Thursday, 6 March 2025

there are many powers in heaven

Elohim and Creation
or
Gods and Creation







"there are many powers in heaven" Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5 - Sefaria. 

# **There Are Many Powers in Heaven**  

The Mishnah states, *"There are many powers in heaven."* (Sanhedrin 4:5, Sefaria). This statement, though brief, reflects an ancient belief that divine power is not singular in manifestation but operates through multiple agencies. Early Christian Gnostic sects were accused of heresy for teaching that the Deity is not the immediate creator of the world and humanity. The Valentinians taught that a creative agency called the Demiurge (meaning "craftsman" or "artisan") and the archons created and oversee the physical universe. These entities were seen as subordinate *Elohim* (gods or angels) to the spiritual *Logos*.  

But where does this teaching originate? Is it biblical?  

## **Historical Traditions of Multiple Powers in Heaven**  

This concept is not unique to Gnostic Christianity; it has deep roots in Jewish traditions. The *Tripartite Tractate*, a Valentinian text, highlights conflicting interpretations among Jewish sects regarding divine agency. It states:  

*"By interpreting them, they established many sects which exist to the present among the Jews. Some say that the God who made a proclamation in the ancient scriptures is one. Others say that he is many. Some say that God is simple and was a single mind in nature. Others say that his activity is linked with the establishment of good and evil. Still others say that he is the creator of that which has come into being. Still others say that it was by the angels that he created."* (*Tripartite Tractate*)  

Those who attribute creation to angels appear to be those who "say that he is many." This belief finds support in various Jewish writings, including the *Book of Jubilees*.  

### **The Book of Jubilees and Angelic Agency**  

The *Book of Jubilees* (dated to 160–150 BCE) presents a tradition where angels played an essential role in the revelation of divine laws and the creation of the world. It claims to be a record of Moses' revelations from angels on Mount Sinai:  

*"And He said to the angel of the presence: Write for Moses from the beginning of creation till My sanctuary has been built among them for all eternity."* (*Jubilees* 1:26)  

Chapter 2 of *Jubilees* speaks of the creation of the *Elohim*, called "spirits" and "angels" in the Ethiopic texts. If an original Hebrew text were available, the word for "angel" might have been *Elohim*, meaning "powers" or "mighty ones." The angels serve before the Deity in a structured hierarchy, with some controlling the natural world.  

The pronouns *"we"* and *"us"* in *Jubilees* are consistently applied to the angels acting on behalf of the Deity, never as a "royal we." For example:  

- *"And He gave us a great sign, the Sabbath day, that we should work six days, but keep Sabbath on the seventh day from all work."* (*Jubilees* 2:17)  
- *"And on the six days of the second week we brought, according to the word of God, unto Adam all the beasts, and all the cattle, and all the birds."* (*Jubilees* 3:1)  
- *"And the Lord said unto us: 'It is not good that the man should be alone: let us make a helpmeet for him.'"* (*Jubilees* 3:4)  

This perspective suggests that when Genesis 1:26 states, *"Let us make man in our image,"* it refers to God addressing His angels rather than using a plural form for Himself.  

## **The Book of Enoch and the Archangels**  

The *Book of Enoch* expands on the concept of heavenly hierarchies, listing seven archangels:  

*"These are the names of the holy angels who watch: Uriel, Raphael, Raguel, Michael, Saraqâêl, Gabriel, and Remiel."* (*Enoch* 20)  

Each archangel has a specific function:  

- Uriel: Over the world and Tartarus  
- Raphael: Over the spirits of men  
- Raguel: Over the luminaries  
- Michael: Over righteous humanity and chaos  
- Saraqâêl: Over the spirits who sin  
- Gabriel: Over Paradise and the cherubim  
- Remiel: Over those who rise at the Resurrection  

This understanding influenced the Gnostic concept of the *Hebdomad*, a group of seven archons governing the world.  

## **Jewish Views from Alexandrian Thought**  

Philo of Alexandria, a Jewish philosopher, distinguished between the supreme God and subordinate divine beings. He interprets Genesis 1:26 as referring to divine assistants:  

*"For no mortal thing could have been formed on the similitude of the supreme Father of the universe, but only after the pattern of the second deity, who is the Word of the supreme Being."* (*Questions and Answers on Genesis*, II)  

Philo describes the *Logos* as God’s reason, His firstborn son, and the instrument through which creation occurs:  

*"God, like a shepherd and a king, governs the earth, the water, the air, and the fire, appointing, as their immediate superintendent, His own right reason (*logos*), His firstborn son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred company as the lieutenant of the great king."* (*On Husbandry*)  

This aligns with John 1:1-3, where the *Logos* (Word) is described as the divine agent in creation.  

## **Gnostic Perspectives on Divine Powers**  

The Gnostic teacher Basilides held that angels created the world and governed nations:  

*"Those angels who occupy the lowest heaven, that, namely, which is visible to us, formed all the things which are in the world, and made allotments among themselves of the earth and of those nations which are upon it."* (*Irenaeus, Against Heresies*, I.24.4)  

Menander, another Gnostic teacher, taught that the world was created by angels, echoing Jewish and Platonic thought about intermediaries in creation.  

## **Conclusion**  

The idea that there are many powers in heaven is well-supported in both Jewish and early Christian traditions. The *Book of Jubilees*, the *Book of Enoch*, Philo, and early Gnostic writings all describe a structured hierarchy of divine beings who act as intermediaries in creation and governance. The *Elohim* of the Hebrew Bible are not necessarily a singular entity but a collective term for divine beings that assist in executing God’s will.  

Understanding Genesis 1:26, *"Let us make man in our image,"* in this context suggests a reference to divine intermediaries rather than a singular God speaking in plurality. The Christian *Logos*, identified with Jesus, was seen as the highest of these divine powers, the *firstborn of all creation* (Colossians 1:15), through whom all things were made.  

This ancient belief in multiple powers in heaven was not heretical but deeply embedded in Jewish thought, later influencing Christian theology.














Early Christian Gnostic sects were accused of heresy for teaching that the Deity, is not immediately the creator of our world, nor of our race. The Valentinians taught that creative agency called the Demiurge (meaning "craftsman" or "artisan") and the archons created and oversees the physical universe. The Demiurge and the archons are subordinate gods (Elohim), or angels to the spiritual Logos.

Where does this teaching come from is it biblical?

Well obviously these teachings must have a biblical foundation which we will look at later. But first we will look at the historical tradition of this teaching

First a look at the Tripartite Tractate which shows conflicting interpretations among Jewish sects as pairs of opposite views. Three such pairs are listed:

By interpreting them, they established many sects which exist to the present among the Jews. Some say that the God who made a proclamation in the ancient scriptures is one. Others say that he is many. Some say that God is simple and was a single mind in nature. Others say that his activity is linked with the establishment of good and evil. Still others say that he is the creator of that which has come into being. Still others say that it was by the angels that he created. (The Tripartite Tractate)

"that which has come into being" presumably "created things"


Those who attribute to the angels a mediating role at creation seem to be identical with those who "say that he is many."
Jewish Views From Palestinian  
The first historical text we will look at is the Book of Jubilees (the Oxford Annotated Bible and the Mercer Bible Dictionary conclude the work can be dated to 160–150 BC)

The Book of Jubilees claims to present "the history of the division of the days events of the years, the year-weeks, and the jubilees of the world" as revealed to Moses by angels while he was on Mount Sinai for forty days and forty nights.

Chapter 1:25 And do thou write down for thyself all these words which I declare unto thee on this mountain, the first and the last, which shall come to pass in all the divisions of the days in the law and in the testimony and in the weeks and the jubilees unto eternity, until I descend and dwell with them throughout eternity.'
26 And He said to the angel of the presence: Write for Moses from the beginning of creation till My sanctuary has been built among them for all eternity.


Angels were used to send down the Quran to Muhammad; it was not sent down directly from God. And this seems to apply in every context that We is used in the Quran.

Chapter 2 of the Book of Jubilees gives us information about the creation of the elohim who are called spirits and angels in the manuscripts of the Ethiopic texts which we have from 15th and 16th centuries. However I believe if we could see an Hebrew original manuscript text the word for angel would be elohim spirits of powers or Mighty Ones.

The spirits and the angels are the ones who serve before the Deity there is an hierarchy to the spirits/elohim the angels of the presence and sanctification would seem to be the archangels, other angles control the natural world each group controls different forces of nature: .


The “heavens and the earth”  were created in a beginning before the first “day” of creation began. (Gen. 1:1)

In the book of Jubilees the pronouns "we"  and "us" is always used of the angels who act on behalf of the Deity:

chapter 2:17 And He gave us a great sign, the Sabbath day, that we should work six days, but keep Sabbath on the seventh day from all work.

Chapter 3:1 And on the six days of the second week we brought, according to the word of God, unto Adam all the beasts, and all the cattle, and all the birds,


chapter 3:4 And the Lord said unto us: 'It is not good that the man should be alone: let us make a helpmeet for him.'

Chapter 3:15 And in the first week of the first jubilee, [1-7 A.M.] Adam and his wife were in the garden of Eden for seven years tilling and keeping it, and we gave him work and we instructed him to do everything that is suitable for tillage.

Chapter 10:22 And the Lord our God said unto us: Behold, they are one people, and (this) they begin to do, and now nothing will be withholden from them. Go to, let us go down and confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech, and they may be dispersed into cities and nations, and one purpose will no longer abide with them till the day of judgment.'
Chapter 14:20 And on that day we made a covenant with Abram, according as we had covenanted with Noah in this month; and Abram renewed the festival and ordinance for himself for ever.

Surah 50:16 And We have already created man and know what his soul whispers to him, and We are closer to him than [his] jugular vein (Surah Qaf [50:16])

According to Shia Islam God does not always do works himself directly he uses the angels to do them.

According to one 
French orientalist and scholar "we" refers to both God and Gabriel the Archangel.

So in the 
book of Jubilee  "We" is used of the angels it is never used as the "Royal WE" (just as in English for royalty). This is how Christians should understand the "We"  and "Us" used in the book of Genesis 1:26, 3:22; 11:7

Next we come to the book of Enoch which lists seven archangels. The Life of Adam and Eve lists the archangels as well: Michael, Gabriel, Uriel, Raphael and Joel. Although this passage does not speak about the angels involed with the creation it does show again an hierarchy among the angels Uriel is in charge of the world and Tartarus, 
Raphael controls or rules over the spirits of men, 

The understanding of seven archangels is also the foundation of the understand about the Hebdomad a group of seven archons which rule over the world and the physical universe

The book of Enoch chapter 20

1. And these are the names of the holy angels who watch.
2. Uriel, one of the holy angels, who is over the world and over Tartarus.
3. Raphael, one of the holy angels, who is over the spirits of men.
4. Raguel, one of the holy angels who †takes vengeance on† the world of the luminaries.
5. Michael, one of the holy angels, to wit, he that is set over the best part of mankind ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ over chaos.
6. Saraqâêl, one of the holy angels, who is set over the spirits, who sin in the spirit.
7. Gabriel, one of the holy angels, who is over Paradise and the serpents and the Cherubim.
8. Remiel, one of the holy angels, whom God set over those who rise.

Jewish Views from Alexandrian 

(1.227) For the scripture says: "I have seen what Laban does unto Thee,"{53}{#ge 31:12.} namely, things contrary to the benefits which I conferred on you, things impure, wicked, and altogether suited to darkness. But it is not right for the man who anchors on the hope of the alliance of God to crouch and tremble, to whom God says, "I am the God who was seen by thee in the place of God." (1.228) A very glorious boast for the soul, that God should think fit to appear to and to converse with it. And do not pass by what is here said, but examine it accurately, and see whether there are really two Gods. For it is said: "I am the God who was seen by thee;" not in my place, but in the place of God, as if he meant of some other God. (1.229) What then ought we to say? There is one true God only: but they who are called Gods, by an abuse of language, are numerous; on which account the holy scripture on the present occasion indicates that it is the true God that is meant by the use of the article, the expression being, "I am the God (ho Theos);" but when the word is used incorrectly, it is put without the article, the expression being, "He who was seen by thee in the place," not of the God (tou Theou), but simply "of God" (Theou); (1.230) and what he here calls God is his most ancient word, not having any superstitious regard to the position of the names, but only proposing one end to himself, namely, to give a true account of the matter; for in other passages the sacred historian, when he considered whether there really was any name belonging to the living God, showed that he knew that there was none properly belonging to him; but that whatever appellation any one may give him, will be an abuse of terms; for the living God is not of a nature to be described, but only to be.


(62) Why is it that he speaks as if of some other god, saying that he made man after the image of God, and not that he made him after his own image? (#Ge 9:6). Very appropriately and without any falsehood was this oracular sentence uttered by God, for no mortal thing could have been formed on the similitude of the supreme Father of the universe, but only after the pattern of the second deity, who is the Word of the supreme Being; since it is fitting that the rational soul of man should bear it the type of the divine Word; since in his first Word God is superior to the most rational possible nature. But he who is superior to the Word holds his rank in a better and most singular pre-eminence, and how could the creature possibly exhibit a likeness of him in himself? Nevertheless he also wished to intimate this fact, that God does rightly and correctly require vengeance, in order to the defence of virtuous and consistent men, because such bear in themselves a familiar acquaintance with his Word, of which the human mind is the similitude and form. (Questions and Answers on Genesis, II)


