Tuesday, 4 March 2025

What is Fate?

 What is Fate?









**Understanding Fate and Providence in Ancient Thought**

Fate, often understood as the force that determines the course of events, has been a subject of intense philosophical and theological exploration throughout history. The concept of fate, defined as "that which is destined or decreed; appointed lot," suggests inevitability and immutability. It is typically seen as a force beyond human control, determining the outcomes of both personal and universal events. While fate is often understood as inevitable and unchangeable, it does not always carry a clear implication of whether the outcomes are good or evil. In ancient Greco-Roman thought, fate was considered an overwhelming force that governs both earthly and heavenly affairs, and various schools of thought sought to understand and interpret its role in human life.

### Fate in the Greco-Roman World

In the Greco-Roman world, fate was regarded as an essential force shaping the destiny of all beings. The Stoics, for example, emphasized fate as a central component of their philosophy. According to the Stoics, fate represented the natural order of the universe, which was governed by divine reason or logos. While individuals were encouraged to cultivate virtue, they were also taught to accept fate with equanimity. For the Stoics, the ultimate goal was to remain indifferent to external circumstances, including pleasure and pain, and to align one’s will with the natural course of the world. This philosophical approach stressed that individuals should maintain peace of mind in the face of life's uncertainties, accepting that fate often plays a significant role in their lives.

Fate in this context was not viewed negatively but was instead regarded as an integral part of the cosmos. The Stoics believed that everything, from the smallest event to the grandest universal law, was preordained according to divine reason. Human beings, in this framework, could not escape fate, but they could cultivate inner virtues that allowed them to respond to it with wisdom.

### Astrological Determinism

Astrology in the ancient world, much like today, played a significant role in shaping individuals' understanding of fate. Astrologers believed that the position of the stars and planets at the time of a person’s birth had a profound impact on their destiny. This view, known as astrological determinism, held that celestial bodies exerted influence over an individual's life, shaping their character, behavior, and future. According to ancient astrological traditions, the alignment of the stars could predict key events, such as the timing of marriages, the likelihood of success in battle, and even the outcome of political struggles.

Astrology was seen as a tool to unlock the secrets of fate. It was not simply about predicting the future but understanding the forces that guided an individual’s path. Scholars like Gesenius noted that in many ancient cultures, including the Hebrew and Chaldee traditions, astrology was widely practiced as a means of divining fate. The belief that cosmic forces shaped human existence was prevalent in many ancient societies, where astrology was considered a legitimate science for understanding fate.

### The Pharisees and Fate

The Pharisees, a prominent Jewish sect during the Second Temple period, had a nuanced understanding of fate. According to the Jewish historian Josephus, the Pharisees believed that everything was determined by both fate and God. Josephus writes, “They attribute everything to Fate and to God; they hold that to act rightly or otherwise rests, indeed, for the most part with men, but that in each action Fate co-operates” (*The Jewish War*, II, 162-163). This statement reflects the Pharisees’ belief that while human beings possess free will and are responsible for their actions, fate, as a divine force, also plays a significant role in determining the outcome of events.

For the Pharisees, fate was not seen as an entirely impersonal force. Instead, it was closely tied to divine providence, with God’s will guiding the course of events. Fate and free will were believed to coexist in a delicate balance. While individuals were expected to make moral choices, they also recognized that their lives were influenced by forces beyond their control. This dual belief in human agency and divine predestination reflects a tension that is common in many religious and philosophical systems, where individuals must navigate the interplay between personal responsibility and the greater cosmic order.

### Fate and Free Will in Ancient Thought

The ancient understanding of fate often reflects a tension between determinism and free will. While philosophers and theologians differed in their interpretations, they generally agreed that fate was an important force shaping human existence. Some traditions, such as Stoicism and astrology, emphasized the inevitability of fate and encouraged individuals to align with it. Others, like the Pharisees, acknowledged both fate and human free will, with a focus on the importance of personal responsibility in moral decision-making.

In all these systems, fate was not a simple, monolithic concept but was rather understood in various ways, often depending on the cultural, philosophical, and religious context. Whether viewed as an impersonal force, a divine will, or a combination of both, fate was seen as a guiding principle that shaped the course of individual lives and the unfolding of history. The ancient world’s understanding of fate continues to influence modern discussions about determinism, free will, and the nature of human agency.

**The Valentinian Understanding of Fate and the Cosmos**

In the cosmology of Valentinus, a distinctive and complex framework of divine emanation and creation emerges. Central to this system is the concept of the Pleroma, which represents the fullness of divine being and the origin of all creation. Within Valentinian thought, the Pleroma is the realm of the First Principle, the ultimate and unknowable source from which all existence emanates. Below this lofty divine realm, there are various levels of creation, each corresponding to a different stage in the unfolding of divine power and knowledge. This structure offers a nuanced understanding of fate, which is intertwined with the cosmic order and the intermediary forces at work in the material and spiritual realms.

### The Pleroma and the Ogdoad

The Valentinian cosmos begins with the Pleroma, the source of all divine emanations. It is the realm of the highest and most perfect existence, from which the Aeons—divine attributes or aspects—emerge. These Aeons represent the various qualities of the First Principle, which together form the totality of divine nature.

The first level beneath the Pleroma is the Ogdoad, a realm that holds particular significance in Valentinian thought. The Ogdoad is a space where the fallen Wisdom, or Sophia, resides. This Wisdom is described as having been formed “in being” and “in knowledge” through the emanations of Christ and the Holy Spirit. The formation “in being” led to the creation of the fixed stars, symbolizing the fixed order of the cosmos, while the formation “in knowledge” brought about the separation of passions from Sophia and the generation of spiritual substance. This spiritual substance, known as *pneumatikon*, plays a crucial role in Valentinian soteriology, which is concerned with the restoration of divine order and the return of the soul to the Pleroma.

Within the Ogdoad, Sophia’s passions were transformed by the Holy Spirit into two distinct substances: the material (*hylē*) and the psychic (*psychikon*). The material substance represents the lower, earthly aspects of existence, while the psychic substance relates to the soul and the intermediary nature of humanity. This separation of passions marks the beginning of the creation of the material world, with these substances forming the foundation of the lower realms.

### The Hebdomad and the Role of the Demiurge

The next level below the Ogdoad is the Hebdomad, or the realm of the seven heavens. This domain is shaped by the fallen Wisdom, specifically through the creation of the psychic substance. The Demiurge, an important figure in Valentinian cosmology, rules over the Hebdomad. The Demiurge is seen as the creator of the sublunary world, formed from the psychic and material substances that were generated by Sophia’s separation. The Hebdomad is often associated with the seven planetary spheres, each of which is governed by a celestial ruler. The Demiurge, as the ruler of this lower realm, is responsible for the formation of the material world, and it is within this context that the creation of the devil and evil spirits occurs. The devil, described as *kosmokrator* (world ruler), exercises dominion over the sublunary realm, which is the earthly domain where fate plays a significant role in the unfolding of events.

The Demiurge’s creation of the material world, as well as his role in the generation of evil spirits, introduces a dualistic element into Valentinian thought. While the Pleroma represents the fullness of divine harmony, the lower realms, under the influence of the Demiurge, are characterized by imperfection, division, and corruption. This dualism between the higher and lower realms reflects a worldview where the material world is not inherently good but instead a reflection of the fallen state of Sophia, the divine Wisdom.

### Fate and the Heavenly Bodies

In this cosmological structure, the concept of fate emerges as a force mediated by the heavenly bodies. The Valentinian understanding of fate aligns with certain ancient ideas, particularly the notion that celestial bodies exert influence over human affairs. Fate, in this view, is exerted through the positions and movements of the stars and planets, which affect the course of events in the sublunary realm. The stars and planets, as part of the heavenly order, are seen as powerful intermediaries that shape the destiny of individuals and the world.

However, Valentinian thought also distinguishes between the fate of those in the material realm and the freedom of the spiritual realm. While fate governs the lives of those who are bound to the material world, Christians—those who possess the divine spark—are believed to be exempt from the deterministic influence of fate. This duality is reflected in early Christian literature and Gnostic texts, including the writings of Bardaisan of Edessa and certain Nag Hammadi texts, which emphasize the idea that Christians, through their spiritual nature, transcend the influence of fate. In this sense, while fate is a powerful force in the sublunary world, it does not have the same hold over the divine soul or the believer, who is destined to return to the Pleroma.

### Conclusion

The Valentinian understanding of fate is deeply intertwined with its cosmological vision, where the interplay between divine emanation, spiritual substance, and material creation shapes the destiny of all beings. While fate is exerted through the heavenly bodies and governs the sublunary realm, the Christian, in their divine essence, is seen as ultimately beyond the reach of fate. The Valentinian narrative offers a unique interpretation of fate that combines the influence of the celestial order with the redemptive power of spiritual ascent, where the goal is to transcend the limitations of the material world and return to the divine fullness of the Pleroma. This understanding of fate highlights the tension between determinism and divine freedom, a theme that resonates throughout Gnostic thought and early Christian teachings.

**Valentinian Views on Fate and the Role of Salvation**

In Valentinian thought, the concept of fate is intricately intertwined with the cosmological order, the powers governing the heavens, and the potential for human salvation. The narrative of fate, especially in relation to the astrological influences on individuals' lives, is deeply connected to the teachings of Valentinus, who posited that fate was a force shaped by the heavens but could be transcended through divine knowledge and spiritual rebirth.

In Valentinian cosmology, the Hebdomad—the seven heavens, as well as the Ogdoad above them—represent the stages of creative power, with the Pleroma being the highest emanation of divine existence. Above these realms lies the realm where the divine wisdom, or Sophia, once fell. This fall led to the creation of the material world, governed by the Demiurge. The Demiurge, in this system, forms the "sublunary" world—the world beneath the moon—which is dominated by the planetary spheres (the seven "planets," including the sun and moon). These spheres are seen as the agents of the invisible forces and powers that govern fate in the physical world.

According to the *Works of Theodotu*, these powers, although invisible and intangible, control the movements of the stars and influence the fate of individuals:  
*“Fate is a union of many opposing forces and they are invisible and unseen, guiding the course of the stars and governing through them. For as each of them arrived, borne round by the movement of the world, it obtained power over those who were born at that very moment, as though they were its own children”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 69). These powers, aligned with the planetary bodies, influence the lives of those born under their guidance, imprinting the course of their lives.

As these powers govern existence, they can be divided into different types: some are beneficent, others maleficent, some aligned with the right and others with the left. *“The twelve signs of the Zodiac and the seven stars which follow them rising now in conjunction, now in opposition… these, moved by the powers, show the movement of substance toward the creation of living beings”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 71). This suggests that not only do the powers guide birth and the conditions of life, but they also play a role in the spiritual and material formation of human beings. However, individuals are born into a battlefield of these opposing forces, and their fate is shaped by which side of this cosmic battle they are aligned with.

However, the Valentinian worldview provides a distinct and esoteric understanding of salvation. Central to this salvation is the concept of gnosis, or divine knowledge. Those who attain gnosis are liberated from the dominion of these heavenly forces and from the deterministic grip of fate. The coming of the Lord, according to Valentinian teachings, signals the possibility of transcending fate and moving into a state of divine providence. The text from *The Works of Theodotu* articulates this:  
*“The Lord came down bringing the peace which is from heaven to those on earth, as the Apostle says, ‘Peace on the earth and glory in the heights.’ Therefore a strange and new star arose doing away with the old astral decree, shining with a new unearthly light, which revolved on a new path of salvation, as the Lord himself, men's guide, who came down to earth to transfer from Fate to his providence those who believed in Christ”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 74). The birth of the Savior is seen as a cosmic event that disrupts the old astral determinism, offering those who believe in Christ a new path—one that leads beyond fate to divine guidance.

Through baptism, believers are symbolically washed from the grip of fate, receiving a spiritual rebirth that frees them from the tyranny of the celestial bodies and their influence. The *Works of Theodotu* emphasizes the significance of this act:  
*“Until baptism, fate is real, but after it the astrologists are no longer right”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 78). The washing away of the old life in baptism symbolizes freedom from the deterministic forces of the cosmos, a transition to divine providence where believers are no longer subject to the whims of fate.

In Valentinian soteriology, this freedom from fate is not simply a physical or ceremonial act but is deeply tied to spiritual knowledge and the understanding of one’s true nature. The transformation is both ontological and epistemological: those who understand who they truly are—children of the divine—are no longer subject to the arbitrary laws of the celestial bodies. As Valentinian teachings suggest, *“the results prophecied show that Fate exists for the others and the consideration of calculations is a clear proof… For example, the Magi not only saw the Lord's star but they recognized the truth that a king was born and whose king he was, namely of the pious”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 75).

This reveals a deep metaphysical truth: fate is a construct for those who lack the knowledge (gnosis) to transcend it. As *The Works of Theodotu* explains, baptism is not only a ritual washing but also a means of liberation from the cosmic forces that once ruled over one's life:  
*“For he who was baptized unto God advanced toward God and has received ‘power to walk upon scorpions and snakes,’ the evil powers”* (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu, 76).

Ultimately, for the Valentinian Gnostic, salvation is about transcending fate and becoming aligned with divine providence. This path of salvation is illuminated through the teachings of Christ and the attainment of gnosis, which enables the believer to rise above the powers of fate, living not according to the stars, but according to the guidance of the divine.

**Beyond Fate: Free Will and the Human Condition**  

Throughout history, human beings have grappled with the nature of existence and the forces that govern it. Philosophers, theologians, and mystics have debated whether life is ruled by fate, divine providence, or human will. The Sadducees, a Jewish sect in the Second Temple period, rejected the idea that fate controlled human destiny, insisting that individuals were responsible for their own actions. Similarly, certain Gnostic traditions, such as those found in *Eugnostos the Blessed*, dismiss fate, providence, and self-governance as inadequate explanations of reality. Instead, these traditions present a radical claim: that true understanding comes only through direct knowledge of the ultimate source of existence.  

### The Denial of Fate, Providence, and Self-Governance  

The Sadducees denied the workings of fate, believing that each person was solely responsible for their circumstances (Josephus, *Jewish Antiquities* XIII.172-173). This stance sharply contrasted with the Pharisees, who held that fate played a role in human affairs, albeit alongside free will. Like the Sadducees, *Eugnostos the Blessed* rejects the notion that fate, providence, or self-rule govern existence. The text states:  

> "For some of them say about the world that it was directed by itself. Others, that it is providence (that directs it). Others, that it is fate. But it is none of these. Again, of three voices that I have just mentioned, none is true." (*Eugnostos the Blessed*)  

Here, three dominant philosophical explanations of the world’s order are dismissed. The idea that the universe governs itself is seen as empty and lifeless. Providence, often understood as divine foresight or intervention, is declared foolish. Fate, which suggests an impersonal force determining all things, is said to be incapable of discernment. These perspectives, while influential in ancient thought, are portrayed as misleading constructs of human reasoning.  

