The Valentinian and the Sefirot

The Valentinian and the Sefirot








# **The Valentinian and the Sefirot**


The interplay between Valentinian thought and Jewish mysticism, particularly Kabbalah, reveals profound parallels in their descriptions of divine emanation and structure. Both traditions depict God as manifesting through stages, utilizing a system of paired attributes or emanations that define the divine order. The concept of the **Sefirot** in Kabbalah and the **Aeons** in Valentinianism function as metaphysical structures that reveal divine characteristics, emphasizing order, balance, and the gradual unfolding of divinity into the cosmos.


## **The Root of the All and the Emanation of the Four**


The Valentinian Exposition from the Nag Hammadi Library describes the ineffable Father as **"the Root of the All,"** an expression that evokes the image of a tree, similar to the **Sefirot** as the "Tree of Life" in Kabbalistic thought. The Father, before any manifestation, exists alone in silence:


> "He dwells alone in silence, and silence is tranquility since, after all, he was in fact One and nothing existed before him. He also exists as Twoness and as a Pair, and his partner is Silence. And he possessed the All dwelling within him." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


Here, the ineffable God first emanates into Two—representing a primordial polarity—and then into Four. The **Tetrad** in Valentinianism corresponds to this fourfold emanation: **Mind and Truth, Word and Life, Man and Church**. This Tetrad is the foundation of the Pleroma, analogous to the **four letters of the Tetragrammaton (YHWH)** in Jewish mysticism.


Further in the text, the expansion of the Father continues:


> "The Fourth accordingly is he who restricted himself in the Fourth: while dwelling in the Three-hundred-sixtieth, he first brought himself (forth), and in the Second he revealed his will, and in the Fourth he spread himself out." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


This reference to **360** represents the totality of divine emanation, linking it to the idea of a **full cycle or completion**. The number 360 corresponds to the **entirety of divine manifestation**, an idea that resonates with the mystical numerology found in Kabbalah.


## **The Tetrad and the Shemhamphorash**


In Jewish mystical traditions, the **Tetragrammaton (YHWH)** is permutated into **72 divine names**, known as the **Shemhamphorash**. This transformation reflects the idea that the divine name contains hidden dimensions, unfolding into the angelic hierarchy. Valentinianism similarly understands the **Tetrad as generating additional divine manifestations**, with the structure of the Aeons expanding into the **Decad (10 Aeons) and Dodecad (12 Aeons), forming a total of 30 Aeons in the Pleroma**.


> "That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church. [...] And the Tetrad is begotten [... ] the Decad from Word and Life, and the Dodecad from Man, and Church became a Triacontad." (*A Valentinian Exposition, Nag Hammadi Library*)


Here, the **Decad** (10 Aeons) mirrors the **Ten Sefirot**, which in Kabbalah serve as the divine attributes through which God interacts with the world. The **Dodecad (12 Aeons)** extends this manifestation, paralleling how **the 10 Sefirot are connected by 22 paths**, forming the **"32 Paths of Wisdom"**, a key structure in Kabbalah.


## **The Decad and the Sefirot**


The Valentinian **Decad** consists of paired emanations, much like the Sefirot, which function in dynamic relationships. The ten Valentinian Aeons of the Decad are:


1. **Bythios (Profound) and Mixis (Mixture)**
2. **Ageratos (Never old) and Henosis (Union)**
3. **Autophyes (Essential nature) and Hedone (Pleasure)**
4. **Acinetos (Immovable) and Syncrasis (Commixture)**
5. **Monogenes (Only-begotten) and Macaria (Happiness)**


In Kabbalistic thought, the **Sefirot** are similarly understood as divine attributes, each with its own function. The first three Sefirot—**Keter (Crown), Chokhmah (Wisdom), and Binah (Understanding)**—parallel the **Valentinian Mind (Nous), Word (Logos), and Life (Zoe)**. The **lower Sefirot**, such as **Chesed (Mercy) and Gevurah (Judgment)**, reflect **aspects of divine justice and balance**, which in Valentinianism manifest as the interplay between **male and female Aeons**.


## **The Father as the Tree and the Tree of Life**


Valentinian texts often describe the **Father as a tree**, which aligns with the **Tree of Life (Etz Chaim)** in Kabbalistic thought. The **Tripartite Tractate** states:


> "The Father is a single one, like a number, for he is the first one and the one who is only himself. Yet he is not like a solitary individual. Otherwise, how could he be a father? For whenever there is a 'father,' the name 'son' follows. But the single one, who alone is the Father, is like a root, with tree, branches and fruit." (*The Tripartite Tractate, Nag Hammadi Library*)


The **Sefirot** are arranged **in a tree-like pattern**, connected by **22 paths**, corresponding to the **22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet**. In Jewish mysticism, these paths serve as the channels through which divine energy flows. The **Valentinian Aeons** similarly exist in structured pairs, reflecting a dynamic process of emanation and return.


## **The Numerological Significance of the Tree of Life**


In both Valentinianism and Kabbalah, **numerology plays a crucial role** in the divine structure. The **10 Sefirot + 22 paths** create the **"32 Paths of Wisdom,"** a system mirrored in Valentinian teachings where the **Aeons form numerical structures representing divine totality**. Additionally, the **seven lights of the Jewish menorah**, symbolizing divine wisdom, can be understood in relation to the **Aeons and their functions within the Pleroma**.


> "The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp." (*Jewish Mystical Tradition*)


This **symbolism of divine light** is reflected in Valentinian descriptions of the **Aeons as divine attributes**, forming the **Pleroma**—the **fullness of divine presence**.


## **Conclusion**


The Valentinian system of **emanation** bears striking parallels to the **Sefirot** of Kabbalah. Both describe a structured process where the **divine manifests in stages**, forming a tree-like pattern of **paired attributes**. The **Tetrad of Valentinianism corresponds to the Tetragrammaton (YHWH), and the Decad to the Ten Sefirot**. Both traditions employ **numerological structures, divine names, and symbolic trees** to illustrate how **God emanates into the cosmos while maintaining transcendence**.


By examining these connections, we see that **Valentinianism and Kabbalah share a common mystical language**, revealing a deep-seated tradition of **divine emanation and structure**, shaping early Christian and Jewish esoteric thought.





















I will speak my mystery to those who are mine and to those who will be mine. Moreover it is these who have known him who is, the Father, that is, the Root of the All, the Ineffable One who exists as Oneness. He dwells alone in silence, and silence is tranquility since, after all, he was in fact One and nothing existed before him. He also exists as Twoness and as a Pair, and his partner is Silence. And he possessed the All dwelling within him. And as for Intention and Persistence, Love and Permanence, they are indeed unbegotten. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

God came forth: the Son, Mind of the All, that is, it is from the Root of the All that even his Thought stems, since he had this one (the Son) in Mind. For on behalf of the All, he received an alien Thought since there were nothing before him. From that place it is he who moved [...] a gushing spring. Now this is the Root of the All and Oneness without any one before him. Now the second spring exists in silence and speaks with him alone. And the Fourth accordingly is he who restricted himself in the Fourth: while dwelling in the Three-hundred-sixtieth, he first brought himself (forth), and in the Second he revealed his will, and in the Fourth he spread himself out. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

This passage is taken to mean that the root of the All the Father first spreads himself out into Two and than Four. From Four he also extends himself as far as Three Hundred Sixty, representing the ultimate edge of the Pleroma although in a distinct dimension of his transcendent essence he keeps himself restricted to the primal Four.

