THE CHURCH OF LOVE
THE CHURCH OF LOVE - from a Cathar text of the year 1148. The Church of Love has no structure, only understanding. It has no members, only those who feel and know that they belong to it. It has no rivals, because it does not feed the spirit of competition. It has no ambition, it only seeks to serve. It knows no boundaries, because love has no boundaries. It is not limited to itself, it seeks to enrich all groups and all religions. It recognizes all the great teachings that have manifested the Truth of Love in all times. Those who belong to it practice the truth of love with all their beings. Who they are, they know. It does not seek to teach, but to be, for in that state of being it is able to give. Recognize the whole earth as a living being of which we are all part. Recognize that the time has come for a final turn, away from egocentricity, and for a voluntary return to unity. It does not make itself known loudly, but works in the domains of freedom of being. Greet all those who have enlightened the way of love and who have dedicated their lives to it. In their ranks there is neither hierarchy nor rigid organization because each one is equal to the other. It does not promise a reward, either in this life nor in the other, besides the joy of being and being in love. Its members are recognized for their works and for their being, and for their eyes; and for no other external sign other than support and fraternal embrace. They know neither fear nor shame,and their testimony will always be valuable, in good times as well as bad. The Church of Love has no secrets, no mystery or initiation other than a great understanding of the power of Love and the knowledge that, if desired, the world will change; but only if one changes oneself first. Those who feel that they are part of it, belong to it. They are all part of the Church of Love.
### Debunking the "Church of Love" Text Attributed to the Cathars
The text known as "The Church of Love," often attributed to the Cathars and dated to 1148, has gained popularity in various spiritual and esoteric circles. However, a thorough examination of historical evidence reveals that this attribution is unfounded. This document aims to clarify the origins of the text and demonstrate that it is not an authentic medieval Cathar writing.
#### 1. **Absence from Historical Records**
The Cathars, a Christian dualist movement prominent in 12th and 13th-century southern France, left behind a limited number of texts. Surviving Cathar writings include the "Cathar Ritual" and fragments of their theological teachings. Notably, there is no mention of a text resembling "The Church of Love" in these historical documents or in contemporary accounts of Cathar beliefs and practices. The earliest known references to "The Church of Love" text appear in the late 20th century, suggesting a much more recent origin.
#### 2. **Modern Origins of the Text**
Investigations into the provenance of "The Church of Love" text point to Colin Bloy, a British dowser and spiritual healer, as its likely author. In 1978, during a visit to Montségur—a site associated with the Cathar legacy—Bloy claimed to have received the text through spiritual inspiration. He later wrote down the "Proclamation of the Church of Love" in 1985, asserting that the words were not his own but were transmitted to him through mystical means. This account indicates that the text originated in the late 20th century, not in the 12th century as some claims suggest.
#### 3. **Anachronistic Language and Concepts**
The language and ideas expressed in "The Church of Love" text reflect contemporary spiritual and philosophical themes rather than medieval Cathar theology. Concepts such as non-competitiveness, the absence of hierarchy, and universal love align more closely with modern New Age thought than with the dualistic and ascetic beliefs of the Cathars. The Cathars held a strict dichotomy between the spiritual and material worlds, viewing the latter as inherently evil—a perspective not evident in the "Church of Love" text.
#### 4. **Lack of Scholarly Support**
Academic research on Catharism does not support the authenticity of "The Church of Love" text as a genuine Cathar document. Scholars specializing in medieval heresies and Cathar studies have not recognized this text in their analyses of Cathar literature. The absence of the text from scholarly discourse further undermines claims of its medieval origin.
#### 5. **Misinterpretation of Cathar Beliefs**
Attributing "The Church of Love" text to the Cathars involves a misrepresentation of their beliefs. The Cathars practiced a form of Christianity that emphasized spiritual purity, asceticism, and a rejection of the material world. Their theology was rooted in a dualistic worldview that saw the physical realm as the creation of an evil force. In contrast, "The Church of Love" text promotes an inclusive and affirmative view of the world, which is inconsistent with Cathar doctrine.
#### 6. **Conclusion**
The evidence indicates that "The Church of Love" text is not an authentic Cathar document from 1148 but rather a modern creation inspired by contemporary spiritual ideals. Its attribution to the Cathars lacks historical basis and reflects a romanticized reinterpretation of their legacy. While the text may offer meaningful insights for modern readers, it should not be considered a genuine artifact of medieval Catharism.
For further reading on Cathar beliefs and history, consider consulting reputable academic sources such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica's entry on the Cathari citeturn0search6 and scholarly works on medieval heresies.
---
**“The Church of Love”: Why This Text Is Not Cathar**
The text popularly titled *“The Church of Love,”* which is often claimed to be a Cathar writing from the year 1148, has circulated widely among modern spiritual, New Age, and esoteric communities. While its message may resonate with contemporary ideals of peace, love, and unity, the claim that this document originated from the Cathars — a medieval Christian dualist movement — is historically inaccurate. In fact, this text does not align with Cathar teachings, cosmology, or their pronounced rejection of the Catholic Church. This document will explain why *“The Church of Love”* is a modern invention and demonstrate how it contradicts the actual theology and ideology of the Cathars.
