**The Corresponding Ransom: Why the Ransom of Jesus Is Not a Commercial Transaction**
The expression “ransom of Jesus” is widely used to describe the means by which humanity is delivered from sin and death. However, the language of ransom in Scripture must be understood carefully. It does not describe a commercial payment, nor a literal financial exchange in which someone receives compensation. Rather, the biblical idea of ransom refers to deliverance accomplished through death and resurrection, leading to forgiveness and reconciliation.
Jesus himself defined his mission in these terms: “The Son of Man came not to be ministered unto but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Matt. 20:28; Mark 10:45). Likewise, Paul wrote, “There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all” (1 Tim. 2:5–6). These passages raise important questions: What was paid? To whom was it paid? And in what sense was it a ransom?
If ransom language were understood commercially, then someone must receive payment. Yet Scripture never identifies a payee. The idea that God receives payment is problematic, since the Creator needs nothing. Moreover, Scripture teaches that “the wages of sin is death” (Rom. 6:23). Death is not a debt owed to God but the consequence of sin itself. Thus the ransom cannot be a literal payment satisfying divine need.
Popular preaching often reduces the matter to substitution imagery, portraying Christ as paying humanity’s debts or dying instead of others. Christ is imagined as stepping into a criminal’s place, absorbing punishment so others escape consequences. But this comparison fails when measured against biblical facts. If Christ literally died instead of humanity, then humanity should no longer die, yet death continues. Furthermore, if death were fully paid as a penalty, Christ should have remained dead. Instead, he rose again. Paul insists that resurrection is essential: “If Christ be not raised, your faith is vain: ye are yet in your sins” (1 Cor. 15:17). Redemption does not rest solely in death but in the victory over death.
If debts were literally paid, forgiveness would become meaningless. A creditor who receives payment from another cannot claim to have forgiven the debtor. Yet Scripture consistently emphasizes forgiveness as an act of divine mercy. Romans 3:25 declares that God presented Christ “to declare His righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God.” Forgiveness arises from divine patience and mercy, not from financial settlement.
Apostolic preaching continually emphasizes forgiveness: “Through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins.” Believers are told, “Be baptized for the remission of sins,” and reminded that “God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.” Salvation is repeatedly attributed to mercy and grace: “According to His mercy He saved us” (Titus 3:5), and believers are “justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 3:24). Likewise, “God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them” (2 Cor. 5:19).
These passages show that forgiveness is granted through divine mercy, not because a debt was commercially paid. If payment settled the matter automatically, forgiveness would be unnecessary, and salvation would belong to humanity by right. Yet Scripture teaches that forgiveness is received through faith and obedience, not claimed as entitlement.
Further problems arise if ransom is treated as commercial substitution. If Christ transferred humanity’s debt to himself, then by purchase he would become owner of humanity rather than God. Moreover, if Christ possessed an entirely separate, uncondemned life unlike other humans, his sacrifice would differ in nature from humanity itself. Yet Scripture affirms shared human nature: “There is one flesh of men” (1 Cor. 15:39), and Christ was “the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim. 2:5), sharing “flesh and blood” with his brethren (Heb. 2:14). Hebrews continues: “For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham’s descendants. For this reason he had to be made like them, fully human in every way” (Heb. 2:16–17).
Thus redemption occurs within shared human nature, not through substitution detached from it. Christ’s death and resurrection belong to the same human condition humanity experiences. If Christ’s death functioned as complete commercial payment, resurrection would contradict the transaction. One cannot pay a debt with money and then receive the money back. Yet Jesus declared authority over his own life: “I lay down my life… and I have power to take it again” (John 10:17–18). Resurrection demonstrates victory, not reversal of payment.
Scripture also uses redemption language without implying financial exchange. Believers are urged to redeem time wisely: “Redeeming the time” (Col. 4:5), which obviously involves no monetary payment. Likewise, believers are described as “bought with a price” (1 Cor. 6:20), expressing dedication to righteousness rather than ownership transfer through commerce.
Paul, reflecting on Hosea’s prophecy, celebrates deliverance from death: “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” He explains, “The sting of death is sin” (1 Cor. 15:55–56). Death’s power arises from sin, not from some external payment demand. Romans 5:12 similarly states, “Death by sin.” Thus redemption addresses the root problem of sin and death, not a financial obligation.
Christ’s mission therefore involves confronting sin within human nature and overcoming death through obedience and resurrection. His death was not merely representative suffering but part of a process culminating in new life. As Scripture declares, Christ “tasted death for every man” (Heb. 2:9), and believers share in that process: “If we died together with him, we shall also live together” (2 Tim. 2:11).
The resurrection is therefore essential. Without it, faith would be futile, and humanity would remain in sin. Redemption involves not simply death endured, but death overcome. Forgiveness flows from divine mercy, made possible through participation in this redemptive process.
Thus the ransom of Jesus must not be understood as a commercial exchange or substitutionary payment. Instead, it is the accomplishment of deliverance through death and resurrection within shared human nature. God remains the initiator of reconciliation, acting through mercy and righteousness rather than financial transaction.
In summary, Scripture presents ransom, redemption, reconciliation, and justification as expressions of divine grace. Christ’s life, death, and resurrection reveal God’s righteousness and open the way for forgiveness and renewal. Redemption is therefore not a matter of payment received, but liberation achieved — not commercial settlement, but transformation leading from death to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment