Showing posts with label The Tripartite Tractate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Tripartite Tractate. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 March 2025

What is the Psychic Aeon The Psychical Realm




The Psychic Realm

A Study of The Psychical Realm
or 
Gnostic Teaching on the Psychic Aeon

What is the Psychic Aeon?

When discussing the term "psychic aeon," it is important to first understand what "psychic" means in this context. Unlike its popular usage in contemporary culture (such as in relation to fortune-telling or the "psychic hotline"), the term "psychic" here refers to "psyche," the Greek word for "mind" or "soul." Thus, when we refer to someone as being centered in the "psychic" realm, we are describing a person whose life and actions are influenced by the mind, intellect, and emotions, as opposed to the "pneumatic" or spiritual realm, which is connected to divine breath or spirit (pneuma). The psychic realm is marked by a focus on the material and natural aspects of life, where reason and emotions drive decisions and actions.

The word "psychic" is derived from the Greek adjective *psychikos* (meaning "soulish" or "ensouled"), which is linked to *psuché* (meaning "soul"). In Strong's Concordance, *psychikos* (Strong's 5591) denotes the "lower" or "natural" aspect of humanity, associated with behaviors tied to the material world, such as those driven by carnality or physical existence apart from divine inspiration (e.g., Jude 1:19, 1 Corinthians 15:44-46). This concept also emphasizes the idea that the body and soul are intertwined, with *psuché* often used synonymously with the physical body.

### The Psychic Aeon in "The Concept of Our Great Power"

Next the psychic aeon. It is a small one, which is mixed with bodies, by begetting in the souls (and) defiling (them). For the first defilement of the creation found strength. And it begot every work: many works of wrath, anger, envy, malice, hatred, slander, contempt and war, lying and evil counsels, sorrows and pleasures, basenesses and defilements, falsehoods and diseases, evil judgments that they decree according to their desires. (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library)

The psychic aeon, as described in "The Concept of Our Great Power" from the *Nag Hammadi Library*, is a time period or age in which humanity, influenced by the soul (or *psyche*), exists in a state of defilement and sin. According to the text, this aeon is "mixed with bodies, by begetting in the souls (and) defiling (them)." In this age, the soul becomes tainted by negative forces such as wrath, anger, envy, malice, hatred, and falsehood, resulting in a world dominated by human passions and desires. The text explicitly states that "the first defilement of the creation found strength," leading to the conception of "every work" of destruction, including war, lies, sorrow, and disease. This state of moral degradation and impurity defines the psychic aeon (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library).

The psychic aeon is not to be understood literally in terms of biological reproduction or the natural birth of children. Rather, it speaks metaphorically of the "begetting" of sin in the soul. This mirrors the biblical notion of sin as something that "conceives" and brings forth evil deeds. As the Psalmist writes, "Behold, the wicked man conceives evil and is pregnant with mischief and gives birth to lies" (Psalm 7:14, ESV). Similarly, the Apostle James writes about the "earthly" wisdom that originates "from the soul" and is "demonic" (James 3:15), which again ties into the concept of the psychic realm governed by unholy desires, emotions, and worldly wisdom.

This is reinforced by the words of Philo of Alexandria, who described the soul’s "female offspring" as wickedness and passion, which make a person "effeminate in every one of our pursuits" (Philo, *On the Contemplative Life*). Here, he contrasts the "healthy state of the passions" (virtue) with the unhealthy, leading to the degradation of the soul, similar to what is described in the psychic aeon.

### The Collective Nature of the Psychic Aeon

The psychic aeon is described as a collective noun, referring not to an individual but to the entire human race during a specific age. It "has congress with bodies" (The Concept of Our Great Power), signifying that this aeon encompasses all human beings, whose actions are shaped by the passions of the soul. The "soul-endowed aeon" specifically refers to humanity after the flood, implying that this age will persist until the final consummation, when it will be replaced by a new, purer aeon.

Interestingly, the Bible also uses the term "soul" collectively in various contexts. In Genesis 14:21, for example, the king of Sodom asks Abraham for the "souls" of the people, which here refers to the totality of persons, not individual souls (Genesis 14:21, NWT). Similarly, in Genesis 23:8, Abraham refers to the "souls" of the Hittites collectively, signifying a group of people. This collective understanding aligns with the idea that the psychic aeon refers to the collective human experience during a particular time, one governed by soul-driven passions and actions.

### The Coming of the Savior

Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one, the man will come into being who knows the great Power. He will receive (me) and he will know me. He will drink from the milk of the mother, in fact. He will speak in parables; he will proclaim the aeon that is to come, just as he spoke in the first aeon of the flesh, as Noah. Now concerning his words, which he uttered, he spoke in all of them, in seventy-two tongues. And he opened the gates of the heavens with his words. And he put to shame the ruler of Hades; he raised the dead, and he destroyed his dominion. (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library)

In the *Nag Hammadi* text, the prophecy speaks of a figure who will come in the psychic aeon—someone who will bring knowledge of the "great Power" and restore the soul. This figure, symbolized as "Noah," will proclaim the coming aeon and speak in parables, as Jesus did in his earthly ministry. This savior figure is described as speaking in seventy-two tongues and performing miracles, including raising the dead and overcoming the dominion of Hades (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library).

The *The Concept of Our Great Power* also speaks of the eventual restoration of divine order, where mercy and wisdom will prevail over the chaos of the psychic aeon. "Then mercy will come…through Sophia…. The firmaments will collapse down to the abyss. The children of matter will perish. From that moment they will not exist. Then will appear the souls who are holy through the light of the Power that is exalted above all powers, the immeasurable, the universal" (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library). In the final consummation, the souls who have been purified through divine wisdom, represented by Sophia, will enter a new aeon of beauty and peace.

### Conclusion

In summary, the psychic aeon represents the realm of human experience dominated by the natural soul and its attachment to the material world. This aeon is fraught with defilements and negative emotions that arise from the soul's engagement with the body and the physical realm. However, it is also a time of potential transformation, as individuals can receive the wisdom of the divine and transcend the corruption of the psychic aeon. Ultimately, through the intervention of a divine figure and the wisdom of Sophia, the souls who are purified will be restored to eternal life in the new aeon.