### True Knowledge and the Path to Immortality  

Rather than relying on philosophical speculation, *Eugnostos* insists that true understanding comes from an entirely different source—the *God of Truth*. The text emphasizes that those who attain knowledge are freed from the limitations of worldly illusions and attain a higher state of existence:  

> "Whoever , then , is able to get free of these three voices I have just mentioned and come by means of another voice to confess the God of truth and agree in everything concerning him, he is immortal dwelling in the midst of mortal men." (*Eugnostos the Blessed*)  

This statement presents knowledge (*gnosis*) as the key to transcending the limitations of earthly existence. Unlike fate, providence, or self-governance, which all fail to provide real wisdom, the direct acknowledgment of the true God leads to immortality—not in the sense of an inherent immortal essence but as a transformation brought about through knowledge.  

### Responsibility and the Pursuit of Truth  

The emphasis on knowledge as the means of liberation aligns with the belief that human beings are not subject to arbitrary cosmic forces but are instead responsible for their own understanding and actions. The Sadducees, who denied fate, shared a similar conviction: people are accountable for their choices, and their actions determine their outcomes. This perspective is echoed in *Eugnostos*, which portrays the pursuit of knowledge as an active process requiring discernment and effort.  

In contrast to deterministic systems that leave no room for human agency, *Eugnostos* presents an invitation to those who seek understanding:  

> "But to you, it is given to know; and whoever is worthy of knowledge will receive (it), whoever has not been begotten by the sowing of unclean rubbing but by First Who Was Sent, for he is an immortal in the midst of mortal men." (*Eugnostos the Blessed*)  

Here, knowledge is not imposed on individuals by fate or divine decree but is granted to those who actively seek it. The reference to being "begotten by First Who Was Sent" suggests that those who attain true understanding align themselves with the highest source of wisdom.  

### The Rejection of Fate and Providence  

In *Eugnostos, the Blessed*, the idea of fate, providence, and self-governance is critiqued as an incomplete understanding of reality. Eugnostos rejects the notions that the world operates through predetermined outcomes or divine orchestration, instead focusing on the individual’s role in navigating life and attaining true knowledge. According to Eugnostos, any belief in fate or external control of one's life leads to an empty existence, as it removes personal agency and the ability to directly shape one’s destiny. This aligns with the view that human life is governed not by external forces, but by individual wisdom and knowledge of the truth.  

Ecclesiastes 9:11 mirrors this rejection of fate and providence by acknowledging the unpredictability and randomness of life. It states: "I returned and saw under the sun that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and chance happen to them all." This passage reinforces the idea that success is not guaranteed by one's abilities, wisdom, or strength, and that unexpected events, over which individuals have no control, often determine outcomes. Both Ecclesiastes and *Eugnostos* recognize the limitations of relying on external forces, and emphasize the necessity of personal agency in understanding and navigating life.  

### Conclusion  

The rejection of fate, providence, and self-governance in *Eugnostos the Blessed* and the teachings of the Sadducees presents a vision of existence that prioritizes human responsibility and the pursuit of true knowledge. Rather than being bound by impersonal forces or predetermined destinies, individuals have the capacity to seek and attain understanding. This pursuit is not merely an intellectual exercise but a transformative process that leads to a state beyond mortality.  

The message is clear: those who rely on fate, providence, or self-rule are misled. True freedom and ultimate destiny lie not in passive acceptance but in the active pursuit of knowledge, leading to communion with the God of Truth.  















In this study we will look at the Gnostic understanding of Fate. But first an introductory reading from The Apocryphon of John:

24 I said, "Christ, where did the counterfeit spirit come from?''

He said to me, "(It all began) when the Mother whose mercy is great and the holy Spirit, the compassionate, who troubles herself with us—the seed that is, the Epinoia of the light awakened the thinking of human beings of the generation of the eternal, luminous, perfect Human. Then the Chief Ruler knew that they surpassed him in the excellence of their wisdom. He wanted to restrict their plan for he was ignorant. He did not understand [that] they were wiser than he. He made a plan with his powers. {He made a plan and begot Fate.}

They begot Fate and they bound the gods of heaven and angels and demons and human beings with measures and seasons and times in order to keep them all in its fetter—for it was lord over them all. (The Apocryphon of John)

Understanding Fate
fate--"That which is destined or decreed; appointed lot. Fate suggests inevitability and immutability in strict use, but usually carries no clear implication of whether it is good or evil" (Webster). 

In the Greco-Roman world fate was considered to be the overwhelming force that determines the destiny of all earthly and heavenly 

The philosophy of the Stoics stressed fate or natural destiny; one should be of high virtue but strive for indifference to pain or pleasure.

Astrologers in the ancient world like today considered “the position of the stars at the hour of birth, by various arts of computation and divining . . . determined the fate of individuals.” (Gesenius’s Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, translated by S. P. Tregelles, 1901, pp. 166, 167)

The Pharisees Regarding their ideas about fate or providence, Josephus reports: “[They] attribute everything to Fate and to God; they hold that to act rightly or otherwise rests, indeed, for the most part with men, but that in each action Fate co-operates.”—The Jewish War, II, 162, 163 (viii, 14).


Valentinian Understanding
In the system of Valentinus, the seven heavens (referred to as the Hebdomad), and even the region above them (referred to as the Ogdoad), were regarded as but the lowest and last stage of the exercise of creative power. Above them was the Pleroma, where were exhibited the first manifestations of the evolution of subordinate existence from the great First Principle.

The Ogdoad, is a place where the fallen Wisdom dwells, having been formed “in being” (κατ᾿οὐσίαν) and “in knowledge” (κατὰ γνῶσιν) by two emanations of the Pleroma, viz. Christ and Holy Spirit. The formation “in being”seems to have given rise to the realm of the fixed stars, whereas the formation “in knowledge” led, on the one hand,to the separation of passions from the fallen Sophia, and, on the other hand, to the generation of the spiritual substance (τὸ πνευματικόν), which will play a crucial role in the Valentinian soteriology.
The separated passions were, in turn, transformed by the Holy Spirit into two other substances, the material and the psychic one.

The next level is the level of the Hebdomad. It is created by Wisdom from the psychic substance, along with its ruler and his angels. This ruler, called Demiurge, is responsible for the formation of the psychic and material elements, thus becoming a creator of the sublunary world. His realm, the Hebdomad, seems to correspond to the seven planetary spheres. Finally, along with the formation of the material elements, the Demiurge also created the devil and the evil spirits. The devil is described as κοσμοκράτωρ, the ruler of the (sublunary) world.

