The Invisible Presence of Christ: The Comforter and Spirit of Truth

Title: The Invisible Presence of Christ: The Comforter and Spirit of Truth

Introduction

The concept of the "Comforter," "Spirit of Truth," or "Holy Spirit" as presented in the Scriptures has been a topic of deep theological exploration and discussion. One perspective suggests that the Comforter is none other than Christ Himself, and this belief is connected with the idea of the invisible presence of Jesus. This study delves into this viewpoint, exploring the biblical passages that support the teaching that Jesus is the Comforter and how it is linked to the invisible presence of Christ.

The Comforter: Christ's Invisible Presence

The discussion begins with the words of Jesus in John 14:16-17, where He promises the arrival of another Helper or Comforter, known as the Spirit of Truth. Jesus tells His disciples that this Comforter would be with them to the "age of ages." This verse is fundamental to the perspective that the Comforter is, in fact, Christ Himself. According to this view, the Comforter who was "dwelling with them" at that moment was Jesus, and He would later be "IN THEM" after His departure.

Ephesians 4:7-13: The Role of the Invisible Presence

Ephesians 4:7-13 plays a crucial role in understanding the invisible presence of Christ. It underlines the significance of Jesus's resurrection and ascension, which paved the way for His invisible presence. 2 Corinthians 3:17 refers to Jesus as "the Lord the Spirit", emphasizing the continuity of His presence even after His physical departure. This presence, however, operates in a different manner – it is no longer in the flesh but in the Spirit.

Jesus's departure had a profound implication: He could come to His disciples IN SPIRIT. This means He could enter their minds and hearts in a way that was not possible in the flesh. It was a transformational shift in the nature of His presence. But the promise of the Comforter was not solely for the disciples at that moment; it extended to all those who would exercise faith in Jesus Christ in all ages.

"Christ IN YOU, the Hope of Glory"

Colossians 1:24-29 offers further insight into the invisible presence of Christ. The verse states that Christ is "IN YOU, the hope of glory." This expression emphasizes the indwelling of Christ within believers, which is central to the perspective of the Comforter being an invisible presence. Christ's presence transcends time and space, reaching every believer across generations.

Implications for the True Church

This viewpoint holds significant implications for the concept of the "true church." Those who believe in the invisible presence of Christ understand that Christ's presence, as the Comforter and Spirit of Truth, is not limited to a particular period or location. It extends to all who accept Him, irrespective of when or where they were born. This understanding highlights the timeless and universal nature of Christ's presence.

Conclusion

The belief that the Comforter, Spirit of Truth, or Holy Spirit is, in reality, Christ Himself, contributes to the understanding of His invisible presence. His promise to dwell within believers, transcending time and space, demonstrates the profound impact of His presence throughout history. This perspective adds depth to our comprehension of Christ's ongoing influence in the lives of His followers, making His presence truly invisible but ever-present, "the hope of glory" for all who believe.

The Concept of the Divine Autogenes John 1:18

The Concept of the Divine Autogenes

Sethian Gnosticism consists of the following elements: “a focus on Seth as a Savior figure and spiritual ancestor of the Gnostic elect; a primal divine triad of an ineffable Father, a Mother called Barbelo, and Son referred to as Autogenes; four emanated luminaries named Harmozel, Oroaiel, Daveithe, and Eleleth and other superterrestial beings related to them; a salvation history thought of as three descents of the Savior, or three critical periods marked by flood, fire, and final judgement; and rituals of baptism and ascent.”

1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. 
2 This one was in [the] beginning with God. 
3 All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.

God’s firstborn Son called “a god,” “the only-begotten god” as the most manuscripts of John 1:18 call him.

John 1:18 No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is in the bosom [position] with the Father is the one that has explained him.

The phrase monogenes´ theos´ rendered in a few translations as “God only begotten" could be understood as a reference to the Autogenes the self-begotten Christ or self-originate Son, an Only Begotten God, The One existing within the bosom of the Father.

And Thought willed to create a work through the Word of the invisible Spirit, and his Will became a work. And he was revealed with Mind and Light, glorifying It. And the Word followed the Will. For because of the Word, Christ the divine Autogenes created the All. Eternal Life with Will, and Mind with Foreknowledge stood. They glorified the invisible Spirit and Barbelo for they had come into being because of her. (The Apocryphon of John)

7 And It gazed into Barbelo in the pure light which surrounds the in­visible Spirit and Its luminescence, and she conceived from It. It begot a spark of light in a light resembling blessedness, but it was [not] equal to Its greatness. This one was only-begotten of the Mother‑Father who had appeared. He is his only offspring, the only-begotten of the Father, the pure light. (The Apocryphon of John)

And the holy Spirit perfected the divine Autogenes, the son of Itself and Barbelo, so he might stand before the great and invisible virginal Spirit. The divine Autogenes, the Christ, (is) that one who honored It with a mighty voice. He appeared through the Pronoia. And the invisible virginal Spirit placed Autogenes as true god over the All Nand It subjected to him all authority and the truth which dwells in It so that he might know the All. (He is) that one whose name they call by a name which is more exalted than any name. For they will say that name to those who are worthy of it. (The Apocryphon of John)

Autogenes. One word.

Autogenes, begotten, Divine Child, Pure Light, Light of the World, Logos (John 1:3)

The "Only begotten" Greek Monogenes; The Monogenes or the "Only begotten" is the Autogenes and Logos

Greek: 'Self-begotten,' 'Self-made' ... Also called ‘self-originate’ so 'autogenes' is Greek for "self-generated"

The Coptic Gnostic Library. Autogenes II/1: 7, 11, 16, 20, 24, 33; 8, 21, 23, 26, 28, 31; 9, 1, 10;

III/2:41, 5; 49, 17; 50, 19, 22; 52, 8, 16; 53, 13; 55, 5; 57, 26; 62, 26; 65, 13; 68, 16;

IX/2: 28,6;

XI/3 :46, 11; 51, 26; 58,12

 - (see also Self-begotten One

Autogenes is the third aeon in the tretractys or tetrad (a group of 10 aeons). Again according to the Barbeloite theology. Autogenes is the father-mother-son. (Tomas Kindahl)

The One as ‘unbegotten’ and ‘self-begotten’: “Great is the good Self-begotten who stood, the God who had already stood. (...) Thou art unbegotten. Thou hast appeared in order that thou mightest reveal the eternal ones. Thou art he who is. Therefore thou hast revealed those who really are.” (Three Steles of Seth)

- The One as self-begotten: “This great name of yours is upon me, O self-begotten Perfect one, who is not outside me.” (Gospel of the Egyptians)

- The expression ‘self-begotten’ (or ‘self-originate’) is often left in the ancient Greek form, as ‘Autogenes’.