The logos is only God’s reason, His image, the instrument by which He created the world, or in a more anthropomorphic way, His “first-born son” or His superintendent (On Husbandry 51)


and let every one in his turn say the same thing, for it is very becoming to every man who loves God to study such a song as this, but above all this world should sing it. For God, like a shepherd and a king, governs (as if they were a flock of sheep) the earth, and the water, and the air, and the fire, and all the plants, and living creatures that are in them, whether mortal or divine; and he regulates the nature of the heaven, and the periodical revolutions of the sun and moon, and the variations and harmonious movements of the other stars, ruling them according to law and justice; appointing, as their immediate superintendent, his own right reason (logos), his first-born son, who is to receive the charge of this sacred company, as the lieutenant of the great king; for it is said somewhere, "Behold, I am he! I will send my messenger before thy face, who shall keep thee in the Road."{7}{#ex 23:20.} (On Husbandry)

The Greek word logos is translated reason in 1Peter 3:15 

1Pe 3:15  But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and [be] ready always to [give] an answer to every man that asketh you a reason <3056> of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

(109) For Moses says that he cannot be defiled neither in respect of his father, that is, the mind, nor his mother, that is, the external sense; {26} {#le 21:11.} because, I imagine, he has received imperishable and wholly pure parents, God being his father, who is also the father of all things, and wisdom being his mother, by means of whom the universe arrived at creation; ()

Philo had inferred from the expression "Let us make man" of the Book of Genesis that God had used other beings as assistants in the creation of man, and he explains in this way why man is capable of vice as well as virtue, ascribing the origin of the latter to God, of the former to his helpers in the work of creation

It is on this account that Moses says, at the creation of man alone that God said, "Let us make man," which expression shows an assumption of other beings to himself as assistants, in order that God, the governor of all things, might have all the blameless intentions and actions of man, when he does right attributed to him; and that his other assistants might bear the imputation of his contrary actions. Philo: On the Creation, XXIV"

The Logos or Word, (which was later manifested in the flesh of Jesus making the Christ), was the Master Worker that He used in creating all things. (John 1:1-3; Col 1:13-16; Pr 8:30) 


This Word, or Logos, was God’s only direct creation, the only-begotten son of God

Certainly the Word or Logos, whom God his Father used in bringing into existence all other creatures, was the chief or the firstborn among all the other angels whom the Hebrew Scriptures call elohím or “gods.” 



Gnostic Views 

Irenaeus writes about the Basilides system Those angels who occupy the lowest heaven, that, namely, which is visible to us, formed all the things which are in the world, and made allotments among themselves of the earth and of those nations which are upon it. The chief of them is he who is thought to be the God of the Jews; (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, i. 24, 4.)

menander said that the world was made by the angels the Satornilians, who believed the world was made by only seven angels Epiphanius (Bishop of Constantia in Cyprus) (2009). The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Book I (sects 1-46)Like that of all else is the creation of mankind as well.


The spiritual Logos moved him invisibly, as he perfected him through the Demiurge and his angelic servants, who shared in the act of fashioning in multitudes, when he took counsel with his archons. Like a shadow is earthly man, so that he might be like those who are cut off from the Totalities. Also he is something prepared by all of them, those of the right and those of the left, since each one in the orders gives a form to the [...] in which it exists. (The Tripartite Tractate)


Ptolemy's Letter to Flora:

For it is evident that the Law was not ordained by the perfect God the Father, for it is secondary, being imperfect and in need of completion by another, containing commandments alien to the nature and thought of such a God.
On the other hand, one cannot impute the Law to the injustice of the opposite, God, for it is opposed to injustice. Such persons do not comprehend what was said by the Savior. For a house or city divided against itself cannot stand [Matt 12:25], declared our Savior. Furthermore, the apostle says that creation of the world is due to him, for Everything was made through him and apart from him nothing was made. [John 1:3] Thus he takes away in advance the baseless wisdom of the false accusers, and shows that the creation is not due to a God who corrupts but to the one who is just and hates evil. Only unintelligent men have this idea, men who do not recognize the providence of the creator and have blinded not only the eye of the soul but also of the body. (Ptolemy's Letter to Flora)

Biblical Interpretation

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth

Mr. Parkhurst, in his lexicon under the word alah, cites many passages where Elohim is associated with other plurals. Upon close examination there will be found no goood reason to question the conclusion, that Elohim [translated God in Gen. 1:1] is a noun plural, and signifies "gods" (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

 (Christopher Maddocks)

In the light of this revelation I understand the Mosaic record of the creation. It pleased the King Eternal nearly six thousand years ago to add a new habitable province to His dominion; not by an original creation of a globe, but by the re-constitution of one already existing as one of the solar planets. He commanded His angels to go and execute the work according to the order detailed by Moses. They hearkened unto the voice of His word; and in six days finished all they were commanded to do. (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

But among all these there was not one fit to exercise dominion over the animal world, or to reflect the divine attributes. Therefore, the Elohim said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the living creatures." So Elohim created man in His image; male and female created He them. Further details concerning the formation of the human pair are given in the second chapter of Genesis, verses 7, 18, 21-25. These passages belong to the work of the sixth day; while that from verse 8 to 14 pertains to the record of the third; and from 15 to 17 is parallel with chapter 1:28-31, which completes the history of the sixth. (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

Ge 3:5 For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.

In the Hebrew the word rendered "gods" is Elohim, the same as occurs throughout the first chapter. From what other source but the sight of its eyes, unless by divine inspiration, could the serpent have derived information about the "gods"? It spoke of what it had seen and heard. But the animals were still without a king; therefore, said the Chief of the Elohim, "Let us make man in our image." There was none like the Elohim of all the creatures they had made; therefore, they determined to make an animal after their form. They shaped him with head, limbs and body like their own; so that he stood before them the earthly image of the celestial Elohim. As much their image as Seth was the image of his father Adam. (Gen 5:3) (Elpis Israel Dr. John Thomas)

GOD... US: Elohim. Plural: "sons of God", ie angels (Job 38:7; Gen 3:22; Psa 8:5; cp Num 12:8; Act 7:38; Gen 32:30 with Hos 12:3,4; 1Ki 22:19). The plural prob relates to angels, although the verb here is singular. So God prob entered into consultation with His surrounding hosts and conferred with them on the creation of man in their joint image. Angels involved in creation: Job 38:4-7; Psa 148:2 (describing creative acts of Gen 1); Psa 104:4,5 -- again in a creative context.

"It is credible that they [the Elohim] were once animal men of other spheres; that in a former state they were made subject to vanity not willingly; that while in the flesh they believed and obeyed God; that they succumbed to death as mortal men; that they rose from the dead, and so attained to immortality as the Elohim of the Invisible God. ..."

"Mortal and corruptible beings like ourselves become Elohim, mighty in strength, and framers of new worlds."

"Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them;" and the Yahweh Elohim, on reviewing the stupendous and glorious creation elaborated by the Spirit, pronounced it "VERY GOOD." Then the Elohim, or "Morning Stars sang together, and all the Sons of God shouted for joy" (Job 38:4-7).


so that creation is not the work of ONE GOD only, but of many gods.


Brothers, behold, then, your Gods and Creators



Many early Jewish and Gnostic Christians taught that the work of creation was done by the angels or the logos some groups call these beings the Demiurge and and his angelic servants

Names and Titles of the Deity

Chapter 2:1 And the angel of the presence spake to Moses according to the word of the Lord, saying: Write the complete history of the creation, how in six days the Lord God finished all His works and all that He created, and kept Sabbath on the seventh day and hallowed it for all ages, and appointed it as a sign for all His works.
2 For on the first day He created the heavens which are above and the earth and the waters and all the spirits which serve before him -the angels of the presence, and the angels of sanctification, and the angels [of the spirit of fire and the angels] of the spirit of the winds, and the angels of the spirit of the clouds, and of darkness, and of snow and of hail and of hoar frost, and the angels of the voices and of the thunder and of the lightning, and the angels of the spirits of cold and of heat, and of winter and of spring and of autumn and of summer and of all the spirits of his creatures which are in the heavens and on the earth, (He created) the abysses and the darkness, eventide <and night>, and the light, dawn and day, which He hath prepared in the knowledge of his heart.
3 And thereupon we saw His works, and praised Him, and lauded before Him on account of all His works; for seven great works did He create on the first day.


The angels themselves are ordered in hierarchical fashion and have been since their creation.

Three levels or ranks may be distinguished: the angels of the presence and the holy ones; the angels appointed over the elements and natural phenomena; and the angels appointed over the powers and other created entities (2:2). 

From the names of the two groups—the angels of the presence and the holy angels—one learns how closely related they are to God and why they are rightly styled the two great kinds (2:18). 

Most of the author references to angels are to these two elite classes.

41:1 2-3 record the creations of the first day, seven in number, viz. heaven, earth, the waters, spirits, the abysses, darkness, light.

According to our Book the angels were created on the first day, and this probably represents the view of earlier Judaism.

18 And all the angels of the presence, and all the angels of sanctification, these two great classes -He hath bidden us to keep the Sabbath with Him in heaven and on earth.

Cf. ii. 18, xv. 27, xxxi. 14. These are the two chief orders of angels. The "angels of sanctification" sing praises to God.

41:4 The various classes of angels that follow constitute the third or lowest order. They preside over the elements and natural phenomena; cf. 1 Enoch lx. 12-21, lxxv., lxxx.; 2 Enoch xix. 1-4, For the "angels of the winds," cf. Rev. vii. 1 f.; 1 Enoch xviii. 1-5, xxxiv.-xxxvi., lxxvi.



Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth

"God created" — The Hebrew is bar a Elohim: a verb in the singular number combined with a noun in the plural : "Mighty ones he created" (J. Thomas, Phanerosis p. 51). The use of a singular verb with a plural noun suggests one motivating power manifested through a multiplicity of agents. The one motivating power in creation was the "Spirit of God" (v. 2) or Yahweh Who worked through the angels to bring the creation into existence. 

This intimate relationship, so intimate as to constitute a Unity in plurality, (but not a plurality in the absolute and primary Power the source of all) is expressed in Isaiah 45:18, "Thus, saith Yahweh, that created the heavens hu ha-Elohim, He the Elohim that formed the earth and made it; He hath established it. He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited. I Yahweh, and none without." In this text Yahweh is twice repeated. This expresses one, being in the singular number; but Elohim is plural expressing two or a multitude; 

and this noun of multitude is prefaced, not by they as they the Elohim; but by 'He', as He the Elohim. This unusual feature is doctrinal not accidental, nor an arbitrary custom of language, but designed. It teaches that the creation was produced from one power ex ou, out of which, are all things, and that this one power operated through a plurality of agents, or Elohim, who are the spirit-embodiments of its rays" {Phanerosis p. 52).

SPIRIT OF GOD: Heb "ruach Elohim": "The spirit strength of the Mighty Ones". "Spirit" = the "wisdom" of Pro 8:22-26

“By the Word of Yahweh were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth” (Psa. 33:6).

Yahweh gave the command, and the Angels obeyed. He said: “let there be light, and there was light” (Gen. 1:3). “He spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast” (cp. Psa. 33:9). So it was that the Angels (Hebrew: Elohim—see Psa. 8:5) were the agents through which the Almighty accomplished His Will in creating the Heavens and Earth. So it is that we read in Genesis chapter 1: “In the beginning, Elohim created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1).

The Fall in the Tripartite Tractate






The Logos in the Tripartite Tractate

The Tripartite Tractate view of the Fall



# **The Tripartite Tractate View of the Fall**  

## **The Logos and the Fall**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* presents a distinct perspective on the Fall, attributing it not to Sophia but to the Logos. This sets it apart from other Gnostic traditions, which often describe the Fall as originating from Sophia's misguided desire. Instead, the *Tripartite Tractate* portrays the Logos as the Aeon responsible for the disordered creation and subsequent fall.  

### **The Fall in the Tripartite Tractate**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* describes how the Logos acted outside of his proper bounds, leading to the disorder and fragmentation of creation:  

> "The intent, then, of the Logos, who is this one, was good. When he had come forth, he gave glory to the Father, even if it led to something beyond possibility, since he had wanted to bring forth one who is perfect, from an agreement in which he had not been, and without having the command.  
> This aeon was last to have <been> brought forth by mutual assistance, and he was small in magnitude. And before he begot anything else for the glory of the will and in agreement with the Totalities, he acted, magnanimously, from an abundant love, and set out toward that which surrounds the perfect glory, for it was not without the will of the Father that the Logos was produced, which is to say, not without it will he go forth." (*Tripartite Tractate* 100.21-30)  

The Logos, attempting to bring forth perfection without proper authorization, initiated a process that resulted in disorder. The text continues:  

> "For, he was not able to bear the sight of the light, but he looked into the depth and he doubted. Out of this there was a division—he became deeply troubled—and a turning away because of his self-doubt and division, forgetfulness and ignorance of himself and <of that> which is." (*Tripartite Tractate* 100.21-30)  

This passage directly links the Fall to the Logos, depicting his doubt and ignorance as the cause of division and fragmentation in creation.  

### **Irenaeus on Sophia and the Fall**  

In contrast, Irenaeus rejects the idea that Sophia, as an Aeon of Wisdom, could experience ignorance and passion:  

> “How can it be regarded as otherwise ridiculous, that (wisdom) was involved in ignorance, corruption, and passion? For these things are alien and contrary to wisdom, nor can they ever be qualities belonging to it. For wherever there is a lack of anything beneficial and an ignorance of knowledge, there wisdom does not exist.” (*Against Heresies* 1.2.2)  

Irenaeus argues that Wisdom (Sophia) cannot suffer from ignorance, reinforcing the *Tripartite Tractate’s* perspective that the Fall was not Sophia’s doing but rather the consequence of the Logos’ misguided action.  

### **The Logos in Biblical Usage**  

The Greek term *logos* (λόγος) has a variety of meanings in Scripture, including:  

- **Reason, thought, or account** (*Matthew 22:15*, *Luke 16:2*).  
- **A decree or order** (*Acts 19:40*).  
- **Divine expression (John 1:1-3)*.  

