rather, it emerges as a symbolic woman, serving as an allegory for both the natural seed of Israel and the spiritual Israel, represented by the Church.

The author of The Exegesis on the Soul notes that wise men of old ascribed a feminine name to the soul, emphasizing its feminine nature. The text transcends linguistic nuances, delving into a profound metaphorical representation. This feminine portrayal aligns with biblical usage, where the term "woman" is occasionally employed to depict a weak or vulnerable man, underscoring the nuanced gendered language present in both the text and broader biblical traditions (Isaiah 3:12; 19:16).

The assertion that the soul is "female in her nature" reaches beyond mere grammatical considerations. It invites readers to explore the metaphorical aspects of femininity, particularly through the reference to the soul having a womb. In this context, the womb symbolizes sin, drawing parallels with biblical passages that metaphorically associate sin with conception, birth, and the bearing of iniquity.

James 3:15 highlights the earthly origin of wisdom, describing it as "born of the soul" or "demoniacal" in Rotherham's Emphasized Bible. This imagery of earthly wisdom being born from the soul further reinforces the reproductive symbolism associated with the soul, indicating its role in the genesis of earthly desires and temptations.

The concept of the soul's womb is intricately linked to the notion of sin as a female principle. Psalm 7:14 portrays sinners as pregnant with what is hurtful, conceiving trouble, and giving birth to falsehood. Similarly, James 1:13-15 depicts the process of temptation and sin as akin to childbirth, where desire conceives and gives birth to sin, ultimately leading to death. This language of childbearing in connection with lust and sin underscores the reproductive aspect of the soul, illustrating its role in the genesis of sinful desires and actions.

Philo, a Jewish philosopher, further elaborates on the feminine nature of the soul's offspring, identifying wickedness and passion as female offspring of the soul. According to Philo, these female offspring lead to effeminacy in pursuits, contrasting with the masculine characters of good dispositions, which invigorate and strengthen individuals in their spiritual journey.


In essence, the feminine symbolism of the soul in The Exegesis on the Soul serves as a powerful allegory, highlighting the nurturing and reproductive aspects of the soul in its spiritual journey. The imagery of the soul as a woman with a womb underscores its role in the genesis of earthly desires and temptations, while also emphasizing the importance of cultivating virtuous dispositions to transcend the influence of sinful tendencies. Through this allegorical framework, the text invites readers to reflect on the transformative power of spiritual renewal and the journey towards overcoming the frailties of the soul in pursuit of divine wisdom and virtue.

**The Virgin Soul: Symbolism, Androgyny, and the Descent into Mortality**

In the labyrinth of allegorical prose within *The Exegesis on the Soul*, a striking revelation unfolds—“As long as she was alone with the father, she was virgin and in form androgynous.” This profound statement not only encapsulates the virginity of the soul but also introduces the concept of androgyny, a state of being both male and female. To unravel this enigma, we delve into the figurative use of the term “virgin” in biblical and literary contexts, uncovering its symbolic significance in the narrative.

The metaphorical use of "virgin" in connection with cities, places, or peoples is a recurring theme in biblical literature. Various references, such as the “virgin daughter” of Israel, Judah, and Zion, convey a sense of being unsubdued, untarnished by foreign conquerors. The symbolic virginity of a people or place implies an undisturbed and pristine state, unspoiled by external forces. In this context, the virginity of the soul in *The Exegesis on the Soul* takes on a symbolic dimension, signifying a state of purity and untarnished existence while in communion with the Father.

The narrative introduces the concept of androgyny, describing the soul as being both male and female in its form. This androgynous nature finds resonance in the symbolic understanding of Israel as the wife of God and, simultaneously, the sons of Israel. The spiritual unity and interconnectedness within this symbolism allow for the conception of trouble within the soul without the involvement of an external agent. The androgynous state of the soul reflects its dual nature—the feminine aspect as the wife of God and the masculine aspect as the sons of Israel, capturing the complexity of its spiritual identity.