- The One as self-begotten Autogenes: “...unproclaimable Father, the aeon of the aeons, Autogenes, self-begotten, self-producing...” (Gospel of the Egyptians)

From the Ennoia/Barbelo/Five-Aeon/Ten-Aeon there emanates a further Divinity, referred to as Autogenes, meaning "Self-Begotten" or "Self-Born". 

In Gospel to the Egyptians it is equated with the Logos. In Allogenes we see this as one of the three aspects of the Barbelo

It is described as the "only-begotten one of the Mother-Father" and "of the Father, the pure Light" [Nag Hammadi Library, Apocryphon of John, p.102].

On the one hand this emanation is called "Autogenes", "Self-begotten", yet on the other it is described as being "begotten" by, or the "only-begotten" of, the Mother-Father.

Autogenes also contains the Son of Man and sometimes also Man.

7. THE SON AS AUTOGENES, SELF-BEGOTTEN, ONLY-BEGOTTEN, FIRST-BEGOTTEN

Ode 32

1. To the blessed ones the joy is from their heart, and light from Him who dwells in them;
2. And the Word of truth who is self-originate,
3. Because He has been strengthened by the Holy Power of the Most High; and He is unshaken for ever and ever.
   Hallelujah.

Ode 32:2 lit. "existed (or, was) from His soul" Comp. Jn 5:26 "For as the Father hath life in himself, even so gave he to the Son to have life in himself." The Ode, by immediately adding "for He is strengthened by the holy power of the Most High," appears to imply that the "self-existence" of the Son of Truth is from the Father.

- Although the One is referred to above as ‘self-begotten’, usually the term Autogenes describes the Son (who is either the Word, the saviour Seth or the Christ). The Autogenes often appears in Sethian Gnostic texts.

- In the Apocryphon of John and the Gospel of the Egyptians, the Autogenes begets or is begotten together with the Four Lights.

- Christ the Son as Autogenes: “Because of the word, Christ the divine Autogenes created everything...” “...the twelve aeons which attend the son of the mighty one, the Autogenes, the Christ, through the will and the gift of the invisible Spirit.” (Apocryphon of John)

- The saviour Seth results from the combination of the Logos, Autogenes and Adamas: “Then the great Logos, the divine Autogenes, and the incorruptible man Adamas mingled with each other. (...) And thus there came forth (...) the great incorruptible Seth, the son of the incorruptible man Adamas.” (Gospel of the Egyptians)

I suspect the Barbeloites directly imported this from Christianity around 150 AD. Autogenes is said to hover over the ground in the heaven Domedon Doxomedon. (My source here is as usual April D DeConick). When comparing Autogenes with other Gnosticism it appears that Autogenes counterparts the Second Man in the Ophite theology. I have made no extensive comparison work regarding Autogenes, so that's about what I know here. (Tomas Kindahl)

Daveithai, He is the Father of The Elect, this is Sethian, Sophia-Wisdom is within Eleleth, so that would make The Elect completely outside of the powers of the Sophia-Wisdom. Though Sophia-Wisdom would be engage in initiating and conducting The Elect awakening in the domain of the Eleleth. (Tomas Kindahl)

Thanks to Tomas Kindahl

Valentinus

Bentley Layton has sketched out a relationship between the various gnostic movements in his introduction to The Gnostic Scriptures (SCM Press, London, 1987). In this model, "Classical Gnosticism" and "The School of Thomas" antedated and influenced the development of Valentinus, who was to found his own school of Gnosticism in both Alexandria and Rome, whom Layton called "the great [Gnostic] reformer" and "the focal point" of Gnostic development. While in Alexandria, where he was born, Valentinus probably would have had contact with the Gnostic teacher Basilides, and may have been influenced by him.

Valentinianism flourished after the middle of the 2nd century AD. This movement was named after its founder Valentinus (c. 100 – 180 AD). The school is also known to have been extremely popular: several varieties of their central myth are known, and we know of "reports from outsiders from which the intellectual liveliness of the group is evident." It is known that Valentinus' students elaborated on his teachings and materials (though the exact extent of their changes remains unknown), for example, in the version of the Valentinian myth brought to us through Ptolemy.

Valentinianism might be described as the most elaborate and philosophically "dense" form of the Syrian-Egyptian schools of Gnosticism, though it should be acknowledged that this in no way debarred other schools from attracting followers. Basilides' own school was popular also, and survived in Egypt until the 4th century.

Simone Petrement, in A Separate God, in arguing for a Christian origin of Gnosticism, places Valentinus after Basilides, but before the Sethians. It is her assertion that Valentinus represented a moderation of the anti-Judaism of the earlier Hellenized teachers; the demiurge, widely regarded as a mythological depiction of the Old Testament God of the Hebrews, is depicted as more ignorant than evil


Valentinian works are named in reference to the Bishop and teacher Valentinius. Circa 153 AD, Valentinius developed a complex cosmology outside of the Sethian tradition. At one point he was close to being appointed the Bishop of Rome of what is now the Roman Catholic Church. Works attributed to his school are listed below, and fragmentary pieces directly linked to him are noted with an asterisk:

• The Divine Word Present in the Infant (Fragment A) *
• On the Three Natures (Fragment B) *
• Adam's Faculty of Speech (Fragment C) *
• To Agathopous: Jesus' Digestive System (Fragment D) *
• Annihilation of the Realm of Death (Fragment F) *
• On Friends: The Source of Common Wisdom (Fragment G) *
• Epistle on Attachments (Fragment H) *
• Summer Harvest*
• The Gospel of Truth*
• Ptolemy's Version of the Gnostic Myth
• Prayer of the Apostle Paul
• Ptolemy's Epistle to Flora
• Treatise on the Resurrection (Epistle to Rheginus)
• Gospel of Philip

The Inner Aeons Ecclesiastes 3:11

The Aeon in their heart 

or

The Aeons Within Us 

Ecclesiastes 3:11

Before we begin this study we will have an opening reading from the Tripartite Tractate:

but the redemption also is an ascent to the degrees which are in the Pleroma and to those who have named themselves and who conceive of themselves according to the power of each of the aeons, and (it is) an entrance into what is silent, where there is no need for voice nor for knowing, nor for forming a concept, nor for illumination, but (where) all things are light, while they do not need to be illumined. (the Tripartite Tractate)

What if I told you the aeons are within our hearts? You can discover them by self knowledge or gnosis.