It is against this background that a particular view of fate, widespread in early Christian literature, is reflected in the Valentinian narrative. This view includes two suppositions: (a) the notion of fate as a force exerted by or mediated through the heavenly bodies, which somehow determines the course of events, including human action, in the sublunary realm; (b) the belief that fate in this sense either does not exist or does not pertain to the Christians. Various versions of this view can be found in the Christian apologists, Bardaisan of Edessa, and some gnostic texts from the Nag Hammadi library.
The Powers and Forces
69 Fate is a union of many opposing forces and they are invisible and unseen, guiding the course of the stars and governing through them. For as each of them arrived, borne round by the movement of the world, it obtained power over those who were born at that very moment, as though they were its own children. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

70 Therefore through the fixed stars and the planets, the invisible powers holding sway over them direct and watch over births. But the stars themselves do nothing but display the activity of the dominant powers, just as the flight of the birds (for omens) indicates something but effects nothing. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

71 Now the twelve signs of the Zodiac and the seven stars which follow them rising now in conjunction, now in opposition, . . . these, moved by the powers, show the movement of substance toward the creation of living beings and the turn of circumstances. But both the stars and the powers are of different kinds: some are beneficent, some maleficent, some right, some left, and that which is born shares in both qualities. And each of them comes into being at its own time, the dominant sign fulfilling the course of nature, partly at the beginning, partly at the end. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

As the heavenly bodies are carried around by the motion of the cosmos, these powers ride upon them, and whichever has reached the upper position obtains authority over those beings that are born in that particular moment.
The text says that the seven ‘planets’ (i.e. five planets plus the Sun and the Moon), moved by those powers, somehow indicate “the motion of the substance to the becoming of the animals”
(71): this enigmatic phrase probably refers to the above-­‐mentioned teaching of the psychic substance, from which the Demiurge creates the souls of beings generated in the sublunary realm. Our passage suggests that each generated being has its own dominant power, which also seems to be responsible for its coming to life and dying. This, 
at least, is how I take this sentence:  "And each of them comes into being at its own time, the dominant sign fulfilling the course of nature, partly at the beginning, partly at the end." (Exc. Th. 71).

that which is born finds itself in the midst of a battlefield: powers are different, some are right, some are left, some beneficient, some maleficent, and “that which is born is shared by them“, that is to say, that which is born can be subdued by either side of the battle,one being the side of God (i.e., presumably, the Demiurge) and the other the side of the devil:

72 From this situation and battle of the powers the Lord rescues us and supplies peace from the array of powers and angels, in which some are arrayed for us and others against us. For some are like soldiers fighting on our side as servants of God but others are like brigands. For the evil one girded himself, not taking the sword by the side of the king, but in madly plundering for himself. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)
Birth
74 Therefore the Lord came down bringing the peace which is from heaven to those on earth, as the Apostle says, “Peace on the earth and glory in the heights.” Therefore a strange and new star arose doing away with the old astral decree, shining with a new unearthly light, which revolved on a new path of salvation, as the Lord himself, men's guide, who came down to earth to transfer from Fate to his providence those who believed in Christ.  (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

75 They say that the results prophecied show that Fate exists for the others and the consideration of calculations is a clear proof. For example, the Magi not only saw the Lord's star but they recognized the truth that a king was born and whose king he was, namely of the pious. At that time only the Jews were noted for piety; therefore the Saviour going down to the pious, came first to these who at that time were carrying fame for piety.  (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

76 As, therefore, the birth of the Saviour released us from “becoming” and from Fate, so also his baptism rescued us from fire, and his Passion rescued us from passion in order that we might in all things follow him. For he who was baptised unto God advanced toward God and has received “power to walk upon scorpions and snakes,” the evil powers. And he commands the disciples “When ye go about, preach and them that believe baptise in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” in whom we are born again, becoming higher than all the other powers.  (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

That’s why the Lord came, to show “a new path of salvation“ to those who believe him. This new path is a path leading beyond fate, liberating man from fate and delivering him to providence: „Therefore a strange and new star arose doing away with the old astral decree, shining with a new unearthly light, which revolved on a new path of salvation, as the Lord
himself, men's guide, who came down to earth to transfer from fate to his providence those who came to believe in Christ“ (74). According to our author, this delivery takes place through baptism, which is „called death and an end of the old life when we get rid of the evil principalities, but it is also called life according to Christ, of which he is the only Lord“
Freedom from Fate
According to Valentinian teaching, one's fate depended on whether one had attained to gnosis or not. Those who did not have gnosis were believed to be subject to judgement and punishment by the Craftsman (demiurge) and his associates in the "Middle" (Gospel of Philip 66:7-20).

78 Until baptism, they say, Fate is real, but after it the astrologists are no longer right. But it is not only the washing that is liberating, but the knowledge of/who we were, and what we have become, where we were or where we were placed, whither we hasten, from what we are redeemed, what birth is and what rebirth. (Extracts from the Works of Theodotu)

Thus baptism is a transcendence of fate, delivering the believer to providence: „Until baptism fate is real, but after it the astrologists are no longer right.“

Clement of Alexandria compares humans governed by fate to marionettes on strings.6 Tatian describes fate as an invention of evil demons who rule over nativities and generate various courses of life without any sense of justice, simply to amuse themselves like spectators in a theatre.“But we are above fate,“ says Tatian defiantly, “and instead of rambling (planetary) demons, we have come to know one ruler who does not ramble; we are not led by fate and have rejected its lawgivers.”7

Beyond Fate
Unlike the Pharisees, says Josephus, the Sadducees denied the workings of fate, maintaining that an individual, by his own actions, was solely responsible for what befell him. (Jewish Antiquities, XIII, 172, 173 [v, 9]) 

Like the Sadducees some Gnostics rejected the ideas of "self governed", "Fate", and "Providence"  

Eugnostos, the Blessed, to those who are his.

Rejoice in this, that you know. Greetings! I want you to know that all men born from the foundation of the world until now are dust. While they have inquired about God, who he is and what he is like, they have not found him. The wisest among them have speculated about the truth from the ordering of the world. And the speculation has not reached the truth. For the ordering is spoken of in three (different) opinions by all the philosophers; hence they do not agree. For some of them say about the world that it was directed by itself. Others, that it is providence (that directs it). Others, that it is fate. But it is none of these. Again, of three voices that I have just mentioned, none is true. For whatever is from itself is an empty life; it is self-made. Providence is foolish. Fate is an undiscerning thing. (Eugnostos, the Blessed)

Whoever, then, is able to get free of these three voices I have just mentioned and come by means of another voice to confess the God of truth and agree in everything concerning him, he is immortal dwelling in the midst of mortal men. (Eugnostos, the Blessed)


The Savior said to them: "I want you to know that all men are born on earth from the foundation of the world until now, being dust, while they have inquired about God, who he is and what he is like, have not found him. Now the wisest among them have speculated from the ordering of the world and (its) movement. But their speculation has not reached the truth. For it is said that the ordering is directed in three ways, by all the philosophers, (and) hence they do not agree. For some of them say about the world that it is directed by itself. Others, that it is providence (that directs it). Others, that it is fate. But it is none of these. Again, of the three voices I have just mentioned, none is close to the truth, and (they are) from man. But I, who came from Infinite Light, I am here - for I know him (Light) - that I might speak to you about the precise nature of the truth. For whatever is from itself is a polluted life; it is self-made. Providence has no wisdom in it. And fate does not discern. But to you it is given to know; and whoever is worthy of knowledge will receive (it), whoever has not been begotten by the sowing of unclean rubbing but by First Who Was Sent, for he is an immortal in the midst of mortal men."  (Eugnostos, the Blessed)

Eugnostos starts by refuting three propositions about the nature of the world which to him represent the basic shortcomings of contemporary philosophy, or perhaps of philosophy as such: (1) the world is governed by itself, (2) by a providence, or (3) is subject to predestination. His refutation is neither philosophical in the proper sense of that word, nor does it deal with the implications of these propositions in detail: That which is from itself leads an empty life, providence is foolish, and that which is subject to destiny or fate is something that does not attain knowledge. According to Eugnostos, real insight is not reached through philosophy; what matters is to be able to refute the propositions of philosophy and by means of another proposition to gain access to and reveal the god of truth. The attainment of this, he says, means to be immortal amidst the mortals

Man, through his thought, is working out his own salvation; he is created in the image and likeness of God and is finally to reach "the goal unto the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus" (Phil. 3:14).

