---
### Comparative Analysis of *The Epistles of Aristeas* and *Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora* on the Nature and Purpose of the Law
Both *The Epistles of Aristeas* and *Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora* address the significance and interpretation of divine Law, though they approach it from notably different theological and philosophical perspectives. The comparison reveals a shared concern for the moral and spiritual dimensions of the Law, yet their emphasis diverges—Aristeas focuses on the moral and ritual purity behind the commandments as lessons in righteousness, while Ptolemy interprets the Law as progressively fulfilled and transcended in a spiritualized form through the Savior.
---
#### The Law as Moral and Ritual Framework: Aristeas
In *The Epistles of Aristeas*, the Law is depicted as divinely inspired legislation designed to safeguard moral purity and promote righteousness among the chosen people. The passage presents a reasoned explanation for the seemingly peculiar dietary and purity laws, emphasizing their ethical symbolism:
> “Our Lawgiver first of all laid down the principles of piety and righteousness and inculcated them point by point, not merely by prohibitions but by the use of examples as well, demonstrating the injurious effects of sin and the punishments inflicted by God upon the guilty.”
Aristeas underscores that the laws are not arbitrary but pedagogical tools, teaching deeper moral lessons through observable behavior and symbolic acts. For instance, the differentiation between clean and unclean animals is not about the animals themselves but about the character traits and virtues the law aims to instill:
> “All these ordinances were made for the sake of righteousness to aid the quest for virtue and the perfecting of character... wild and carnivorous birds... by naming them unclean, he gave a sign... that they must practice righteousness in their hearts and not tyrannize over any one in reliance upon their own strength.”
This indicates a strong ethical underpinning—external laws serve as reminders and training to cultivate justice, self-control, and memory (“For the act of chewing the cud is nothing else than the reminiscence of life and existence”).
Aristeas further asserts that the Law “hedged us round on all sides by rules of purity, affecting alike what we eat, or drink, or touch, or hear, or see,” all meant to keep the community distinct and morally vigilant. The emphasis is on the holistic life—external and internal purity—where every action is a potential act of righteousness:
> “He bids men also, when lying down to sleep and rising up again, to meditate upon the works of God... The excellency of the analogy in regard to discrimination and memory has now been pointed out... For our laws have not been drawn up at random or in accordance with the first casual thought... but with a view to truth and the indication of right reason.”
This careful explanation implies that the Law is an integrated system of spiritual and practical wisdom, designed by a “wise man and specially endowed by God.” The Law embodies divine reason and fosters a God-centered life through discipline, memory, and virtue.
---
#### The Law as Symbolic and Fulfilled: Ptolemy
In contrast, *Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora* presents the Law as containing both a perfect, pure core and an imperfect, provisional element that requires completion and spiritual interpretation. Ptolemy distinguishes three parts of the Law:
1. **The pure and perfect Law** — the Decalogue or Ten Commandments, “pure and not mixed with inferiority,” which forbids evil and commands good.
2. **The law “interwoven with injustice”** — laws of vengeance like “an eye for an eye,” which Ptolemy regards as necessary but imperfect, “alien to the nature and goodness of the Father of all.” These laws are understood as provisional, shaped by human weakness and circumstance.
3. **The allegorical or exemplary law** — rituals and observances such as offerings, circumcision, Sabbath, fasting, and Passover, which are symbolic images of spiritual realities.
The letter stresses that the Savior’s coming was to “destroy this part of the law while admitting that it came from God” (the punitive laws), and to reinterpret the allegorical laws by shifting their meaning from literal to spiritual:
> “The names remained the same but the content was changed. Thus the Savior commanded us to make offerings not of irrational animals... but of spiritual praise and glorification and thanksgiving and of sharing and well-doing with our neighbors.”
Physical circumcision is replaced by a “circumcision... in regard to our spiritual heart,” the Sabbath by being “idle in regard to evil works,” fasting by spiritual abstinence, not merely external bodily fasting:
> “He wanted us to be circumcised, not in regard to our physical foreskin but in regard to our spiritual heart; to keep the Sabbath, for he wishes us to be idle in regard to evil works; to fast, not in physical fasting but in spiritual...”
Ptolemy endorses the external fasting practice “if it is done reasonably” but sees it as a reminder rather than a literal fulfillment, emphasizing internal spiritual transformation:
> “He wanted us to be circumcised... to keep the Sabbath... to fast, not in physical fasting but in spiritual... external fasting... for those not yet able to keep the true fast may have a reminder...”
Importantly, Ptolemy cites Paul’s teaching to underline this spiritual reinterpretation:
> “Paul the apostle shows that the Passover and the unleavened bread are images when he says, ‘Christ our Passover has been sacrificed, in order that you may be unleavened bread, not containing leaven... but may be a new lump.’ \[1 Cor 5:7]”
This passage reflects a philosophical and theological outlook where the Law is seen as preparatory and provisional, with its true fulfillment found in the spiritual teaching and mission of the Savior. The Law moves “from the perceptible and phenomenal to the spiritual and invisible.”
---
#### Comparing Key Themes and Approaches
* **Purpose and Nature of the Law**
Aristeas treats the Law primarily as an ethical and ritual system designed to shape character and ensure community purity, with every rule serving a moral lesson. Ptolemy acknowledges this but focuses on the insufficiency of the Law in its original form and its necessary spiritual completion.
* **Interpretation of Rituals and Ordinances**
Both texts agree that ritual laws have symbolic significance. Aristeas highlights the moral and spiritual lessons behind the purity laws and their function in promoting righteousness and remembrance of God. Ptolemy goes further by explaining that these symbols must be spiritually reinterpreted in the era of the Savior — literal observances give way to spiritual realities.
* **Law’s Perfection and Imperfection**
Ptolemy uniquely classifies the Law’s parts, highlighting an imperfect, punitive component that is ultimately set aside by the Savior. This perspective recognizes human limitations and the provisional nature of some commandments. Aristeas does not explicitly make this distinction but does emphasize the Lawgiver’s wisdom in addressing human weaknesses.
* **Role of the Savior**
For Ptolemy, the Savior is central as the one who fulfills and transforms the Law, particularly its allegorical parts, into spiritual truth. Aristeas does not directly mention a Savior but presents the Law as a divine gift designed to educate and separate the people for God’s purposes.
* **Memory and Discrimination**
Aristeas places special emphasis on memory and discrimination — the Law is a constant reminder to practice righteousness thoughtfully. This personal and intellectual engagement with the Law is less explicit in Ptolemy, who emphasizes a spiritualized understanding rather than an ethical discipline per se.
---
### Conclusion
Both *The Epistles of Aristeas* and *Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora* deeply engage with the meaning of divine Law but from complementary angles. Aristeas presents a traditional Jewish understanding focusing on moral purity, symbolic teaching, and social separation as means to uphold righteousness. Ptolemy offers a Christian Gnostic perspective, viewing the Law as a tripartite construct: pure commandments, imperfect punitive rules, and symbolic ordinances, all culminating in spiritual fulfillment by the Savior.
Together, these texts illuminate the multifaceted nature of divine Law—both as an ethical framework and a spiritual allegory—showing its dynamic role across different theological traditions and eras.
---
If you want, I can help break this down further or explore specific themes more deeply!
Certainly! Here is a comparative analysis of **Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora** and **The Epistles of Aristeas**, focusing on their approaches to law, spirituality, and moral instruction, illustrated by key quotations from each text.
---
### Comparative Analysis of Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora and The Epistles of Aristeas
Both **Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora** and **The Epistles of Aristeas** engage deeply with the nature of divine law and its moral and spiritual implications, but they do so from somewhat different perspectives and with different emphases.
---
#### 1. **The Nature and Purpose of Law**
**Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora** presents the law as having multiple layers — a pure, spiritual core, a punitive or retributive component, and a symbolic or allegorical dimension that ultimately points beyond itself:
> *“The Law of God, pure and not mixed with inferiority, is the Decalogue, those ten sayings engraved on two tables, forbidding things not to be done and enjoining things to be done. These contains pure but imperfect legislation and required the completion made by the Savior.”*
Here, the Decalogue (Ten Commandments) represents the perfect law, but this law is “pure but imperfect,” necessitating completion by Christ. Ptolemy also discusses a **law of vengeance**:
> *“There is also the law interwoven with injustice, laid down for vengeance and the requital of previous injuries, ordaining that an eye should be cut out for an eye... Admittedly, this commandment was a just one and still is just, because of the weakness of those for whom the legislation was made so that they would not transgress the pure law.”*
This passage reflects a recognition that certain laws were practical concessions to human weakness rather than ideal moral standards, and these were superseded or “destroyed” by the Savior, though still acknowledged as originating from God.
In contrast, **The Epistles of Aristeas** emphasize the **moral and educational** function of the law as a divine safeguard to maintain purity and righteousness, particularly among the Jewish people:
> *“Our Lawgiver first of all laid down the principles of piety and righteousness and inculcated them point by point... For he proved first of all that there is only one God and that his power is manifested throughout the universe...”*
Here, the law is portrayed as a holistic moral system designed to cultivate virtue and maintain a distinct, holy people, separated from others through detailed purity laws governing food, contact, and behavior. The law is seen as an impregnable “rampart” that protects the community’s spiritual and moral integrity:
> *“Our Lawgiver... fenced us round with impregnable ramparts and walls of iron, that we might not mingle at all with any of the other nations, but remain pure in body and soul, free from all vain imaginations...”*
Thus, while Ptolemy sees law as partly allegorical and requiring fulfillment by the Savior, Aristeas highlights the law’s role as a practical and moral framework, grounded in the recognition of God’s sovereignty and the ethical consequences of actions.
---
#### 2. **Symbolism and Allegory in the Law**
Both documents recognize that certain elements of the law are symbolic rather than literal, but their treatment of symbolism differs.
Ptolemy explicitly describes the **ritual laws** — offerings, circumcision, Sabbath observance, fasting — as **allegories**:
> *“Finally, there is the allegorical (exemplary) part... dealing with offerings and circumcision and the sabbath and fasting and Passover and unleavened bread... Since all these things are images and symbols, when the truth was made manifest they were translated to another meaning.”*
He explains how the literal observances are replaced by spiritual realities — spiritual praise replaces animal sacrifices, spiritual circumcision replaces physical circumcision, Sabbath is understood as rest from evil rather than physical rest, and fasting becomes abstaining from evil rather than mere physical fasting:
> *“Thus the Savior commanded us to make offerings... of spiritual praise and glorification and thanksgiving... He wanted us to be circumcised... in regard to our spiritual heart; to keep the Sabbath... idle in regard to evil works; to fast... in spiritual abstinence from everything evil.”*
Aristeas, meanwhile, also sees meaning behind purity laws but emphasizes the **moral lessons** taught by the distinctions in clean and unclean animals and actions:
> *“All these ordinances were made for the sake of righteousness to aid the quest for virtue and the perfecting of character.”*
He elaborates on how the types of animals allowed or forbidden symbolize moral qualities — tame birds representing innocence and non-violence, wild and carnivorous birds representing cruelty and tyranny — and how these dietary laws serve as a constant moral reminder:
> *“He gave a sign by means of them that those, for whom the legislation was ordained, must practice righteousness in their hearts and not tyrannize over anyone in reliance upon their own strength...”*
The law’s symbolism is practical and ethical, teaching justice, memory, and discrimination in action:
> *“For the division of the hoof and the separation of the claws are intended to teach us that we must discriminate between our individual actions with a view to the practice of virtue.”*
---
#### 3. **Relationship of Law to Divine Justice and Human Nature**
Ptolemy’s letter portrays the law of vengeance as a concession to human weakness and the imperfection of the old covenant:
> *“...for he who does not want one murder committed, saying, You shall not kill and then commanded a murder to be repaid by another murder, has given a second law which enjoins two murders although he had forbidden one.”*
This paradox indicates that even divine law had a practical side shaped by necessity rather than absolute justice, and Christ’s arrival corrects this imperfection, pointing to a higher, spiritual justice.
Aristeas instead portrays divine justice as comprehensive and omnipresent, with human beings fully accountable for thoughts and actions:
> *“...even if a man should think of doing evil - to say nothing of actually effecting it - he would not escape detection, for he made it clear that the power of God pervaded the whole of the law.”*
The emphasis is on the all-encompassing sovereignty of God, who knows all and ensures that moral order is maintained. The laws are a means to avoid sin and its consequences, underscoring human moral responsibility.
---
#### 4. **The Role of Memory and Vigilance**
Aristeas stresses the role of **memory and constant vigilance** in religious observance, symbolized through the laws about animals, garments, and even the positioning of divine oracles:
> *“For the act of chewing the cud is nothing else than the reminiscence of life and existence... Wherefore he exhorts us in the Scripture also in these words: 'Thou shalt surely remember the Lord that wrought in thee those great and wonderful things.'”*
This notion of remembrance is tied to moral consciousness and fear of God, ensuring that the community stays on the right path through ritual reminders in daily life.
Ptolemy’s letter, by contrast, does not elaborate on memory but rather on spiritual transformation, suggesting that external laws are replaced by internal spiritual realities after Christ’s coming.
---
### Summary
In summary:
* **Ptolemy’s Letter to Flora** highlights the **completion and transformation** of the law through Christ, emphasizing its spiritual and allegorical nature and recognizing the imperfection of the law’s punitive elements.
* **The Epistles of Aristeas** focus on the **practical and moral purpose** of the law to maintain purity, justice, and remembrance of God’s sovereignty, stressing human accountability and ethical lessons embedded in ritual observances.
Both texts underscore the importance of divine law in shaping moral behavior but from different theological vantage points: Ptolemy looks forward to the fulfillment and spiritualization of the law in Christ, while Aristeas underscores the wisdom and moral rigor of the law as given to Israel.
---
If you'd like, I can help you develop this into a more formal essay or expand on any specific section!
No comments:
Post a Comment