Psalm 77:5 NWT I have thought upon the days of long ago, On the years in the indefinite past.

The first clue is found in Ecclesiastes 3:11 which states that God put ha-olam in the human heart. Ha-olam can be translated as "age" "everlasting" "forever and ever" "eternal" “world” or “eternity.”

Ecclesiastes 3:11 ¶  Every thing hath he made beautiful in its [proper] time: he hath also placed the eternity in their heart, without a man’s being able to find out the work that God hath made from the beginning to the end. (Leeser's Jewish Bible)

Ecclesiastes 3:11 All the things which he made, considered as a whole, are good in his time. But with regard to all things considered as one whole, to them he hath assigned the whole age; so that no man can find out the work which God hath done from beginning to end. (Greek)

Ecclesiastes 3:11 ¶  The whole He hath made beautiful in its season; also, that knowledge He hath put in their heart without which man findeth not out the work that God hath done from the beginning even unto the end. (Young's)

Ecclesiastes 3:11 Everything he has made pretty in its time. Even time indefinite he has put in their heart, that mankind may never find out the work that the [true] God has made from the start to the finish (NWT)

From the Septuagint interlinear screenshot we can see that the word translated "age", "eternity" or "time indefinite" is the Greek word aeon. In the Hebrew the word is Olam both Hebrew and Greek words have the same meaning. 

Depending on the context aeon could mean a long stretch of time, a spiritual being or a realm in which spiritual beings live. Aeons are one of the orders of spirits, or spheres of being, that emanated from the Deity.

However there is another meaning to the word aeons which is shown in Ecclesiastes 3:11 the aeons are internal aspects of our nature

God has placed an inherit constitution in man the capability of conceiving of eternity, the struggle to apprehend the everlasting

The Bible says of humans: “He has put eternity into man’s mind.” (Ecclesiastes 3:11) We use this distinctive ability daily, even in as common an act as glancing in a mirror and thinking what our appearance will be in 10 or 20 years. And we are confirming what Ecclesiastes 3:11 says when we give even passing thought to such concepts as the infinity of time and space. The mere fact that we have this ability harmonizes with the comment that a Creator has put “eternity into man’s mind.

This ability also gives us a sense of divine purpose. God has a purpose for the aeons, which He makes in Christ Jesus.…in accord with the purpose of the eons, which He makes in Christ Jesus, our Lord (Ephesians 3:11).

However believers should be careful that the aeon their mind and heart is dwelling on is not the present aeon of this order of things: 

2Cor 4:4  In whom, the god of this age, hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, to the end they may not discern the radiance of the glad-message of the glory of the Christ--who is the image of God.

Our mind can easily become corrupted. The joys and goals of this age can distract us or even replace our God-given hope

Rom 12:2  and be not conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, for your proving what [is] the will of God — the good, and acceptable, and perfect.

 What is meant by being “conformed to this age”? To be “conformed to this age” is to attach greater importance to the joys and goals of this life rather than to spiritual matters. Things of the Spirit should always come first in our life.

"be not fashioned or shaped in harmony with this present age, either in your thinking or your way of life".

Therefore, believers should not seek identification with the aims and objects of an "age" that is destined to pass away in ignominy. By not conforming to this age, we must concentrate our spiritual gaze upon the age to come, which will replace this sorrowing, sinful present existence (Eph. 2:7).

Let’s have a look now at Isaiah 57:15. “For thus says the High and Lofty One Who inhabits eternity.” Yahweh inhabits eternity, and yet He has put eternity in our hearts. Because eternity is within us than we have to look within ourselves to understand eternity or the aeons. This is called self knowledge or gnosis to know thyself

Man in himself is a microcosm, a little world humankind regarded as the representation in miniature of the universe

The author of the book The Syzygies of AEON puts it like this: 

The aeons are more than ideas and concepts they are active principles which influence us not from the outside like the stars and planets of astrology or tarot, but from within. The Aeons are inherit active principles which are spiritual, instinctive, organic elements that are part of our own being—physical, psychological, and spiritual (The Syzygies of AEON)

The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible (vol. IV, p. 643): Time: The O.T. and the N.T are not acquainted with the conception of eternity as timelessness. The O.T. has not developed a special term for "eternity." The word aeon originally meant "vital force," "life;" then "age," "lifetime." It is, however, also used generally of a (limited or unlimited) long space of time. The use of the word aeon is determined very much by the O.T. and the LXX. Aeon means "long distant uninterrupted time" in the past (Luke 1:10), as well as in the future (John 4:14). 

αἰών Aiwn is compounded of aei and wn. The word aei is from aw, aew, or ahmi, signifying primarily, "to blow, to breathe"; secondly, "to live, to pass or spend time." From this derivation aei would present the idea of a going on; and as a particle of time is expressive of that which is unlimited or undefined; "not so much that which cannot be bounded as that which is not bounded -- which is not attempted to be defined, but is considered as going on, on, on. 

Aei, therefore, alone, would not express the true idea of eternity, but only of time, whose end is not bounded by any specification. This flowing word, indicative of passing time, must be connected with, and, as it were, anchored upon another of more stability, in order to give it any kind of fixedness." This other word is wn, the particle of that verb of existence which expresses, in its philosophical sense, the highest mode of being. One part of the compound word, then, is unconfined; the other, since wn is of all tenses, altogether excludes the idea of time. Aiwn, then, is not time, long or short, bounded or endless. (Dr. John Thomas Eureka)

Eternity is not an endless number of years, and things that are spiritual and eternal cannot be measured by days and months and years.

Time is the measure that man gives to passing events. The only power in time is what man imparts to it. When man gets into the understanding of the Absolute, he takes his freedom from all bondage of time and declares that time shall no more enter into the substance of his mind or body or affairs.

Now let's look at the word essence now this is from the latin word essentia, essencia  from Latin essentia meaning "being, essence," abstract noun formed (to translate Greek ousia "being, essence") from essent-, present participle stem of esse"to be," from PIE root *es- "to be."

Now why am I talking about this word called essence because that is exactly what the Aeons are they are the essence of God they are different parts of God, states of God and we have many different kinds of aeons in the plural they are listed as word, will, thought, life, understanding, grace, perception prudence you see these are essences of God they are parts of God and they make up the wholeness

The word aeon originally meant "vital force," "life;" then "age," or "lifetime." this is because αἰών is so connected with ἄημι (aēr 109) to breathe, blow, as to denote properly that which causes life, vital force.