For instance, in *John 1:1-3*:  

> “In the beginning was the Word (*Logos*), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Through him all things were made; without him, nothing was made that has been made.”  

The *Tripartite Tractate* differentiates between the divine Logos of John and the Logos responsible for the Fall, showing that *logos* can be used generically for Aeons rather than referring solely to the Son of God.  

### **The Fall and Adam in Scripture**  

In contrast to the Gnostic Sophia myth, the Bible attributes the Fall to Adam rather than Eve:  

> “Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.” (*Romans 5:12*)  

Eve was deceived, but Adam willingly disobeyed (*1 Timothy 2:13-14*), much like the Logos in the *Tripartite Tractate*. The Fall, then, is a result of deliberate action, not of ignorance or accident.  

### **The Logos and the Demiurge in Valentinian Thought**  

Valentinian teacher Heracleon viewed the Demiurge positively, describing him as the agent of the Logos in creation:  

> “All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word 'from whom' or 'by whom,' but the one 'through whom (all things were made).'” (*Heracleon on John 1:3*, *Commentary on John*)  

This aligns with the *Tripartite Tractate*, which describes the Logos as the organizing force behind the cosmos.  

### **Conclusion**  

The *Tripartite Tractate* offers a unique perspective on the Fall, attributing it to the Logos rather than Sophia. This differs from other Valentinian texts and Gnostic traditions that place responsibility on Sophia. The text portrays the Logos as acting beyond his limits, leading to disorder, a view supported by Irenaeus’ rejection of Sophia’s involvement in ignorance. Additionally, the Logos’ role aligns with biblical teachings on Adam’s responsibility for sin. Heracleon’s description of the Demiurge further reinforces that the *Tripartite Tractate’s* Logos is not identical with the divine *Logos* in *John 1:1-3*, but a distinct Aeon who caused creation’s fragmentation.











First a quote from the Tripartite Tractate

The intent, then, of the Logos, who is this one, was good. When he had come forth, he gave glory to the Father, even if it led to something beyond possibility, since he had wanted to bring forth one who is perfect, from an agreement in which he had not been, and without having the command.
This aeon was last to have <been> brought forth by mutual assistance, and he was small in magnitude. And before he begot anything else for the glory of the will and in agreement with the Totalities, he acted, magnanimously, from an abundant love, and set out toward that which surrounds the perfect glory, for it was not without the will of the Father that the Logos was produced, which is to say, not without it will he go forth. But he, the Father, had brought him forth for those about whom he knew that it was fitting that they should come into being.
The Father and the Totalities drew away from him, so that the limit which the Father had set might be established - for it is not from grasping the incomprehensibility but by the will of the Father, - and furthermore, (they withdrew) so that the things which have come to be might become an organization which would come into being. If it were to come, it would not come into being by the manifestation of the Pleroma. Therefore, it is not fitting to criticize the movement which is the Logos, but it is fitting that we should say about the movement of the Logos that it is a cause of an organization which has been destined to come about.
The Logos himself caused it to happen, being complete and unitary, for the glory of the Father, whom he desired, and (he did so) being content with it, but those whom he wished to take hold of firmly he begot in shadows and copies and likenesses. For, he was not able to bear the sight of the light, but he looked into the depth and he doubted. Out of this there was a division - he became deeply troubled - and a turning away because of his self-doubt and division, forgetfulness and ignorance of himself and <of that> which is.

What does Irenaeus say about the Fall of Sophia

Irenaeus against heresies: How can it be regarded as otherwise ridiculous, that (wisdom) was involved in ignorance, corruption, and passion? For these things are alien and contrary to wisdom, nor can they ever be qualities belonging to it. For wherever there is a lack of any thing beneficial and an ignorance of knowledge, there wisdom does not exist. Let them therefore no longer call this suffering Aeon, Sophia, but let them give up either her name or her sufferings. And let them, moreover, not call their entire Pleroma spiritual, if this Aeon had a place within it when she was involved in such a tumult of passion. For even a vigorous soul, not to say a spiritual substance, would not pass through any such experience.

the tripartite tractate contens an early form of Christian Gnosticism which differs complets from other Gnostic texts when it comes to the Fall

Now let's a look at the bible's use of Logos 


3056 λόγος logos log’-os 


some of the meanings of the word 

 its use as respect to the MIND alone 
2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning, calculating 
2b) account, i.e. regard, consideration 
2c) account, i.e. reckoning, score its use as respect to the MIND alone 
2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning, calculating 
2b) account, i.e. regard, consideration 
2c) account, i.e. reckoning, score

decree, mandate or order reason, cause, ground, 



Mt 5:32  But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause <3056> of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.


Mt 22:15  Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk <3056>.


Lu 16:2  And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account <3056> of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.


60 ¶  Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying <3056>; who can hear it?

66  From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Act 19:40  For we are in danger to be called in question for this day’s uproar, there being no cause whereby we may give an account <3056> of this concourse.


Looking at these Bible quotes we can see that there are many uses of the word logos not all of them referring to the divine logos

The tripartite tractate associate the fall with logos and not with Sophia.  In fact, the fallen aeon is not called Sophia at all, but simply a logos, or word (logos being used as a generic name for the aeons).

I've always felt it wrong that sophia (wisdom) in Gnosticism is the bad guy that created sin that's just really absurd and it complete doesn't make any sense at all

In the Bible Eve is not responsible for sin Adam is, we see this in Paul’s statement at Romans 5:12-19, which places the responsibility for sin upon Adam. Compare 
tripartite tractate 
107.20–108.12

“And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.”

This gives no indication that Eve deceived Adam or seduced him into eating.  In fact, Adam is partially blaming God for the woman's presence.  At the same time he was trying to place the responsibility on Eve for HIS disobedience.  Yet there is NOT ONE accusation against Eve throughout the scriptures, except to state that she, being deceived, was in the transgression (1 Timothy 2:13-15 “For Adam was First formed, then Eve.  And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.  Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.”)


Eve was deceived by the Serpent, but “Adam was not deceived,” says the apostle Paul. (1Tim 2:14) With full knowledge Adam willfully and deliberately chose to disobey and then as a criminal he tried to hide. When brought to trial, instead of showing sorrow or regret or asking for forgiveness, Adam attempted to justify himself and pass the responsibility off on others, even blaming God for his own willful sin. “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit from the tree and so I ate.” (Gem 3:7-12)

Tri. Trac. 107.20–108.12: This is the expulsion which was made for him, when he was expelled from the enjoyments of the things which belong to the likeness and those of the representation. It was a work of providence, so that it might be found that it is a short time until man will receive the enjoyment of the things which are eternally good, in which is the place of rest. This the spirit ordained when he first planned that man should experience the great evil, which is death, that is complete ignorance of the Totality, and that he should experience all the evils which come from this and, after the deprivations and cares which are in these, that he should receive of the greatest good, which is life eternal, that is, firm knowledge of the Totalities and the reception of all good things. Because of the transgression of the first man, death ruled. (Romans 5:17) It was accustomed to slay every man in the manifestation of its domination, which had been given it as a kingdom because of the organization of the Father's will, of which we spoke previously.