Original article















What is psychic?
When using the term "psychic," it's crucial to clarify that we are not referring to the likes of Sylvia Browne or the activities associated with the psychic hotline. Instead, we are using "psychic" in a more nuanced sense, relating it to "psyche," which pertains to the mind as we commonly understand it, including the intellect and other faculties such as emotions and reasoning. Therefore, an individual centered in the psychic realm is primarily driven by their intellectual and cognitive aspects, as well as their emotional dimensions.

Conversely, the term "pneumatic" is derived from "pneuma," signifying the breath of spirit. In this context, it describes someone who is closely connected to or centered in the spiritual realm. Being pneumatic involves identifying with the higher, transcendental aspects of existence. This orientation moves beyond the confines of the physical world, delving into matters of faith, purpose, and establishing a profound connection with the divine.

To truly comprehend these terms, it's essential to grasp their original and intricate meanings rather than getting caught up in modern misconceptions. By doing so, we can gain a more profound understanding of the intricate relationship between intellectual and spiritual dimensions. This understanding is crucial for navigating beyond the sensational portrayals often associated with the term "psychic" and delving into the rich theological and philosophical insights that these terms offer.

When delving into matters of religion, it is essential to consider the triad of conscious activities: spiritual, psychical, and physical. The spiritual domain pertains to fundamental principles of absoluteness, the psychical encompasses the realm of mental imagery, while the physical corresponds to the plane of tangible manifestation. The archetype of a well-rounded and fully developed individual, epitomized by figures like Jesus, embodies the harmonious alignment and conscious synchronization of spirit, soul, and body. This unity allows one to honour the inherent laws of existence. Those progressing towards this state undergo diverse encounters, symbolically depicted in religious scriptures.

The term "psychic" originates from the Greek word "psychikos," which signifies attributes related to the mind or mental realm. This term also holds a connection with the human mind or psyche. Additionally, in Greek, the word "psuché" represents the concept of the soul. It's worth noting that "psuchikos" is an adjective associated with "psuché," suggesting qualities of being soulful, soulical, ensouled, or soul-endowed.

The usage of "psychic" or "psychical" appears relatively sparingly within the New Testament.

psuchikos: natural, of the soul or mind

Original Word: ψυχικός, ή, όν
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: psuchikos
Phonetic Spelling: (psoo-khee-kos')
Definition: natural, of the soul or mind
Usage: animal, natural, sensuous.

5591 psyxikós (an adjective, derived from 5590 /psyxḗ, "soul, natural identity") – properly, soulish, i.e. what is natural, as it relates to physical (tangible) life alone (i.e. apart from God's inworking of faith).

5591 /psyxikós ("natural") typically describes the natural ("lower") aspect of humanity, i.e. behavior that is "more of earth (carnality) than heaven." 5591(psyxikós) then sometimes stands in contrast to 4152 /pneumatikós("spiritual") – the higher, spiritual aspect of humanity that develops through faith (4102 /pístis).

the psychic body
1Co 15:44 It is sown a natural <5591> body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural <5591> body, and there is a spiritual body.

1Co 15:44 It is sown a body of the soul, it is raised a body of the spirit; if there is a body of the soul, there is also of the spirit:-- (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

1Co 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural <5591>; and afterward that which is spiritual.

1Co 15:46 Howbeit, not first, is the body of the spirit, but that, of the soul,--afterwards, that of the spirit. (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

In the original Greek, the term "natural" (ψυχικός) refers to the psychical or ensouled nature of the body. This suggests that the natural body is inherently tied to the realm of the soul, the animating force that gives life to the physical form. This body is susceptible to the limitations and vulnerabilities of the material world.


Here the body of the soul or the Psychical body is the natural body or the flesh.

14...Why even the soul is a body, for the Apostle says, "It is sown a body of soul, it is raised a body of spirit." (1cor 15:44) And how can the souls which are being punished be sensible of it, if they are not bodies? Certainly he says, "Fear him who, after death, is able to cast soul and body into hell." (Matthew 10:28) Now that which is visible is not purged by fire, but is dissolved into dust. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)

Title:  The Significance of the Psychical Body in 1 Corinthians 15:44

Introduction

Throughout human history, the contemplation of the soul and its connection to the physical body has been a subject of deep philosophical and religious inquiry. The writings of ancient texts, such as the New Testament, and the interpretations and reflections of thinkers over the centuries have contributed to a nuanced understanding of the relationship between the soul, the body, and the spirit. In this exploration, we delve into the insights provided by ancient texts, particularly focusing on passages from 1 Corinthians 15, and the interpretations of scholars like Theodotus, shedding light on the complex interplay of the soul, the body, and the spirit.

The scriptural passage in 1 Corinthians 15:44 presents a fascinating exploration of the psychical body, shedding light on the intricate relationship between the physical and the spiritual. This passage, when analyzed in its original Greek context, provides profound insights into the nature of human existence, the resurrection, and the interconnectedness of body and soul.

In this verse, the term "natural" is translated from the Greek word "psuchikos," which refers to the psychical or ensouled nature of the body. This terminology suggests a fundamental connection between the physical body and the animating force of the soul. The psychical body represents the embodied state of humanity, encompassing both the material and the immaterial aspects of human existence.

The apostle Paul's intention in employing the terms "natural" and "spiritual" becomes clearer when considering the broader context of his theological message. He contrasts the psychical body with the spiritual body, indicating an evolution or transformation that occurs after death and in the resurrection. This transformation signifies a shift from the limitations of the material world to a higher, more refined state of being.

Paul's reference to the natural body as a "body of the soul" underscores the inseparable connection between the physical and the spiritual. It challenges the dualistic notion that separates the body from the soul, emphasizing that the soul is intimately intertwined with the physical vessel it animates. This perspective aligns with a holistic understanding of human nature, where the body and soul are not opposing forces but integral components of the human experience.

Furthermore, the concept of the psychical body holds implications for discussions on immortality and the afterlife. The Greek term "psuche," often translated as "soul," refers to the vital life force that sustains an individual. This concept diverges from traditional notions of an immortal soul and aligns more closely with the biblical understanding of the soul as mortal, subject to both physical death and potential resurrection.

This understanding leads to the interpretation that the psychical body, or the body of the soul, is synonymous with the natural body or the flesh. This implies that the body, which is animated by the soul, is inherently tied to the material realm. This body is subject to the limitations, vulnerabilities, and mortality of the physical world. It is the vessel through which the soul experiences the tangible existence on Earth.

Paul's distinction between the natural and the spiritual body is a reflection of the transition from the mortal to the immortal, from the earthly to the transcendent. He elucidates that while the natural body is essential for earthly life, it is the spiritual body that is raised in resurrection. The spiritual body is not bound by the constraints of the physical realm; it is freed from the limitations of mortality. This concept echoes the transformation undergone by Christians in their resurrection, resembling the glorified body of Jesus Christ.

This distinction between the natural and the spiritual body underscores the temporary nature of the psychical body. It implies that the earthly existence, encompassing the psychical body, is transitory. The idea of the psychical body aligns with the biblical narrative of creation, where humans were formed from the dust of the ground and received the breath of life. The combination of the physical body and the animating soul constitutes the psychical body, which is subjected to both physical death and the eventual resurrection.

This perspective on the psychical body stands in contrast to the concept of the immortal soul that has been pervasive in various religious and philosophical traditions. The belief in the immortal soul often suggests a separation between the physical and the spiritual, wherein the soul persists beyond death. However, the biblical interpretation of the psychical body emphasizes the interconnectedness of body and soul, and their mutual dependence.

The Roman Catholic translation, The New American Bible, reinforces this viewpoint by stating that saving one's soul is not about salvaging a distinct spiritual entity but about the entirety of the person, including their living, desiring, and willing aspects. This aligns with the notion that the soul is deeply intertwined with the physical existence.

In conclusion, the concept of the psychical body, or the body of the soul, in the Bible serves to emphasize the connection between the earthly, material form and the animating force of the soul. This connection highlights the impermanent nature of the psychical body, which is subject to mortality and transformation. While the psychical body is inherently linked to the natural, earthly realm, the understanding of the spiritual body signifies a transition to the immortal and transcendent state. This interpretation challenges the notion of the immortal soul and encourages a holistic view of human existence, wherein body and soul are intricately interwoven elements.

The reference to the psychical body also contributes to the discourse on resurrection. The transformation from the natural body to the spiritual body signifies a profound change in the state of being. While the natural body is bound by the limitations of the physical realm, the spiritual body transcends these limitations and attains a higher form of existence. This transformation echoes the biblical narrative of redemption and renewal, highlighting the transformative power of divine intervention.

In interpreting 1 Corinthians 15:44, it's essential to consider the cultural and philosophical context of the Corinthian society. The Corinthians were influenced by various philosophical schools of thought, including Platonic dualism, which emphasized the separation of the physical and the spiritual. Paul's use of "psuchikos" challenges this dualistic perspective by emphasizing the inherent unity of body and soul.

Ultimately, the notion of the psychical body serves as a bridge between the material and the spiritual, offering a holistic understanding of human existence. This concept echoes throughout the New Testament, emphasizing the interconnectedness of body, soul, and spirit. It invites believers to contemplate the profound implications of the resurrection and the transformative journey from the psychical to the spiritual.

In conclusion, 1 Corinthians 15:44's reference to the psychical body holds significant theological implications, challenging dualistic perspectives and underscoring the unity of body and soul. The passage speaks to the transformation of human existence from the limitations of the physical world to the expansiveness of the spiritual realm. By delving into the original Greek terminology and considering the broader biblical narrative, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate interplay between the material and the immaterial aspects of our being.

Conclusion

The contemplation of the soul, body, and spirit as depicted in ancient texts like 1 Corinthians 15 and interpreted by scholars like Theodotus provides a profound exploration of human existence. The interplay between the soul and the body, described as a "body of soul," suggests a complex relationship that intertwines the tangible and the ethereal. While the soul's connection to the body allows for a tangible experience of existence, the interplay between the "natural body" and the "spiritual body" hints at a transformative journey toward a refined and immortal state.

Theodotus's insights offer a thought-provoking perspective on the soul's potential for immortality, underscoring the significance of aligning one's soul with higher principles. Ultimately, these contemplations invite individuals to consider the intricate relationship between the soul, the body, and the spirit, sparking profound reflections on the nature of human existence and the path to spiritual growth.
God has a Soul the psychic substance
The Divine nature has been a subject of profound contemplation for centuries, sparking philosophical, theological, and spiritual inquiries. Among these, the notion of God having a soul and consequently a physical body unveils an intricate perspective that challenges conventional interpretations. This concept, while rooted in scriptural references and ancient thought, offers a new dimension to our understanding of the Divine.
 
The idea of God having a soul, a psychic essence, adds a fascinating layer to our understanding of the divine nature. Biblical passages and ancient texts intertwine to unveil a concept that transcends the traditional boundaries of theological discourse. From Leviticus to the Nag Hammadi Library, the notion that God possesses a soul gains momentum, challenging us to rethink our perception of the divine.

Leviticus provides the initial clue, offering a unique perspective on God's relationship with humanity. "And I will set my tabernacle among you: and my soul shall not abhor you" (Leviticus 26:11). This passage suggests that God's soul is not distant but intimately connected to His creation. It implies that God's essence is not only spiritual but also resonates within the realm of the soul.

Further insights emerge from the Book of Job, where the creation of man is described as a collaboration between God's spirit and His breath: "God’s own spirit made me, And the Almighty’s own breath proceeded to bring me to life" (Job 33:4). Here, God's spirit is the agent of creation, but it is His breath that animates and brings life. This act signifies the union of the divine and the corporeal, suggesting that the soul is an integral part of God's identity.

The Psalms and Isaiah's prophecies add depth to this notion of God's soul. References to "my soul" in relation to God (Psalm 24:4) and descriptions of God's servant as having a soul (Isaiah 42:1) challenge conventional perceptions of divinity. These passages intimate that the divine essence is not limited to the realm of spirit; it extends to the soul, implying a more profound connection between God and humanity.

This perspective prompts us to consider that humanity's creation is not just in the likeness of God's spirit but also in the likeness of His soul. If humanity mirrors God's soul, then there exists a shared psychic realm that unites the divine and the human. This concept expands our understanding of being created in the image of God beyond the physical and spiritual dimensions.

The [Invisible] Spirit [is] a psychic (animate) and intellectual power, a knower and a foreknower.  (Zostrianos, The Nag Hammadi Library)

The Nag Hammadi Library adds layers of complexity to this enigma. In "Zostrianos," the Invisible Spirit is portrayed as a psychic and intellectual power, a knower and a foreknower. This depiction aligns with ancient beliefs that the Divine possesses not only transcendent wisdom but also an intimate understanding of creation. This portrayal bridges the gap between the divine and the psychic, suggesting that God's soul encompasses profound knowledge and insight.

Grant what no angel eye has seen and no archon ear (has) heard, and what has not entered into the human heart which came to be angelic and (modelled) after the image of the psychic (animate) God when it was formed in the beginning, since I have faith and hope. (Prayer of the Apostle Paul, The Nag Hammadi Library)

The "Prayer of the Apostle Paul" resonates with this idea, drawing parallels between humanity and God's psychic image. It suggests that humans were created in the beginning after the model of the psychic God, bestowed with an animating force that reflects the divine essence. This concept implies that the soul is not just a bridge between body and spirit but a vessel that carries the very essence of God within the human experience.

The Valentinians, who believed God to be corporeal, further contribute to this perspective. They envisioned God as having a shape and body corresponding to His preeminence over all spiritual beings. This belief aligns with the notion that God's soul is intricately connected to a corporeal form, solidifying the concept of a divine corporeal identity.

In conclusion, the idea that God has a soul and, by extension, a corporeal identity challenges conventional theological boundaries. Biblical passages and ancient texts converge to reveal a divine essence that encompasses not only the spiritual but also the psychic. This concept expands our understanding of humanity's relationship with the divine, suggesting a shared psychic realm that unites both. The notion of God's soul encourages us to rethink the depths of our connection to the divine, inviting us to explore the intersection of the spiritual and the corporeal within the framework of our faith.

In the tapestry of theological exploration, the concept of God possessing a soul beckons us to reconsider the boundaries of our understanding. It prompts us to delve into the mysteries of divine embodiment, cosmic ensoulment, and the profound connection between the human and the divine. As we navigate these depths, we are reminded that the enigma of God's soul is an invitation to expand our perception, to embrace the ineffable, and to explore the timeless question of what it truly means to be made in the image and likeness of the Divine.
The Psychic Place a Mental Realm
The soul as the mind, as the seat of the senses, affections, and various emotions. The soul is used occasionally for mental acts and the intellect

Psalm 139:14 Proverbs 19:2 that the soul be without knowledge is not good (but RVm desire without knowledge, 

Proverbs 24:14 know wisdom for thy soul (or according to thy desire, think not in thy soul (or in thyself,  

Jas 3:15  This wisdom is not one, from above, coming down, but is earthly, born of the soul, demoniacal! (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

Jude 1:19 These are the ones who cause divisions, worldly-minded, devoid of the Spirit.

 You have become psychic, since you have received the substance of the formed. If you cast out the smallest part of this, so that you do not acquire again a human part - but you have accepted for yourself the animal thought and likeness - you have become fleshly, since you have taken on animal nature. For (if) it is difficult to find a psychical man, how much more so to find the Lord? (The Teachings of Silvanus)

Heracleon: Fragments from his Commentary on the Gospel of John

The ascent to Jerusalem signifies the ascent of the Lord from material realm things to the animate (psychic) place (or realm), which is an image of Jerusalem


the lower material (hylic) level of existence is symbolized by Capharnaum the psychic level of existence is symbolized by Jerusalem


Heracleon compares the holy of holies the part of the temple accessible only to the high pries to the eternal realm of the pleroma which the spirituals are permitted to enter


Here Heracleon links the psychic realm with the image of Jerusalem 


image refers to a pattern. type, plan, or form


image--"A mental representation of anything not actually present to the senses" (Webster).

Here the 
Psychic aeon is a world of forms it is a mental realm 


psychic--Pertaining to the intellect which is common to the ordinary man; but not yet quickened to the standard of Spirit.

When the psychic dominates in an individual it separates him from, or hinders him from coming into, consciousness of the true peace, unity, and joy that are results of the spiritual life. The psychic, apart from true spiritual understanding and dominion, leads to piercing, cutting, inharmonious experiences.

The realm of the soul is not the realm of God that is the higher realm of the consciousness built in accordance with the Christ mind. The realm of Spirit is wherever God is working to express Himself. When man as principle becomes the perfect image and likeness of God, no other realm will appear to have being.

The Soul is man's consciousness--that which he has realized or developed by the Spirit or intellectual reasoning; and also the impressions that he has received from the world around him ie social and environmental influences thus man's consciousness- is made up of intellectual reasoning, social and environmental factors (See 
The Psychic Aeon below

The soul is both the conscious mind and the memory of a person. It is in this realm of the soul that ideas first take form.

The psychical realm is a mental feeling plane and must have its base of activity, therefore the body is this base of activity

the same word occurs in 1Cor 2:14: 
  
1Co 2:14  But the natural <5591> man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

1Co 2:14  But, a man of the soul, doth not welcome the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, and he cannot get to know them, because, spiritually, are they examined; (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

"natural," that is, living on the level of instincts, not on a spiritual level

The word natural in 1Co 2:14 stands opposed evidently to spiritual.  It denotes those who are governed and influenced by the natural instincts; the animal passions and desires, in opposition to those who are influenced by the Spirit of God.

Natural.--That is, literally, that part of our nature which we call "mind," and hence signifies that man in whom pure intellectual reason and the merely natural affections predominate.

Jas 3:15  This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual <5591>, devilish.

Jas 3:15  This wisdom is not one, from above, coming down, but is earthly, born of the soul, demoniacal! (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

Here in James 3:15 we get a glimpse into the Psychical Realm it is not of God or in heaven but is of the natural or the outward senses. It is from beneath (cp. 1 Cor. 15:43), and not of God (see James 1:17). The emanation of the flesh, governed by its emotions (Rom.7:5), and not properly disciplined by the divine wisdom.

It is a wisdom from beneath, It is dusty, pyschical, and demoniacal. It is dusty, or of the earth, because it is the vain speculation of the groundling; it is psychical, because it has no higher origin than the thinking of the soul flesh, or body of this death; and it is demoniacal, because it is that thinking of the flesh which begets many works of wrath, anger, envy, malice, hatred, slander, contempt and war, lying and evil counsels, sorrows and pleasures, basenesses and defilements, falsehoods and diseases

Philo of Alexandria: Now the female offspring of the soul are wickedness and passion, by which we are made effeminate in every one of our pursuits; but a healthy state of the passions and virtue is male, by which we are excited and invigorated.

Jude 1:19  These be they who separate themselves, sensual <5591>, having not the Spirit.

Jude 1:19  These, are they who make complete separation, mere men of soul, Spirit, not possessing. (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

Jude 1:19 These are the ones who cause divisions, worldly-minded, devoid of the Spirit. 