However, the narrative takes a poignant turn as it describes the soul's descent into mortality. The transition from being alone with the Father to descending into a body signifies a profound shift—from a state of purity and androgyny to a state of bondage or servitude to sin. The choice of the term "body" in this context holds significant weight. In Greek, the word translated as "body" (Strong’s 4983) can also be rendered as "slave." This nuanced interpretation introduces a layer of depth, suggesting that the soul, once in union with the Father, becomes a servant to sin upon its descent into mortality.

The descent into life, characterized by alienation from the life of God and the blindness of the heart, aligns with biblical concepts of spiritual estrangement due to ignorance. The narrative draws parallels with the idea that friendship with the world is enmity with God, emphasizing the transformative impact of worldly influences on the soul's spiritual state. The symbolism within this descent echoes the biblical notion of falling away from divine communion into a state of spiritual separation.

In essence, the allegorical narrative in *The Exegesis on the Soul* unveils a profound journey—from the virgin and androgynous state of the soul, in harmonious communion with the Father, to its descent into mortality and bondage to sin. The use of symbolism, androgyny, and the metaphorical understanding of virginity enriches the narrative, offering readers a contemplative exploration of the soul's complex spiritual identity and its profound relationship with divinity. As the soul navigates the realms of purity, duality, and mortality, the narrative invites reflection on the intricate interplay between the spiritual and the earthly, urging readers to delve into the profound mysteries concealed within the allegorical depths of the text.

**The Symbolic Descent: Figurative Language in the Exegesis on the Soul**

In the labyrinth of *The Exegesis on the Soul*, a profound revelation echoes - "When she fell down into a body and entered this life, then she fell into the hands of thieves." This statement, laden with symbolism and figurative language, unfolds a narrative of spiritual descent and apostasy. To decipher its depths, we embark on a journey through biblical allegory, exploring the nuanced meanings of falling, bodies, and the hands of thieves.

The notion of falling from heaven is not foreign to biblical literature. Figuratively understood, it represents a loss of authority or a descent from a position of prominence. In Isaiah 14, the demise of the king of Babylon is expressed as a fall from heaven, a metaphorical expression signifying a loss of dominion. This figurative descent is also applied to the nation of Israel in Lamentations 2:1, where the daughter of Zion is beclouded and thrown down from heaven to earth. Luke 11:23 further emphasizes the concept, illustrating how Capernaum, despite its previous exalted state, will descend to Hades. This figurative language is not about celestial realms but political and spiritual authority.

Theologian Matthew Henry, in his commentary, interprets such figurative language as political speeches. For example, in his analysis of Revelation 6, he sees the earthquake, darkened sun, and falling stars as symbols of political upheaval and the collapse of the Jewish church and state. This perspective aligns with a figurative understanding of the Exegesis on the Soul, urging readers to interpret its symbolic language as reflections of spiritual and political realities.

In interpreting passages that describe descent or falling, such as those encountered in the Exegesis on the Soul, Matthew Henry adopts a figurative approach. Instead of interpreting these depictions as literal falls from physical heights, he discerns them as symbolic representations of political or spiritual declines. This interpretative strategy reflects a broader trend in biblical scholarship that endeavors to unveil layers of meaning beyond the literal sense of the text.

Matthew Henry, an English Presbyterian minister whose Complete Commentary on the Bible remains influential, demonstrates a keen awareness of the figurative language employed in biblical narratives. In his commentary on Revelation 6, where cataclysmic events are described, Henry sees these occurrences not as literal cosmic disturbances but as political upheavals. The great earthquake, the darkened sun, and the falling stars are, for him, symbols of significant political changes, reflecting the collapse of the Jewish church and state. This approach showcases an inclination to view dramatic and cosmic language in the Bible as conveying deeper, symbolic truths about political and spiritual realities.

This interpretive stance aligns with a broader trend in biblical scholarship that seeks to move beyond a rigidly literal understanding of scripture. Scholars often recognize the rich tapestry of symbolic language woven throughout the Bible to convey profound truths. The use of metaphor, allegory, and symbolism is acknowledged as a common and intentional feature in ancient texts, allowing for layers of meaning beyond the surface narrative.