This vital force should be understood as a flowing energy that passes through us like a breathe. Note the holy spirit is God's active force. 

Again quoting from the The Syzygies of AEON we can see:

[The aeons] are a diverse and complex set of forces that relate to each other in complex ways and were considered to be the closest our inferior minds could come to understanding the powers of God....These profound and powerful forces, that effected our very being, comprised a full spectrum of energies that existed within us. (The Syzygies of AEON)

1Kings 19:12  And after the earthquake a fire; [but] Yahweh [was] not in the fire: and after the fire a still small voice.

The Aeons speak to us through the Spirit. The "still small voice" is the inner silent voice of the aeons the inner consciousness of God's presence. The communion is not in words but ideas. So still, so small, so quiet is this secret place where God dwells in man that it may be overlooked, unless one retires into silent meditation in solitude, and in meekness seeks the Lord. The Aeons are made manifest as perfect wholeness through the enlightened mind.

The Aeons are the mediators and heralds of God

Ode 12:4 And the Most High has given Him to His aeons, which are the interpreters of His beauty, And the narrators of His glory, And the confessors of His purpose, And the preachers of His mind, And the teachers of His works. (Odes of Solomon)

Ode 12:8 And by Him the aeons spoke to one another, and those that were silent acquired speech. (Odes of Solomon)

It is important to know the names of the Aeons and there functions as part of achieving enlightenment. The Aeons are grouped together in male and female pairs 

There are Thirty aeons altogether which make up the Pleroma which literally translates to

“fullness” or “wholeness

The next clue comes from Colossians 2:9 were the word Pleroma is used: 

Col 2:9 because it is in him that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells bodily. 10 And so YOU are possessed of a fullness by means of him, who is the head of all government and authority (NWT)

Col 2:10  and in him ye are made full, who is the head of all principality and power: (ESV)

The fullness (pleroma) of the aeons or the divine aspects or attributes were manifested in Jesus. We too are made full in him been partakers of the divine quality (2peter 1:4)

Colossians 2:10 "Ye are in Him (by virtue of union with Him) [filled full]" of all that you need (Joh 1:16). Believers receive of the divine Anointing which flows down from their Divine Head and High Priest (Ps 133:2). He is [full of] the "fullness" itself; we, are filled from Him. 

 “It is in [Christ] that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells bodily. And so you [believers] are possessed of a fullness by means of him, 

In the The Letter of Peter to Philip from the Nag Hammadi Scriptures Jesus in answering a question to his disciples says “Concerning the Pleroma, it is I.  I was sent down in the body for the seed that had fallen away." 

Concerning the fullness, it is I. I (the christ or logos) was sent down in the body (of Jesus) for the seed that had fallen away. And I came down to their mortal model. But they did not recognize me, thinking I was a mortal. I spoke with the one who is mine, and the one who is mine listened to me just as you also who have listened to me today. And I gave him authority to enter into the inheritance of his fatherhood. And I took him the one who is mine up to my Father. They the Aeons were brought to completion filled with rest through his salvation. Since he was deficiency, he became fullness. “Concerning the fact that you are being detained, it is because you are mine. When you strip yourselves of what is corruptible, you will become luminaries in the midst of mortals. (The Letter of Peter to Philip, Nag Hammadi Codex VIII, 2)

"you will become luminaries in the midst of mortals" (The Letter of Peter to Philip)

to become luminaries means the believers will become aeons 

Thus, like Christ, the Gnostic Christians can also become Anointed Ones or Christ. Just as Christ is a fullness and an illurninator, so also the Gnostics become fullnesses and illurninators. Christ's fate is their fate, his lot their lot. Among the Gnostics the realization of salvation can involve a mystical identification with Christ, so that the author of the Gos. Phil. can proclaim that one is mystically united with the divine:  "You saw the Spirit, you became spirit; you saw Christ, you became Christ; you saw the [Father, you] will become the Father" (II 61,29-32) . 156 

Those who say, "There is a heavenly man and there is one above him" are wrong. For it is the first of these two heavenly men, the one who is revealed, that they call "the one who is below"; and he to whom the hidden belongs is that one who is above him. For it would be better for them to say, "The inner and outer, and what is outside the outer". Because of this, the Lord called destruction the "the outer darkness": there is not another outside of it. He said, "My Father who is in secret". He said, "Go into your chamber and shut the door behind you, and pray to your Father who is in secret" (Mt 6:6), the one who is within them all. But that which is within them all is the fullness. Beyond it, there is nothing else within it. This is that of which they say, "That which is above them". (Gospel of Philip)

For the Gnostics the Pleroma is not just a spatial place located above the physical heavens. The Pleroma or the Fullness is also an internal, spiritual state of being that is accessible in this life through direct experience. The Gospel of Philip says, “But that which is within them all is the fullness. Beyond it, there is nothing else within it. This is that of which they say, "That which is above them".

If we look now at our opening reading from the Tripartite Tractate we can see that the redemption which is called "an ascent to the degrees which are in the Pleroma" is accomplished "according to the power of each of the aeons"

The redemption meant being brought back from a state of horrible deficiency and emptiness and being restored to this otherwise inaccessible divine fullness within oneself. The Treatise on Resurrection holds that when someone’s spirit is saved, “fullness fills what it lacks.” 

The Gospel of Truth elaborates:

Thus fullness, which has no deficiency but fills up deficiency, is provided to fill a person’s need, so that the person may receive grace. While deficient, the person had no grace, and because of this a diminishing took place where there was no grace. When the diminished part was restored, the person in need was revealed as fullness.(The Gospel of Truth.)

Likewise, in the Secret Book of James, Christ urges his listeners to “Be filled and leave no space within you empty.” And the Gnostic author of the Prayer of the Apostle Paul, as if responding to this commandment, says to Christ, “You are my fullness.”

Thus, the Gnostics’ cosmology was what it was in order to facilitate the inner spiritual transformation they called “gnosis,” the root of the word “Gnostic.”

The Amēns Pistis Sophia

The Amēns Pistis Sophia

To begin this study we will have an opening reading from Pistis Sophia: Chapter 93

"And that mystery knoweth why the twin-saviours have arisen and why the three Amēns have arisen.

"And that mystery knoweth why the five Trees have arisen and why the seven Amēns have arisen. 

Pistis Sophia: Unveiling the Mysteries of Amēns and Emanations

In the enigmatic world of Gnostic texts, the "Pistis Sophia" stands as a testament to the profound spiritual exploration of the early Christian era. Chapter 93 of this ancient text opens a door to the mysteries surrounding the twin-saviors and the Amēns, inviting us to delve into the intricate web of Gnostic cosmology.