The Four primal emanations maybe a symbol for the four worlds (Olam) in Kabbalah they could also stand as a symbol for 4 letters of the divine name YHWH or Tetragrammaton (meaning "consisting of four letters"). The Tetragrammaton was permutated into 72 angelic names by simply taking the yo da valve and mutating them

The Valentinians understood the four primal emanations as a refernce to the tetragrammaton which was permutated into 72 angelic names by simply taking the yo da valve and permutating them, that was known as the Shemhamphorash.

The different names of God in the Jewish mysticism current at the time of Jesus the names of God were understood to be emanations or divine attributes of God they were hypostasis or emanations of Godhead manifesting into existence as the world's are coming into existence Jewish mysticism

In Jewish angelology, the angels and archangels are manifested as coming forth and emanating from Godhead and originally all the angels were personifications of these things and they were named with a suffix EL which means of God for example Micha-EL the loving kindness of God Rapha-EL the healing of God and so on. In the Kabbalah the Sephirot became the emanation of the more abstract moral qualities of God in the Valentinian Pleroma of the Aeons Godhead was manifested in pairs male/female pairs

The Valentinian Exposition from the Nag Hammadi Library

That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church. Now the Uncreated One projected Word and Life. Word is for the glory of the Ineffable One while Life is for the glory of Silence, and Man is for his own glory, while Church is for the glory of Truth. This, then, is the Tetrad begotten according to the likeness of the Uncreated (Tetrad). And the Tetrad is begotten [... ] the Decad from Word and Life, and the Dodecad from Man, and Church became a Triacontad. Moreover, it is the one from the Triacontad of the Aeons who bear fruit from the Triacontrad. They enter jointly, but they come forth singly, fleeing from the Aeons and the Uncontainable Ones. And the Uncontainable Ones, once they had looked at him, glorified Mind since he is an Uncontainable One that exists in the Pleroma.
But the Decad from Word and Life brought forth decads so as to make the Pleroma become a hundred, and the Dodecad from Man and Church brought forth and made the Triacontad so as to make the three hundred sixty become the Pleroma of the year. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)



The Decad is the Sefirot
God emanated himself in stages to create the universe. There are ten aeons, which are vessels or containers called the Sephirot (the word Sephirot means emanations). These emanations or attribute that are manifested are powers and virtues, wisdom, knowledge, justice, mercy, and so on these are still referenced in attributions to the seven lights of the Jewish synagogue, which you will find on the altar in a synagogue with seven lights this seven lights will reference 10 Sefirot.

The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp.

There are 22 paths that connect these ten Sephirot and that makes 32 names of God. The root attributes of the powers and virtues of God were understood as a kind of tree like the tree of life. It was the image of God in mankind as the blind men said I see men as trees walking we find a lot of this tree language in this tree of life are ten Sefirot ten vessels

The tree of sefirot also has a numerological significance. Between the 10 sefirot run 22 channels or paths, which connect them, a number which can be associated with the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Together the spiritual forces of the 10 sefirot and the 22 connecting channels are called the "32 Paths of Wisdom".






Samuel Zinner writes:

Morever the name Theudas is curiously reminiscent of Syrian Jewish-Christian tradition and this might explain the many Jewish (actually; Jewish-Christian) Kabbalistic elements in the Valentino an system. Traditional scholarship over-emphasizer traditional scholarship over-elements the Valentnian system.aspects of Valentine's thought we therefore now turn to an examination of the possible Jewish components found in his metaphysics.First in the Valentnian system Logos. and Zoe (word and Life) emit ten emanations whereas the celestial Son of man and Ecclesia (Church) emit twelve emanations.These number correspond precisely to the ten sefirot and the twelve tribes of Israel whi Kabbalists add together in order to arrive at the number of the 22 Letters of the Hebrew alphabet. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

In later Valentnian school of Ptolemy we encounter a doctrine of two Sophia's precisely paralleled in the Kabbalah Upper and lower shekhinah, the upper being wholy righteous, the lower being morally ambiguous. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

The Jewish-Christian Ebionite distinction between the celestial Saviour the earthly Jesus. also seems to be reflected in Valentnian thought. The Valentnian system reflected in Valentnian thought. The Valentinian systems references to concepts such as the Father measure size or extent are all reminiscent of the ancients shi'ur qomah traditions. For Valentinus Sophia is the last of the aeonic emanations precisely as Shekinah is the final sefirah in Kabbalah . (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

According to Ptolemy all the aeons were Words which is exactly paralleled in the Kabbalah a teaching that the ten sefirot correspond to God's ten words of creative command in the Genesis creation account (nine explicit commands one implicit). (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

The Valentinian use of gematria in the Greek name iesous is also indicative of typical Kabbalistic procedures. Although gematria was by no means confined to Jewish circles in light of the other extensive specifically Jewish parallels in Valentinus' thought it is more natural to associate his practice of gematria with Judaism than with Hellenism. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

As the Zohar teaches that Hokhmah made the emanation Elohim (Binah understanding) so the Valentnian Ptolemy teaches that Sophia is exalted above the Demiurge. Naturally qualifications must be made with regard to various details but the overall general paradigms seem sufficient to indicate a strong Jewish or better Jewish-Christian component within Valentinianism and we would suggest that the best candidate for transmission of these ideas to Valentinus would be Theudas. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)


Since it is quite likely that the Nag Hammadi Gospel of Truth was written by Valentinus we should comment on it somewhat .Its Jewish Christian character is especially apparent in its divine Name Christology. We note that the word God occurs in this document only once and this is strongly suggestive of the traditional Jewish avoidance of the name God. There is a heavily Syrian Jewish-Christian complexion this text if this tendency had been mediated to Valentinus via Theudas this then might imply that the latter may have been of Syrian origin. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

According the Gospel of Truth 17 the obvious flaws in creation do not in actuality exist. For the mutable creation itself in contrast to the immutable Father can be said to be non_existent therefore the flaws in creation are no dishonor to God. In Folio 18 We find a point curiously Philo Oblivion did not emerg into existence from the Father even if it did come to because of him (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)


The image of the hypostatic Book in folios 19_23 is deeply Jewish-Christian in tone. 6In folio 23 we encounter a list of emanational attributes associat!ed with the supernal pleroma man of which curiously coincide to varying degrees with the Kabbalistic sefirot such as Wisdom Knowledge Forbearance. Crown Glory Love.Folio 24 reflects the Syrian Jewish-Christian idea that the feminine bosom of the Father is the Holy spirit Jewish-Christian as well is the Triad of Father Mother (=Holy Spirit) and Son ... into the Father into the Mother Jesus of the unending sweetness Folio 27 s lan_guage may indicate Knowledge of the traditions concerning pre-existence found in the Gospel of Thomas logion19 and this yet another Syrian feature of the Gospel of Truth...those come into existence... before they come into existence Fo-lios 38-39 present the Jewish-Christian doctrine of the Son as the Name of the Father.This passage implies that the Father essence is unnameable for his essence cannot be named there fore the Son is his name. (The Gospel of Thomas By Samuel Zinner)

Why Gnostic Christians Should Meditate on the Aeons, Not Chakras

 

# **Why Gnostic Christians Should Meditate on the Aeons, Not Chakras**  

**Welcome to *Pleroma Pathways* apocalyptic and mystic Christianity, where we explore esoteric and apocalyptic texts.**  

Throughout early Christian history, the Aeons have been central to the spiritual life of the Gnostic believer. The term *Aeon* occurs over a thousand times in the Nag Hammadi Scriptures and in the writings of the early Church Fathers, emphasizing their significance. In contrast, the concept of Chakras, which originates from Eastern traditions and has been absorbed into New Age mysticism, is entirely absent from early Christian writings. The Gnostics did not focus on energy centers within the body but instead meditated on the names of the Aeons, particularly those within the Ogdoad.  

Just as Jewish mystics meditate upon the **Sefirot** of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life to draw closer to God, so too should Christian Gnostics focus on the Aeons, divine emanations that lead us back to the Pleroma. The Ogdoad, consisting of **Bythos Βύθος (the Depth) and Sige-Charis  Nous Νοΰς (Nus, Mind) and Aletheia Άλήθεια (, Truth) (the Word; Logos Λόγος) and  (the Life; Zoe Ζωή) Anthropos Άνθρωπος (Man) and Ecclesia Έκκλησία**, represents the divine order through which Christ came into the world. By meditating upon these Aeons, we attune ourselves to the divine, becoming luminaries in the midst of mortals.  

## **The Biblical and Gnostic Basis for Meditating on the Aeons**  

The *Letter of Peter to Philip* from the Nag Hammadi Scriptures records Jesus saying:  

*"Concerning the Pleroma, it is I. I was sent down in the body for the seed that had fallen away. … They [the Aeons] were brought to completion, filled with rest through his salvation. Since he was deficiency, he became fullness."* (Nag Hammadi Codex VIII, 2)  

This passage affirms that Christ came to restore the fullness of the Aeons and that those who follow Him will also be restored to this divine state. To meditate on the Aeons is to follow Christ’s own path, moving from deficiency to fullness.  

Similarly, the *Gospel of Philip* explains that through Christ, believers also become Aeons:  

*"You saw the Spirit, you became spirit; you saw Christ, you became Christ; you saw the Father, you will become the Father."* (Gospel of Philip, II 61,29-32)  

This mystical identification with Christ is the goal of the Gnostic path. The Pleroma is not merely a distant realm—it is an inner reality accessible through divine knowledge. The *Gospel of Truth* elaborates on this:  

*"Thus fullness, which has no deficiency but fills up deficiency, is provided to fill a person’s need, so that the person may receive grace. … When the diminished part was restored, the person in need was revealed as fullness."*  

Likewise, in the *Secret Book of James*, Christ urges His followers:  

*"Be filled and leave no space within you empty."*  

The meditation on the Aeons is the method by which Gnostic Christians fill themselves with divine knowledge and grace.  

## **Man as a Microcosm of the Aeons: The Valentinian View**  

Valentinian Gnosticism, one of the most developed early Christian mystical traditions, taught that humanity was a reflection of the divine order. The early Church Father Irenaeus records the Valentinian teaching:  

*"Man, also, being formed after the image of the power above, had in himself that ability which flows from the one source. This ability was seated in the region of the brain, from which four faculties proceed, after the image of the Tetrad above, and these are called: the first, sight, the second, hearing, the third, smell, and the fourth, taste. And they say that the Ogdoad is indicated by man in this way: that he possesses two ears, the like number of eyes, also two nostrils, and a twofold taste, namely, of bitter and sweet."* (*Against Heresies*, 1.18.1)  

This passage demonstrates that the Ogdoad is not only a cosmic reality but is also inscribed within the human form. Rather than relying on foreign concepts such as Chakras, Gnostic Christians should recognize that their bodies already reflect the divine emanations. The Ogdoad is hidden within the human being, waiting to be revealed through meditation and divine knowledge.  

## **The Corrupting Influence of New Age Mysticism**  

The term *Chakra* originates from Hindu and Buddhist traditions and was never used by early Christians or Gnostic thinkers. Its introduction into Christian discourse is a result of New Age mysticism, which seeks to merge incompatible religious traditions. While Eastern practices may hold wisdom in their own right, they do not align with the revealed teachings of Christ and the Pleroma.  

Many New Age practitioners claim that Chakras are energy centers that must be balanced to achieve enlightenment. However, Gnosticism teaches that salvation is not about balancing bodily energies but about **ascending through the Aeons** to reunite with the divine fullness. The *Tripartite Tractate* confirms this:  

*"The redemption … is called 'an ascent to the degrees which are in the Pleroma' and is accomplished 'according to the power of each of the Aeons'."*  

This ascent is not about energy centers but about spiritual realization. The Aeons are the path to salvation, not the Chakras.  

## **Why Christians Must Meditate on the Aeons**  

The *Treatise on Resurrection* states that when a person is redeemed, **"fullness fills what it lacks."** This fullness is found in the divine emanations—the Aeons—not in foreign mystical systems. To align with Christ, believers must meditate upon the names of the Aeons, focusing on their spiritual meanings:  

 

- **Bythos Βύθος (the Depth) and Sige-Charis** – Contemplating the ineffable source of all things and the silence that allows divine wisdom to emerge.  

- **Nous Νοΰς (Nus, Mind) and Aletheia Άλήθεια (, Truth** – Awakening divine intelligence and recognizing the hidden things of truth.

- **the Word; Logos Λόγος) and (the Life; Zoe Ζωή) ** – The active Word of God and the divine life that sustains creation.  

- **Anthropos Άνθρωπος (Man) and Ecclesia Έκκλησία** – The spiritual image of the divine and the collective body of believers.  

Meditating on these Aeons restores believers to the divine harmony from which they originated. As the *Gospel of Philip* states:  

*"For those who are in the Pleroma, everything is inside them, and outside them there is nothing."*  

By meditating on the Aeons, Gnostic Christians fulfill the commandment of Christ to become **luminaries in the midst of mortals** (*Letter of Peter to Philip*). They are filled with divine knowledge, transformed into fullness, and prepared for the age to come.  

## **Conclusion**  

Gnostic Christianity does not need to borrow from New Age mysticism. The true path to spiritual restoration lies in the Aeons, as revealed in the Nag Hammadi Scriptures and Valentinian tradition. Just as Jewish mystics contemplate the **Sefirot**, Gnostic Christians must meditate on the divine emanations of the Pleroma. By doing so, they follow in the footsteps of Christ, ascending from deficiency to fullness, and becoming illuminators in the world.  

*"You saw Christ, you became Christ."* (*Gospel of Philip*)  

Let us, therefore, turn our attention away from the foreign concepts of Chakras and return to the sacred tradition of meditating upon the Aeons—the true keys to divine knowledge and transformation.

The Greater and Lesser Yahweh Exodus 23:21

# The Greater and Lesser Yahweh  

## *Two Powers in Heaven (Shtei Rashuyot Ba-Shamayim)*  

During the Second Temple period, some Jewish texts introduced the idea of a second divine figure, either beside YHWH or beneath Him. This concept developed into the belief that there were multiple "powers in heaven" (*shtei rashuyot ba-shamayim*), a teaching later deemed heretical in rabbinic Judaism (Mishnah *Sanhedrin* 4:5 – Sefaria).  

In mystical and esoteric Jewish traditions, these two powers were sometimes referred to as the *Greater Yahweh* and the *Lesser Yahweh*. This distinction is found in Merkabah texts such as *3 Enoch*, where the angel Metatron is called "the Lesser YHWH" (3 Enoch 48B:1[44]; 48D:1[90]). Similarly, in Gnostic literature such as *Pistis Sophia* and the *Book of Jeu*, we encounter "Great Iao" and "Little Iao" (*Pistis Sophia*, chs. 7 [twice], 86, 140; *Book of Jeu*, ch. 50), possibly corresponding to these designations.  

## Two Yahwehs in the Bible  

The idea of two Yahwehs is suggested in passages where one Yahweh appears to speak or act on behalf of another Yahweh.  

### *The Angel of Yahweh in Exodus 23:20-21*  

> *"See, I am sending an angel ahead of you to guard you along the way and to bring you to the place I have prepared. Pay attention to him and listen to what he says. Do not rebel against him; he will not forgive your rebellion, since my Name is in him."* (Exodus 23:20-21)  

This angel carries the divine Name and possesses authority to judge sin, suggesting an identity closely tied to Yahweh Himself.  

### *Yahweh Speaking to Yahweh in Exodus 24:1-2*  

> *"And to Moses He (Yahweh) said: 'Go up to Yahweh...'"* (Exodus 24:1)  

Here, Yahweh commands Moses to approach another Yahweh, reinforcing the idea of two Yahwehs.  

### *Elohim and El in Genesis 35:1*  

> *"Then Elohim said to Jacob, 'Arise, go up to Bethel and dwell there; and make an altar there to El, who appeared to you when you fled from the face of Esau your brother.'"*  

This passage differentiates between *Elohim* and *El*, suggesting a hierarchy within the divine realm.  

### *Yahweh Calling Upon Yahweh in Genesis 19:24*  

> *"Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the LORD out of heaven."*  

One Yahweh appears to act on behalf of another Yahweh, further supporting the concept of two Yahwehs.  

### *Amos 4:11 – The Lesser Yahweh and the Greater Yahweh*  

> *"I overthrew some of you, As Elohim overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, And you were like a burning stick plucked from the burning; Yet you have not returned to me," Says Yahweh.*  

Here, the "I" (Yahweh) overthrows like *Elohim* overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. This implies a Yahweh distinct from Elohim.  

## Yahweh as the Head Angel  

Jewish angelology often presents Yahweh as manifesting through angelic figures. Genesis 18 describes Yahweh appearing to Abraham, yet the text states that three men (*Elohim*) stood before him. The lead figure in this group is later identified as Yahweh, suggesting an angelic Yahweh figure.  

## Second-Century Jewish Literature: *Metatron as the Lesser Yahweh*  

### *The Third Book of Enoch (3 Enoch 12:1-5)*  

Metatron, identified as Enoch after his transformation, is called the "Lesser YHWH":  

> *"And He called me THE LESSER YHWH in the presence of all His heavenly household; as it is written (Ex. 23:21): 'For my name is in him.'"* (*3 Enoch* 12:5)  

Metatron is thus depicted as a divine figure bearing the Name of Yahweh.  

### *3 Enoch 48C – Metatron’s Exaltation*  

> *"I made honor, majesty, and glory his garment; beauty, pride, and strength, his outer robe, and a kingly crown, 500 times 500 parasangs, his diadem. I bestowed on him some of my majesty, some of my magnificence, some of the splendor of my glory... and I called him by my name, 'The Lesser YHWH, Prince of the Divine Presence, knower of secrets.'”*  

This passage reflects the belief that Yahweh's authority could be delegated to a principal angelic figure.  

## The Logos as the Mediator and Energizer of Angels  

The Logos, as described by Philo of Alexandria, serves as the intermediary between God and creation. Philo attributes to the Logos the role of empowering and sustaining angelic beings.  

### *Logos as the Chief of Angels*  

> *“And even if there be not as yet any one who is worthy to be called a son of God, nevertheless let him labor earnestly to be adorned according to his first-born word [Logos], the eldest of his angels, as the great archangel of many names; for he is called the authority, and the name of God, and the Word, and man according to God's image, and he who sees Israel.”*  

— *On the Confusion of Tongues* 146  

### *The Logos as the Mediator of Divine Energy*  

> *“For God, as shepherd and king, governs (περιαντλεῖ) the universe in accordance with law and justice, setting over it His true Logos, His first-born son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred flock, as though he were the lieutenant of a great king.”*  

— *On the Husbandry* 51  

### *The Logos as the Source of Angelic Motion and Action*  

> *“This same Word [Logos] is continually a suppliant to the immortal God on behalf of the mortal race, which is exposed to affliction and misery; and is also the ambassador sent by the Ruler of all to the subject race.”*  

— *Who is the Heir of Divine Things?* 205  

### *The Logos as the Power Behind Angelic Visions*  

> *“For it was indispensable that the man devoted to God should make use of the ministrations of the divine Word [Logos], which is superior to all the angels, inasmuch as it has been called the eldest of all, the archangel with many names.”*  

— *On Dreams* 1.157  

Philo describes the Logos as the chief angel, the firstborn of God, who energizes and sustains the angels in their roles.  

## The Demiurge and the Logos  

According to Heracleon’s commentary on John 1:3:  

> *“All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word ‘from whom’ or ‘by whom,’ but the one ‘through whom (all things were made).’”*  

This suggests that the Demiurge, often equated with the *Elohim*, operates under the influence of the Logos.  

### *Elohim as the Demiurge*  

Ptolemy, a Valentinian teacher, explains that the Law was given through angels (*Elohim*), aligning with Acts 7:53, Galatians 3:19, and Hebrews 2:2. This suggests that the *Elohim*, as intermediaries, function as the Demiurge—divine agents governing the material world.  

### *Conclusion: The Logos and the Lesser Yahweh*  

While *3 Enoch* attributes the title of *Lesser YHWH* to Metatron, the broader tradition suggests that this role aligns more closely with the Logos. The Logos serves as the intermediary power, energizing the angelic host and directing the Demiurge in shaping the cosmos. This perspective bridges Jewish angelology with early Christian thought, positioning the Logos as the ultimate mediator between the divine and the created world.

https://youtu.be/Kab_farFCOA

Why Gnosticism Does Not Support Karma

 

Why Gnosticism Does Not Support Karma  

The concept of karma, which originated in India with the *Rig Veda*, is not a Jewish, Christian, or Gnostic teaching. Karma, as commonly understood, is a principle of cause and effect where actions determine future experiences, often linked to reincarnation. However, neither Valentinian Gnosticism nor the teachings found in *Eugnostos the Blessed* support such an idea. Instead, these traditions address fate and providence in distinct ways, but neither suggests a system of karmic justice governing human existence.  

The word karma originates from the Sanskrit root kṛ, meaning "to act" or "to do." In Hinduism and Buddhism, karma refers to the moral law of cause and effect, where one's actions determine future experiences. However, this concept is distinct from the Greek and Hebrew terms used in biblical and Gnostic texts. The Greek word for fate, μοίρα (moíra), refers to an allotted portion or destiny, while πεπρωμένο (peproméno) signifies something that has been predetermined. Neither of these terms carry the moral causality implied in karma. Furthermore, fate is not the same as providence, which is expressed by the Greek πρόνοια (pronoia), meaning divine foresight or care. Unlike karma, which suggests an impersonal moral mechanism, providence implies an intentional guiding force, often associated with God’s will in biblical thought.

Ecclesiastes 9:11 provides a perspective that directly contrasts with the deterministic implications of karma. The verse states: "I returned and saw under the sun that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and chance happen to them all." Here, the Hebrew word מִקְרֶה (miqreh) and the Greek ἀπάντημα (apántēma) convey the idea of random chance or unforeseen events, emphasizing unpredictability in life. This contradicts the notion of karma, which suggests that one’s past actions always determine their future outcomes. Instead, the biblical and Gnostic perspectives recognize that human experiences are shaped by a mixture of fate, providence, and random occurrences, none of which align with the karmic cycle of action and reaction.

## The Valentinian Perspective: Fate and Providence  

Valentinian Gnosticism acknowledges the existence of fate (*heimarmene*) and providence (*pronoia*), but it does not equate these with karma. Fate is seen as a system of opposing forces that influence human existence through cosmic alignments, while providence is the means by which salvation is granted through Christ. According to the Valentinians, the celestial bodies and their movements indicate the workings of unseen powers, but they do not independently cause events. Instead, these movements display the activity of higher powers, which guide births and circumstances.  

However, Valentinian Gnosticism teaches that the coming of Christ liberates believers from fate, transferring them to divine providence. This transition is achieved through baptism, which is not merely a ritual but a transformative act that frees one from the constraints of fate. Before baptism, fate is real, but afterward, it no longer holds power over the believer. This belief places emphasis on knowledge (*gnosis*) as the key to salvation, rather than on a deterministic system of cause and effect like karma.  

The idea that one's destiny is shaped by past actions and carried forward in a cycle of rebirth is absent in Valentinian thought. Instead, fate governs those who lack *gnosis*, while those who attain knowledge are freed from it. The Valentinian tradition presents a dualistic worldview where opposing forces influence human existence, but ultimate liberation comes through the knowledge and guidance of Christ, not through karmic retribution.  

## Eugnostos the Blessed: A Rejection of Fate and Providence  

The non-Valentinian text *Eugnostos the Blessed* goes even further in rejecting any concept of fate, providence, or self-governance. Unlike the Valentinians, who see fate as real until transcended, *Eugnostos* dismisses all such concepts as misguided human speculation. The text states:  

> “The wisest among them have speculated about the truth from the ordering of the world. And the speculation has not reached the truth. For the ordering is spoken of in three (different) opinions by all the philosophers; hence they do not agree. For some of them say about the world that it was directed by itself. Others, that it is providence (that directs it). Others, that it is fate. But it is none of these. Again, of three voices that I have just mentioned, none is true. For whatever is from itself is an empty life; it is self-made. Providence is foolish. Fate is an undiscerning thing.”  

This passage makes it clear that *Eugnostos* does not accept fate as a governing force over human affairs. It also rejects providence as lacking wisdom and denies the idea that the world directs itself. Instead, the text argues that true knowledge comes not from philosophy or cosmic determinism, but from the revelation of the true God. 

Both *Eugnostos* and Ecclesiastes emphasize the limitations of relying on external forces and highlight the randomness of existence, which stands in direct contrast to the structured cause-and-effect system of karma.   

## Galatians 6:7-8 and the Rejection of Karma  

Galatians 6:7-8 states:  

> “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked. For whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life.”  

At first glance, this passage may seem similar to karma because it speaks of reaping what one sows. However, the key difference is that this principle is not an impersonal law of cause and effect operating over multiple lifetimes. Instead, it is a moral and spiritual truth governed by God’s judgment, not by an automatic system. The passage warns that choices have consequences, but these consequences are based on divine will, not a mechanical cycle of rebirth or karmic debt.  

Unlike karma, which suggests that every action produces a corresponding effect in a future life, Galatians 6:7-8 presents two clear paths: corruption for those who live according to the flesh and eternal life for those who live by the Spirit. This distinction is not based on an endless cycle of rebirth but on a direct relationship with God, who grants eternal life as a gift. The emphasis is on spiritual transformation rather than inevitable repayment for past deeds. This understanding of sowing and reaping is rooted in the biblical concept of divine justice rather than an impersonal cosmic law, making it incompatible with karma.

## 

## Gnostic Thought and the Rejection of Karma  

Neither Valentinian Gnosticism nor *Eugnostos the Blessed* supports the idea of karma. The Valentinians acknowledge fate as a temporary condition from which one can be liberated through Christ, while *Eugnostos* outright denies fate, providence, and self-governance. In both perspectives, salvation comes through knowledge, not through a cycle of moral retribution.  

Unlike karma, which suggests that past actions determine future experiences in a continuous cycle, these Gnostic perspectives emphasize the role of knowledge in transcending worldly conditions. Valentinian thought allows for fate’s influence until it is overcome, while *Eugnostos* dismisses the very idea that fate or providence has any real power.  

Thus, Gnosticism does not support karma, because it neither upholds a system of moral causality nor believes in reincarnation. Instead, it presents a path of liberation through knowledge, rejecting the idea that human existence is bound to an endless cycle of consequences dictated by past actions.

The Law of Moses as the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil

The Law Of Moses As An Adversary

# **The Law of Moses as the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil**  

The Law of Moses serves as a type of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, as it imparts the knowledge of sin but does not provide salvation. The apostle Paul affirms this in his letter to the Romans:  

**"By the law is the knowledge of sin" (Romans 3:20).**  

The Gospel of Philip makes this connection explicit:  

**"The law was the tree. It has power to give the knowledge of good and evil. It neither removed him from evil, nor did it set him in the good, but it created death for those who ate of it. For when he said, 'Eat this, do not eat that,' it became the beginning of death."** (**The Gospel of Philip 75**)  

The Law, like the Tree of Knowledge, introduced a system of commandments that made humans aware of sin but could not remove their fallen state. Instead, it set the stage for the coming of Christ, who would fulfill the Law and replace it with grace and truth. As Paul writes:  

**"Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby" (Ephesians 2:15-16).**  

The "enmity" in this passage refers to the Law of commandments contained in ordinances, specifically the penalties and divisions that the Law created between Jews and Gentiles. The Law, while given by God, established distinctions that kept the two groups separate, with commandments, rituals, and legal barriers that prevented full unity. Through His death, Jesus abolished the enmity—not by nullifying God's moral principles, but by removing the barriers and penalties that the Law imposed.By doing so, He made peace, creating one new humanity in Himself, where both Jews and Gentiles are reconciled to God as one body. The Gospel of Truth describes how Jesus took on this burden, represented as a book, and was nailed to the cross, signifying the fulfillment and transcendence of the Law: 

**"For this reason Jesus appeared. He put on that book. He was nailed to a cross. He affixed the edict of the Father to the cross."** (**The Gospel of Truth**)  

The Law was the knowledge of sin, and Jesus bore its burden, fulfilling and transcending it. He became the true fruit of knowledge, but unlike the original Tree, He did not bring death to those who partook of Him. Instead, He brought joy and salvation:  

**"He was nailed to a tree. He became a fruit of the knowledge of the Father. He did not, however, destroy them because they ate of it. He rather caused those who ate of it to be joyful because of this discovery."** (**The Gospel of Truth**)  

The imagery of the Tree of Knowledge is further connected to the fig tree, which symbolizes Israel and the Law. Adam and Eve covered themselves with fig leaves after eating from the tree, just as the Jews sought righteousness through the works of the Law. However, these leaves were insufficient, just as the Law was insufficient for salvation. The true covering came from the slain Lamb:  

**"The fig leaves which Adam and Eve covered themselves with also represented the Law, seeing they were replaced by the slain lamb. Their initially glossy appearance typifies well the apparent covering of sin by the Law, which faded in time. The fig tree is a symbol of Israel. It seems reasonable to speculate that having eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge, they made their aprons out of its leaves, thus making the tree of knowledge a fig tree."**  

Jesus Himself cursed the fig tree when He found it barren, symbolizing the end of the Old Covenant and the coming of the New:  

**"Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, 'May you never bear fruit again!' Immediately the tree withered" (Matthew 21:19).**  

The Pharisees, who strictly adhered to the Law but lacked true righteousness, are likened to this tree:  

**"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness" (Matthew 23:27).**  

The word **"beautiful"** used here is the same word used in the Septuagint to describe the Tree of Knowledge, drawing a connection between the Pharisees and the Law that could only bring death.  

The Law, though divinely given, was not the final revelation of God but a necessary stage in the divine plan. It served to teach humanity about sin and the need for a Savior. As Paul explains:  

**"The law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith" (Galatians 3:24).**  

The Gospel of Philip reinforces this idea:  

**"The law was the tree. It has power to give the knowledge of good and evil [for without it we would not know sin nor could we become 'as gods' setting ourselves up as gods in the temple of God (our bodies)]. It neither removed him from evil, nor did it set him in the good, but it created death for those who ate of it [there is no salvation available from the works of the law according to the 'letter' but the 'spirit' of the law was life for those who discerned it as an allegory pointing to the Savior and the power of sonship]. For when he said, 'Eat this, do not eat that,' it became the beginning of death [This Command was the groundwork for the great task of creating sons. Shortly after the precept Adam was given his first taste of free will and his conscience failed him and as a result, construction could now begin on the greatest temple (not made with hands) ever created!]."** (**The Gospel of Philip 75**)  

Thus, the Law was both a curse and a preparation. It revealed sin but could not remove it. It was the Tree of Knowledge that brought death, yet through Christ, who took it upon Himself, it became a means to life. Jesus, the true revelation of the Father, fulfilled the Law and established a new covenant of grace, bringing true righteousness apart from the works of the Law.  

As John declares:  

**"For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ" (John 1:17).**  

Therefore, while the Law served its purpose, true life and salvation come only through Christ, the living fruit of the knowledge of the Father.

The law was the tree. It has power to give the knowledge of good and evil. It neither removed him from evil, nor did it set him in the good, but it created death for those who ate of it. For when he said, "Eat this, do not eat that", it became the beginning of death. (The Gospel of Philip)

For this reason Jesus appeared. He put on that book. He was nailed to a cross. He affixed the edict of the father to the cross. (The Gospel of Truth)

He was nailed to a tree. He became a fruit of the knowledge of the father. He did not, however, destroy them because they ate of it. He rather caused those who ate of it to be joyful because of this discovery.
(The Gospel of Truth)

15  Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

16  And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

Here is the rewritten 800-word document that aligns with your request, ensuring that all references to the Law of Moses as an adversary or false accuser are removed, while retaining the perspective that the Law represents the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

---

**The Law as the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil**  

The Gospel of Philip provides a striking perspective on the nature of the Law:  

*"The law was the tree. It has power to give the knowledge of good and evil. It neither removed him from evil, nor did it set him in the good, but it created death for those who ate of it. For when he said, 'Eat this, do not eat that,' it became the beginning of death."* (Gospel of Philip)  

This understanding aligns with the biblical narrative of Genesis, where the Tree of Knowledge introduced an awareness of good and evil. The Law, given to Israel, similarly brought knowledge of righteousness and sin, yet it could not grant the power to overcome sin entirely. Instead, it revealed the limitations of human nature and the need for something greater.  

Paul elaborates on this in his writings, explaining that the Law, though good and holy in itself, revealed the human inclination toward disobedience. He states, *“The strength of sin is the law”* (1 Corinthians 15:56), not because the Law itself was sinful, but because it exposed sin and made it evident in human actions.  

### **Christ and the Fulfillment of the Law**  

Jesus’ mission was not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it, bringing about a new way of reconciliation between humanity and God. The Gospel of Truth describes this fulfillment in symbolic language:  

*"For this reason Jesus appeared. He put on that book. He was nailed to a cross. He affixed the edict of the Father to the cross."* (Gospel of Truth)  

Here, Jesus is portrayed as embodying the Law—"putting on the book"—and bringing it to its intended fulfillment through His death and resurrection. He became the means through which humanity could move beyond the limitations of the Law.  

*"He was nailed to a tree. He became a fruit of the knowledge of the Father. He did not, however, destroy them because they ate of it. He rather caused those who ate of it to be joyful because of this discovery."* (Gospel of Truth)  

Unlike the first experience with the Tree of Knowledge, where eating brought consequences of mortality, Jesus' fulfillment of the Law transforms this knowledge into joy. He grants access to true understanding and reconciliation with God.  

### **Reconciliation and the New Creation**  

Paul explains this transformation in his letter to the Ephesians:  

*"Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby."* (Ephesians 2:15-16)  

The "enmity" described here is the division created by the Law. While it established a standard of righteousness, it also distinguished between those under the covenant and those outside of it. Through Christ, this division is abolished, and all are invited into unity with God.  

### **The Law as a Tutor Leading to Christ**  

Paul describes the purpose of the Law in Galatians:  

*"Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster."* (Galatians 3:24-25)  

The Law served as a guide, teaching the people about righteousness and sin, but its role was temporary. It was never meant to be the final solution; rather, it pointed forward to Christ. Once faith in Him is established, believers are no longer under the instruction of the Law in the same way, for they have entered into a new relationship with God.  

Paul further explains this shift:  

*"For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh."* (Romans 8:3)  

The Law was unable to change human nature because it depended on human effort to uphold it. Christ, however, accomplished what the Law could not by condemning sin itself and offering a new way through the Spirit.  

### **The Spiritual Transformation**  

Galatians 5 contrasts the works of the flesh with the fruits of the Spirit, showing how living by the Spirit leads to transformation beyond the requirements of the Law:  

*"If you be led of the Spirit, you are not under the law."* (Galatians 5:18)  

This does not mean the Law was evil, but rather that its function as a guide has been surpassed by the life of the Spirit. Those who follow Christ are no longer bound to the written commandments but are led by a deeper, spiritual connection with God.  

Paul connects this transition with the concept of crucifixion:  

*"They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts."* (Galatians 5:24)  

Just as Jesus was crucified, putting an end to the enmity created by the Law, His followers are called to crucify their former ways of living. The transformation is not about rejecting the Law itself but moving beyond it into a new reality in Christ.  

### **The Freedom Found in Christ**  

In Colossians, Paul emphasizes the freedom believers have received:  

*"Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross."* (Colossians 2:14)  

This does not mean the Law was evil, but rather that its role in condemning sin has been fulfilled. In Christ, believers find a new foundation for their relationship with God, one based on grace rather than adherence to legal commands.  

Paul summarizes this transformation in Romans 7:  

*"But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter."* (Romans 7:6)  

The Law, like the Tree of Knowledge, brought awareness of good and evil, but it could not provide the means to transcend the struggle. Through Christ, humanity is invited into a new life, where righteousness is not attained by human effort but through union with Him.  

### **Conclusion**  

The Law was given as a means of instruction, revealing the nature of righteousness and sin. Yet, like the Tree of Knowledge, it could not grant the power to overcome sin. Through Christ, the purpose of the Law was fulfilled, and believers are now called to live by the Spirit. This is not a rejection of the Law’s value but an acknowledgment that its role has been completed in the new creation established through Jesus. The joy found in Christ is the true fruit of knowledge, leading not to condemnation but to life and unity with God.

Moses and Jesus John 1:17,18

Moses and Jesus John 1:17,18

Here is your document with the corrected spacing:

---

The Law of Moses, the Demiurge, and the Revelation of God in Christ

John 1:17-18

The Law Given Through Elohim

The Law, as recorded in the Pentateuch, was not directly given by God the Father but was ordained through the agency of angels, also referred to as Elohim. This is evident from multiple scriptural testimonies. Stephen, in his defense before the Sanhedrin, affirms:

"Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it" (Acts 7:53).

The Greek word for "disposition" is diatagas, signifying ordinance or arrangement. This demonstrates that the Law was mediated through angels, not given directly by the Father. The Apostle Paul reinforces this understanding:

"Why then the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made, and it was put in place through angels by an intermediary" (Galatians 3:19, ESV).

The reference to angels in the giving of the Law aligns with Moses' own account of encountering an angel in the burning bush:

"And the angel of Yahweh appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush" (Exodus 3:2).

This angel, speaking in the name of God, acted as an intermediary, just as the Elohim mediated the giving of the Law. Hebrews further affirms:

"For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward…" (Hebrews 2:2).

These verses establish that the Law was delivered through angelic beings, not by the Father directly.

Ptolemy’s Interpretation of the Law

The early Christian teacher Ptolemy offers a significant interpretation of the Law’s nature. He rejects the views of both the Jewish tradition, which attributes the Law to the perfect God, and the Marcionites, who claim that it was given by a malevolent being. Instead, he presents a more nuanced view:

"For it is evident that the Law was not ordained by the perfect God the Father, for it is secondary, being imperfect and in need of completion by another, containing commandments alien to the nature and thought of such a God." (Letter to Flora)

He further divides the Law into three parts:

1. The Law of God – True commandments given by the Deity Himself.
2. The Law of Moses – Commandments given by Moses from his own reasoning.
3. The Traditions of the Elders – Human commandments interwoven into the Law.

Jesus confirms this division in His disputes with the Pharisees:

"Because of your hard-heartedness Moses permitted a man to divorce his wife; from the beginning it was not so" (Matthew 19:8).

Jesus contrasts the original divine intention with Moses' accommodation. Additionally, He rebukes the traditions of the elders:

"You have nullified the Law of God through the tradition of your elders" (Matthew 15:6).

This distinction aligns with Ptolemy’s claim that the Law, while containing divine elements, is not wholly from the Father but mediated through Elohim and shaped by human traditions.

If the Law was mediated by angels, also called Elohim in the Hebrew Scriptures (Psalm 82:1, 6), and if the Demiurge is identified as the intermediary who gave the Law, then it follows logically that the Elohim are the Demiurge. Ptolemy’s interpretation clarifies that the Law was neither from the perfect Father nor from an evil being but from an intermediary power—the Demiurge—who is distinct from both.

Since multiple scriptural passages affirm that angels, or Elohim, were responsible for delivering the Law (Acts 7:53, Galatians 3:19, Hebrews 2:2), they collectively fulfill the role of the Demiurge. This does not mean they are malevolent but rather that they function as intermediaries, governing the present age until Christ, the true revelation of the Father, inaugurates the world to come (Hebrews 2:5). Therefore, the Elohim, as celestial rulers and administrators of the Law, are rightly understood as the Demiurge, the architect of the material order and its legal structures.

The Revelation of the Deity in Christ

The Law, being mediated through angels and imperfect in its final form, stands in contrast to the ultimate revelation of the Deity in Christ. John declares:

"For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ" (John 1:17).

While Moses received the Law through angelic mediation, Jesus reveals the Father directly:

"No one hath seen God at any time: An Only Begotten God, The One existing within the bosom of the Father, He, hath interpreted him" (John 1:18, Rotherham).

Moses did not see the Father but saw the Elohim. When Moses asked to see the Elohim's glory, he was only permitted to see a limited manifestation through an intermediary:

"And I will take away my hand, and thou shalt see my back: but my face shall not be seen" (Exodus 33:23).

Jesus, the Logos made flesh, fully reveals the Father:

"All things have been delivered to me by my Father, and no one fully knows the Son but the Father, neither does anyone fully know the Father but the Son and anyone to whom the Son is willing to reveal him" (Matthew 11:27).

Jesus is the exegete of the Father. The Greek term exegeomai means "to declare, interpret," from which we derive "exegesis." Christ, by His life, death, and resurrection, fully expounds the nature of God, surpassing the limited revelation given through the Law.

The Intermediate Role of the Demiurge

Ptolemy, recognizing that the Law was neither from the Father nor from an evil being, identifies the Demiurge as its author:

"For if the Law was not ordained by the perfect God himself, as we have already taught you, nor by the devil, a statement one cannot possibly make, the legislator must be some one other than these two. In fact, he is the demiurge and maker of this universe and everything in it; and because he is essentially different from these two and is between them, he is rightly given the name, intermediate." (Letter to Flora)

This aligns with the concept that the angels, as intermediaries, administered the Law. The present age is subjected to these celestial rulers:

"For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come" (Hebrews 2:5).

This indicates that the coming age, under Christ’s rule, will no longer be governed by these intermediaries.