Therefore since sin came by one man it stands to reason that Sophia is not responsible for the fall the Logos is


The account in the Gospel of Truth is also extrememly relevant here. The opening paragraphs of the Gospel of Truth describe the Fall. It contains no explicit references to mythological figures familiar from other Valentinian texts (e.g. Sophia, the demiurge, etc.). However, these passages do refer to a semi-personified "error."

Both Error and Logos fail in their quest to find the Father.

"He is the lord of all of them, that is, the countenance which the logos (i.e. Error) brought forth in his thought as a representation of the Father of the Totalities. Therefore, he is adorned with every name which is a representation of him, since he is characterized by every property and glorious quality. For he too is called 'father' and 'god' and 'demiurge' and 'king' and 'judge' and 'place' and 'dwelling' and 'law'" (Tripartite Tractate 100:21-30).


Ptolemy interprets the same passage in terms of the Aeons in the Fullness (pleroma) in his Commentary on the Prologue of John quoted in Irenaeus Against Heresies1:8:5 (cf also Excerpts of Theodotus 6:4). In this case, Ptolemy interprets the passage to refer to the Aeon Word (logos) who, along with his partner Life (zoe), is the one who is responsible for the creation of all subsequent Aeons


Heracleon a Valentinian teacher describes the the demiurge in relatively positive terms as the logos's agent and hence ultimately the Father's agent in creation 


Fragments from a Commentary on the Gospel of John by Heracleon Fragment 1, on John 1:3 (In John 1:3, “All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made.”) The sentence: "All things were made through him" means the world and what is in it. It excludes what is better than the world. The Aeon (i.e. the Fullness), and the things in it, were not made by the Word; they came into existence before the Word. . . “Without him, nothing was made” of what is in the world and the creation. . . "All things were made through Him," means that it was the Word who caused the Craftsman (Demiurge) to make the world, that is it was not the Word “from whom” or “by whom,” but the one “through whom (all things were made).”. . . It was not the Word who made all things, as if he were energized by another, for "through whom" means that another made them and the Word provided the energy. 

The Father the single One created the universe 52.4-6 It is, then, only the Father and God in the proper sense that no one else begot. As for the Totalities, he is the one who begot them and created them. He is without beginning and without end.

However, the perpetuation of the cosmos through the creation of physical bodies is accomplished through the logos



Now this Logos is different than the Son. or this first thought in the tripartite tractate
the Gospel of John the logos and the Son of God are one and the same

The point made may be a distinction between the logos as willed by the Father and as originating in him, cf. 75:23-24.






The Father is the Tree of Life in The Tripartite Tractate

The Father is the Tree of Life in The Tripartite Tractate



The Tree of Life, Wisdom, and the Limbs of the Ineffable

The expression “tree of life” carries profound symbolic meaning in Scripture and in the sacred mysteries. It is not merely a botanical metaphor, but a living image of wisdom, fruitfulness, speech, endurance, and the unfolding fullness of the divine mind. The Scriptures use this expression in connection with righteousness, fulfilled desire, healing speech, and eternal reward. It also becomes the pattern through which the structure of the ineffable Totality may be understood.

The book of Proverbs declares:

“She is a tree of life to those who take hold of her, And happy are all who hold her fast.” (Pr 3:18)

Here wisdom is explicitly identified as a tree of life. This wisdom is not abstract philosophy but living, active insight. The text does not describe wisdom as an object but as something to be grasped and held fast. It produces happiness. Thus the “tree of life” is associated with true wisdom, the fruitage of the righteous, the realization of a thing desired, and calmness of the tongue (Pr 11:30; 13:12; 15:4). It is also linked with endurance and reward, being associated with “the crown of life” (Re 2:7, 10).

Wisdom here is personified. It stands as a manifestation or aspect of the Deity’s own mind—his thought extended and expressed. The tree is therefore not separate from its root. It grows from the source of being itself.

The message of the Deity is likewise described as seed:

“The seed is the word of God.” (Lu 8:11)

And the explanation continues:

“As for that in the fine soil, these are the ones who, after hearing the word with a fine and good heart, retain it and bear fruit with endurance.” (Lu 8:15)

The word is seed; wisdom is a tree; righteousness bears fruit. The imagery is internally consistent. The word, when planted in receptive soil, becomes fruitful life. It unfolds, expands, and multiplies. The Psalmist affirms the dynamic power of this word:

“He sends out his word, and it runs with speed.” (Ps 147:15)

The word is not static; it moves, grows, and produces. Thus Scripture presents a living pattern: root, seed, growth, fruit.

This same pattern appears in the sacred exposition of the ineffable Totality. The text known as The Tripartite Tractate begins with the root:

“As for what we can say about the things which are exalted, what is fitting is that we begin with the Father, who is the root of the Totality, the one from whom we have received grace to speak about him.”

The Father is described as root—hidden, foundational, the source from which all proceeds. The text continues:

“He existed before anything other than himself came into being. The Father is singular while being many, for he is the first one and the one who is only himself… the single one, who alone is the Father, is like a root, with tree, branches and fruit.”

Here the entire structure of reality is described as a tree. The root remains unseen beneath the surface, yet from it spring trunk, branches, and fruit. The Father is not isolated; he is generative. As the text states, if there is “father,” there must be “son.” Thus the root necessarily implies extension.

The mystery is further explained in Pistis Sophia:

“They are as the Limbs of the inexpressible....There is a multitude of limbs but only one body.”

The limbs are many; the body is one. Diversity exists within unity. The ineffable source expresses itself in structured fullness without division.

Another exposition deepens this root imagery:

“He is, the Father, that is, the Root of the All, the Ineffable One who dwells in the Monad. He dwells alone in silence… and his Pair is Silence.”

Silence here is not emptiness but tranquility. From this Monad arises Mind:

“God came forth: the Son, Mind of the All… from the Root of the All that even his Thought stems.”

The Son is Mind of the All—the conscious expression of the root. He is described further:

“He is a spring. He is one who appears in Silence, and he is Mind of the All… For he is the projector of the All and the very hypostasis of the Father, that is, he is the Thought and his descent below.”

The spring imagery echoes the tree. Root and spring both signify source. From the hidden depth flows living water; from the hidden root grows the tree.

In the structured emanational order, the first extensions from the root are described as Silence (Sigē) and Grace (Charis). From these proceed Nous (Mind) and Aletheia (Truth). These form the androgynous fullness called the Monogenes. This is not multiplicity of independent beings but unfolding aspects of the one ineffable source—mental powers expanding from the primal thought.

The visible base of the tree is Logos (Word) and Zoe (Life). As the exposition states:

“That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church… Word is for the glory of the Ineffable One while Life is for the glory of Silence, and Man is for his own glory, while Church is for the glory of Truth.”