Sunday, 2 March 2025

A Personal Relationship with God and the Covenant: Insights from Scripture and the Gospel of Thomas

Covenant Relationship With God
A Personal Relationship With God



A Personal Relationship with God and the Covenant: Insights from Scripture and the Gospel of Thomas

A personal relationship with God is a journey of profound self-discovery and spiritual awakening. While traditional biblical covenants, like that of God with Abraham, highlight a binding promise between God and His people, the Gospel of Thomas emphasizes an inward, personal connection with the divine. This relationship, both deeply individual and universally transformative, reveals the Kingdom of God that is not found in distant places but within the seeker.

The Covenant with Abraham: A Divine Promise

The covenant between God and Abraham, as seen in Genesis 17:1-10, forms the foundation for understanding God’s relationship with His people. God promises to be with Abraham and his descendants, saying, “I will establish my covenant between me and you… to be your God.” (Gen 17:7). This covenant is not merely a contract, but a divine commitment, a relationship where God makes an eternal promise to be with His people, to guide and multiply them. The core of this covenant is not the outward signs like circumcision, but the profound spiritual understanding that God is always present with His people.

For Abraham, this covenant represents more than just an agreement; it marks the beginning of a deeper faith—a faith that grows and matures through spiritual understanding. The promises of God made to Abraham and his descendants offer a glimpse of a relationship where the divine and the human intersect in meaningful, lasting ways. Just as Abraham was called to walk before God in faith and perfection (Gen 17:1), those in the covenant are also called to live a life of faith, continually learning and growing in their relationship with God.

Circumcision and the Heart: A Symbol of Faith and Transformation
For Gnostic Christians it is the anointing not baptism which brings us into covenant relationship with God and Jesus. circumcision of the flesh profits nothing in the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus touches on the true nature of circumcision:
"If it were useful, they would be born already circumcised. On the other hand, true circumcision in the spirit is entirely beneficial" (Gospel of Thomas 53).

Here, the Gospel of Thomas reflects the spiritual meaning behind the physical act. True circumcision is not about external compliance but about a transformation of the heart and spirit. This mirrors Jeremiah’s prophecy of the new covenant, where God promises to write His law on the hearts of His people:
"I will put my law in their inward parts and in their heart" (Jeremiah 31:33).

This inward transformation reflects the essence of a personal relationship with God. It is not about following external laws but about allowing the divine truth to shape and direct one’s heart and mind.

A Personal, Inner Relationship with God: Insights from the Gospel of Thomas

While the covenant with Abraham focuses on external signs and promises, the Gospel of Thomas offers a perspective on relationship with God that emphasizes inward transformation. Jesus’ teachings in this text suggest that the Kingdom of God is not a distant, external reality but an inner truth waiting to be discovered. Jesus said:
"If those who lead you say to you, ‘See, the kingdom is in the sky,’ then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, ‘It is in the sea,’ then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside you and outside you." (Gospel of Thomas 3).

In this saying, Jesus reveals that the divine is not far off but within and around us. A personal relationship with God begins with recognizing the presence of the divine within ourselves and others. This internal discovery is not merely intellectual but spiritual—a shift in how one perceives the world and oneself in relation to God.

The Journey of Seeking and Finding

The Gospel of Thomas emphasizes that building a relationship with God requires an active pursuit. Jesus says:
"Seek, and you will find. When you find, you will be troubled. When you are troubled, you will marvel, and you will reign over all." (Gospel of Thomas 2).

This pursuit of God is not easy—it challenges established beliefs and brings about personal transformation. Jesus’ words highlight the fact that seeking the divine is a path of disturbance and awe. Those who embark on this journey will be changed, and their perception of God and themselves will deepen as they seek the truth within.

Embodying the Divine Wisdom

A relationship with God, according to both the Gospel of Thomas and biblical teachings, also involves becoming more like Christ. In the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus said:
"Whoever drinks from my mouth will become like me. I myself shall become that person, and the hidden things will be revealed to him." (Gospel of Thomas 108).

This intimate relationship with Jesus transforms the believer into someone who reflects the divine wisdom. By living out the teachings of Jesus, one grows spiritually, becoming more aligned with God’s nature.

Trusting in the Divine Presence

In both the Gospel of Thomas and the covenantal promises in the Bible, a key aspect of the relationship with God is trust. Jesus urged His followers not to be consumed by worldly concerns but to trust in God’s providence:
"Do not be concerned from morning until evening and from evening until morning about what you will wear." (Gospel of Thomas 36).

This trust is central to the covenant relationship. It is not based on external rituals or material assurances but on a deep faith in God’s presence and guidance. Just as God promised to be with Abraham and his descendants, He promises to be present in the lives of believers, guiding them through faith.

Conclusion: A Living Relationship

A personal relationship with God, as explored in both the Old Testament covenant with Abraham and the teachings of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas, is one of continuous transformation. This relationship is not static; it is a dynamic, living connection where the believer seeks, finds, and becomes more like Christ. Whether through the external covenant promises or the internal spiritual awakening in the Gospel of Thomas, the relationship with God is defined by trust, understanding, and the discovery of the divine within. Ultimately, as Jesus teaches, the Kingdom of God is not a far-off reality but one that is present within each believer, waiting to be discovered through a deeper relationship with Him.

Gnostic Apostolic Succession: Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars

 



Gnostic Apostolic Succession: Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars**  


## **Introduction**  


Gnostic Christianity has preserved a distinct apostolic tradition, one based not on institutional hierarchy but on the transmission of divine knowledge (*gnosis*). While the Catholic and Orthodox Churches emphasize apostolic succession through an unbroken chain of bishops, Gnostic Christians understand apostolic succession as the continuity of spiritual enlightenment, independent of formal ecclesiastical structures. This tradition continued through groups such as the Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars, who, despite persecution, upheld a spiritual lineage rooted in Gnostic thought.  


## **Paulicians: Guardians of Apostolic Gnosis**  


The Paulicians emerged in the 7th century in Armenia as a Christian movement opposed to the established Byzantine Church. They rejected the veneration of the cross, the hierarchical priesthood, and the sacraments of the institutional church, instead emphasizing direct communion with God through knowledge and inner enlightenment.  


Paulician theology was deeply influenced by the teachings of Paul, particularly his emphasis on spiritual transformation and freedom from the Mosaic Law (Galatians 3:23-25). They saw themselves as restorers of the true apostolic tradition, tracing their beliefs back to the early Gnostic interpretations of Paul. The Paulicians also drew from Sethian ideas, particularly the contrast between the material world, which they viewed as corrupt, and the spiritual realm, which could be accessed through divine knowledge.  


Their dualistic interpretation of reality must have originated from Sethian groups, whose cosmology depicted the material world as the creation of a lower, ignorant deity, separate from the true, transcendent God. Although the Paulicians aligned themselves with Paul’s teachings, this influence likely shaped their rejection of the material world and their view of Yaldabaoth as a false god.  


Their opposition to icons and church rituals led to fierce persecution by the Byzantine Empire. Many were executed or exiled, yet their teachings persisted, spreading into the Balkans, where they influenced the later Bogomils.  


## **Bogomils: The Continuation of Gnostic Apostolic Succession**  


The Bogomils emerged in the 10th century in Bulgaria as successors to the Paulician tradition. Their name, meaning “beloved of God,” reflected their commitment to a spiritual Christianity free from external religious authority. Like the Paulicians, the Bogomils rejected the established church, viewing it as corrupt and aligned with Yaldabaoth, the false creator-god of the material world.  


Bogomil teachings emphasized:  


- The rejection of church hierarchy and sacraments.  

- The belief that Jesus was sent to reveal the path to salvation through *gnosis*.  