Conclusion

The Law was mediated by angels (Elohim) and structured through Moses, but it was incomplete. Ptolemy's division clarifies its nature, distinguishing divine precepts from human additions. Jesus Christ, the Logos, surpasses this mediated revelation by fully revealing the Father. As John declares:

"And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace" (John 1:16).

Thus, while the Law served its purpose, the fullness of divine truth is found only in Christ..














John 1:17 Because, the law, through Moses, was given, favour and truth, through Jesus Christ, came into existence.
18 No one, hath seen, God, at any time: An Only Begotten God, The One existing within the bosom of the Father, He, hath interpreted him. (Rotherham's Emphasized Bible)

Some say (Jews,Ebionite and Christians) that it is legislation given by God the Father; others (Marcion Christians), taking the contrary course, maintain stubbornly that it was ordained by the opposite, the Devil who causes destruction, just as they attribute the fashioning of the world to him, saying that he is the Father and maker of this universe. Both are completely in error; they refute each other and neither has reached the truth of the matter.

Ptolemy begins by showing these two views are utterly in error

For it is evident that the Law was not ordained by the perfect God the Father, for it is secondary, being imperfect and in need of completion by another, containing commandments alien to the nature and thought of such a God. (Ptolemy's Letter to Flora)


First, you must learn that the entire Law contained in the Pentateuch of Moses was not ordained by one legislator - I mean, not by God alone, some commandments are Moses', and some were given by other men. The words of the Savior teach us this triple division. The first part must be attributed to God alone, and his legislation; the second to Moses - not in the sense that God legislates through him, but in the sense that Moses gave some legislation under the influence of his own ideas; and the third to the elders of the people, who seem to have ordained some commandments of their own at the beginning. You will now learn how the truth of this theory is proved by the words of the Savior.

In some discussion with those who dispute with the Savior about divorce, which was permitted in the Law, he said Because of your hard-heartedness Moses permitted a man to divorce his wife; from the beginning it was not so; for God made this marriage, and what the Lord joined together, man must not seperate. [Matt 19:8] In this way he shows there is a Law of God, which prohibits the divorce of a wife from a husband, and another law, that of Moses, which permits the breaking of this yoke because of hard-heartedness. In fact, Moses lays down legislation contrary to that of God; for joining is contrary to not joining.

The Savior also makes plain the fact that there are some traditions of the elders interwoven in the Law. For God,he says, Said, Honour your father and your mother, that it may be well with you, But you , he says addressing the elders, ...have declared as a gift to God, that by which you have nullified the Law of God through the tradition of your elders. Isaiah also proclaimed this, saying, This people honours me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, teaching precepts which are the commandments of men. [Matt 15:4-9].

Therefore it is obvious that the whole Law is divided into three parts; we find in it the legislation of Moses, of the elders, and of God himself. This division of the entire Law, as made by us, has brought to light what is true in it.

For if the Law was not ordained by the perfect God himself, as we have already thaught you, nor by the devil, a statement one cannot possibly make, the legislator must be some one other than these two. In fact, he is the demiurge and maker of this universe and everything in it; and because he is essentially different from these two and is between them, he is rightly given the name, intermediate. (Ptolemy's Letter to Flora)

the demiurge is the intermediate just like the angels been the intermediary Galatians 3:19




Moses and Angels The Law was given through Moses by angles or the Elohim this can be seen from Stephen's speech in acts 7 and Moses’ testimony to his encounter with the Angel of Yahweh (Ex 3:16 Ex 14:19,20).



Acts 7:53 Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it
The word "disposition" is the Gr. diatagas and signifies "ordinance." It has the idea of constitution or arranging. The NIV has "the law that was put into effect by angels," whereas the NEB has "the law as God's angels gave it to you." In receiving the Law, Moses did not see the great Uncreated and Eternal Spirit personally, but an angelic representative (Num. 12:8; Exo. 20:1; Gal. 3:19; Heb. 2:2; Acts 7:38).

In the case of God's own Son, the circumstances were entirely different (Heb. 1:1 -2); he was elevated to become the medium of the divine will, described as the "Word made flesh" (Jn. 1:14).



Galatians 3:19 Why then the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made, and it was put in place through angels by an intermediary. (English Standard Version)

By Angles: See Exo 3:2; 23:20; Isa 63:9; cp Heb 2:2-4.



Exodus 3:2 And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.



"And the angel of Yahweh appeared unto him" — The angel spoke in the name of Deity, and therefore can be identified with the angel referred to in ch. 23:20-23.


Examples of angels speaking in the name of God are found throughout the Word. A typical example is given in Judges 2:1. The angel of Yahweh visited Israel with the message: "I made you to go up out of Egypt." The work is there attributed to the angel, whilst elsewhere it is declared as being of Yahweh. In fact, the work of deliverance was effected by Yahweh through "His ministers," the angels as the Elohim (cp. Psa. 103:20-21; Heb. 1:14).


The Law is given by the angels it is called the word spoken by angels in hebrews 2:2 that is, by the ministration of angels.. the

5 ¶ For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come,

This age or world is subjected meaning controlled by the angels

Because Angels control world rulers, "principalities and powers" can refer both to them and the Angels behind them.


The words, “No one has ever seen God; the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.” (John 1:18), were spoken, not by the Baptist, but by the disciple.

No one, hath seen, God, at any time Not even Moses (Exo 33:18,20).

Moses’ experience of seeing a veiled manifestation of the Glory of God whilst he was hidden in a cleft of the rock (Ex. 33:22). “No man hath seen (and goes on seeing) God at any time”, not even Moses/ for the theophany he beheld was specifically limited (v.22, 23). When the covenant was made at Sinai a theophany was not only heard but also seen (Ex. 24:10,11);

An Only Begotten God, The One existing within the bosom of the Father, He, hath interpreted him

led him forth, i.e. into full revelation.

(Matthew 11:27) All things have been delivered to me by my Father, and no one fully knows the Son but the Father, neither does anyone fully know the Father but the Son and anyone to whom the Son is willing to reveal him.




"Exegeomai": to declare, interpret (cp English "exegesis"). In this final verse of the prologue is the climactic and ultimate statement of the career of the Logos, "the Word of God made flesh", Jesus of Nazareth. His whole life, all his teachings, and at last and especially his death and resurrection and ascension to heaven, all "expound" or "interpret" his heavenly Father.




This verse proves that, Jesus had a knowledge of God above that which any of the ancient prophets had, and that the fullest revelations of his character are to be expected in the gospel. By his Word and Spirit he can enlighten and guide us, and lead us to the true knowledge of God; and there is no true and full knowledge of God which is not obtained through his Son. Comp. #Joh 14:6 1Jo 2:22,23.

God cannot be understood in his completeness by outward senses. The indwelling Word, the Christ, God's spiritual idea, declares God and makes him manifest to outward senses by redeeming the life and substance of the body and raising it to spiritual glory.

John 1:18 And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him

Verse 18: No man hath seen the Creator at any time. "God" meaning "elohim" refers to angels. See Exod# 33. 11, 20. The showing of YHWH to Moses was the showing of a highly placed angel, typifying that the people would see the manifestation of God in Jesus.