The chapter begins with a tantalizing statement: "And that mystery knoweth why the twin-saviors have arisen and why the three Amēns have arisen." Immediately, we are confronted with the notion of twin-saviors and Amēns, both shrouded in deep spiritual significance.

The word "Amēn" itself has roots in Hebrew and Greek, carrying connotations of faithfulness and truth. In the Hebrew tradition, it is applied to Yahweh as "the faithful God," (Deut 7:9; Isa 49:7) emphasizing the unwavering nature of divine faithfulness. For Jews, "Amen" also serves as an acronym for "El Melech Ne’eman," meaning "Mighty, Faithful King." In the Book of Revelation, Jesus is referred to as "the Amen." Revelation 3:14, states:

"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God."

This verse presents a unique and symbolic characterization of Jesus Christ as "the Amen." In this context, "the Amen" signifies Jesus as the embodiment of truth, faithfulness, and the ultimate authority.

Hebrew 0539 אמן ‘aman aw-man’

Greek 281. ἀμήν amen [am-ane’];

So we can see from the bible that beings or persons can be called Amen. In some Gnostic texts an angel is named as the Amen:   

 The Book of Baruch by Justin

When the father knowing nothing beforehand

saw that half-virgin Edem, he burned for her,

and he the father is called Elohim,

and Edem burned equally for Elohim. Their desire

drew them to a single union of love.

From this coupling the father seeded twelve angels

for himself through Edem.

The paternal angels are Michael, Amen, Baruch, Gabriel, Esaddaeus

 The Gospel of Thomas Saying 19: Jesus said, “Congratulations to the one who came into being before coming into being. If you become my disciples and pay attention to my sayings, these stones will serve you. For there are five trees in Paradise for you; they do not change, summer or winter, and their leaves do not fall. Whoever knows them will not taste death.” The Gospel of Thomas Saying 19:Saying 19 introduces the concept of becoming a disciple of Jesus and paying attention to His sayings to gain access to hidden knowledge.
It mentions five trees in Paradise that do not change with the seasons and whose leaves do not fall, promising that those who know them will not taste death.
The paternal angels, including Amen, Michael, Baruch, Gabriel, and Esaddaeus, are associated with these five trees in Paradise.

Surprisingly, the Gnostic landscape adds another layer of complexity to the concept of Amēns. In some Gnostic texts, an angel is identified as "Amen" (amen an angel of elohim). Take, for example, Justin's "Book of Baruch," where Amen is named among the paternal angels, a celestial hierarchy of divine beings.

Further delving into Gnostic cosmology, we discover that the Amēns play a role in the structure of the Pleroma, the spiritual realm of divine emanations. The regions of the three Amēns are symbolized by the first three emanations of the Pleroma, reflecting their importance within the Gnostic framework.

Moreover, these Amēns are also associated with the seven planetary rulers or archangels, drawing parallels between the Gnostic cosmos and the celestial hierarchy found in various religious traditions. They are, in essence, the seven voices or spirits of God, as described in Revelation 4:5.

Revelation 4:5 presents a vivid image of "seven lamps of fire burning before the throne," signifying the seven Spirits of God. This connection underscores the Gnostic belief in the interconnectedness of their cosmology with elements of Judeo-Christian traditions.

The Seven Amēns as Planetary Rulers or Archangels: The text suggests that the seven Amēns can be identified with the seven planetary rulers or archangels. This concept aligns with the idea that these entities have influence over specific aspects of the material world, including celestial bodies. The seven archangels are often seen as intermediaries between the divine and the material realm in various religious and esoteric traditions.


The Seven Amēns as the Seven Spirits of God: The passage also connects the seven Amēns to the seven Spirits of God, as mentioned in Revelation 4:5 and 5:6. These seven spirits are associated with divine attributes or qualities and are seen as channels of divine revelation. In the Gnostic context, the seven Amēns may represent these aspects of divine wisdom and revelation.

Pistis Sophia: And Jesus hail not told his disciples to total expansion of the emanations of the Treasury, nor their orders, how they are extended; nor had he told them their saviors, according to the order of every one, how they are; nor had he told them what guard is at every (gate) of the Treasury of the Light; nor had he told them the region of the Twin-savior, who is the Child of the Child; nor had he told them the regions of the three Amens, in what regions they are expanded; nor had he told them into what regions the five Trees are expanded; nor as to the seven Amens, that is the seven Voices, what is their region, how they are expanded. (Pistis Sophia)

The Gospel of Thomas Saying 108. Jesus said: He who drinks from my mouth will become like I am, and I will become he. And the hidden things will be revealed to him.

The Gospel of Thomas Saying 108:Saying 108 speaks of a transformative process where those who drink from Jesus' mouth will become like Him, and hidden things will be revealed to them. This aligns with the Gnostic concept of spiritual enlightenment and ascent.

Intriguingly, the "Pistis Sophia" mentions the Twin Savior, the Child of the Child, whose regions remain a mystery. This enigmatic figure invites comparisons to sayings attributed to Jesus himself, such as Gospel of Thomas Saying 108: "He who drinks from my mouth will become like I am, and I will become he. And the hidden things will be revealed to him." This suggests a profound connection between the seeker and the divine, akin to the transformative journey described in Gnostic texts.

The Twin Saviour, Child of the Child: The text alludes to a Twin Saviour, known as the Child of the Child. This mysterious figure likely holds a central role in Gnostic salvation or enlightenment. The Gnostic belief in personal spiritual transformation and ascent may be connected to the idea that individuals can become like the Twin Saviour through a deep spiritual connection, as mentioned in Gospel of Thomas Saying 108.

Connecting the Dots:

The mention of the five trees in Paradise in Saying 19 appears to have a connection to the five Trees in Pistis Sophia Chapter 93, symbolizing spiritual knowledge and perhaps the means to attain immortality.
The presence of Amen as one of the paternal angels associated with the five trees reinforces the idea of Amen as a significant divine figure in Gnostic thought.
The Twin Saviour mentioned in Pistis Sophia Chapter 93 could be seen as an extension of the transformative process hinted at in Saying 108 of The Gospel of Thomas, where individuals can become like Jesus through deep spiritual understanding.
Overall, these passages from Pistis Sophia and The Gospel of Thomas underscore the Gnostic emphasis on acquiring hidden knowledge, spiritual transformation, and the role of divine entities, such as the Amēns and the Twin Saviour, in the quest for enlightenment and salvation.