- The idea that the world was ruled by evil forces, but that through knowledge and ascetic living, believers could attain spiritual liberation.  


Their theology closely resembled Sethian Gnosticism, particularly in their understanding of Jesus as a revealer rather than a sacrificial figure. However, their dualistic worldview, emphasizing an absolute opposition between spirit and matter, suggests influence from Sethian groups, who maintained that the material world was inherently flawed and ruled by an inferior deity.  


The Bogomils spread their teachings throughout the Balkans and into Western Europe, influencing the Cathars in southern France. Despite efforts by the Orthodox and Catholic Churches to suppress them, their spiritual lineage persisted.  


## **Cathars: The Gnostic Christians of Medieval Europe**  


The Cathars, active between the 12th and 14th centuries, were the Western European inheritors of the Gnostic tradition carried by the Paulicians and Bogomils. Centered in the Languedoc region of France, the Cathars rejected the authority of the Catholic Church, which they saw as an institution of Yaldabaoth.  


Key Cathar beliefs included:  


- A distinction between the false, material god (Yaldabaoth) and the true, hidden God of the spiritual realm.  

- The view that Jesus came to reveal knowledge, not to atone through suffering.  

- The rejection of sacraments, particularly the transubstantiation, which they saw as a deception of the institutional church they view the Eucharist as a simple Thanksgiving meal they also rejected the trinity and the worship of the cross.  

- The practice of asceticism to purify the self and attain spiritual enlightenment.  


Cathar initiates, known as *Perfecti* (Perfected Ones), lived celibate, simple lives, rejecting wealth and worldly power. They embodied the belief that salvation was achieved through inner transformation rather than external rituals.  


Like the Paulicians and Bogomils before them, the Cathars inherited a dualistic cosmology that must have originated from earlier Sethian influences. Their belief in two opposing divine forces—the benevolent God of spirit and the malevolent ruler of matter—mirrored the Sethian portrayal of the transcendent Father and the ignorant Yaldabaoth.  


Due to their growing influence, the Catholic Church launched the Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229) to exterminate the Cathars. Despite severe persecution, Cathar ideas persisted underground and later influenced movements such as the Reformation and esoteric Christianity.  


## **Conclusion**  


The Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars represent a continuous thread of Gnostic apostolic succession, transmitting divine knowledge outside the structures of institutional Christianity. Their dualistic interpretation of reality must have originated from Sethian groups, who saw the material world as a deception and sought liberation through knowledge. Rather than relying on hierarchical ordination, these Gnostic Christians upheld an apostolic tradition rooted in inner revelation and direct communion with God. Though persecuted, their teachings endured, preserving the essence of Gnostic Christianity across centuries.  

Samael Aun Weor Cult




The So-Called Universal Gnostic Church: A Deceptive Path to Gnosis

Welcome to Pleroma Pathways, where we explore esoteric and apocalyptic texts. In this article, we delve into the teachings of Samael Aun Weor, a controversial figure in modern spiritual movements, often associated with a dangerous cult-like ideology. While Aun Weor and his followers claim to promote Gnostic principles, their practices and teachings bear little resemblance to authentic Gnosticism. Instead, they present a warped version of Gnosis that has led many down a destructive path.

**Samael Aun Weor: The Cult Leader**

Victor Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, later adopting the name Samael Aun Weor, founded what has come to be known as the Universal Gnostic Church in Mexico in 1949. By changing his name to Samael Aun Weor, he effectively created a false identity to present himself as an enlightened figure, misleading his followers into believing he had a special connection to spiritual truths. The name "Samael" is particularly concerning as it is associated with Satan in various esoteric traditions, further reflecting the deceptive nature of his path. His adoption of this name was part of a larger pattern of manipulation, designed to enhance his perceived authority and legitimacy.

Throughout his life (1917–1977), he produced numerous works that blend various occult traditions, from Theosophy to Tantric sexual alchemy, under the guise of a modern Gnostic revival. However, his teachings quickly became a vehicle for control and manipulation, leading to accusations of being a cult leader.

At the core of Aun Weor’s ideology is the notion of “Sexual Alchemy,” a practice that he believed could lead to spiritual enlightenment. He taught that the key to transcending physical limitations and achieving spiritual awakening lay in controlling sexual energy, particularly through non-ejaculatory sex. According to Aun Weor, traditional sexual practices and the act of ejaculation were the root causes of human ignorance, aging, and death. His followers were encouraged to practice “Sexual Magic” to achieve spiritual growth, an approach that distorted the original Tantric traditions into an authoritarian tool for control.

**Not Gnostic, But a Distortion of Gnosis**

The teachings of the so-called Universal Gnostic Church claim to be rooted in Gnostic principles, but they bear little resemblance to authentic Gnostic thought. Traditional Gnosticism emphasized that the divine spark was within each person, and knowledge of this inner truth led to liberation from the material world. Aun Weor’s teachings, however, centered on the belief that spiritual awakening could only be achieved through strict, often bizarre rituals and practices dictated by Aun Weor himself. This hierarchical structure, with Aun Weor as the supreme guide, mirrors more closely the dynamics of a cult than a genuine philosophical or spiritual movement.

Gnosticism, especially in its ancient form, was concerned with self-knowledge and enlightenment. It rejected the idea of external authority figures, instead emphasizing personal experience and direct, inner knowledge of the divine. Aun Weor's movement, on the other hand, placed the burden of spiritual awakening on adherence to his teachings, creating a system that could only be understood and attained by following his rules. This system of control is characteristic of many cults, where the leader is seen as the only legitimate authority on truth.

**Cult-Like Practices and Control**

The so-called Universal Gnostic Church exhibited many of the typical signs of a destructive cult. One of the most alarming aspects of this movement is its extreme focus on sexual control. Aun Weor’s emphasis on “Sexual Magic” has led many followers into unhealthy, obsessive practices. While Gnostic teachings may have explored sexuality in a metaphorical or symbolic sense, Aun Weor’s interpretation was a far cry from these ancient ideas. His teachings placed sexual control at the center of spiritual awakening, often isolating members from society and their natural relationships.

Furthermore, Aun Weor’s followers were taught to view themselves as part of an exclusive group, with all other paths deemed false or evil. This sense of elitism is a hallmark of cult-like movements. The idea that other spiritual traditions are controlled by “dark forces” is another tactic often used to solidify the group’s control over its members. In this way, Aun Weor’s teachings fostered a mentality of paranoia and distrust of the outside world, leading to the alienation of many followers.

**A False Path to Gnosis**

It is crucial to understand that Gnosticism is not about adhering to an authoritarian figure or following rigid, dogmatic practices. Genuine Gnostic thought is concerned with self-knowledge and spiritual enlightenment through personal insight and experience. Aun Weor’s teachings, on the other hand, created a pseudo-Gnostic system that was far more concerned with control and manipulation than with true spiritual awakening.

Many individuals have been harmed by Aun Weor’s cult, whether through the disintegration of their personal lives, the alienation from loved ones, or the mental and emotional strain caused by his obsessive teachings. Genuine spiritual seekers should be cautious of movements that claim to offer the “only” path to enlightenment, as they often serve to trap individuals in a cycle of dependence and manipulation.

**The Deceptive Names: Glorian and Gnostic Students**

The organizations that propagate Aun Weor’s teachings go by various names, with two of the most prominent being **Gnostic Teachings** and **Gnostic Students**, along with **Glorian Book Publishers**. These names serve as fronts to continue spreading his teachings and ideology under different guises. By using multiple names and a false identity, Aun Weor and his followers obscure the true nature of the movement, making it harder for people to recognize the dangers within. The use of pseudonyms serves to maintain a sense of legitimacy and hide the manipulative tactics at play, deceiving potential followers into believing that they are part of an established spiritual tradition.