In the case of passages discussing falling or descent, the figurative interpretation is rooted in the recognition that these expressions carry more than just physical or geographical implications. Instead, they often signify shifts in political authority, spiritual states, or moral conditions. This nuanced approach respects the literary conventions of the time and the cultural context in which these texts were written.

For example, when the Exegesis on the Soul speaks of the soul falling into a body, the figurative understanding embraces the idea that this descent is not a literal fall from a celestial realm but a symbolic representation of a spiritual and political decline. The body, in this context, takes on a dual meaning—it can be understood both as a collective entity or a societal organization and as a state of servitude or slavery to sin. This figurative interpretation allows for a more nuanced and layered comprehension of the text.

In conclusion, Matthew Henry's figurative approach to passages describing descent or falling in the Bible is part of a broader trend in biblical scholarship that seeks to uncover deeper layers of meaning. Embracing the symbolic and metaphorical aspects of biblical language allows scholars and readers alike to appreciate the intricate tapestry of truths woven into these ancient texts, transcending literal constraints to reveal profound insights into spiritual and political realities.

So, when the Exegesis speaks of the soul falling into a body, we enter the realm of metaphorical richness. The Greek word for body, Strong’s 4983, carries a dual meaning—it can be translated as both "body" and "slave." This opens a nuanced interpretation, suggesting that the soul, once in unity with the Father, becomes a "slave" or "servant" to sin upon its descent. Moreover, the term "body" is used in various contexts in the Bible, ranging from the temple of the Holy Spirit to the spiritual unity of believers. In this context, it symbolizes a collective whole or a totality, hinting at a political body or an organized society.

The Exegesis draws parallels with Ezekiel 37, where a valley full of bones symbolizes Israel in a state of political death and captivity. The restoration of the bones signifies the revival of the nation from its dispersed and captive state. Likewise, when the soul falls into a body, it implies a political descent for Israel, losing its place of preeminence and falling into a state of spiritual death—the body of sin.

However, delving deeper, the word "body" is also a versatile term, portraying a social, ethical, or mystical unity, such as the church. It casts a shadow, a reflection of truth. Thus, the soul's descent into a body is not a mere physical journey but a profound transformation—a transition from a higher state to a lower one, signifying servitude to sin or dwelling in a house of sin. 

The narrative unfolds further, proclaiming that the soul, in its descent, enters this life—an existence marked by alienation from the life of God. Drawing on biblical wisdom, the text invokes Ephesians 4:18, portraying the ignorance and blindness that shroud the hearts of those separated from divine understanding. The stark dichotomy is emphasized by the declaration that friendship with the world is enmity with God, solidifying the soul's predicament as an enemy of God when entangled in the pursuits of worldly allure.

The hands of thieves, in the narrative, represent the agents of spiritual decay and apostasy. This figurative language finds resonance in biblical passages where thieves are associated with destruction and plundering. The soul's descent into the hands of thieves encapsulates the spiritual fall and corruption of the nation of Israel.

In essence, the Exegesis on the Soul weaves a tapestry of figurative language, drawing from biblical allegory to convey the spiritual descent and apostasy of Israel. The fall from heaven, the descent into a body/slave, and the hands of thieves collectively depict a narrative of political and spiritual decline. As readers navigate the symbolic terrain of this text, they are beckoned to unravel the layers of meaning, recognizing the rich tapestry of metaphorical language employed to articulate profound truths about the spiritual journey of the soul and the fate of nations.

Valentinus

Bentley Layton has sketched out a relationship between the various gnostic movements in his introduction to The Gnostic Scriptures (SCM Press, London, 1987). In this model, "Classical Gnosticism" and "The School of Thomas" antedated and influenced the development of Valentinus, who was to found his own school of Gnosticism in both Alexandria and Rome, whom Layton called "the great [Gnostic] reformer" and "the focal point" of Gnostic development. While in Alexandria, where he was born, Valentinus probably would have had contact with the Gnostic teacher Basilides, and may have been influenced by him.

Valentinianism flourished after the middle of the 2nd century AD. This movement was named after its founder Valentinus (c. 100 – 180 AD). The school is also known to have been extremely popular: several varieties of their central myth are known, and we know of "reports from outsiders from which the intellectual liveliness of the group is evident." It is known that Valentinus' students elaborated on his teachings and materials (though the exact extent of their changes remains unknown), for example, in the version of the Valentinian myth brought to us through Ptolemy.

Valentinianism might be described as the most elaborate and philosophically "dense" form of the Syrian-Egyptian schools of Gnosticism, though it should be acknowledged that this in no way debarred other schools from attracting followers. Basilides' own school was popular also, and survived in Egypt until the 4th century.

Simone Petrement, in A Separate God, in arguing for a Christian origin of Gnosticism, places Valentinus after Basilides, but before the Sethians. It is her assertion that Valentinus represented a moderation of the anti-Judaism of the earlier Hellenized teachers; the demiurge, widely regarded as a mythological depiction of the Old Testament God of the Hebrews, is depicted as more ignorant than evil


Valentinian works are named in reference to the Bishop and teacher Valentinius. Circa 153 AD, Valentinius developed a complex cosmology outside of the Sethian tradition. At one point he was close to being appointed the Bishop of Rome of what is now the Roman Catholic Church. Works attributed to his school are listed below, and fragmentary pieces directly linked to him are noted with an asterisk:

• The Divine Word Present in the Infant (Fragment A) *
• On the Three Natures (Fragment B) *
• Adam's Faculty of Speech (Fragment C) *
• To Agathopous: Jesus' Digestive System (Fragment D) *
• Annihilation of the Realm of Death (Fragment F) *
• On Friends: The Source of Common Wisdom (Fragment G) *
• Epistle on Attachments (Fragment H) *
• Summer Harvest*
• The Gospel of Truth*
• Ptolemy's Version of the Gnostic Myth
• Prayer of the Apostle Paul
• Ptolemy's Epistle to Flora
• Treatise on the Resurrection (Epistle to Rheginus)
• Gospel of Philip

The Repentance and Restoration of Sophia Genesis 3:16

The Restoration of Sophia

The restoration of Sophia

opening reading from the gospel of Philip

When Eve was still with Adam, death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more.

If the woman had not separated from the man, she should not die with the man. His separation became the beginning of death. Because of this, Christ came to repair the separation, which was from the beginning, and again unite the two, and to give life to those who died as a result of the separation, and unite them. But the woman is united to her husband in the bridal chamber. Indeed, those who have united in the bridal chamber will no longer be separated. Thus Eve separated from Adam because it was not in the bridal chamber that she united with him. (Gospel of Philip)

Israel surely would not have been visited by god and brought out of the land of Egypt and the house of bondage if it had not sighed to god and wept about its oppressive labors. Again in the Psalms it is written, (the Exegesis of the soul)

This whole account is an allegory of what is occurring in the heavens (to include the earth). The Father separated a part from within Himself (“Ruach”, the feminine spirit that moves in all creation) and infused it into the body of Adam (mankind). This resulted in the beginning of the first death for the spirit became “individualized” (i.e. was given free will) in the foreknowledge that we might learn through experience all of the facets of the Father’s love and wisdom. It was the only way our heavenly Father could introduce to us the complete knowledge of good and evil that we might come to know the power of agape’ (love).

“Israel” represents the wife who was separated from Him by the veil of flesh that they might learn obedience through suffering (something they could not achieve any other way).

Lamentations 2 New International Version
2:1 How the Lord has covered Daughter Zion with the cloud of his anger!
He has hurled down the splendor of Israel from heaven to earth;
he has not remembered his footstool in the day of his anger.

Jesus was the “firstborn in many brothers” who rent the veil of flesh and by doing so He became the head of the bride of which each body part is being united in the bridal chamber(s) (through the image, our hearts) one member at a time until the whole body is completed. Then shall the dead all be raised in Christ and those who belong to Him at His coming that they be caught away to be with Him for the grand ceremony!

Eve is the mother if all living also a symbol of wisdom and the tree of life

Gen 2:20 ¶ And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

Pr 3:18 She [is] a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her: and happy [is every one] that retaineth her.