In summary, Pistis Sophia Chapter 93 offers a glimpse into the intricate and symbolic nature of Gnostic cosmology and spirituality. It introduces us to various divine entities, including twin-saviors, Amēns, and emanations of the Pleroma, all of which play roles in the Gnostic understanding of the cosmos and the quest for spiritual knowledge and enlightenment. These concepts are deeply rooted in Gnostic mysticism and reveal the complex interplay between the material and spiritual realms in Gnostic thought.

Yaldabaoth a Psychological Approach

Title: Yaldabaoth: The Psychological Implications of a Mythical Figure

To escape this disorder of the world one can transcend it by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a gnosis

An opening reading from The Apocryphon of John and On the Origin of the World

 And when she saw (the consequences of) her desire, it changed into a form of a lion-faced serpent. And its eyes were like lightning fires which flash. She cast it away from her, outside that place, that no one of the immortal ones might see it, for she had created it in ignorance. And she surrounded it with a luminous cloud, and she placed a throne in the middle of the cloud that no one might see it except the holy Spirit who is called the mother of the living. And she called his name Yaltabaoth.

The Apocryphon of John

And when Pistis Sophia desired to cause the thing that had no spirit to be formed into a likeness and to rule over matter and over all her forces, there appeared for the first time a ruler, out of the waters, lion-like in appearance, androgynous, having great authority within him, and ignorant of whence he had come into being. Now when Pistis Sophia saw him moving about in the depth of the waters, she said to him, "Child, pass through to here," whose equivalent is 'yalda baoth'.
On the Origin of the World

Since that day, there appeared the principle of verbal expression, which reached the gods and the angels and mankind. And what came into being as a result of verbal expression, the gods and the angels and mankind finished. Now as for the ruler Yaltabaoth, he is ignorant of the force of Pistis: he did not see her face, rather he saw in the water the likeness that spoke with him. And because of that voice, he called himself 'Yaldabaoth'. But 'Ariael' is what the perfect call him, for he was like a lion. Now when he had come to have authority over matter, Pistis Sophia withdrew up to her light.
On the Origin of the World

Title: Yaldabaoth: The Psychological Implications of a Mythical Figure

Introduction

Yaldabaoth, a name deeply rooted in ancient texts and Gnostic traditions, offers a fascinating lens through which to explore the intricacies of human psychology. In this document, we delve into the symbolism and meaning of Yaldabaoth from various perspectives, drawing from Greek and Hebrew sources, Gnostic texts, and biblical references. By doing so, we aim to unravel the profound psychological implications associated with Yaldabaoth and its relevance in understanding the human condition.

Origin and Symbolism

Yaldabaoth, also known as Ialdabaoth or Yaltabaoth, derives from both Greek and Hebrew traditions. Its etymology reveals layers of meaning, translating to "Children of the Void" or "Children of the Abyss," signifying a profound connection to the depths of human existence. The components of its name—'yalda' (child), 'bohu' (void), and 'abbott' (fatherhood)—provide rich material for interpretation


In Gnostic scriptures, Yaldabaoth is depicted as a lion or a lion-faced serpent, symbolizing the outward senses or ego. This symbolism underscores the notion that Yaldabaoth represents the rational ruler of the outward senses. It is created when reason follows the influences of the ego, shedding light on the profound implications of ego-driven consciousness.

Yaldabaoth as the Lord of the World

Gnostic beliefs posit Yaldabaoth as the lord of this world, exerting dominance over the human condition. This concept holds that Yaldabaoth defines human psychological existence. According to this perspective, humans are inherently ego-bound, necessitating the development of an individual ego. Yaldabaoth is seen as the shadow of ego development, perpetuating the formation of a focal narcissistic ego within human consciousness.

Symbolism of the Lion

The lion-faced aspect of Yaldabaoth carries significant symbolism. In various religious and biblical texts, lions are associated with fierceness and predation. They represent wickedness, opposition to God, and hostility toward God's people. This symbolic connection serves to underscore the negative aspects of human nature and consciousness embodied by Yaldabaoth

The Bible describes wicked individuals and nations as lions, reinforcing the idea that Yaldabaoth represents human consciousness in opposition to divine principles (Psalm 10:9; Psalm 22:13; Psalm 35:17; Psalm 57:4; Jeremiah 12:8). It is also associated with false prophets (Ezekiel 22:25), wicked rulers and princes (Proverbs 28:15; Zephaniah 3:3), and even the Babylonian World Power (Daniel 7:4). Additionally, the seven-headed, ten-horned wild beast emerging from the sea, which derives its authority from the dragon, is depicted as having a lion's mouth (Revelation 13:2).Psalm 91:13 further illustrates the lion and the cobra as denoting the power of the enemy, where the lion represents open attack and the cobra signifies underhanded scheming or attacks from concealed places. This biblical symbolism reinforces the notion that Yaldabaoth symbolizes aspects of human consciousness in opposition to divine principles, as interpreted by Gnostic traditions."

The lions mentioned in Daniel 6:10-23 further symbolize savage thoughts that can arise within us.


Yaldabaoth and the Sea

Both Yaldabaoth and the Beast in Revelation 13:1 are described as ascending from the sea. In biblical symbolism, the sea often represents the unformed state of the mind or doubt. It signifies instability and a lack of clarity in one's thoughts and beliefs. Yaldabaoth's emergence from the sea symbolizes the birth of ego-driven consciousness, characterized by confusion and instability.

In Revelation, we read about a beast emerging from the sea with ten horns and seven heads, each bearing a blasphemous name. This imagery of a beast rising from the sea finds a parallel in the description of Yaldabaoth. Like the Beast in Revelation 13:1, Yaldabaoth is described as ascending out of the sea, representing the emergence of a ruler from the depths of the waters, lion-like in appearance.

The concept of the 'Seas' in Genesis 1:10 takes on a symbolic meaning, representing the unformed state of the mind. Being 'at sea' metaphorically signifies a state of doubt and instability in one's mental processes, where thoughts have not been aligned with underlying principles.

Water, particularly 'the sea,' is associated with doubt in various contexts. In Mark 6:47-51, it can also be interpreted as the denial of sin, bad thoughts, and beliefs. The racing thoughts forming a 'sea of thought' require faith in oneself to navigate safely. This faith is born from understanding, particularly understanding of God and Christ, highlighting the significance of spiritual comprehension in overcoming the challenges posed by the sea of doubt and uncertainty."