**Conclusion**

The so-called Universal Gnostic Church, while presenting itself as a modern Gnostic revival, is not truly Gnostic in nature. Instead, it embodies the characteristics of a destructive cult, using false ideologies, pseudonyms, and authoritarian control to manipulate its followers. Genuine Gnosis is found within oneself, not through an external leader or rigid system of rules. True spiritual awakening comes from within, through personal insight and self-knowledge, not through adherence to the doctrines of a self-proclaimed “Master.”

Gnostic Saints or Fathers of Christian Gnosticism

Gnostic Saints or Fathers of Christian Gnosticism







Praying for the Saints | Gnostic Devotions





Gnostic Saints and Fathers of Christian Gnosticism

Fathers of the Gnostic Church: James the Just, Mary Magdalene, Theudas, and Paul

Gnostic Christians trace their spiritual lineage through figures who preserved and transmitted divine knowledge (gnosis). Among them, James the Just, Mary Magdalene, Theudas, and Paul stand out as central figures in the Gnostic tradition.

James the Just, the brother of Jesus, was recognized as the leader of the early Christian community in Jerusalem (Acts 15:13-21). The Gospel of Thomas (Saying 12) affirms his authority:

“No matter where you come, it is to James the Just that you shall go, for whose sake heaven and earth have come to exist.”

Mary Magdalene was also revered in Gnostic circles. The Gospel of Mary presents her as possessing deeper understanding than the male apostles, emphasizing her role as the recipient of Jesus' hidden teachings.

Theudas, a lesser-known figure, was a disciple of Paul and played a crucial role in transmitting Pauline teachings to Valentinus, thereby linking Valentinian Gnosticism directly to the apostolic tradition.

Paul himself is sometimes regarded as a proto-Gnostic, given his emphasis on inner revelation (gnosis) and the contrast he draws between the spiritual and the material (1 Corinthians 2:6-16).

Gnostic Saints and Pre-Christian Figures

Gnostics often looked beyond the Christian tradition, seeing spiritual precursors in earlier figures. Adam and his son Seth were considered foundational, with Seth often depicted as the father of a spiritual race of gnostics. The Three Steles of Seth (Nag Hammadi Library) highlights his role in transmitting divine knowledge.

Other figures include:

  • Norea, a character absent from canonical Genesis but present in Gnostic texts, who resists the forces of the Demiurge and preserves the Gnostic lineage during Noah’s time.
  • The three companions of Daniel, known from biblical tradition but given unique interpretations in Gnostic writings.
  • John the Baptist, sometimes seen as an early Gnostic leader, particularly in Mandaean traditions.

Jesus and the Apostolic Gnosis

Jesus is central to Gnostic thought, not merely as a redeemer through external means, but as the revealer of gnosis. His teachings, particularly in the Gospel of Thomas, emphasize self-discovery and enlightenment:

“If you bring forth what is within you, what you have will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not have will destroy you.” (Gospel of Thomas, Saying 70)

Several of Jesus’ apostles are considered Gnostic figures:

  • Thomas the Apostle, associated with the Gospel of Thomas, which presents an esoteric understanding of Jesus' teachings.
  • John the Evangelist, whom some Gnostic sects claimed as one of their own.
  • Paul, whose emphasis on hidden wisdom (1 Corinthians 2:7) and spiritual transformation aligns with Gnostic themes.

The Valentinian Tradition

Valentinus, one of the most influential Gnostic teachers, was said to have been a disciple of Theudas, connecting him directly to Paul. His school of thought divided into Eastern and Western branches due to Christological differences.

Western Valentinians

  • Ptolemy, a Valentinian teacher whose Letter to Flora explains the distinction between the law of the Demiurge and the higher divine law.
  • Flora, a female Valentinian theologian.
  • Heracleon, whose commentaries on the Gospel of John survive in Origen’s writings.
  • Hermogenes, a painter and late 2nd-century Gnostic thinker.
  • Monoimus the Arab, who developed a unique system of Gnostic thought.
  • Prodicus, Secundus, Florinus, Alexander, and Theotimus, prominent teachers.

Eastern Valentinians

  • Marcus the Valentinian, known for his use of Gematria in Gnostic teachings.
  • Axionicus of Antioch, active during Tertullian’s time.
  • Theodotus, whose teachings were preserved in Clement of Alexandria’s Extracts from the Works of Theodotus.
  • Ambrose and Candidus, Valentinian theologians of the 3rd century.

Thecla, featured in the Acts of Paul and Thecla, is a key figure in early Christian and Gnostic traditions, portrayed as a devoted disciple of Paul. She rejected marriage, embraced asceticism, and performed self-baptism (auto-baptism) as a symbol of direct communion with the divine. This act reflects Gnostic ideals of spiritual autonomy and personal revelation. Revered in Gnostic circles, Thecla is seen as embodying divine wisdom and spiritual independence, aligning with Paul’s teachings about transcending the flesh and attaining spiritual knowledge.

Rejecting the Catholic Concept of Saints

The term "saint" in Catholic and Orthodox Christianity refers to individuals canonized by church authorities, often after performing alleged miracles. However, the biblical term hagios ("holy one") simply denotes those consecrated to God.

The early Christian understanding of holiness was not tied to posthumous veneration but to divine calling in the present life. As 1 Peter 1:3-4 states:

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope… to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable.”

The Gospel of Philip further emphasizes that holiness is intrinsic to the believer:

“The holy person is completely holy, including the person’s body. The holy person who takes up bread consecrates it, and does the same with the cup or anything else the person takes up and consecrates. So how would the person not consecrate the body also?”

This passage rejects the idea that sanctity comes through external validation, instead affirming that holiness is inherent in those who receive divine knowledge (gnosis).

Conclusion

The Gnostic tradition maintains a spiritual lineage through figures such as James the Just, Mary Magdalene, Theudas, and Paul. Unlike the institutional church, which claims authority through hierarchical succession, Gnostic Christians uphold an apostolic tradition based on inner revelation and divine knowledge. By recognizing both biblical and pre-Christian figures as transmitters of wisdom, Gnostics preserve a broader and deeper understanding of spiritual enlightenment.


Saturday, 1 March 2025

Gnostic Apostolic Succession




Gnostic Apostolic Succession

The concept of apostolic succession is central to early Christianity, signifying the transmission of divine authority and knowledge from Jesus to his disciples and their successors. While the mainstream church claims an unbroken line through Peter and the bishops of Rome, Gnostic Christians, particularly the Valentinians, preserved a different lineage—one rooted in mystical knowledge (gnosis) and the transmission of secret teachings. This tradition, as evidenced by early Christian texts, suggests that the true apostolic succession was not limited to hierarchical structures but was instead based on spiritual enlightenment.

The True Successor: James, Not Peter

The traditional claim that Peter was the chief apostle and the foundation of the Church is not strongly supported in the earliest Christian writings. Instead, the Book of Acts chapter 15:13-21 portrays James as the leader of the early Christian community in Jerusalem, making the final ruling on doctrinal matters.

The Gospel of Thomas reinforces this claim. In saying 12, the disciples ask Jesus who will lead them after his departure, to which he replies:

“No matter where you come, it is to James the Just that you shall go, for whose sake heaven and earth have come to exist.”

This declaration affirms James' preeminent role in preserving Jesus' teachings. His leadership was based not on institutional power but on his deep spiritual insight and close relationship with Jesus.