Reading again now from the Gospel of Philip with commentary notes

When Eve [holy spirit (mother of everyone living)] was still with Adam [still in the creative thoughts of the Father], death did not exist [God does not die, hence His image and likeness would not die as long as it continued in Oneness with the Father]. When she was separated from him [when she was manifest in creation as individual spirit consciousness (i.e. was able to make independent choices)], death came into being [by making the wrong choice to follow a path contrary to Gods Law causing double mindedness – it is the separation of the will of the Father from the will of individual spirit]. If he enters again [into harmony with the will of the Father] and attains his former self [brings body, soul and spirit back together as One], death will be no more [this is victory over death] (Philip 56)

The separation of Eve from Adam happened at the fall:

Eve, through her presumptuous action, had lost her equality, her "one-ness" with her husband, and her restoration to this position was made subject to him.

Genesis 3:16 And to the woman He says, "Multiplying, yea, multiplying am I your grief and the groaning of your pregnancy. In grief shall you bear sons. "Yet by your husband is your restoration, and he shall rule over you. (Concordant Literal Version)

Some read teshuwqah, return, instead of teshuwqwah, desire. The Concordant Version reads: "By your husband is your restoration, and he shall rule over you."

The Septuagint and Syriac are similar, and render "turning or returning." The Septuagint renders by the Greek apostrophee, "a turning oneself, an escape, a place of refuge from evil" (see Liddell & Scott Greek Lexicon).

"Desire" is "teshuwqah", found in the OT only here and in Gen 3:16; 4:7; Song 7:10. Eve’s desire was for what she had lost, but hoped to regain it through him. This expresses a desire to return, a desire for oneness, a desire that the individual will (even HIS will!) should be subordinated to the needs of the unit which is the couple: "And the two will become one flesh" (Eph 5:31; cp Jn 17:21; Act 4:32; 27:23; 1Co 6:19,20). Instead "teshuwqah" some read "teshuwbah" return. Thus the Concordant translation renders: “By your husband is your restoration and he shall rule over you”. the LXX and the Syriac also render it as “return.” all these meanings are most significant. 

Spiritually, this state of equality between man and woman is restored in Christ (see Gal. 3:28), for both have equal privileges and status in him. But this is only a token of the complete restoration to equality with "the man" Christ Jesus in the age to come, to which the Lord referred in his prayer: "That they all may be one; as Thou, Father, art in me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that Thou hast sent me" (John 17:21).

As for the Wisdom who is called "the barren," [the little wisdom (Phi 28)] she is the mother of the angels [those who were anointed as men of "God" i.e. the righteousness seeking people who overcome the world and become prophets and guides to the royal line of Israel]. And the companion of the [...Christ was called] Mary Magdalene.  [...He] loved her more than all the disciples [she represents those with a pure heart who are willing and able to hear what the spirit is saying], and used to kiss her often on her mouth [this is a euphemism for passing on the deeper meanings of the Word in love (see Philip 32) – Mary obviously had a pure and unadulterated heart which is what Jesus loves most in people so He was willing to answer her deeper questions, ones the disciples would not ask]

Eve being the mother of all living she is justified by her children

Luke 7:35 But wisdom is justified of all her children.

The restoration of Sophia begins with her children Believers justify or vindicate Sophia

Wisdom or Sophia could be used collectively of the ecclesia the Bride of Christ we can see this from The Exegesis on the Soul it is at the end of the text when we get a clear understanding of who or what the soul is.

Repentance

Reading now from the The Exegesis on the Soul:

Israel surely would not have been visited by god and brought out of the land of Egypt and the house of bondage if it had not sighed to god and wept about its oppressive labors. Again in the Psalms it is written,

I was greatly troubled in my groaning. I will bathe my bed and my cover each night with my tears. I have become old in the midst of all my enemies. Depart from me, all you who work at lawlessness, for look, the lord has heard the cry of my weeping and the lord has heard my prayer.