Yaldabaoth vs. Yahweh

It is essential to differentiate Yaldabaoth from Yahweh. Yaldabaoth represents the carnal mind or the ego, whereas Yahweh symbolizes a higher divine consciousness. This distinction highlights the complex interplay between human psychology and spirituality, underscoring the struggle between ego-driven desires and a higher spiritual understanding.

Conclusion

Yaldabaoth, as a symbol and archetype, offers a profound exploration of human psychology. Drawing from ancient traditions, Gnostic texts, and biblical references, we have delved into the multifaceted nature of Yaldabaoth and its role in shaping the human condition. The lion-faced serpent's emergence from the sea of doubt symbolizes the complexities of ego development, consciousness, and spirituality.




In understanding Yaldabaoth, we gain insight into the intricate interplay between ego and self-awareness. Yaldabaoth remains a compelling figure, inviting us to contemplate our own inner struggles and the quest for a deeper understanding of human consciousness. This exploration prompts us to reflect on the ever-present tension between ego-driven desires and the pursuit of higher spiritual truths. In the end, Yaldabaoth stands as a symbol of the human condition, encapsulating the journey of ego development and self-discovery

Original text 

Ialdabaoth Greek Ιαλνταμπαόθ Yaldabaoth Hebrew ילדאבהות (Literally "Children of the Void," or Children of the Abyss (depth of the waters) from ילדה = yalda= child; בהו = bohu = void; אבהות = abbott = fatherhood, parentage, paternity).

Yaltabaoth

In the gnostic scriptures Yaldabaoth is described as a lion or a lion-faced serpent these are symbols of the outward senses or ego

O Ialdabaoth, who art the rational ruler of the outward senses,

Yaldabaoth (ignorance via the ego) is created when reason follows the outward senses

The Gnostics held that Yaldabaoth was the lord of this world and dominates the human condition. Yaldabaoth defines human psychological existence. humans are of necessity ego-bound in the sense of being required to develop an individual ego for the gnostics the figure of Yaldabaoth is the shadow of ego development Yaldabaoth is the archetype that creates and sustains an inevitable development within human consciousness toward the formation of the focal narcissistic ego

mankind has observed the characteristics and habits of animals and has applied them in a figurative or symbolic sense to persons, peoples, governments, and organizations. Thus Yaldabaoth is a symbol of human consciousness individually and organised collectively in opposition to God

lion-faced serpent The "serpent" is outward senses of consciousness. It may also be called desire, Those who had been bitten by the fiery serpents that is the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life,.
In the Bible wicked people and nations are described has a lion

.Because of the lion’s fierce and predatory characteristics, the animal was also used to represent wicked ones (Ps 10:9), persons who oppose God and his people (Ps 22:13; 35:17; 57:4; Jer 12:8), false prophets (Eze 22:25), wicked rulers and princes (Pr 28:15; Zep 3:3), the Babylonian World Power (Da 7:4). And the seven-headed, ten-horned wild beast out of the sea, which gets its authority from the dragon , was depicted as having a lion’s mouth. (Re 13:2) At Psalm 91:13 the lion and the cobra seem to denote the power of the enemy, the lion being representative of open attack and the cobra of underhanded scheming, or attacks from a concealed place.—Compare Lu 10:19; 2Co 11

The lions of Daniel 6:10-23 represent the savage thoughts that arise in us.

Rev 13:2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

Pr 28:15 ¶ As a roaring lion, and a ranging bear; so is a wicked ruler over the poor people.

Ps 22:21 Save me from the lion’s mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns.
Isa 5:29 Their roaring shall be like a lion, they shall roar like young lions: yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the prey, and shall carry it away safe, and none shall deliver it.

1Pe 5:8 ¶ Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:


2Ti 4:17 Notwithstanding the Lord stood with me, and strengthened me; that by me the preaching might be fully known, and that all the Gentiles might hear: and I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.

The dragon stood on the shore of the sea. And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.
Like the Beast in Rev 13:1 Yaldabaoth is described as ascending out of the sea there appeared for the first time a ruler, out of the waters, lion-like in appearance

The "Seas" of Genesis 1:10 represent the unformed state of mind. We say that a man is "at sea" when he is in doubt about a mental process; in other words he has not established his thoughts in line with the principle involved, he is unstable.

Water ("the sea"), in Mark 6:47-51, represents doubt; it can also be understood as denial of sin bad thoughts and beliefs. The racing thoughts have formed a sea of thought, and to walk over it safely requires that one have faith in oneself. Faith necessary to accomplish so great a work comes from understanding--understanding of God and Christ.



Yaldabaoth is not Yahweh but represents the carnal mind or the ego

Yaldabaoth is a personification of human nature

Yaldabaoth describes human psychological existence

the figure of Yaldabaoth is the shadow of ego development Yaldabaoth is the archetype that creates and sustains an inevitable development within human consciousness toward the formation of the focal narcissistic ego

demons are not evil by nature Dionysius the Areopagite or pseudo dionysius

demons are not evil by nature

Dionysius the Areopagite or pseudo dionysius

But, neither are the demons evil by nature; for, if they are evil by nature, neither are they from the Good, nor amongst things existing; nor, in fact, did they change from good, being by nature, and always, evil. Then, are they evil to themselves or to others? If to themselves, they also destroy themselves; but if to others, how destroying, or what destroying?—Essence, or power, or energy? If indeed Essence, in the first place, it is not contrary to nature; for they do not destroy things indestructible by nature, but things receptive of destruction. Then, neither is this an evil for every one, and in every case; but, not even any existing thing is destroyed, in so far as it is essence and  nature, but by the defect of nature’s order, the principle of harmony and proportion lacks the power to remain as it was. But the lack of strength is not complete, for the complete lack of power takes away even the disease and the subject; and such a disease will be even a destruction of itself; so that, such a thing is not an evil, but a defective good, for that which has no part of the Good will not be amongst things which exist. And with regard to the destruction of power and energy the principle is the same. Then, how are the demons, seeing they come into being from God, evil? For the Good brings forth and sustains good things. Yet they are called evil, some one may say. But not as they are (for they are from the Good, and obtained a good being), but, as they are not, by not having had strength, as the Oracles affirm, “to keep their first estate.” For in what, tell me, do we affirm that the demons become evil, except in the ceasing in the habit and energy for good things Divine? Otherwise, if the demons are evil by nature, they are always evil; yet evil is unstable. Therefore, if they are always in the same condition, they are not evil; for to be ever the same is a characteristic of the Good. But, if they are not always evil, they are not evil by nature, but by wavering from the angelic good qualities. And they are not altogether without part in the good, in so far as they both are, and live and think, and in one word—as there is a sort of movement of aspiration in them. But they are said to be evil, by reason of their weakness as regards their action according to nature. The evil then, in them, is a turning aside and a stepping out of things befitting themselves, and a missing of aim, and imperfection and impotence, and a weakness and departure, and falling away from the power which preserves their integrity in them. Otherwise, what is evil in demons? An irrational anger—a senseless desire—a headlong fancy.—But these, even if they are in demons, are not altogether, nor in every respect, nor in themselves alone, evils. For even with regard to other living creatures, not the possession of these, but the loss, is both destruction to the creature, and an evil. But the possession saves, and makes to be, the nature of the living creature which possesses them. The tribe of demons then is not evil, so far as it is according to nature, but so far as it is not; and the whole good which was given to them was not changed, but themselves fell from the whole good given. And the angelic gifts which were given to them, we by no means affirm that they were changed, but they exist, and are complete, and all luminous, although the demons themselves do not see, through having blunted their powers of seeing good. So far as they are, they are both from the Good, and are good, and aspire to the Beautiful and the Good, by aspiring to the realities, Being, and Life, and Thought; and by the privation and departure and declension from the good things befitting them, they are called evil, and are evil as regards what they are not: and by aspiring to the non-existent, they aspire to the Evil