The Transmission of Hidden Knowledge

The transmission of secret teachings was a fundamental part of early Christian mysticism. Hippolytus, a third-century Christian writer, records that the Naassenes, a sect often associated with early Christian Gnosticism, claimed to have received their secret doctrines from Mariamne (presumably Mary Magdalene), who in turn received them from James, the brother of the Lord. This transmission of knowledge through James and Mary Magdalene aligns with the existence of several important Gnostic texts, such as the Apocalypse of James, the Pistis Sophia, and the Gospel of Mary, which depict Mary Magdalene and James as primary recipients of Jesus’ hidden teachings.

Clement of Alexandria further confirms this tradition by stating that Valentinus, the greatest of the Gnostic teachers, was instructed by Theudas, who had been a disciple of Paul (Stromata 7:17). This direct connection to Paul reinforces the legitimacy of Valentinian succession, showing that their teachings were not fabrications but part of an authentic Christian lineage.

The Valentinian Claim to Apostolic Succession

Unlike the emerging Orthodox Church, which emphasized external authority, the Valentinians believed that true succession was based on spiritual revelation. The Gospel of Truth, attributed to Valentinus, emphasizes the necessity of divine revelation:

“No one could have been revealed among those who had been entrusted with salvation unless the book had appeared.”

This statement highlights the idea that salvation is linked to knowledge (gnosis), which must be revealed rather than imposed through institutional structures. The Valentinians saw themselves as the rightful inheritors of the apostolic tradition, possessing the hidden wisdom necessary for salvation.

The Gospel of Philip expands on this idea, emphasizing the importance of chrism over baptism:

“We are called Christians from the word ‘chrism,’ not from the word ‘baptism.’ Christ also has his name from chrism, for the Father anointed the Son, the Son anointed the apostles, and the apostles anointed us. Whoever is anointed has everything: resurrection, light, cross, Holy Spirit.”

Here, the text explicitly outlines the Valentinian understanding of apostolic succession. The Father anointed the Son, the Son anointed the apostles, and the apostles anointed their successors. This passage demonstrates that the transmission of divine authority was not merely symbolic but followed a direct, spiritual lineage. This succession was not dependent on institutional hierarchy but on the continued transmission of divine knowledge and power through the laying on of hands and anointing.

The Apostolic Tradition in Valentinianism

The Valentinian tradition was not a deviation from Christianity but a continuation of its deepest mysteries. In The Treatise on the Resurrection, a Gnostic teacher reassures a disciple:

“These words I have received from the generosity of my Lord, Jesus the Christ. I have taught you and your brothers and sisters, who are my children, about them, and have omitted nothing that may strengthen you.”

This reflects the personal transmission of knowledge, a hallmark of true apostolic succession. Similarly, in Ptolemy's Letter to Flora, the Valentinian teacher affirms:

“For, if God permits, you will later learn about their origin and generation, when you are judged worthy of the apostolic tradition which we too have received by succession.”

This statement underscores that Valentinian teachers saw themselves as part of an unbroken lineage, tracing their wisdom back to Jesus and his apostles. Unlike the institutional church, which relied on external ordination, the Valentinians maintained that only those who were spiritually prepared could receive and pass on the true apostolic tradition.

Conclusion

The Valentinian claim to apostolic succession challenges the mainstream narrative of an unbroken institutional hierarchy. By tracing their lineage through James, Mary Magdalene, and Paul, and by emphasizing gnosis over ecclesiastical authority, the Valentinians preserved a different but equally valid Christian tradition. Their teachings reveal that apostolic succession was not about titles and offices but about receiving and transmitting divine knowledge. In this light, the Valentinians—not the bishops of Rome—are the true heirs of the apostolic tradition.

Valentinus: Christian Mystic and Teacher






**Valentinus: Christian Mystic and Teacher**


Valentinus was a second-century Christian mystic and poet whose teachings emphasized mystical knowledge (*gnosis*). He is often labeled a "Gnostic" due to the central role that *gnosis* played in his theological framework, but his beliefs were deeply rooted in early Christian traditions. Born around 100 AD in Phrebonis, a town in Upper Egypt, Valentinus received his education in nearby Alexandria. This city, known for its vibrant intellectual and religious discourse, shaped his theological outlook.


In Alexandria, Valentinus became a disciple of Theudas, a Christian teacher who had himself studied under the Apostle Paul. Valentinus claimed that Theudas had transmitted to him secret wisdom that Paul had reserved for his closest disciples. This esoteric knowledge became a foundation of Valentinus' own teachings. Like many early Christian mystics, he reported having a vision of the risen Christ. Following this profound experience, he began his career as a Christian teacher in Alexandria around 120 AD. His theological insights quickly gained attention, and he attracted a devoted following in both Egypt and Syria.


Around 136 AD, Valentinus left Alexandria and traveled to Rome, making a brief stop in Cyprus along the way. Upon arriving in Rome, he gained a reputation for his eloquence and depth of knowledge. His ability to express complex theological ideas in poetic and philosophical terms won him great respect within the Roman Christian community. By 143 AD, he had become such an influential figure that he was considered a leading candidate for the office of bishop. However, it is uncertain whether he declined the position himself or was ultimately passed over. Regardless, he continued to teach in Rome for at least another decade, further developing his theological system.


The later years of Valentinus’ life remain uncertain. Some sources suggest that he remained in Rome until his death around 155 AD, while others claim that he left the city after failing to attain the bishopric, retreating to Cyprus. His teachings, however, did not fade with his passing. His disciples continued to develop and spread his ideas throughout the Roman Empire, creating a distinct school of thought known as Valentinianism.


### **The Teachings of Valentinus**


Valentinian theology is deeply esoteric and poetic, drawing from both Christian and philosophical traditions. At the heart of his teachings was the concept of *Bythos* (Depth), the ultimate, unknowable God. From *Bythos* emanated a series of divine beings called Aeons, representing aspects of the divine mind. These Aeons formed the *Pleroma*, the fullness of divine existence.


However, a cosmic mishap occurred when one of the Aeons, often identified as Sophia (Wisdom), acted outside the harmonious order, leading to the creation of the material world. Unlike other Gnostic sects that depicted the creator of the physical realm as an entirely malevolent being, Valentinus' teachings suggested that the Demiurge (the craftsman of the material world) was an ignorant but not entirely evil entity, acting as a distant image of the true God. Humanity, according to Valentinian thought, was composed of three distinct groups:


1. **The spiritual (pneumatic)** – those who possessed divine knowledge (*gnosis*) and were destined to return to the divine realm.
2. **The psychic (soulish)** – ordinary Christians who lived moral lives and would be rewarded in a lesser heavenly state.
3. **The material (hylic)** – those entirely bound to the physical world, who would ultimately perish.


Valentinus and his followers maintained Christian rituals, including baptism, but also practiced a unique rite known as the "Mystery of the Bedchamber." This ritual symbolized a spiritual union rather than a literal marriage, emphasizing the believer’s restoration to divine wholeness. Unlike some other early Christian sects, the Valentinians sought to remain within the broader Christian community rather than separate themselves entirely.


### **Legacy of Valentinus**


Valentinianism remained influential for several centuries, drawing both admiration and opposition from church leaders. The discovery of the *Nag Hammadi* texts in 1945 renewed scholarly interest in Valentinus, as many of these writings reflected his theological perspective. Though eventually labeled as heretical by later church authorities, Valentinus' legacy endures as one of the most sophisticated and poetic expressions of early Christian mysticism.