# **Christian Gnostic Canon**
# **Canonicity**
The question of canonicity has never been as settled or straightforward as later theological systems have claimed. The belief that the canon was fixed early, universally, and permanently is contradicted by the historical record and by the diversity of canons embraced by various communities. The real test of canonicity is not the number of times a text has been quoted by later nonapostolic writers, nor the approval of ecclesiastical councils, nor the authority of creeds, confessions, or doctrinal statements. The true test rests in the book itself. Its contents must reveal evidence that it is a product of holy spirit. A canonical text cannot contain superstition, magical speculation, demonism, or any form of creature worship. It must be in full harmony and complete unity with the rest of Scripture, bearing witness to the authorship of the Deity. Each book must conform to the divine “pattern of healthful words” and remain consistent with the teachings and works of Christ Jesus. This internal witness—not institutional authority—is the foundation upon which canonicity must be measured.
---
# ** Diversity of the Canons by individual denominations**
History proves that the canon has never been closed. Through the centuries, new books have been added to different canons by various believing communities based on their perceived spiritual authority. The Ethiopian Church includes 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and the Ascension of Isaiah. The Roman Catholic Church added the Deuterocanonical books long after the time of the apostles, while Protestants rejected them. The Latter-day Saints extended their canon with the *Book of Mormon*, *Doctrine and Covenants*, and *Pearl of Great Price*. These examples demonstrate that communities consistently recognize new texts as authoritative when they believe them to possess spiritual truth, regardless of whether other traditions agree.
Early Gnostic groups likewise used writings beyond the traditional canon. The *Book of Enoch* (1 Enoch) was quoted, transmitted, and revered by early Christian Gnostics. References to Enochian traditions and the Watchers appear in several Nag Hammadi texts, demonstrating that these communities saw the Enochic literature as essential to understanding the heavenly realms, angelic orders, and the prehistory of the world. The medieval Bogomils later used the Slavic *2 Enoch* (Slavonic Enoch), continuing this lineage of spiritual interpretation.
This factual fluidity forces a reconsideration of strict canonical boundaries. If one community may expand the canon on the basis of spiritual authenticity, then the principle applies universally: a book is canonical because its content reveals divine truth, not because an institution declares it so. The apostles never sealed the canon, and no Scripture states that the canon would be permanently closed. The canon remains open to discernment, testing, and recognition by those seeking the mind of the Deity.
---
# **Lost Books**
Scripture itself references numerous works that are no longer extant, demonstrating that the inspired authors used a wider body of literature than survives today. These include the **Book of the Wars of Yahweh (Numbers 21:14)**, the **Book of the Just (Joshua 10:13; Second Samuel 1:18)**, the **Book of the Acts of Solomon (First Kings 11:41)**, the **Book of the Annals of the Kings of Israel (First Kings 14:19; Second Chronicles 33:18; cf. Second Chronicles 20:34)**, the **Book of the Annals of the Kings of Judah (First Kings 14:29; First Kings 15:7)**, the **Annals of Samuel the Seer (First Chronicles 29:29)**, the **History of Nathan the Prophet (Second Chronicles 9:29)**, the **Annals of Shemaiah the Prophet and of Iddo the Seer (Second Chronicles 12:15)**, the **Annals of Jehu son of Hanani (Second Chronicles 20:34)**, an **unknown writing of Isaiah (Second Chronicles 26:22)**, the **Annals of Hozai (Second Chronicles 33:18)**, and an **unknown lament for Josiah composed by Jeremiah (Second Chronicles 35:25)**.
The Apocrypha also mention additional lost works, most notably the **Annals of John Hyrcanus (First Maccabees 16:24)**. The Pseudepigrapha contain further references to documents now vanished, such as those cited in the *Testament of Job* (40:14; 41:6; 49:3).
The presence of so many lost works proves that the spiritual world of ancient Israel and early believers included texts we no longer possess. Their disappearance raises a compelling question: if inspired or authoritative books were lost in antiquity, what prevents later discoveries—such as the Nag Hammadi Library or the Dead Sea Scrolls—from containing additional inspired writings? The existence of lost books does not undermine Scripture; it simply reveals that the full scope of ancient sacred literature has not been preserved.
---
# **Questioned Books Within the Traditional Canon**
Even the books currently within the Protestant and Catholic canons were not universally accepted. **Martin Luther** disparaged the *Letter of James* as an “epistle of straw” because he believed it contradicted his doctrine of justification by faith alone. The earliest church questioned **2 Peter**, while debates persisted for centuries regarding **Hebrews**, **Revelation**, **Jude**, and **2 and 3 John**. Some communities even rejected the *Gospel of John* based on theological concerns.
The Ethiopian canon remains significantly different from both Protestant and Catholic traditions. If millions of believers embrace a distinct set of sacred books, then no denomination can claim exclusive authority over the boundaries of Scripture.
---
# **My Personal List of Canonical Books**
Evaluated by the criteria of doctrinal harmony, spiritual insight, and consistency with the teachings of Christ Jesus, the following works merit inclusion as canonical or near-canonical:
**1 Enoch, 2 Enoch, Tobit, 2 Baruch, the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, the Gospel of Truth, the Odes of Solomon, the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, Eugnostos the Blessed, Exegesis on the Soul, the War Scroll, the Apocryphon of James, the Thanksgiving Hymns, the Damascus Document, the Community Rule, the Tripartite Tractate, the Treatise on Resurrection, the Letter of Barnabas, the Valentinian Exposition, the Didache, Ecclesiasticus, Wisdom of Solomon, the Gospel of Mary, and the Letter to Flora.**
These works align strongly with a **Valentinian** perspective, in which the Demiurge is not evil but ignorant—a limited celestial ruler identifiable with **Yahweh Elohim**, the **archangel Michael**, subordinate to the supreme Father. This view harmonizes the broader biblical narrative with these additional writings far more coherently than the Sethian conception of an evil creator.
Modern biblical scholarship already integrates the Pseudepigrapha—especially apocalyptic literature—into commentary on **Daniel**, **Ezekiel**, and **Revelation**. The same method should be applied to Nag Hammadi writings, incorporating them into sermons, study, and theological exposition.
---
# **Rejection of All Church Creeds and Statements of Faith**
Creeds, confessions, catechisms, and doctrinal decrees are human constructions, not divine revelation. They impose philosophical systems upon Scripture and often perpetuate the traditions of men rather than the teachings of Christ Jesus. True discipleship requires abandoning these ecclesiastical frameworks.
The exhortation is clear: *Cast away to the owls and to the bats the traditions of men.* Make a whole burnt offering of creeds and confessions. Follow the example of the Ephesian disciples, who *“handed over their books of curious arts and burned them before all”* (**Acts 19:19**). Such theological debris belongs to a darker age; the living word of the Deity alone can meet the needs of the present generation.
Let the noble-minded Bereans be our example, who *“searched the Scriptures daily”* to verify the apostolic message (**Acts 17:12**). So also must we search the Scriptures, the Pseudepigrapha, and the Nag Hammadi writings with humility, discernment, and honesty—receiving only what conforms to the pattern of healthful words and rejecting every tradition that contradicts it.
---
No comments:
Post a Comment