They were moved by the motions of sin found in the flesh; so the flesh governed their thinking and actions (Rom. 7:5; 8:5-6)

the word psuchikos is used in the apocrypha LXX 2 Maccabees 4:37; 2 Maccabees 14:24. heartily, from the heart, in the 4th book of Maccabees the word psuchikos is translated mental when referring to desires, desires that springs from the mental and emotional impulses

4 Maccabees 1:32

Some desires are mental, others are physical, and reason obviously rules over both.  (New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)

and of desires some relate to the soul and others to the body reason obviously holds sway (4 Maccabees, H. Anderson, OTP)

32 Some desires come from the inner person, and others come from the body. Clear thinking obviously has control over both. (4 Maccabees 1 Common English Bible CEB)
The Psychic Aeo




What is the Psychic Realm or aeon?

According to the Concept of Our Great Power, from the Nag Hammadi Library, the Psychic Realm is identical with the existing world that we live in:

This is the work that came into being. See what it is like, that before it comes into being it does not see, because the aeon of the flesh came to be in the great bodies. And there were apportioned to them long days in the creation. For when they had polluted themselves and had entered into the flesh, the father of the flesh, the water, avenged himself. For when he had found that Noah was pious (and) worthy - and it is the father of the flesh who holds the angels in subjection. And he (Noah) preached piety for one hundred and twenty years. And no one listened to him. And he made a wooden ark, and whom he had found entered it. And the flood took place.

And thus Noah was saved with his sons. For if indeed the ark had not been meant for man to enter, then the water of the flood would not have come. In this way he intended (and) planned to save the gods and the angels, and the powers, the greatness of all of these, and the <nourishment> and the way of life. And he moves them from the aeon (and) nourishes them in the permanent places. And the judgment of the flesh was unleashed. Only the work of the Power stood up.

Next the psychic aeon. It is a small one, which is mixed with bodies, by begetting in the souls (and) defiling (them). For the first defilement of the creation found strength. And it begot every work: many works of wrath, anger, envy, malice, hatred, slander, contempt and war, lying and evil counsels, sorrows and pleasures, basenesses and defilements, falsehoods and diseases, evil judgments that they decree according to their desires.

Yet you are sleeping, dreaming dreams. Wake up and return, taste and eat the true food! Hand out the word and the water of life! Cease from the evil lusts and desires and (the teachings of) the Anomoeans, evil heresies that have no basis.

And the mother of the fire was impotent. She brought the fire upon the soul and the earth, and she burned all <the> dwellings that are in it. And its shepherd perished. Moreover, when she does not find anything else to burn, she will destroy herself. And it will become incorporeal, without body, and it will burn matter, until it has cleansed everything, - and all wickedness. For when it does not find anything else to burn, it will turn against itself until it has destroyed itself.

Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one, the man will come into being who knows the great Power. He will receive (me) and he will know me. He will drink from the milk of the mother, in fact. He will speak in parables; he will proclaim the aeon that is to come, just as he spoke in the first aeon of the flesh, as Noah. Now concerning his words, which he uttered, he spoke in all of them, in seventy-two tongues. And he opened the gates of the heavens with his words. And he put to shame the ruler of Hades; he raised the dead, and he destroyed his dominion.

The soul-endowed aeon is the human race after the flood. This aeon will remain in place until the final consummation. That aeon is a colletive noun here is indicated by the fact that the soul-endowed aeon singular has congress with bodies" plural the soul-endowed differs from the fleshly in that souls with which it is endowed are eligible for eternal life

The word soul is sometimes used collectively for a group of people in some parts of the Bible Genesis 14:21 Genesis 23:8 Jeremiah 48:6

Genesis 14:21 After that the king of Sodom said to Abram: “Give me the souls, but take the goods for yourself.” 

The souls,” (Hebrew., han·ne´phesh, singular. but used collectively)
 
23:7 Thereupon Abraham got up and bowed down to the natives, to the sons of Heth, 
8 and spoke with them, saying: “If YOUR souls agree to bury my dead out of my sight, listen to me and urge Ephron the son of Zohar for me, 
9 that he may give me the cave of Mach·pe´lah, which is his, which is at the extremity of his field. For the full amount of silver let him give it to me in the midst of YOU for the possession of a burial place.” (Genesis 23:7-9 NWT) 

NWT Footnote: Lit., "with your soul," used collectively. Heb., 'eth-naph·shekhem´; Gr., psy·khei´.

Gen 23:8  and spoke to them, saying, If it be your will that I should bury my dead from before me, hear me, and entreat for me Ephron the son of Zohar, (Derby)

Gen 23:8  And said to them: If it please your soul that I should bury my dead, hear me, and intercede for me to Ephron the son of Seor. (Douay-Rheims Bible)

Gen 23:8  and he speaketh with them, saying, ‘If it is your desire to bury my dead from before me, hear me, and meet for me with Ephron, son of Zoar; (Youngs)

KJV translates nephesh (H5315) as "mind" here!

Gen 23:8  And he communed with them, saying it be your mind (H5315) that I should bury my dead out of my sight; me, and intreat for me to Ephron

The phrase "If it be your will" (Derby) or "you are willing" (NIV) indicates "will" is also involved in this translation of nephesh:

"If you are willing to let me bury my dead." - Gen. 23:8 - NIV; NEB

So the noun soul can be used collectively for a group of people this agrees with the understand the psychic aeon in the The Concept of Our Great Power

Then, in this aeon, which is the psychic one,

The psychic aeon is a collective noun

The aeon is the totality of the persons who live during the time 


see Mental Perception for an understanding of the psychic aeon. It is a small one



Next the psychic aeon. It is a small one, which is mixed with bodies, by begetting in the souls (and) defiling (them). For the first defilement of the creation found strength. And it begot every work: many works of wrath, anger, envy, malice, hatred, slander, contempt and war, lying and evil counsels, sorrows and pleasures, basenesses and defilements, falsehoods and diseases, evil judgments that they decree according to their desires. (The Concept of Our Great Power, The Nag Hammadi Library)

 which is mixed with bodies, by begetting in the souls (and) defiling (them). For the first defilement of the creation found strength

this is not to be understood literally as natural human offsprings rather it is sin conceiving remember the questions from the letter of James 3:15 and Philo of Alexandria above 

Jas 3:15  This wisdom is not one, from above, coming down, but is earthly, born of the soul, demoniacal! (Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible)

Philo of Alexandria: Now the female offspring of the soul are wickedness and passion, by which we are made effeminate in every one of our pursuits; but a healthy state of the passions and virtue is male, by which we are excited and invigorated.

Psalm 7:14, ESV: Behold, the wicked man conceives evil and is pregnant with mischief and gives birth to lies.

The ancient text "The Concept of Our Great Power" from The Nag Hammadi Library paints a vivid picture of this psychic aeon. It emerges as a realm where the first tendrils of defilement found strength, birthing a multitude of works – works that spring from the tainted well of wrath, anger, envy, malice, and other divisive forces. This aeon, a collective noun encompassing generations, finds itself entwined with the physical realm, begetting in souls a defilement that taints the very essence of their being. The image is stark – a creation marred by the shadow of its own potential, a creation led astray by the siren calls of desires and self-serving judgments.

Yet, this concept of defilement is not to be taken as a literal offspring, but rather as sin's insidious conception. Just as James 3:15 suggests, there exists a wisdom born not from above but from the earthly, a wisdom that carries the imprint of the soul's defilement. In this light, the words of Philo of Alexandria resonate, describing the offspring of the soul as wickedness and passion. Here, wickedness conceives mischief, and lies are birthed – a poignant echo of Psalm 7:14.

The psychic aeon, a collective age, stands as a testament to the human condition. It reflects the perpetual struggle between the higher virtues that elevate humanity and the base impulses that tarnish the soul. This aeon, entwined with bodies, finds itself at the crossroads of potential, poised between the currents of defilement and the yearning for redemption.
The Psychic Heaven
The psychic heaven, i.e. the realm of the heavenly bodies, or the hebdomad the beings of the psychic realm, which rule the seven heavens, are reflections of their archetypes in the Pleroma

The spiritual substance is a single thing and a single representation, and its weakness is the determination in many forms. As for the substance of the psychics, its determination is double, since it has the knowledge and the confession of the exalted one, and it is not inclined to evil, because of the inclination of the thought. As for the material substance, its way is different and in many forms, and it was a weakness which existed in many types of inclination. (The Tripartite Tractate)

the images of the Pleroma which have been emitted in fact constitute this sphere. in which the aeon-logos resides and from which he creates and supervises the visible world

In Philo’s writings, the Logos is not only the pattern according to which the world was created (ἀρχέτυπος, παράδειγμα) or place (τόπος) for the Ideas, but also an instrument (ὄργανον) through which (δι’ οὗ) God created the world. The Logos also functioned as a cutter (τομεύς) that divided matter and shaped the cosmic elements (earth, water, air and water) out of it. (Opif. 25; Her. 140. See Runia, Philo of Alexandria, 446-451)

47 Now the Saviour became the first universal creator. “But Wisdom,” the second, “built a house for herself and hewed out seven pillars” and first of all she put forth a god, the image of the Father, and through him she made heaven and earth, that is “heavenly things, and the earthly” – the things on the right hand and on the left. This, as an image of the Father, then became a father and put forth first the psychic Christ, an image of the Son, then the archangels as images of the Aeons, then the angels of the archangels from the psychic and luminous substance to which the prophetic word refers, “And the Spirit of God was superimposed upon the waters,” declaring that in the combination of the two substances, made for him, the simple was superimposed but the heavy and material substance is borne under, the thick and coarse. But it is even suggested that this was incorporeal in the beginning when it is called “invisible.” Yet it was never invisible to any man that ever lived nor to God, for he made it. But he has somehow declared its absence of form, shape and design. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotus)

However, the psychic essence is not associated with Sophia’s will to turn back but it is simply presupposed as a luminous essence out of which the essences of the angels and the heavenly lights were made.

according to which the Savior is the “first creator” who delegated the final task of creation to Sophia and the Demiurge, who finally shaped the psychic heaven and material earth out of pre-cosmic matter (Gen. 1:1). It is notable that Heracleon also interpreted “all things” in John 1:3 to be a reference to “the cosmos and its contents” (Orig. Comm. Joh. 2.14).

the psychic heaven, i.e. the realm of the heavenly bodies, was ruled by the psychic “intellects,” who had their archetypes in the Pleroma

The Savior bestowed upon matter the capability of forming into two essences (hylic and psychic essences) and the elements of the world (earth, water, air and fire). The Savior left matter in a confused stage to be separated by the Demiurge into structures and bodies.

Hebdomad this is the domain of angelic manifestations and therefore the realm of archetypes, thrones and powers

Moreover, he says, the psychic substance is of a fiery nature, and they call it [Middle] Space and Hebdomad and Ancient of Days. And whatever other statements of this kind they make concerning this [space], they [in reality] refer to the [cosmic] psychic substance, which they declare to be the fabricative power of the [physical] world. And it is of a fiery nature. Moses also, says the writer, declares, 'The Lord, thy God, is fire burning and consuming,' for thus he would have it written." (Frangements of a Faith Forgotten)

the Psychic Realm is the Intermediate place called the Middle or the firmament, the hebdomad

"According to this, then, the soul [that is, the psychic substance] is partly mortal [and partly immortal], being as it were a kind of mean. (It is [both] the Hebdomad [the sublunary space] and [also] the means of bringing the Hebdomad to an end.) For it is below the Ogdoad [the mind or spirit-substance]--where is Wisdom, the day of perfect forms [that is, the sun-space], and the Common Fruit of the Pleroma--but above the hylic matter [the earth-space], of which it is the fashioner [or demiurgic power]. If then the soul is made like unto the things above, it becomes immortal, and entereth into the Ogdoad; which is, he says, the Jerusalem above the heavens; whereas if it be made like to matter, that is to say the material passions, then it is destructible and perishes." (Frangements of a Faith Forgotten)

there are many realms or worlds astronomical and physical worlds, worlds of thought, spiritual worlds and so on in every one of them the Father is all in all.

the material world knowable by the senses, the invisible world of angels and the divine world of Reality



The spiritual is the realm of absolute principles; the psychical is the realm of thought images; the physical is the realm of manifestation. The well-balanced, thoroughly developed man, of which Jesus is the type, comprehends and consciously adjusts his spirit, soul, and body as a whole, and thereby fulfills the law of his being. Those who are on the way to this attainment have various experiences, which are symbolically set forth in the Scriptures.

The soul touches both the higher realm of the pleroma, from which it receives direct inspiration, and the external world, from which it receives impressions. But as man brings into expression the original image and likeness of the divine mind his soul is purified and established in its primitive innocence.

food for the soul. The soul is fed by the divine mind, the true food for the soul is the Word of God. The Word of God when properly understood gives eternal life.



Psychic thoughts that connect the individual soul with the soul of the earth and the heavenly bodies. They are not spiritual, but shine by borrowed light.


the psychical realm of consciousness in man is the power of confusion

the psychical realm is deceptive for it is governed by the outward senses

the psychical realm lacks true spiritual discernment
the psychical realm is the domain of thought images



Thursday, 6 March 2025

The Fall in the Tripartite Tractate






The Logos in the Tripartite Tractate

The Tripartite Tractate view of the Fall



# **The Tripartite Tractate View of the Fall**  

## **The Logos and the Fall**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* presents a distinct perspective on the Fall, attributing it not to Sophia but to the Logos. This sets it apart from other Gnostic traditions, which often describe the Fall as originating from Sophia's misguided desire. Instead, the *Tripartite Tractate* portrays the Logos as the Aeon responsible for the disordered creation and subsequent fall.  

### **The Fall in the Tripartite Tractate**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* describes how the Logos acted outside of his proper bounds, leading to the disorder and fragmentation of creation:  

> "The intent, then, of the Logos, who is this one, was good. When he had come forth, he gave glory to the Father, even if it led to something beyond possibility, since he had wanted to bring forth one who is perfect, from an agreement in which he had not been, and without having the command.  
> This aeon was last to have <been> brought forth by mutual assistance, and he was small in magnitude. And before he begot anything else for the glory of the will and in agreement with the Totalities, he acted, magnanimously, from an abundant love, and set out toward that which surrounds the perfect glory, for it was not without the will of the Father that the Logos was produced, which is to say, not without it will he go forth." (*Tripartite Tractate* 100.21-30)  

The Logos, attempting to bring forth perfection without proper authorization, initiated a process that resulted in disorder. The text continues:  

> "For, he was not able to bear the sight of the light, but he looked into the depth and he doubted. Out of this there was a division—he became deeply troubled—and a turning away because of his self-doubt and division, forgetfulness and ignorance of himself and <of that> which is." (*Tripartite Tractate* 100.21-30)  

This passage directly links the Fall to the Logos, depicting his doubt and ignorance as the cause of division and fragmentation in creation.  

### **Irenaeus on Sophia and the Fall**  

In contrast, Irenaeus rejects the idea that Sophia, as an Aeon of Wisdom, could experience ignorance and passion:  

> “How can it be regarded as otherwise ridiculous, that (wisdom) was involved in ignorance, corruption, and passion? For these things are alien and contrary to wisdom, nor can they ever be qualities belonging to it. For wherever there is a lack of anything beneficial and an ignorance of knowledge, there wisdom does not exist.” (*Against Heresies* 1.2.2)  

Irenaeus argues that Wisdom (Sophia) cannot suffer from ignorance, reinforcing the *Tripartite Tractate’s* perspective that the Fall was not Sophia’s doing but rather the consequence of the Logos’ misguided action.  

### **The Logos in Biblical Usage**  

The Greek term *logos* (λόγος) has a variety of meanings in Scripture, including:  

- **Reason, thought, or account** (*Matthew 22:15*, *Luke 16:2*).  
- **A decree or order** (*Acts 19:40*).  
- **Divine expression (John 1:1-3)*.  

For instance, in *John 1:1-3*:  

> “In the beginning was the Word (*Logos*), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Through him all things were made; without him, nothing was made that has been made.”  

The *Tripartite Tractate* differentiates between the divine Logos of John and the Logos responsible for the Fall, showing that *logos* can be used generically for Aeons rather than referring solely to the Son of God.  

### **The Fall and Adam in Scripture**  

In contrast to the Gnostic Sophia myth, the Bible attributes the Fall to Adam rather than Eve:  

> “Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.” (*Romans 5:12*)  

Eve was deceived, but Adam willingly disobeyed (*1 Timothy 2:13-14*), much like the Logos in the *Tripartite Tractate*. The Fall, then, is a result of deliberate action, not of ignorance or accident.  

### **The Logos and the Demiurge in Valentinian Thought**  

Valentinian teacher Heracleon viewed the Demiurge positively, describing him as the agent of the Logos in creation:  

> “All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word 'from whom' or 'by whom,' but the one 'through whom (all things were made).'” (*Heracleon on John 1:3*, *Commentary on John*)  

This aligns with the *Tripartite Tractate*, which describes the Logos as the organizing force behind the cosmos.  

### **Conclusion**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* offers a unique perspective on the Fall, attributing it to the Logos rather than Sophia. This differs from other Valentinian texts and Gnostic traditions that place responsibility on Sophia. The text portrays the Logos as acting beyond his limits, leading to disorder, a view supported by Irenaeus’ rejection of Sophia’s involvement in ignorance. Additionally, the Logos’ role aligns with biblical teachings on Adam’s responsibility for sin. Heracleon’s description of the Demiurge further reinforces that the *Tripartite Tractate’s* Logos is not identical with the divine *Logos* in *John 1:1-3*, but a distinct Aeon who caused creation’s fragmentation.











First a quote from the Tripartite Tractate

The intent, then, of the Logos, who is this one, was good. When he had come forth, he gave glory to the Father, even if it led to something beyond possibility, since he had wanted to bring forth one who is perfect, from an agreement in which he had not been, and without having the command.
This aeon was last to have <been> brought forth by mutual assistance, and he was small in magnitude. And before he begot anything else for the glory of the will and in agreement with the Totalities, he acted, magnanimously, from an abundant love, and set out toward that which surrounds the perfect glory, for it was not without the will of the Father that the Logos was produced, which is to say, not without it will he go forth. But he, the Father, had brought him forth for those about whom he knew that it was fitting that they should come into being.
The Father and the Totalities drew away from him, so that the limit which the Father had set might be established - for it is not from grasping the incomprehensibility but by the will of the Father, - and furthermore, (they withdrew) so that the things which have come to be might become an organization which would come into being. If it were to come, it would not come into being by the manifestation of the Pleroma. Therefore, it is not fitting to criticize the movement which is the Logos, but it is fitting that we should say about the movement of the Logos that it is a cause of an organization which has been destined to come about.
The Logos himself caused it to happen, being complete and unitary, for the glory of the Father, whom he desired, and (he did so) being content with it, but those whom he wished to take hold of firmly he begot in shadows and copies and likenesses. For, he was not able to bear the sight of the light, but he looked into the depth and he doubted. Out of this there was a division - he became deeply troubled - and a turning away because of his self-doubt and division, forgetfulness and ignorance of himself and <of that> which is.

What does Irenaeus say about the Fall of Sophia

Irenaeus against heresies: How can it be regarded as otherwise ridiculous, that (wisdom) was involved in ignorance, corruption, and passion? For these things are alien and contrary to wisdom, nor can they ever be qualities belonging to it. For wherever there is a lack of any thing beneficial and an ignorance of knowledge, there wisdom does not exist. Let them therefore no longer call this suffering Aeon, Sophia, but let them give up either her name or her sufferings. And let them, moreover, not call their entire Pleroma spiritual, if this Aeon had a place within it when she was involved in such a tumult of passion. For even a vigorous soul, not to say a spiritual substance, would not pass through any such experience.

the tripartite tractate contens an early form of Christian Gnosticism which differs complets from other Gnostic texts when it comes to the Fall

Now let's a look at the bible's use of Logos 


3056 λόγος logos log’-os 


some of the meanings of the word 

 its use as respect to the MIND alone 
2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning, calculating 
2b) account, i.e. regard, consideration 
2c) account, i.e. reckoning, score its use as respect to the MIND alone 
2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning, calculating 
2b) account, i.e. regard, consideration 
2c) account, i.e. reckoning, score

decree, mandate or order reason, cause, ground, 



Mt 5:32  But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause <3056> of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.


Mt 22:15  Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk <3056>.


Lu 16:2  And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account <3056> of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.


60 ¶  Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying <3056>; who can hear it?

66  From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Act 19:40  For we are in danger to be called in question for this day’s uproar, there being no cause whereby we may give an account <3056> of this concourse.


Looking at these Bible quotes we can see that there are many uses of the word logos not all of them referring to the divine logos

The tripartite tractate associate the fall with logos and not with Sophia.  In fact, the fallen aeon is not called Sophia at all, but simply a logos, or word (logos being used as a generic name for the aeons).

I've always felt it wrong that sophia (wisdom) in Gnosticism is the bad guy that created sin that's just really absurd and it complete doesn't make any sense at all

In the Bible Eve is not responsible for sin Adam is, we see this in Paul’s statement at Romans 5:12-19, which places the responsibility for sin upon Adam. Compare 
tripartite tractate 
107.20–108.12

“And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.”

This gives no indication that Eve deceived Adam or seduced him into eating.  In fact, Adam is partially blaming God for the woman's presence.  At the same time he was trying to place the responsibility on Eve for HIS disobedience.  Yet there is NOT ONE accusation against Eve throughout the scriptures, except to state that she, being deceived, was in the transgression (1 Timothy 2:13-15 “For Adam was First formed, then Eve.  And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.  Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.”)


Eve was deceived by the Serpent, but “Adam was not deceived,” says the apostle Paul. (1Tim 2:14) With full knowledge Adam willfully and deliberately chose to disobey and then as a criminal he tried to hide. When brought to trial, instead of showing sorrow or regret or asking for forgiveness, Adam attempted to justify himself and pass the responsibility off on others, even blaming God for his own willful sin. “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit from the tree and so I ate.” (Gem 3:7-12)

Tri. Trac. 107.20–108.12: This is the expulsion which was made for him, when he was expelled from the enjoyments of the things which belong to the likeness and those of the representation. It was a work of providence, so that it might be found that it is a short time until man will receive the enjoyment of the things which are eternally good, in which is the place of rest. This the spirit ordained when he first planned that man should experience the great evil, which is death, that is complete ignorance of the Totality, and that he should experience all the evils which come from this and, after the deprivations and cares which are in these, that he should receive of the greatest good, which is life eternal, that is, firm knowledge of the Totalities and the reception of all good things. Because of the transgression of the first man, death ruled. (Romans 5:17) It was accustomed to slay every man in the manifestation of its domination, which had been given it as a kingdom because of the organization of the Father's will, of which we spoke previously.


Therefore since sin came by one man it stands to reason that Sophia is not responsible for the fall the Logos is


The account in the Gospel of Truth is also extrememly relevant here. The opening paragraphs of the Gospel of Truth describe the Fall. It contains no explicit references to mythological figures familiar from other Valentinian texts (e.g. Sophia, the demiurge, etc.). However, these passages do refer to a semi-personified "error."

Both Error and Logos fail in their quest to find the Father.

"He is the lord of all of them, that is, the countenance which the logos (i.e. Error) brought forth in his thought as a representation of the Father of the Totalities. Therefore, he is adorned with every name which is a representation of him, since he is characterized by every property and glorious quality. For he too is called 'father' and 'god' and 'demiurge' and 'king' and 'judge' and 'place' and 'dwelling' and 'law'" (Tripartite Tractate 100:21-30).


Ptolemy interprets the same passage in terms of the Aeons in the Fullness (pleroma) in his Commentary on the Prologue of John quoted in Irenaeus Against Heresies1:8:5 (cf also Excerpts of Theodotus 6:4). In this case, Ptolemy interprets the passage to refer to the Aeon Word (logos) who, along with his partner Life (zoe), is the one who is responsible for the creation of all subsequent Aeons


Heracleon a Valentinian teacher describes the the demiurge in relatively positive terms as the logos's agent and hence ultimately the Father's agent in creation 


Fragments from a Commentary on the Gospel of John by Heracleon Fragment 1, on John 1:3 (In John 1:3, “All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made.”) The sentence: "All things were made through him" means the world and what is in it. It excludes what is better than the world. The Aeon (i.e. the Fullness), and the things in it, were not made by the Word; they came into existence before the Word. . . “Without him, nothing was made” of what is in the world and the creation. . . "All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word “from whom” or “by whom,” but the one “through whom (all things were made).”. . . It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, for "through whom" means that another made them and the Word provided the energy. 

The Father the single One created the universe 52.4-6 It is, then, only the Father and God in the proper sense that no one else begot. As for the Totalities, he is the one who begot them and created them. He is without beginning and without end.

However, the perpetuation of the cosmos through the creation of physical bodies is accomplished through the logos



Now this Logos is different than the Son. or this first thought in the tripartite tractate
the Gospel of John the logos and the Son of God are one and the same

The point made may be a distinction between the logos as willed by the Father and as originating in him, cf. 75:23-24.