If we repent, truly god will heed us, he who is long-suffering and abundantly merciful, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen. (The Exegesis on the Soul)

The text seems to be referring to the nation of Israel or the Israel of God the ecclesia collectively has the soul which needs to repent this can be seen at the end of the document:

If we repent, [we like Israel need to ask for forgiveness] truly God will listen to us, he who is long suffering and abundantly merciful, to whom is the glory for ever and ever. Amen! (Exegesis on the Soul )

The word repent is a Jewish or Hebrew term and would be understood by Jewish-Christian readers

"If we repent, truly God will listen to us,"

The soul is used collectively for the nation of Israel and the church or the Israel of God. (Galatians 6:16) The author of the Exegesis on the Soul is using figurative language the soul is symbolic of a group of people (Genesis 14:21 Genesis 23:8 Jeremiah 48:6)

In the phrase "If we repent, truly God will listen to us" It is obvious "We" is the members of the Church or the spiritual Israel. It also shows the text is addressing a group of people calling them to repentance.

Just as the soul is an allegory for the sons of Israel or the church so is Wisdom or Sophia

So our repentance is also the repentance of Sophia remember wisdom is justified of all her children.

The Restoration

Song of Solomon 7:10 New International Version

I belong to my beloved, and his desire is for me.

When the Bride exclaims: "His desire is toward me," she means that the promised restoration is directed to her, that she has been chosen to enjoy this privilege. It is significant, that immediately upon making this statement, she launches into a description of labor to be performed in mutual cooperation: "let us go forth," "let us lodge," "let us get up early," "let us see." When her Lord returns she shall be united to him, and will experience that glorious unity promised, including a restoration of that state of fellowship and equality that existed before sin entered into the world.

Therefore, Christ came to correct the separation that was from the beginning. There was both unity and equality in Eden before sin made its ugly appearance. The man and the woman were as one rejoicing together before God, which was brought to an end by the seductive suggestion of the serpent, and its terrible fruit of sin. 

The unity in Eden was broken, and because the woman was first in the transgression, she was brought into subjection to her husband (1Tim 2:12-14). After God told the serpent, He would provide a Redeemer who would bruise its head and release man from its power (sin). sentence was than pronounced upon the woman: Gen 3:16 And to the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy pains and thy groanings; in pain thou shall bring forth children, and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. Your desire... to Your husband: Woman's desire to man, Christ: Song 2:16; 6:3. Man's pre-eminence over his wife: Eph 5:22-24. 

Eve was reminded that her restoration, return, was subject to her husband, and that he must exercise the rule over her. Eve, however, was typical of the bride of Christ, and these words spoken to her have an added significance when related to the bride. The restoration of the bride is subject to her husband (Christ), and he must bear rule over her, if she would attain unto it.

What is the restoration?

That unity for which Christ prayed the Father when he declared: John: 17:20,21 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.

This expresses the complete union of marriage; that oneness that shall only be experienced when the marriage of the lamb hath come. For the moment, the bride is espoused as a “chaste virgin” to Christ, and in this relationship, there is partial restoration. Thus, Paul wrote: Galatians: 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 

Paul taught that in Christ there is a restoration of oneness. We experience that initially at baptism, for no matter of which sex we might be, we are than made personally responsible to Christ. But the “oneness” there indicated, is but a token of the complete restoration in the future, when Christ’s prayer will be fulfilled, and when, taking her to himself in the bridal chamber, he will acknowledge that they are “one flesh” (Eph 5:31). Meanwhile, the second Eve remains in subjection to her husband (1Tim 2:11-12 Eph 5:22 Col 3:18)

The Marriage

Reading again from the Exegesis on the Soul

Then, by the will of the father, the bridegroom came down to her in the bridal chamber, which had been prepared. And he decorated the chamber.

This marriage is not like carnal marriage, in which those who make love with each other become satiated in their lovemaking. And as if it were a burden, they leave behind the annoyance of physical desire. They turn their faces from each other. In this marriage once they join they become a single life. As the prophet said about the first man and woman,

They will become a single flesh.

They were originally joined to each other when they were with the father, before the woman led the man astray, who is her brother. This marriage brings them together again, and the soul joins her true love and real master, as the scriptures tell us :

The woman’s master is her husband.

Then gradually she recognized him and was again happy, weeping before him as she remembered the disgrace of her former widowhood. She adorned herself abundantly so he might be pleased to stay with her.