The Tetrad unfolds into Decad and Dodecad, forming a Triacontad—thirty structured expressions of the divine mind. These are not primordial independent beings but aspects of thought ordered into fullness.

The Pleroma—“that which fills”—is the body. It is the children, the Church, the fullness that occupies the space of divine expression. The limbs are named in paired attributes: Bythios and Mixis; Ageratos and Henosis; Autophyes and Hedone; Acinetos and Syncrasis; Monogenes and Macaria. These are qualities—depth, mixture, agelessness, union, essential nature, pleasure, immovability, commixture, only-begottenness, happiness. They describe internal states of the divine fullness.

The branches extend further in pairs: Paracletus and Pistis; Patricas and Elpis; Metricos and Agape; Ainos and Synesis; Ecclesiasticus and Macariotes; Theletus and Sophia. These again are attributes—comfort, faith, paternal quality, hope, maternal quality, love, praise, intelligence, blessedness, wisdom. The tree is abundant.

Finally, fruit emerges. The text declares:

“Moreover, it is the one from the Triacontad of the Aeons who bear fruit… they come forth singly, fleeing from the Aeons and the Uncontainable Ones.”

And further:

“Again, the will of the Father is: always produce and bear fruit.”

Fruitfulness is the will of the root. Production, expansion, manifestation—this is the natural activity of the divine mind.

Thus the tree of life in Proverbs is not isolated symbolism. It corresponds to the entire structure of divine wisdom. Wisdom is the tree; the word is seed; righteousness bears fruit; the Father is root; Mind is spring; Word and Life form the base; the fullness is body; attributes are limbs and branches; fruit is manifestation.

The aeons, therefore, are not separate persons controlled externally. They are aspects of the mind of the Deity—mental powers unfolding from primal thought into ordered fullness. Just as a tree does not consist of disconnected parts but of organically unified growth from one root, so the Totality unfolds from the Root of the All.

To take hold of wisdom is to grasp the tree of life. To receive the word as seed is to become fruitful soil. To understand the root is to perceive the unity behind multiplicity. The crown of life promised in Revelation is not separate from this structure; it is participation in the living fullness that flows from the ineffable Root.

Thus Scripture and sacred exposition converge in a single image: a living tree whose root is hidden, whose trunk is Word and Life, whose branches are attributes, whose limbs are powers, and whose fruit is the realized fullness of divine thought.









Original text

The expression “tree of life” is used with regard to true wisdom, the fruitage of the righteous, the realization of a thing desired, and calmness of the tongue; it is also associated with the crown of life. (Pr 3:18; 11:30; 13:12; 15:4; Re 2:7, 10

. God’s word or message is like “seed,” which, if planted in good soil, brings forth much fruitage (Lu 8:11-15); his sayings are also said to ‘run with speed.’—Ps 147:15

Wisdom is called the tree of life in the book of Proverbs see Proverbs 3:18

She is a tree of life to those who take hold of her, And happy are all who hold her fast.
wisdom is a personification of God or an aspect of God

The tree of life is used with regard to true wisdom, God’s word or message is like “seed,” which, if planted in good soil, brings forth much fruitage (Lu 8:11-15).

As for what we can say about the things which are exalted, what is fitting is that we begin with the Father, who is the root of the Totality, the one from whom we have received grace to speak about him.
2. The Father
He existed before anything other than himself came into being. The Father is singular while being many, for he is the first one and the one who is only himself.  Yet he is not like a solitary individual. Otherwise, how could he be a father? For whenever there is a "father," the name "son" follows. But the single one, who alone is the Father, is like a root, with tree, branches and fruit.

The Tripartite Tractate, is an explanation of the limbs of the ineffable


Of the Limbs of the Ineffable."

AND those who are worthy of the mysteries which abide in the inexpressible, which are those which have not gone forth,--these exist before the First Mystery, and to use a likeness and similitude, that ye may understand it, they are as the Limbs of the inexpressible....There is a multitude of limbs but only one body.....For this cause he who hath found the words of those mysteries, is like unto him.....[sc. the First, i.e. the inexpressible], Pistis Sophia

Moreover it is these who have known him who is, the Father, that is, the Root of the All, the Ineffable One who dwells in the Monad. He dwells alone in silence, and silence is tranquility since, after all, he was a Monad and no one was before him. He dwells in the Dyad and in the Pair, and his Pair is Silence. And he possessed the All dwelling within him. And as for Intention and Persistence, Love and Permanence, they are indeed unbegotten. God came forth: the Son, Mind of the All, that is, it is from the Root of the All that even his Thought stems, since he had this one (the Son) in Mind. For on behalf of the All, he received an alien Thought since there were nothing before him. From that place it is he who moved [...] a gushing spring. Now this is the Root of the All and Monad without any one before him. Now the second spring exists in silence and speaks with him alone. And the Fourth accordingly is he who restricted himself in the Fourth (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

Let me explain this in this manner........ A Tree that grows Multiple Fruit is as the limbs of the inexpressible, let us begin at the root, there is the main root that remains hidden is the very source of the tree = The Father- The Bythos:

There also the First extensions of the root that spreads out from the main root Bythos, is called = Holy Spirit - sigē or charis (Grace), which has extensions from it, this secondary root has two emanations which are aspects or attributes, Nous Νοΰς (Nus, Mind) and Aletheia Άλήθεια (, Truth) Nous and Aletheia make up the androdinous emanation of the son the Monogenes

While these things are due to the Root of the All, let us for our part enter his revelation and his goodness and his descent and the All, that is, the Son, the Father of the All, and the Mind of the Spirit; for he was possessing this one before [...]. He is a spring. He is one who appears in Silence, and he is Mind of the All dwelling secondarily with Life. For he is the projector of the All and the very hypostasis of the Father, that is, he is the Thought and his descent below. (The Nag Hammadi Library
A Valentinian Exposition)

Now we move on to the base of the tree/stump, or base which is called = Logos (the Word; Logos Λόγος) and Zoe (the Life; Zoe Ζωή) which is the visible beginning part of the tree, the inner most part is call = Zoe-Logos, and he also has extensions called= Anthropos Άνθρωπος (Homo, Man) and Ecclesia Έκκλησία[5

That Tetrad projected the Tetrad which is the one consisting of Word and Life and Man and Church. Now the Uncreated One projected Word and Life. Word is for the glory of the Ineffable One while Life is for the glory of Silence, and Man is for his own glory, while Church is for the glory of Truth. This, then, is the Tetrad begotten according to the likeness of the Uncreated (Tetrad). And the Tetrad is begotten [... ] the Decad from Word and Life, and the Dodecad from Man, and Church became a Triacontad. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

The body- which is the children, the church we are called = Pleroma: 'that which fills' - we fill the space between Christ and the remaining 22 aeons

on to the Limbs which is called Bythios (Profound) and Mixis (Mixture)

Ageratos (Never old) and Henosis (Union)

Autophyes (Essential nature) and Hedone (Pleasure)

Acinetos (Immovable) and Syncrasis (Commixture)

Monogenes (Only-begotten) and Macaria (Happiness)



The Branches- are the emanations of Paracletus (Comforter) and Pistis (Faith)

Patricas (Paternal) and Elpis (Hope)

Metricos (Maternal) and Agape (Love)

Ainos (Praise) and Synesis (Intelligence)

Ecclesiasticus (Son of Ecclesia) and Macariotes (Blessedness)

Theletus (Perfect) and Sophia (Wisdom)


And last the fruit - is the emanations of they that were emanated by the aeons.

Moreover, it is the one from the Triacontad of the Aeons who bear fruit from the Triacontrad. They enter jointly, but they come forth singly, fleeing from the Aeons and the Uncontainable Ones. And the Uncontainable Ones, once they had looked at him, glorified Mind since he is an Uncontainable One that exists in the Pleroma.I deserve the things (passions) I suffer. I used to dwell in the Pleroma putting forth the Aeons and bearing fruit with my consort" And she knew what she was and what had become of her.Again, the will of the Father is: always produce and bear fruit. That she should suffer, then, was not the will of the Father, for she dwells in herself alone without her consort. Let us [...] another one [...] the Second [...] the son of another [...] is the Tetrad of the world. And that Tetrad put forth fruit as if the Pleroma of the world were a Hebdomad. And it entered images and likenesses and angels and archangels, divinities and ministers. (The Nag Hammadi Library A Valentinian Exposition)

The aeons are not persons or primordial beings controlled by the Father they are aspects of the mind of God or mental powers, unfolding or expanding from its thought to become an idea


Wednesday, 5 March 2025

The Logos is an Angel

The Logos is an Angel







**The Logos as an Angel**


**Welcome to Pleroma Pathways, apocalyptic and mystic Christianity, where we explore esoteric and apocalyptic texts.**


The concept of the *Logos* as an angelic being is deeply embedded in ancient Jewish and Hellenistic  thought, particularly in the writings of Philo  of Alexandria. Philo describes the *Logos* as a mediator between God and the world, an intermediary power that functions as God’s messenger and creative agent. In this framework, the *Logos* takes on characteristics commonly associated with angels, particularly in its role as the divine Word, the great archangel, and the ruler of Israel.




### **Philo’s Description of the Logos as an Angel**


Philo of Alexandria explicitly refers to the *Logos* as an angelic being. In *On the Confusion of Tongues* 146, he writes:


> “And even  if there  be not as yet anyone who is worthy to be called  a son of God, nevertheless let him labor earnestly to be adorned according  to His first-born word (*Logos*), the eldest of his angels, as the great archangel of many names; for he is called the authority, and the name of God, and the word (*Logos*), and man according to God’s image, and he who sees Israel.”


Here, the *Logos* is directly called “the eldest of His  angels” and “the great archangel.” This passage highlights  the *Logos* as the firstborn of God’s heavenly host,  emphasizing its function as a divine messenger and ruler over Israel.


In *On Dreams* 1.215, Philo further describes the *Logos* as the angelic presence of God:


> "For God, as Shepherd and King, leads all things according to justice; and the divine Word (*Logos*) is the divider of all things, and the captain and pilot of the universe, and the law by which all things are directed. But some say that He is Himself a man, and that he is called 'the Being' (*ho ōn*), and that he is the eldest of the angels, both the ruler of Israel and the visible Lord, who, being the eldest of all, is called the Archangel."


Philo’s description aligns with the Jewish belief that God communicates with the world through angelic intermediaries. The *Logos*, as the highest angelic being, functions as God's visible manifestation and ruler of Israel, similar to the Angel of the Lord in the Hebrew Scriptures.


### **The Logos and the Angel of the Lord**


The *Logos* shares attributes with the Angel of the Lord in the Hebrew Bible, who speaks on behalf of God and is often identified with God’s presence. For example, in Exodus 3:2-6, the Angel of Yahweh appears in the burning bush, yet the text later states that it was God speaking. This duality mirrors Philo’s conception of the *Logos* as both distinct from and unified with God.


Additionally, Exodus 23:20-23 describes an angel sent to guide Israel, stating that “my name is in him.” This aligns with Philo’s description of the *Logos* as “the name of God” and suggests that the *Logos* was understood as an angelic manifestation of the divine will.


### **The Logos in Relation to the Aeons and Emanations**


The Valentinian tradition later incorporated a similar understanding of the *Logos* as an emanation from the divine. According to the followers of Valentinus:


> “The Angel is a Logos having a message from Him who is. And, using the same terminology, they call the Aeons Logoi.”


Here, the angelic function of the *Logos* is emphasized in relation to divine emanations, reinforcing the idea that the *Logos* serves as a divine intermediary, much like the angelic host in Jewish cosmology.


### **The Logos and the Role of Angels in Creation**


The Book of Jubilees describes the angels as God’s agents in creation:


And the angel of the presence spoke to Moses according to the word of Yahweh, saying: Write the complete generations of the creation, how in six days Yahweh Elohim finished all his works and all that he created... For on the first day he created the heavens which are above and the earth and the waters and all the spirits which minister before him; the angels of the presence, and the angels of sanctification..."


The connection between the Logos and the angelic hosts aligns with the idea that divine intermediaries execute God's will. Psalm 33:6 states:


> “By the Word of Yahweh were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth” (Psalm 33:6).


The *Logos* is often associated with the creative power of God, acting as the agent through which the heavens and earth were formed. Genesis 1:3 states, “Let there be light,” and it was the *Logos*—as the divine Word—that brought light into being. This creative role aligns with Philo’s depiction of the *Logos* as a mediator between the transcendent God and the material world.


The Emanation of the Logos and the Angels
In Jewish and early Christian thought, angels are often understood as emanations of the divine, extending God's presence into the world while maintaining His transcendence. Philo expresses this view when he describes the Logos as an "emanation" or an "offspring" of God, similar to how angels are portrayed.


The Logos is thus not separate from God but a direct extension of His will. As Philo states in On the Migration of Abraham (6):For it was impossible that anything mortal should be formed in the similitude of the supreme Father of the universe, but it could only be made in the likeness of the second God, who is the Word (Logos) of the supreme Being; since it is fitting that the rational soul of man should bear it as an impression of the Word, since the Word is the eldest-born image of God."


While Philo calls the Logos the "second God," he does not mean an independent deity but rather a divine emanation fulfilling the role of the highest angelic being.


### **Conclusion**


Philo’s descriptions of the *Logos* align closely with the Jewish concept of an angelic mediator. As “the eldest of the angels” and “the great archangel,” the *Logos* functions as the divine Word, the visible Lord, and the ruler of Israel. The *Logos* shares characteristics with the Angel of Yahweh, serves as God’s agent in creation, and acts as the mediator between the transcendent God and the material world.


This understanding of the *Logos* influenced later Christian thought, particularly in the Gospel of John, which identifies Jesus as the *Logos* made flesh. However, within Philo’s framework, the *Logos* remains an angelic power, the highest of God’s messengers, revealing divine will to humanity.