### 1. **No Historical Evidence of the Text’s Existence**
First and foremost, there is no record of a text titled *“The Church of Love”* in any known Cathar manuscripts, rituals, or inquisitorial records from the 12th or 13th centuries. The surviving Cathar literature, such as *The Cathar Ritual* and fragments from interrogations of Cathar believers, make no mention of such a text or anything remotely resembling its ideas. If this document had existed in 1148, it would almost certainly have appeared in either Cathar writings, the records of the Catholic Inquisition, or medieval chronicles describing Catharism. Instead, *“The Church of Love”* appears only in modern sources, suggesting it was composed in the 20th century and falsely attributed to the Cathars to lend it an air of ancient mystery and authority.
### 2. **Modern Language, Ideas, and Tone**
The style, vocabulary, and values presented in this text reflect modern spiritual philosophy rather than medieval dualist Christianity. The language of inclusivity, universal love, non-competitiveness, and ecological awareness in phrases like *“Recognize the whole earth as a living being of which we are all part”* would have been entirely foreign to the Cathars.
The Cathars were dualists. They believed in two opposing principles: a good, spiritual God and an evil, material creator (often identified with the god of the Old Testament). They taught that the material world was the product of the evil principle, a place of suffering and corruption. Far from embracing *“the whole earth as a living being,”* the Cathars rejected the material world and considered it something to escape. Their faith was not about unity with the physical world or finding joy within it, but rather achieving release from it through asceticism and spiritual purity.
### 3. **Contradiction of Cathar Rejection of Catholic and Worldly Religion**
Another issue is the text’s message of inter-religious harmony: *“It seeks to enrich all groups and all religions. It recognizes all the great teachings that have manifested the Truth of Love in all times.”* This is fundamentally incompatible with Cathar theology.
The Cathars did not view all religious traditions as equally valid or valuable. They openly and actively rejected the Roman Catholic Church, condemning it as the *Church of the Evil God*, an institution that corrupted the message of Christ and perpetuated the evils of the material world. Cathar writings and testimonies from inquisitorial records make it clear that Cathars saw themselves in direct opposition to the Catholic hierarchy, sacraments, and priesthood, which they believed enslaved people to the material world.
The *“Church of Love”* text, on the other hand, promotes a message of universal acceptance without rivalry or condemnation. This is not how the Cathars operated or believed. They were a counter-Church, an alternative religious community set against what they saw as the corrupt church of the world.
### 4. **Absence of Dualism and Cathar Eschatology**
Cathar beliefs were fundamentally dualistic and eschatological. They believed in a sharp distinction between the physical and the spiritual, between good and evil, and between this world and the next. The text *“The Church of Love”* completely ignores this core teaching.
Cathar doctrine taught that salvation involved the renunciation of the material world and the return of the immaterial spirit to the good God. This demanded strict ascetic practices, including vegetarianism, celibacy for the Perfecti (fully initiated Cathars), and the rejection of worldly pleasures and attachments. The Cathars believed in the *end of the world*, in which spirits would be freed from their material prisons. None of these concepts are present in *“The Church of Love”*. Instead, it presents a humanistic and optimistic message about transforming the world through love, which is utterly foreign to the Cathar worldview.
### 5. **Likely Modern Origins**
It is widely accepted by historians and researchers that this text originated in the 20th century. Many trace it to Colin Bloy, a British esoteric writer and healer, who claimed to have channeled this message in the 1970s. Though it draws loosely on romanticized ideas of medieval heresy and alternative spirituality, it bears no resemblance to genuine Cathar writings or medieval theology. The pseudo-historical dating to 1148 appears to be a modern fabrication designed to lend the text authenticity and ancient authority.
### **Conclusion**
*“The Church of Love”* is a modern creation falsely attributed to the Cathars. Its inclusive, world-affirming, and love-centered message directly contradicts the dualistic, ascetic, and world-rejecting teachings of the actual Cathar movement. It does not represent Cathar doctrine, theology, or their sharp rejection of the Catholic Church and the material world. While its message may be appealing to modern spiritual seekers, it should not be mistaken for authentic medieval Cathar thought.
---
**Why the “Church of Love” Text is Fake as a Cathar Teaching**
ReplyDelete1. **No historical Cathar sources match this** — Actual Cathar texts like *The Book of the Two Principles* or *The Gospel of the Secret Supper* focus on dualism, asceticism, the rejection of the material world, and salvation through purity — not an abstract mystical love.
2. **Cathars rejected the physical world as evil** — while the “Church of Love” embraces it and speaks of the earth as one living being. Cathars were known for rejecting marriage, sex, and earthly pleasures because they saw the material world as the work of an evil demiurge.
3. **Cathars had a clear, defined dualistic theology** — the Father of Light versus the Prince of this World — not a nebulous love-based belief system.
4. **No medieval record or Inquisition transcript mentions such a text** — Cathars were persecuted heavily, and while we have records of their beliefs and trials, this document never appears.
---
**Conclusion**
While **Epiphanes’ “On Righteousness”** and the **“Church of Love”** text superficially share anti-hierarchical and egalitarian sentiments, they come from completely different worlds:
- One is a radical **2nd-century Gnostic argument for natural communal justice**.
- The other is a **modern, romanticized pseudo-Cathar invention**, falsely attributed to medieval heretics, with no basis in Cathar theology, history, or documents.
Would you like me to help you write a formal rebuttal or historical explanation of this for others? I’d be glad to assist!