And the prophet said in the Psalms,

Hear, my daughter, and see me and bend your ear, and forget your people and your father’s house, for the king has desired your beauty, and he is your lord.

He has her turn her face from her people and the gang of her adulterers with whom she had mingled, to devote herself now to her king, her real lord, and to forget the house of the earthly father with whom things were bad for her, and remember her father in heaven. So Abraham was told,

Leave your country and kin and your father’s house. (Exegesis on the Soul)

God is Corporeal Spirit John 4:24

John 4:24  "God is spirit; and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth" (RSV) 

PROBLEM: This verse is quoted to show that God is not tangible.

Most people misunderstand this verse and assume or declare that Spiritual beings are immaterial.

SOLUTION: Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial

Jesus is concerned with redemption and worship that is acceptable not with a description of whether God is tangible or not. cf. v.7 - 23.

It is in the framework of this purpose that men must worship the Father4. Jesus was teaching the woman that in the redemption he had brought, he had living waters5 to offer so that they could worship God "in spirit".

4 "To be spiritually minded is life". (Rom. 8:6).

5 the teaching of the Spirit (i.e. Word of God) (cf. v.14).

The verse does not say that we must have received some divine effluent from God into our hearts before we can worship correctly. The context shows that: 

correct knowledge ("in truth") is one necessity, "salvation is of the Jews". (v. 22). 

attitude of mind ("in spirit" i.e. sincerity, Josh. 24:14) is the other necessity6. 

"Ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father." (v. 21). 

6) It was not where the worship occurred (empty tradition or letter) that mattered but the attitude of the worshipper that mattered i.e. a positive response showing love and zeal for the truth. cf. 2 Cor. 3:5, 6.

God is Corporeal

"We should not assume that anything we cannot see or hear or touch is by nature, by its basic character, silent, immaterial or invisible. We cannot see God who is Spirit. We cannot, today, see angels who are spirits. We hear no voice from heaven. Yet we know that some men heard, saw and touched things which are eternal, things which may be described as eternal." 2

Stephen saw the "heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God",3 Acts 7:56 while those around saw nothing. So we cannot argue that God, Jesus and the angels are immaterial because we by our limited senses cannot see or touch them.4

Angels appeared as ordinary men to Abraham ("three men stood by Him", Gen.18:2).

In the future the "inhabitants of Jerusalem ... shall look upon me (Jesus) whom they have pierced". (Zech. 12:10). They will say unto him, "What are these wounds in thine hands?" 

That conception of God which thinks of Him as mere abstract power, intangible, universal, without person or locality is not true. We cannot worship abstract universal power and claim we worship God.

The phrase "God is Spirit" is sometimes offered as evidence that He is immaterial but Jesus (whom we know to be a corporeal being) is called the Lord the Spirit in 2 Cor. 3:17,18. "He is now no longer flesh and blood; but Holy Spirit Nature a flesh and bones embodiment of Spirit."

Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” (John 20:27).

"And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish,....and he (Jesus) took it, and did eat before them" (Luke 24:43).

Dr. Thomas’ comments as follows: 

"The spiritual body is constituted of flesh and bones energized by the spirit. This appears from the testimony concerning Jesus. On a certain occasion, he unexpectedly stood in the midst of his disciples, at which they were exceedingly alarmed, supposing they beheld a spirit, or ghost, as at a former time. But, that they might be assured that it was really he himself, he invited them to handle him, and examine his hands and feet: "For", said he, "a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have". He gave them further proof by eating a piece of fish and. Thomas placed his hand into his side, and was convinced that he was the same who had been crucified. What stronger proof can we need of this that the spiritual body is corporeal and tangible in nature? It is the animal body purified, not evaporated into gas, or vapour. It is a bloodless body; for in the case of Jesus he had poured out his blood on the cross. The life of the animal body is in the blood: but not so that of the spiritual body: the life of this resides with the Father." (Elpis Israel)

Since Jesus has flesh and bones it seems inconsistent that his Father would not. The writer to the Hebrews says that Christ was "the very image of his substance"

The angels are "ministering spirits" but they were seen by men many times.

Many passages in scripture show that God is corporeal and shares emotions that we do:

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." (Gen. l:26).

"God created man, in the likeness10 of God made he him" (Gen. 5:1, 3).

"He that sitteth in the heaven shall laugh" (Psa. 2:4).

"Hide not thy face . . . incline thine ear unto me" (Psa. 102:2).

"He hath looked down from the height of His sanctuary" (Psa. 102:19).

" ... sat on the right hand of God" (Mark 16:19).

"Man... is the image ... of God" (1 Cor. 11:7).

"Christ, who is the image of God"11 (2 Cor. 4:4).

"Men, which are after the similitude of God" (James 3:9).

Jesus is not saying that God is immaterial nor is he just referring to the nature of God, but is stating that God is acting in a specific manner for the redemption of man, as he once acted in the past. 

We should continually remember that to Israel God was Spirit, an Angel bearing His Name. This statement can be verified by an analysis of Isaiah 48:16, 17, 20.
"The Lord Yahweh, and his Spirit hath sent me. Thus saith Yahweh, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am Yahweh thy God ... which leadeth thee the way that thou shouldest go."

Note that the Spirit is "the Holy One of Israel".

In this Spirit activity of redemption, there was to be corresponding spirit in their worship.

So if God is spirit - and the Bible emphatically declares this truth - it does not mean that he does not have material form! It is consistent to say that God, *in the sense of an individual person* has a body of spirit

The fact that Israel believed God has a human form is quite clear from Gen 1:26 where God makes man in their image (demut), and their likeness (tselem). That this image and likeness refers to *genetic* resemblance is made clear from Gen 5:1,3 where Adam begets a son after his own likeness (tselem) after his image (demut) and called his name Seth.

Notice that "Adam begat a son in his likeness, after his image." If this language is understood, then surely it can be seen that we are created in the image of God even as Jesus was the express image of Him. 

If we are to be one with God even as Jesus is one with the Father (John 17:22) then we must be physically and morally like Jesus was after his glorification. 

2nd Century Understanding 

Also for early Christians like Origen, Heracleon, and Theodotus understood God to be Corporeal:

Heracleon understands this verse to refer to the nature of worship and not the nature of God:

Fragment 24, on John 4:24 (In John 4:24a, it says,) “God is spirit.” Undefiled, pure, and invisible is his divine nature. (In John 4:24b, it says,) “Those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth." Worthily of the one who is worshipped, in a spiritual, not a fleshly fashion.....and they worship in truth, not in error, as the Apostle teaches when he calls this kind of piety “ a rational service.” (Romans 12:2) (Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John)

Theodotus understood the spirit world to have shape and body: 

10 But neither the spiritual nor the intellectual things, nor the archangels <and> those created first, nor even he is shapeless and formless and figureless and incorporeal, but he also has his own shape and body proportionate to his superiority over all spiritual things, just as also those created first (have their own shape and body) proportionate to their superiority over the beings beneath them.

For in general what has come to be is not without substance, but unlike the bodies in this world, they have form and body. For male and female here differ from each other, but there the Only-Begotten and uniquely intellectual one has been furnished with his own form and substance that is utterly pure and sovereign, and he has the immediate benefit of the Father’s power. The ones created first, even if in number they are distinct and each is bounded and delineated, in any case the likeness of their deeds demonstrates their unity, equality, and likeness. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)

14 The demons are said to be incorporeal, not because they have no bodies (for they have even shape and are, therefore, capable of feeling punishment), but they are said to be incorporeal because, in comparison with the spiritual bodies which are saved, they are a shade. And the angels are bodies; at any rate they are seen. Why even the soul is a body, for the Apostle says, “It is sown a body of soul, it is raised a body of spirit.” And how can the souls which are being punished be sensible of it, if they are not bodies? Certainly he says, “Fear him who, after death, is able to cast soul and body into hell.” Now that which is visible is not purged by fire, but is dissolved into dust. But, from the story of Lazarus and Dives, the soul is directly shown by its possession of bodily limbs to be a body. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)