But does some one say that souls are evil? If it be that they meet with evil things providentially, and with a view to their preservation, this is not an evil, but a good, and from the Good, Who makes even the evil good. But, if we say that souls become evil, in what respect do they become evil, except in the failure of their good habits and energies; and, by reason of their own lack of strength, missing their aim and tripping? For we also say, that the air around us becomes dark by failure and absence of light, and yet the light itself is always light, that which enlightens even the darkness. The Evil, then, is neither in demons nor in us, as an existent evil, but as a failure and dearth of the perfection of our own proper goods.

Extracts from the Works of Theodotus

14 The demons are said to be incorporeal, not because they have no bodies (for they have even shape and are, therefore, capable of feeling punishment), but they are said to be incorporeal because, in comparison with the spiritual bodies which are saved, they are a shade. And the angels are bodies; at any rate they are seen. Why even the soul is a body, for the Apostle says, “It is sown a body of soul, it is raised a body of spirit.” And how can the souls which are being punished be sensible of it, if they are not bodies? Certainly he says, “Fear him who, after death, is able to cast soul and body into hell.” Now that which is visible is not purged by fire, but is dissolved into dust. But, from the story of Lazarus and Dives, the soul is directly shown by its possession of bodily limbs to be a body.

Debunking Misconceptions: Demons and Their Nature

In the realm of ancient theological and philosophical discussions, the concept of demons has often been associated with inherent evil. However, a closer examination of the writings attributed to Dionysius the Areopagite, also known as pseudo-Dionysius, reveals a more nuanced perspective.

Demons Not Inherently Evil

Contrary to the prevalent belief that demons are evil by nature, pseudo-Dionysius presents a compelling argument that challenges this assumption. He starts by asserting that if demons were inherently evil, it would follow that they could not be attributed to the realm of the Good, nor would they be considered among existing entities. Furthermore, if their nature was evil, they would either harm themselves or others. This leads to a crucial question: are they evil to themselves or to others?

The Nature of Evil in Demons

The analysis then delves into the nature of evil within demons. Pseudo-Dionysius proposes that the evil attributed to demons is not inherent but rather a result of their deviation from their original state of goodness. The demons' inability to maintain their initial state of goodness is a consequence of their own lack of strength, which subsequently leads to their straying from their divine essence.

Understanding the Transition from Good to Evil

Pseudo-Dionysius raises the essential question of how demons transition from being creations of God to beings perceived as evil. He argues that demons undergo this transformation due to their diminishing capacity for engaging in divine and virtuous actions. In essence, their goodness declines as they lose the strength and energy required to partake in acts aligned with the divine.

The Complex Reality of Demons

Rather than viewing demons as purely evil entities, pseudo-Dionysius emphasizes that demons still possess certain aspects of the good. They continue to exist, live, think, and exhibit a form of aspiration. It is their departure from their inherent nature and their inability to act in harmony with it that leads to their characterization as evil.

The Role of Weakness in Evil

The text further explores the concept of evil within demons, highlighting that it manifests as weakness, deviation, and a failure to fulfill their intended purpose. While demons may experience irrational anger, senseless desires, and unfounded fantasies, these traits are not inherently evil in themselves. Instead, it is the demons' inability to harness and direct these qualities in a virtuous manner that leads to their perceived evil.

Souls and Evil

The discussion extends to souls and whether they can be considered evil. Pseudo-Dionysius argues that souls do not inherently possess evil; rather, they can exhibit evil characteristics when their virtuous habits and energies falter. Evil in souls arises from their own weakness, leading to a departure from their intended state of goodness.

The Concept of Evil as Absence

Ultimately, the text asserts that evil, whether in demons or souls, is not a tangible entity but rather a dearth and absence of the perfection of one's inherent goodness. It likens this absence to the darkness that envelops the air when light is absent, emphasizing that even in such cases, the light itself remains intrinsically good and capable of illuminating the darkness.

In summary, pseudo-Dionysius challenges the conventional notion of demons as inherently evil beings. He invites readers to consider the complexity of their nature, highlighting that their perceived evil is a result of their own shortcomings and a departure from their original state of goodness. This nuanced perspective encourages a more profound exploration of the relationship between good and evil in theological and philosophical discussions.

BARBELO Thunder, The Perfect Mind

My brother, and my friend, let me share with you the insight of perfect forgiveness, this is from Thunder, Perfect Mind......... I am the first and the last.

I am the honoured and scorned.

I am the whore and holy.

I am the wife and the virgin.

I am the mother and daughter.
I am the members of my mother
and the barren one with many sons.
I have had a grand wedding
and have not found a husband.

The Mother of all life is: " BARBELO " , for the many of us she is the life and Wisdom of us, and the few only the life.

In this we ignorantly do, we say that we are the Obedient, yet we scorn the disobedient, forgetting she BARBELO is the life, giving life to the disobedient.


We praise the woman that marries, while we cast stones at the whore, forgetting the "BARBELO" is the life, giving life to the whore.


How can this be? The " BARBELO " of the life, in the obedient be loved, and the " BARBELO " of life, in the disobedient, be hated?


Again, she that marries is clean, and the whore is unclean, forgetting the" BARBELO " of life dwells in them both!


So my brother and friend, let us turn from such ignorance repent, and receive the wisdom and understanding of the " BARBELO ", after all she is the life, giving life, in us!